Senate 2010 Analysis (early-January)


Lots of great stuff on this, a big news day for the Senate… – krempasky

Several major changes have taken places in the last month in the world of 2010 Senate elections. The biggest legislative event probably significantly helps Republican chances of gaining seats in 2010: Obamacare passed the Senate along party lines.

Unfortunately, most of the other developments have not been as positive for Republican hopes. Last month, I discussed how the outside chance of Republicans retaking the Senate was, for the first time, alive even if it was still extremely remote. This month, the chances of a Republican Senate in 2011 are even remoter. But they aren’t quite dead yet.

Here is my updated analysis for the 2010 Senate races. I’ve generally ranked them in order of most likely to flip to least.

Democrat Seats:

Nevada – Harry Reid

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is still in trouble as his opponents numbers slowly rise and his continue to shrink.

An early-December Rasmussen poll still shows Reid losing to both Sue Lowden and Danny Tarkanian by 43-49. A MaisonDixon/LVJR poll from the same time showed Lowden leading 51-41 and Tarkanian leading 48-42. The two are virtually tied for the Republican nomination in the same poll: Lowden edges Tarkanian 25-24.

My last update from late-November had Nevada as our number one pick-up opportunity, and that continues with the same caveats: Reid is the most powerful Democrat in the Senate, and his war chest is extensive.

I’d feel more comfortable with this one if either Republican candidate were consistently polling above 50%, but I’m still fairly upbeat that this is our best pick-up opportunity. Reid could still turn this one around; we’ll see how things develop in the next few weeks and months.

North Dakota – Byron Dorgan (Retiring)

With Sen. Byron Dorgan’s recent retirement announcement, this seat is almost a guaranteed pick-up for Republicans. I haven’t rated it as highly as Nevada because we don’t technically know the candidate for either party yet. Governor John Hoeven will make this an assured pick-up, but he may choose to stay with his job and/or run against Sen. Kent Conrad in 2012. On the Democratic side, Rep. Earl Pomeroy could seek a promotion. That would be a gamble for him since he would lose his incumbency advantage and may risk flipping both seats red if he fails. However, he has been elected state-wide several times, so if he decides to run and Hoeven does not, he becomes the slight favorite against any generic Republican.

Whoever the eventual nominees are, Republicans stand an extremely decent shot of picking up this seat.

Colorado – Michael Bennet (Appointed)

Rasmussen polling from early-December is good for Republicans in Colorado. Former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton, the front-runner for the nod, leads Sen. Bennet 46-37 while Ken Buck leads him 42-38 and Tom Wiens leads 42-41.

Since Norton announced her entrance into the Republican primary, there has only been one primary poll, Tarrance Group poll from mid-September. She led her closest rival, Ken Buck, by 45-15.

Sen. Bennet isn’t yet guaranteed his nomination, though he does lead his challenger, former Colorado State House Speaker Andrew Romanoff 41-27 in that same poll.

Fortunately for Republicans, even if Romanoff does defeat Bennet in the primary, all of the Republican candidates beat him as well. In the Rasmussen poll from early-December, Norton leads Romanoff 45-34, Buck leads him 41-39, and Wiens leads 41-40.

I’d still like to see one of the Republicans scratch 50% before I rest assured that this is a pick-up for Republicans, but I’m feeling fairly good about it right now.

Arkansas – Blanche Lincoln

Sen. Blanche Lincoln is still clinging on to her slight advantage over her Republican rivals, although there haven’t been any polls since her vote for Obamacare. An early-December Rasmussen poll shows St. Sen. Gilbert Baker leading Lincoln 47-41 but a Research2000 poll from the same time has Lincoln etching out a 42-41 advantage. St. Senate Minority Leader Kim Hendren and Curtis Coleman have similar situations: both lead the Senator 46-39 and 44-40 respectively in the Rasmussen poll but both trail 30-46 and 39-44 in the Research2000 poll.

I’d like to see polling become more consistent before this race either improves or drops off the radar. I feel certain that Sen. Lincoln’s vote for Obamacare will not be taken too kindly in Arkansas, so her numbers may sink drastically in coming polls.

Of course she could also decide to follow Sen. Dorgan’s lead and take early retirement. That may actually hurt Republican chances at taking this seat if one of the Blue Dog Representatives decides to seek a promotion.

Delaware – Ted Kauffman (Appointed – Retiring)

Still no confirmation from St. Attorney General Beau Biden on whether he will run. This seems bizarre, but it’s impossible to know whether his delay means that he is more likely to run or less likely.

If he decides to run, Democrats will still have to spend money to win. Rep. Michael Castle leads him in an early-December Public Policy poll 45-39.

Whoever the eventually Democratic nomination is, be sure that Deleware will receive a lot of visits both from President Obama and Vice-President Biden.

