2010 Senate Analysis


This is my first diary on RedState, though I’ve been around for quite some time. I’m usually a stalker, so please bear with me.

Following is what I believe to be a preliminary outline for the 2010 Senate Elections. I have tried to be fairly accurate in basing what I have written on reality instead of what I would like to happen. Many thing can happen between now and November 2010, so these rankings may change drastically.

Democratic Seats:

Nevada – Harry Reid

Who would have thought six years ago, when Sen. Harry Reid won reelection with 61% of the vote, that his seat would be the #1 pickup opportunity for Republicans in 2010? But just this week the Cook Political Report changed this race from Likely Democrat to Toss Up. This is largely because Reid has such huge negatives with one recent poll (Research 2000) finding his approval rating to be as low as 36%. In a late-August poll by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc., Reid trailed two Republican challengers, Danny Tarkanian and Sue Lowden, by at least 5 points. Tarkanian led Reid by 11 points whereas Lowden led by 5. Tarkanian led Lowden in the primary race 33-14 with 47% undecided and 6% going to other candidates. The early-September Research 2000 poll showed slightly better numbers for Reid: Tarkanian only led by 45-40 while Lowden led 44-41

Chances are excellent that Republicans should be able to “Daschle” Reid even in a non-wave year. With 2010 shaping up to be a medium to large wave, I rate this as an almost guaranteed flip barring unforeseen complications.

Connecticut – Chris Dodd

Is it possible for Republicans to pick up a seat in ever-increasingly-blue New England? Connecticut provides the best chance this year, with severely tainted Sen. Dodd. Dodd has relatively low approval ratings (42% according to a late-July Quinnipiac poll). There hasn’t been much polling in Connecticut since July when former Rep. Rob Simmons, the front runner in the Republican primary (Simmons was at 42% with no other candidate breaking 5%), led Dodd 48-39. In fact, Simmons has led Dodd in every major poll except one since early March.

This would prove to be a shock pick-up, but it seems plausible. If 2010 turns into a wave year, Connecticut could turn red.

Arkansas – Blanche Lincoln

Sen. Blanche Lincoln could be one of many casualties of over-reaching Democratic control of the Legislative and Executive branches. A late August Public Policy poll found her approval at just 36%. She polls within the margin of error with several unknown Republicans: St. Sen. Gilbert Baker led 42-40, Curtis Coleman led 41-40, and Tom Cotton trailed by 40-39. There have been no primary polls conducted.

Sen. Lincoln will be a tough nut to crack. She won reelection back in 2004 with 56% of the vote. But a lot has changed. Specifically, Democrats have taken control of Congress and are doing many things that go against the grain in the South, even Arkansas.

Arkansas stands a good chance of turning turned red.

Delaware – Ted Kauffman (Retiring)

Delaware provides an interesting pick-up opportunity in a solidly-blue state, though with the sacrifice of the State’s sole House seat. This is the seat vacated by Joe Biden, and Ted Kaufman was appointed with the understanding that he would not seek reelection in deference to Vice-President Biden’s son Beau. Biden, Jr. has yet to announce, but there is little doubt that he will. However, Delaware seems to be a less enthusiastic about dynasty seats than Massachusetts, and Michael Castle, who has also not announced any intention of running, is beating him handily in all polls: a late-April poll by Susquehanna Polling and Research has Castle leading Biden 55-34. This followed an early-March Public Policy poll showing Castle leading 44-36. Christine O’Donnell has announced her intention to run for the Republican nomination but will most likely be destroyed by Biden. Castle’s House seat will almost certainly go Democratic if he does not seek reelection.

Castle has announced that there is a better chance of him running for this Senate seat than another term in the House. However, he has also hinted that he may retire from politics.

If Castle runs, rate this as an almost-assured pick-up. If he chooses not to run, it goes down to the bottom of the list.

Colorado – Michael Bennet (Appointed)

The Republican field seems to be a bit crowded, with no clear favorites. The only Republican leading Bennet in the polls is former Gov. Bill Owens by 44-41, but he has not announced whether he will run. Bennet leads all other Republicans: Ryan Frazier by 5 points, Ken Buck by 4, John Suthers by 6, Scott McInnis by 6, Josh Penry by 7, and Tom Tancredo by 9.

The GOP has a fair chance of picking up this seat in purple Colorado, but we have to play our cards right. In a wave year, and with the right candidate, this could be a firm flip.

EDIT: Only Frazier, Buck, and Cleve Tidwell (possibly Norton and Wiens) are running for the Republicans. Bennet is facing a primary against Romanoff. A new Rasmussen poll tonight shows Frazier leading Bennet by 1 point.

North Dakota – Byron Dorgan

It must be made perfectly clear that the GOP has 0-chance of taking this seat if Gov. John Hoeven decides not to run. Dorgan won reelection in 2004 with 64% of the vote, and there are simply no other Republicans who could touch him. In a late-July Public Opinion Strategies poll, Hoeven leads Dorgan 53-36, almost guaranteeing the flip. However, the big question is: Will he run? He does not appear to be in any hurry to announce.