I still rate Delaware as a fairly good pick-up opportunity, but it would be a lot easier if Biden decides not to run.

Pennsylvania – Arlen Specter (Party-Switcher)

Early-December polls have finally stopped the bleeding for Sen. Arlen Specter in the Democratic primary match-up between him and Rep. Joe Sestak. A Rasmussen poll shows Specter leading 48-35 while a Quinnipiac U poll has him 53-30. Sestak may still pull this one out, but his chances are grimmer than they were a month ago.

Meanwhile, things are looking worse for the dear Senator in the general against former Rep. Pat Toomy. The Quinnipiac poll shows them tied at 44% while the Rasmussen poll actually has Toomy leading 46-42.

Should Sestak succeed in the primary, Toomy leads him by 5 points in the Quinnipiac poll and 7 in the Rasmussen poll.

This isn’t a sure-fire pick-up, but Republicans stand a moderately good chance of picking this seat up. Toomy needs to consistently poll better than Specter in non-Rasmussen polls before I’ll feel comfortable rating this one any higher.

Illinois – Roland Burris (Appointed – Retiring)

Alexi Giannoulias still appears to be the front runner in the Democrat primary. A mid-December Chicago Tribune has him leading his closest rival, Cheryl Jackson, 31-14. None of the other candidates scratch 10%. The same poll has Rep. Mark Kirk claiming 41% for the Republican nod while none of the other candidates even get 5%.

Sadly, this race seems to be slipping away from Republicans. The latest, an early-December Rasmussen report now shows Giannoulias leading Kirk 42-39. This is almost the converse polling from the same Rasmussen poll last August. Kirk’s lead has never been strong and it seems it’s slowly dissipating now.

And, of course, this is Illinois, so Republicans would have to be polling more than 5% more than Democrats to actually beat the voting-fraud in Chicago.

A lot could develop here, but I think President Obama’s old senate seat is no longer a plausible pick-up for the Republicans.

Connecticut – Chris Dodd (Retiring)

Sen. Chris Dodd’s decision not to run for re-election was the worse thing that could have happened to Republican’s chances of taking this seat. There are no clear front-runners for the Democratic nod, so we won’t really know the status of this election for at least a month or two.

Meanwhile, the Republican nomination became a lot more doubtful with the release of a mid-December Moore Information poll which showed, for the first time, CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment Linda McMahon beating both former Representative Rob Simmons by 37-35 (Peter Schiff gets 4% of the vote). Simmons had been polling over 50% against Dodd and was clearly the stronger candidate. However, since Dodd will no longer be on the ballot, there’s no telling what this change in the Republican field could mean.

I’ve down-graded Connecticut from our third-best pick-up opportunity to one of our last. That’s not to say we don’t stand a good chance; we won’t know that for at least a few more weeks. But we certainly aren’t as strong as we were 48 hours ago.

New York – Kirsten Gillibrand (Apointed)

Republican Rudy Giuliani decided not to run for anything in 2010, seriously damaging Republican’s chances of being able to beat Sen. Gillibrand. Still, former Governor George Pataki has been polling even with the Senator and in a wave year could pull this one off. Representative Peter King has also changed his mind (again) about a possible run and may decide to challenge Sen. Gillibrand after all.

I doubt this seat is a realistic pick-up opportunity anymore. However, this could change if polling numbers for either Pataki or King come out strongly in their favor. Or, of course, someone could dope-slap Giuliani to help him realize what an idiot he’s being by not helping his party out.

California – Barbara Boxer

Former CEO of Hewlett-Packard Carly Fiorina and St. Assemblyman Chuck DeVore are still locked in their tight primary fight to see who will challenge Sen. Boxer. Nothing has changed since my last update in which a mid-November Rasmussen report shows Boxer leading Fiorina 46-37 and DeVore 46-36.

This race is a phantom pick-up opportunity for Republicans. Unless something major happens in the next few months, Boxer is safe for the next six years.

Hawaii – Daniel Inouye

No new developments in Hawaii. Gov. Lingle has yet to announce her intentions.

Indiana – Evan Bayh

Sen. Bayh’s Obamacare vote may come back to haunt him, but so far there hasn’t been any polling.

We do have four Republian candidates: Former Congressman John Hostettler, State Senator Marlin Stutzman, business owner Richard Behney, and businessman Don Bates Jr.

I keep seeing posts here at Redstate and other conservative blogs alluding to the belief that Sen. Bayh may be in trouble, but I still don’t rate this rate as a high Republican pick-up opportunity unless the Bayh decides to follow Sen. Dorgan’s lead and call it quits.

Massachusetts – Paul Kirk (Appointed – Retiring)

Despite polls showing St. Sen. Scott Brown within 9 points of Democratic candidate Martha Coakley, this race isn’t a realistic Republican pick-up opportunity. It may, however, be a significant factor to the November races if Brown comes within a few points of Coakley.

Other:

Sens. Patty Murray (WA), Ron Wyden (OR), Barbara Mikulski (MD), Pat Leahy (VT), Russ Feingold (WI) and Chuck Schumer (NY) all seem safe but these seats might become competitive in the future.

Republican Seats:

Missouri – Kit Bond (Retiring)

For the fourth time, I rate Missouri as the Republicans’ least secure seat. A mid-December Rasmussen shows the race virtually unchanged since last January (2009): Democrat Sec. of State Robin Carnahan leads Republican Rep. Roy Blunt 46-44

However, the same caveat as always applies to this race: Republicans usually do better than predicted in Missouri, the only swing state to go to McCain in 2008.

I still think, in the end, Republicans will win this seat. Still, I’d feel more comfortable if Blunt’s numbers improved significantly in the next few months.

Ohio – George Voinovich (Retiring)

An early-December Rasmussen poll confirmed Republican Rep. Rob Portman slight edge over Sec. of State Jennifer Brunner (40-33) and Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher (38-36).

As with Rep. Blunt, I’d breath easier if Portman’s numbers improved drastically in the next few weeks and months, but I feel fairly confident that we’ll pull this race out in the end.

New Hampshire – Judd Gregg (Retiring)

A late-December American Research Group poll confirmed that Republican Attorney General Kelly Ayotte has a fairly solid lead over Democratic challenger, Rep. Paul Hodes (43-36).

As with Reps. Bond and Portman, I’d fell better if Ayotte polled above 50%, but I’m fairly confident this race is ours in the end.

Kentucky – Jim Bunning (Retiring)

A late-December Public Policy poll confirmed that Rand Paul is now the front-runner for the Republican nomination. He leads Sec. of State Trey Grayson by 44-25.

Meanwhile, the same poll showed a surprise twist in the Democratic primary as well with Attorney General Jack Conway beating Lt. Gov. Daniel Mongiardo for the first time in any poll 37-33.

Greyson leads Conway 40-33 and Mongiardo 44-35 while Paul leads Conway 42-36 and Mongiardo 42-36.

I’m breathing much easier about this race than I was last month. Rand Paul seems to have become a major candidate over-night and he’s now polling comfortably against both Democratic candidates as well as Treyson.

North Carolina – Richard Burr

A mid-December Public Policy poll still found Sen. Burr edging all Democrat candidates: Kenneth Lewis 43-37, Elaine Marshall 42-37, and Kevin Foy 45-36.

Once again, I would feel still like Burr to poll above 50%, but I feel confident than the Republicans should have no problem defending this seat unless we see a surprise wave year for the Democrats.

Louisiana – David Vitter

No new polls here means that we have no idea whether Sen. Vitter is considered safe in the Republican primary or if Sec. of St. Jay Dardenne may take over for him next January. Whatever the case, a Republican will almost certainly be elected in Louisiana next November

Florida – George LeMieux (Retiring)

A mid-December Rasmussen poll has, for the first time, former Speaker of the St. House Marco Rubio tying Governor Charlie Crist for the Republican primary. This might have had Democrats rejoicing since, until that time, Rubio seemed the weaker candidate against presumed Democratic candidate Rep. Kendrick Meek.

However, the same poll found Rubio leading Meek 49-35 while Crist only leads 42-36.

This race is almost assured to stay in Republican hands whoever the final winner is of the primary.

Kansas – Sam Brownback (Retiring)

An early-December Survey USA poll finds Rep. Jerry Moran topping Rep. Todd Tiahart for the Republican nomination 37-34. Both are solid conservatives, and either should hold the seats for the Republicans.

Arizona – John McCain

Whatever the final decision of former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, Sen. John McCain seems destined for another six years in the Senate. An early-December Tarrance Group poll shows McCain beating Hayworth 56-36.

Utah – Robert Bennett

Sen. Robert Bennett is facing several more conservative challengers in the Republican primary. The candidate will be chosen at the generally conservative Convention, so Bennett could be in trouble. Because the nomination will not be done through a primary, race, no polling has been done

Other:

Sens. Lisa Murkowski (AK), John Thune (SD), Tom Coburn (OK), Jim DeMint (SC), Johnny Isakson (GA), Richard Shelby (AL), Chuck Grassley (IA), and Mike Crappo (ID) all seem safe but these seats might become competitive in the future.

Synopsis:

Republicans are poised to make significant gains in the Senate. While our outlook has slightly decreased since last month (especially in CT and NY), we still stand to be able to take a significant number of seats from the Democrats.

Republicans should be able to hold all of our competitive seats: MO, NH, OH, and KY.

We now stand excellent chances of picking up 3-6 seats: NV, CO, ND, AR, DE, and PA.

IL, NY, and CT could still come into play, but at this point these seats are looking less possible than they were a month ago.

We should also keep our eyes on WI and IN for retirements that could make these seats competitive.

Last month I discussed how the road to 51 Republican seats in the Senate was possible (though a bit too optimistic) for the first time. The path is a little rockier this month, but it is still possible. It would require Republicans to sweep NV, CO, ND, AR, DE, PA, IL, NY, CT, and pick up two more seats either in IN, WI, CA, or with a party-switch, most likely Lieberman or Nelson (NE). The likelihood of a party-switch was drastically reduced when both Lieberman and Nelson voted for Obamacare.

Republican chances in ND have been significantly increased since last month while our chances in CT, IL, and NY have been considerably decreased.

Realistically, I see all of the Republican seats eventually coming home (with MO being the most doubtful). This should become evident before summer. In addition, Republicans stand a better than 50% chance of taking NV, ND, and CO, about a 50% chance of taking AR, DE, and PA, and a less than 50% chance of taking IL, NY, and CT.

Conclusion: Republicans stand an excellent chance of gaining at least 3 seats, a good chance of taking 4-6, and a slim chance of taking 7+.



RSS feed

50 Comments Leave a comment

I would say those numbers might start looking a lot better

kyle8 (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 6:53AM EST (link)

closer to the election IF, as I believe, we will be facing even higher unemployment, and a real dramatic increase in inflation.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

kowalski

kyle8 (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 6:55AM EST (link)

provided that the Democrats even bother having an election. They might just declare martial law, or send out their goons to intimidate and steal every election.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 
 

+6 will do for a start.

Moe Lane (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 8:38AM EST (link)

We can recalibrate and figure out where to get the other five in a few months.

I agree.

Mayhem (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 1:40PM EST (link)

We need to at least get back a healthy filibuster, and I think we’ll do that pretty easily in November.

James Madison, Jim DeMint, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan… You get the picture.

 
 

First Promotion

Gandalf (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 8:48AM EST (link)

krempasky – Thanks for the promotion of my l’il diary. I really just do these for my own interest/hobby, but I’m glad people find them interesting.

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

 

Connecticut

nutmegger (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 8:59AM EST (link)

Smart money is on Dick Blumenthal picking up the Democratic nomination. Blumenthal has been CT’s AG since 1990. He’s ruthless, underhanded, a publicity hound (“The most dangerous place in Connecticut is between Dick Blumenthal and a TV camera” – http://www.slate.com/?id=89649) and a fiery populist who gives the people what they think they want while ruining the state’s business climate. I’m no fan of McMahon, but I would prefer ANYBODY over Blumenthal.

Schiff is a good candidate.

Ann_W (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:26AM EST (link)

Everyone talks as if the republican party primary is a two person race. For conservatives it would be choosing the least bad of the alternatives. But Schiff is a very good candidate. NY 23 shows that things can happen quickly if people care about issues, not just getting an R in there. And we have longer than the NY 23 race had.

Find out about Schiff, if you like what you hear talk to friends, etc, especially if you know people who are active politically. If we are going to stop bankrupting the country, we east coast conservatives have to fight for better than the Democrat lite candidates that we always have.

That does suck that Dodd dropped out, though.

“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”
— Milton Friedman

The War on Poverty– forty-six years and counting!

Schiff Should Stay On The Street, Become Sec. of Treasury in 2012

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:43AM EST (link)

… I dont think he belongs in the Senate.

So we'll just resign ourselves to having a RINO

Ann_W (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 12:24PM EST (link)

Why not try to elect someone who won’t go along with every money distribution whim? Someone who actually understands economics?

This gov’t is so messed up, is it not worth a little of our effort to try to correct some of the problems?

“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”
— Milton Friedman

The War on Poverty– forty-six years and counting!

 
 

Seconded

SE-779 (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:45AM EST (link)

“Earnesty is stupidity sent to College”-PJ O’Rourke
“If you vote based on who has more election signs, you’re an idiot.”-Glenn Beck
“Stupid is what stupid writes.”-Yogi Berra
“It ain’t over til’ the sodaholic passes a gall-stone.”
“If I am going to stick a knife in you I am going to do it up front in your chest, I am never going to do it in your back. You will always see it coming.”-John Oxendine
“If wishes were horses, we’d be knee deep in crap.”-Dr. Robert “Rocket” Romano
“Yeah, try to hide your wild enthusiasm at my return. I find overt displays of emotion embarrassing.”-Dr. Robert “Rocket” Romano
“If you want something cuddly to keep you company, buy a hamster, don’t have a child.”-Jesse Ventura

 
 

Blumenthal(D-Conn)- Boring Political Hack

Spartan4Life (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:38AM EST (link)

I heard this guy on CNBC this AM. He has about as much charisma as a fence post.

Also, I don’t know anything about Connecticut politics but it only took a NY second to figure out that this guy is just a partisan Dem hack. He hasn’t even announced yet and he was already lawyering up on some of the questions he was being asked.

I have great faith in the American people. Hopefully, the people of Connecticut will see through this phoney.

 
 

Why are you concerned with Rasmussen's polling?

smagar (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:15AM EST (link)

Toomy needs to consistently poll better than Specter in non-Rasmussen polls before I’ll feel comfortable rating this one any higher.

“Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?” (Macaulay)

Not Concerned

Gandalf (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 10:00AM EST (link)

But Rasmussen is, for whatever reason, polling better for Republicans in most places than every other polling firm (See AR for a clear example of the difference between Rasmussen and most other firms).

I’m not calling foul on them; just saying that I will feel more comfortable when the other firms reflect Rasmussen numbers.

And, of course, in PA we have to have enough votes to not only beat Specter outright but also beat the Philly voter fraud. I won’t feel comfortable giving this one to Republicans until Toomy consistently polls better than Specter in several different polls.

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

Ras is polling differently for several significant and valid reasons.

eburke (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 10:15AM EST (link)

a) He uses the most sophisticated measurement of the current makeup of the electorate namely a rotating survey of 15,000 LVs who are polled on nothing but what their party ID is (which keeps any bias from any other questions out of the picture). So, he’s probably got *the* best view of what the composition of the electorate (he certainly a lot closer than the Alphabet polls, i.e. ABC, CNN, NBC, et al) who are still using polling models w/ +13 – 15 Dem compositions.

b) He actually surveys Likely Voters (I know, what a concept) whereas the vast majority of the rest of these clowns are surveying “Adults”. So…let’s attempt to predict the outcome of an election by polling people who care so much about the outcome that they aren’t even registered to vote.

The polling post-Obama’s election has become even more of a joke than it was before the election. There’s a reason Ras is consistently one of the most accurate pollsters in the business (anyone remember those ‘final’ ABC/CBS polls showing The One leading by +14? Yeah, right!)

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

eburke- I like your description "Alphabet Polls"

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:22AM EST (link)

who poll “Adults.” It depends on what your meaning of “adults” is. From my observations, there are no adults either in Washington or in the electorate that have the intelligence or sense to consider the short and long term consequences of being in favor of a Communist Dictatorship. Yes, the Alphabet polls is an accurate description of those children that still haven’t learned their ABC’s.

Well, actually Scope, I have other descriptions of them

eburke (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:28AM EST (link)

but using them in print on this family-friendly site might induce Moe to go fetch his blam stick.

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

Come on eburke

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:40AM EST (link)

you gotta experience Moe’s “Don’t do that again” at least once to be a full fledged member of Redstate. It’s kind like an initiation.

ROTFLOL, Scope nt

eburke (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:46AM EST (link)

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

 
 

Just heard on Beck

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:46AM EST (link)

that Rham Emmanuel is considering a run for Chicago mayor. Is that true?

Sorry- Didn't mean to post as Reply to This

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:48AM EST (link)

That’s different. More often I forget to Reply to This.

 

Scope re: Rham running for Chicago mayor

sharonmcp (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 1:22PM EST (link)

CHICAGO (WBBM) — There’s word this morning that President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, already is looking at life beyond the White House and that he might be eyeing the 5th floor at Chicago’s City Hall.

It was no secret that then-Chicago Congressman Rahm Emanuel was less than thrilled when the newly-elected president asked him to give up his seat in the House to become the White House chief of staff a year ago.

Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn tells Newsradio 780 she’s heard from people close to Emanuel that he’s told them he’s almost ready to leave.

“He’s said, ‘The job of chief of staff is an 18-month job, it’s a burn-out job.’ He’s made it quite clear that he’s not happy and that he’s totally stressed all the time and that he’s thinking of running for mayor of Chicago,” Quinn said.

http://www.wbbm780.com/Rahm-Emanuel-reported-eyeing-mayor-s-job/6048918

“Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.” ~ Ronald Reagan

In Chi-Town He could even get elected

txgeekgirl (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 1:33PM EST (link)

If thereis one thing we can be sure of, the corruption in Chicago politics runs to the core. With ACORN’s manifestations and support, Rahm stands a good chance at winning. Sadly, winning means the people of Chicago lose.

http://lenamargita.com

 

sharonmcp- Thanks for the reply

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 2:33PM EST (link)

I’ve been doing a little digging myself. I did find the article you linked above, written by none other than the far left liberal Sally Quinn. In addition, I found another article from a Chicago blogspot, Dennis Byrne Barbershop-

http://www.chicagonew.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/2010/01/chicago-mayor-rahm-emanuel.html

The first comment at that blogspot from Jack-

He says, “given all the lightweights on the list of :who’ll be chicago’s next mayor”? Then he wonders how the upcoming trial of former Gov. Blago, and his brother, will play out for Emanuel.

So, from your linked article, there is speculation that Daley may not run for re-election because of plunging poll numbers, in addition to the fact that his wife is in ill health and Obama didn’t deliver the Olympics to Chicago. The trial aspect is interesting for Emanul as well.

Beck had said this morning that there is friction between Valerie Jarret and Emanuel. Emanuel’s name is tied to the takeover of the country by the Liberals. He is frequently mentioned as an architect in the Liberal Admin. He has become a negative to the administration, much as Dodd has been. Could the same thought process apply to Emanuel as has been to Dodd? Remove him from the administration, and the negativity he has garnered, but, keep him in a position where he can still help our cause?

It is all speculation of course, but, it will be interesting if Quinn planted a message from the WH, as a test for Emanuels chances as Chicago mayor? Don’t the Libs usually test before they decide?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dropping like Flies

txgeekgirl (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:16AM EST (link)

Headline across the world –

One of my co-workers, who is not very politically outspoken but a conservative to say the least, sums it up – “They know what they’ve done and what they’ve done is wrong!”

When you know re-election is going to be futile considering that as an elected official you went completely against your constituency to please a dictator, why go through the hassle?

http://lenamargita.com

 

I am not cheering - Dems are going to the Preemptive Torricelli Strategy

Jack_Savage (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:46AM EST (link)

These officials are simply in trouble, like Torricelli was in NJ, the Dems know it so they are acting now instead of having to go to the NJ Supreme Court. Democrats will run someone who they can claim was beamed down from outer space, had nothing to do with anything that has gone on before and will do all he can to “fix” the problems we face. The bonehead resident Democrats will swallow this line whole, elect another Dem, and the cycle starts again.

The GOP has GOT to attack whomever the Dems run as cut from the same cloth as the incumbent. The news in the past few days has not been positive, in my view. I would MUCH rather run against someone who has had their hands all over the legislation coming out of DC. We underestimate the density of the skulls of Democrat voters here, and do so at our peril.

Amen, Jack. That was my first thought when I heard

eburke (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:58AM EST (link)

the news that Dodd was retiring on my way to work this morning. “So who got to him and told him he needed to ‘retire’ or there just might be all sorts of DOJ folks standing at his doorway wanting to ‘look around’.

I think your Torricelli analogy absolutely nails it. They’re just having to do this a little earlier ’cause let’s face it, it’s not easy to find a state DC as corrupt as Jersey’s just anywhere.

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

It is a simple, cold, political calculus

Jack_Savage (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 10:10AM EST (link)

And it is based on the fact that Democrat voters are not all that smart. Democrats will not hesitate to throw incumbents under the bus in order to save a seat. The incumbents knew this was the bargain when they first became Democrats – if you need to go, you need to go, but we will take care of you on the back end – OK ol’ buddy?

The only principle for Dems is power, and that is all it ever has been. Ask a Dem what they believe in, and they will answer “winning”.

Yes Jack, how right you are

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:26AM EST (link)

those sacrificed Dems also know that they will be given cushy positions elsewhere in the Government, where they don’t have to depend on the voters to retain their paychecks and perks.

PS- I suspect Dodd

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:28AM EST (link)

will become an Obama czar in charge of ethics.

Ya know Scope, that's hilarious.

eburke (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:29AM EST (link)

Unfortunately, it’s also probably true.

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

 
 
 
 
 

You have to give the Dems credit---they have discipline and focus

smagar (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 10:03AM EST (link)

When they have weak candidates who imperil their chances to hold onto seats in strong D areas (NJ, Connecticut), they clear out the weak candidates and keep the seat.

They know how to take, and hold, power.

“Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?” (Macaulay)

Absolutely

Jack_Savage (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 10:16AM EST (link)

I think that was the type structure Delay was trying to build that, ironically, has led to our time in the wilderness. Republican voters are simply built differently than Dems – we ask the government to get out of our lives, we view government service as a bit of a downgrade except in certain instances and are not entrenched in the government / political structure like Dems are.

When I think about it, it is a miracle the GOP has done what it has done standing simply on principle.

I am a little surprised they let the NJ governor’s seat go – it may have been because what’s his name was so wealthy, but I really expected them to show him the door in the summer. They won’t make the same mistake twice, apparently.

Christie's win in NJ

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:34AM EST (link)

was soley because of the unpopularity of the corruptocrat Corzine. I doubt Christie would have won if Corzine’s team weren’t arrested for corruption, and, not that long before the election. If it had happened too long before the election, Corzine would still be the Governor. Liberals have very short memories.

 
 
 
 

If this were a normal election cycle

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:47AM EST (link)

your predictions would be very interesting. This is anything but a “normal election cycle.” I think it is more likely the hardest cycle to predict at this time, mainly because we still don’t know what else this Progressive Congress is going to pass in the middle of the night. For example, the biggest predictor will be if the Universal Voting bill becomes law. It depends if ACORN continues to be funded through back doors. It depends if we have yet more terror attacks, successful or prevented. It depends on weather the Republicans in Congress, and the Republican committees, miraculously grow a spine. It dpends on weather RNC head Steel develops a better messaging campaign, and stops saying stupidly that the Republicans have no chance of regaining the House. Actually, it depends on weather the Republicans have the spine and will to have him booted, and they choose someone who can put a more intelligent and positive spin on Republican victories. Confidence and success begets more confidence and success.

According to a recent poll, as related by Beck, Republicans want candidates with values, while Democrats want candidates that can win. Time for the Republican elites to stop trying to promote the same d@mn thinking patterns of the Liberals. Time for Republicans to adopt the fact that, as was seen with the election of Jason Chafetz, the message and the candidate can win over those with the fattest purse. We the People are now in charge, and, we are donating to the individual candidates of our choice. Have you read the recent article that looked very woeful for the NRCC, as they don’t even have enough money to support even one House candidate in 2010. It probably has something to do with the fact that Eric Cantor sent a $5,000. check to Scozzafava, and other house members did the same.

So much is still going to happen between now and Nov. 2010, it is way to early to predict anything with any accuracy.

These are NOT predictions

Gandalf (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 10:07AM EST (link)

These are my take on where I see the current races as of now. It’s waaaay too early for anyone to make any predictions about anything.

Even a Republican as secure as Mike Crappo in Idaho may be vulnerable if he’s got with his pants down, and several of these other Democratic seats could become vulnerable if the economy continues its downward spiral, Obamacare continues to be an issue, and/or we have another terrorist attack.

So I agree with your post, just wanted to point out that these are not my predictions but simply my analysis of the races as of 6 January, 2010.

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

Gandalf- I appreciate the work you have done

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 10:28AM EST (link)

and, as you said, you enjoy doing these types of analyses. As you have agreed though, anything can, and most likely will, happen on the way to November 2010. The Democrats simply do not care a darn about their polling numbers, especially the die hard Pelosi types, except of course those that are choosing to retire. I do agree some retirements are politically motivated, rather than “I want to spend more time with my family.” I must believe that there will be more Democrat retirements before campaign season gets into full swing, as there have got to be at least a few that don’t want to be a part of the illegal corrupt takeover of the US. I had said quite awhile ago, Pelosi, Reid and Obama (one and the same as Axelrod and Emmanuel) have given many a political death sentence. Either they vote for Progressivism, and screw their constituients, or they vote for their constituients and screw the Communists. So, it comes down to, either cut off your pair now, or go through tough campaigning and slowly bleed to death.

 
 
 

11 months is an eternity in politics and peoples memories are short

Marcus_Traianus (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 9:55AM EST (link)

If the current comprehensive Republican strategy remains encapsulated in an idea which professes that Democrats stinging, resolute, anti-democratic failures will lead to gains, count on the numbers not being so favorable, in fact probably not even close.

Take notice of the Democrat “retirements” in which many seem to see as a sign of Republican “promise”. This posture, in and of itself, is indicative of the hope that such resignation will bring success. The fact is such removal will take away the face of Democrats responsible for any lingering anger and replace them with new members professing their disagreement with politics of the past. Having taken away or muted the anger factor what are Republicans left with…? Exactly.

There is no singular piece of sagacious goals and principals around which the entire Republican structure has organized. There is no “Contract with America” or guiding document which articulates a vision. Instead we have numerous organizations, tenured party acolytes and individual interest groups throwing around conservative nomenclature which they believe plays to an angry mob. We even have Steele saying the gains won’t be so astounding. Why? It is his own failure and those at the top of this party which will continue (and has been) the cause of our demise. Grass roots are a nice start, but unless they can grow into productive, thriving fields of verdure they will continued to be trampled underfoot.

Unless those at the top of this party start to get it and also retire, we will continue to be cave dwellers with barely improved numbers come November.

“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson

Marcus- I am remembering

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 10:54AM EST (link)

McDonnell (new VA Governor) while campaigning consistently said, keep campaigning as though you are 10 points behind, all the way up until election day, no matter where you are in the polls. To think that Republicans will automatically gain a majority or many seats, would be a death knell for any campaign that adopts that attitude.

I have disqualified Steel, and all of the Republican elites with their various committees working to promote good candidates, or funding campaigns of those favored by the Republican and Independent voters. They are a waste of time and money. Speaking of money, they aren’t doing real well against the DNC money machine. Not only here at Redstate, but everywhere I read on the web, people are donating to the candidates of their choice directly. To me, that is the way to choke off the voices of the elites that ignore the voters wants and wishes.

As far as the Tea Parties, they need to remain without a national face or leader. Those that have worked so hard on promoting the Tea Parties in every state, county, community, should remain stalwart in their efforts. They are the leaders for the activists. They are the ones that will pound the streets, in their local elections, to get the best candidates elected across the country. Also, our ColdWarrior is the biggest voice promoting all of us that care about the direction of our country, to get off our duffs, and get involved locally. This election is going to be controlled more at the local level than depending on any crappy national committees.

 
 

Bayh

Mayhem (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 11:16AM EST (link)

I agree, Bayh will hold unless something changes. He won’t win by 30 point as he has in the past, but he will win.

This state is a huge missed opportunity for the GOP. If Republicans could recruit Mike Pence or Lt. Gov. Becky Skillman, this race would become exponentially more competitive. The waters are stirring in this State and a pickup is well within grasp, if only the GOP could get a good candidate. 2010 might be our only chance to take out Bayh.

Unless something changes (a good GOP candidate, scandal, or Bayh retirement), Bayh will win narrowly in Indiana.

James Madison, Jim DeMint, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan… You get the picture.

PPP Poll

proudgop (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 12:30PM EST (link)

PPP did a poll with Blumenthal as replacement on Sunday ( perhaps this is what caused Dodd to drop out?)

VIa PPP:
Blumenthal is unusually popular, especially in hyper partisan times when voters like few politicians. 59% have a favorable opinion of him to just 19% who see him negatively. It’s no surprise that he’s liked by 71% of Democrats and 60% of independents, but even Republicans view him favorably by a 37/35 margin. It doesn’t take a lot of hands to count the number of Democratic politicians with positive numbers among GOP voters these days.

Blumenthal leads Rob Simmons 59-28, Linda McMahon 60-28, and Peter Schiff 63-23

Sadly this probably takes CT off our pick ups opportunities

I Saw That; But The GOP Should Ignore It

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 12:43PM EST (link)

PPP is fairly accurate, but they are a Democratic outfit and they have becominga little hysterical like Nate Silver.

They are slumming for silver linings. If Brown has a shot in Mass, a guy like Simmons has a shot in CT.

Even if Blumenthal is popular, there is no way he is leading 2-1 over everybody. No way. Not in this environment.

There will be time to dig up dirt on Blumenthal. Lets start by tying him to Dodd.

I hope so

proudgop (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 12:45PM EST (link)

I hope you are right

I mean Blumenthal turned a blind eye as Dodd did more unethical things

I hope in my state New York the NY GOP can get Gen Patraeus in

 
 
 
 

Mike Lee will beat Bennett in Utah

utah_1 Wednesday, January 6th at 12:36PM EST (link)

Mike Lee will beat Bennett in Utah and finally get one of the biggest problems in the Senate into retirement.

Pomeroy No Senate in ND

proudgop (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 1:58PM EST (link)

He is not running for US Senate running for re-election to house

 
 

I am sitting out here today thinking if the D's run....

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 2:04PM EST (link)

MSLSD idiot and fat **** Ed Shultz for Dorgans seat that they really, truly are BLIND to the Movement that is occurring on the ground. Dorgan had to LIE about his Conservatism to get elected and create a persona for edification at home that was in DIRECT contradiction to the votes he gave in DC and they think that the FAR-LEFT WHACKJOB Shultz stands an iota of a chance? They are truly DELUDED!

 

ND Senate Strategery

Tony82 (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 3:06PM EST (link)

With the welcome news that one of the world’s worst combovers, aka Byron Dorgan, will be vacating the ND Senate seat, maybe the GOP should rethink its strategy of recruiting Gov. Hoeven. Former Gov (1992-2000) and US Sec of Agriculture (2008-2009) Ed Schafer should also be able to win this seat for the GOP. That would free up Hoeven to complete his second term and run against Conrad in 2012.

Conrad helped Schafer during his nomination for Ag Sec, so he might not be so inclined to run against him in 2012. (We should assume for now that Conrad will not retire in 2012.) Plus, Schafer is older than Hoeven by 11 years. Better to reserve Hoeven for the bruising fight against an incumbent and use Schafer now for the easy open seat.

Hoeven is saying he WILL run!....

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 3:09PM EST (link)

What Are The Odds On Ed Schultz Running Now

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 3:11PM EST (link)

While he is their best hope, Hoevan would still crush him and make him cry and at the same time get him off the air,

Schultz is probably going to hide behind his mic.

 

I figured that the moment the news of Dorgan's retirement broke.

Third Street (Diary) Wednesday, January 6th at 3:14PM EST (link)

Word must have gotten to him about this a few days ago. He would never have retired otherwise.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

 
 
 

Strong work

Lycurgus Wednesday, January 6th at 4:03PM EST (link)

Nice compilation Gandalf, I don’t know where you get the time to draft such exhaustive political status updates!

If to please the people we offer what we ourselves disapprove, how then shall we stand? Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God. ~George Washington