This is possibly our second-biggest pick-up opportunity (after Nevada) if Hoeven decides to run. If he passes, then it stays blue.

New York – Kirsten Gillibrand (Apointed)

After some work, Sen. Gillibrand has cleared the Democratic primary field and will almost assuredly win the party’s nomination. Sparse polling has been done on this race, but both Rudy Giuliani and former-governor George Pataki could prove to make reelection tough for Gillibrand. No polling has been done on Giuliani since January when he trailed Gillibrand by 2 points. But Pataki has led or tied Gillibrand in all but one poll since March. The latest, a Siena poll conducted in late August, has Pataki leading 42-39.

If Pataki or Giuliani run, this race could prove competitive. If they both decline, Democrats easily retain this seat even in a wave year.

Illinois – Roland Burris (Retiring)

Burris’s decision not to run for reelection has drastically improved Democrats’ chances of retaining this seat. In a late-April Public Policy poll, Illinois Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias leads all other Democratic challengers by more than 12 points. Rep. Mark Kirk led Peter Roskam in a mid-February Zogby poll by 5 points for the GOP nod.

In a mid-August Rasmussen poll, Kirk etched out a lead of 41-38 over Giannoulias.

In a wave year, we might stand a good chance of picking up this seat if we can overcome voter-fraud.

Pennsylvania – Arlen Specter (Party-Switcher)

Sen. Arlen Specter changed parties in early 2009 with the promise that he would avoid a primary challenge. Unfortunately for him, he’s getting one anyway. Rep. Joe Sestak is slowly gaining on Specter in the polls. He has narrowed Specter’s lead from 38 in early-May to just 15 by mid-August. The liberal wing of the Democratic Party is clearly trying “Lamont” Specter as they did Lieberman in 2006, but it is unclear if Specter would respond the same way Lieberman did by running as an Independent should he lose the Democratic nomination.

Specter still leads presumptive Republican nominee Pat Toomey. A mid-August Research 2000 poll found Specter leading 45-40 while an outlier Rasmussen poll from the same time found Toomey leading 48-36. The only thing we know for sure is that Specter’s lead is apparently narrowing.

Toomey leads Sestak 43-35 in the Rasmussen poll while trailing in the Research 2000 poll 42-41.

The best bet for Republicans here is for Sestak to beat Specter in the primary and Specter to run as an Independent. This would almost assure a Republican victory. However, in a wave year, we stand a minimally good chance of picking up this seat.

EDIT: PA has a Sore Loser law which would prevent Specter from running as an Independent if he loses his primary bid.

California – Barbara Boxer

There has been minimal polling on this race. Old polls show HP CEO Carly Fiorina leading St. Assemblyman Chuck DeVore for the Republican nomination, but it is possible that these numbers may have reversed. A mid-July Rasmussen poll showed Fiorina within striking distance of Sen. Barbara Boxer (45-41), but a mid-August Research 2000 poll showed that Boxer has reclaimed the a strong lead of 52-31. Boxer leads DeVore 53-29.

This is an extremely small chance that the GOP could pull this out, but the chances are getting smaller and smaller since DeVore and Fiorina seem intent on a brutal primary.

Hawaii – Daniel Inouye

Sen. Inouye won reelection in 2004 with 76% of the vote. The only Republican who could give Sen. Inouye a run for his money would be Gov. Linda Lingle, but even she trails him 52-40 in a mid-June Research 2000 poll. Something unexpected may happen, but barring that Inouye will win in a landslide, which could be decreased to only a few points if Gov. Lingle runs.

Washington – Patty Murray

Sen. Murray will not win with as big of a margin as she did in 2004, but she will cruise to reelection unless Dino Rossi runs. That is highly unlikely and so is flipping this seat red.

Wisconsin – Russ Feingold

Sen. Feingold seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Indiana – Evan Bayh

Sen. Bayh seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Oregon – Ron Wyden

Sen. Wyden seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Maryland – Barbara Mikulski

The only possible way to make this seat competitive would be for former Gov. Bob Elrich or RNC Chairman Michael Steele to run. Neither seem interested. This seat is safely Democratic for now.

Vermont – Pat Leahy

The only possibility of making this seat competitive is if Gov. Jim Douglas decides to run. A mid-January Research 2000 poll had Sen. Leahy leading Douglas 58-36, so the chances are unlikely.

New York – Chuck Schumer

Sen. Schumer seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Republican Seats:

Missouri – Kit Bond (Retiring)

Rep. Roy Blunt seems to have the Republican nomination all but sewn up while Sec. of State Robin Carnahan is the only announced or rumored Democratic candidate. This is currently rated as the best Democratic pick-up opportunity because of Sec. Carnahan’s recent electoral success (she garnered more votes in 2008 than any other candidate in the history of Missouri). The latest poll, a Democracy Corps poll from late April, shows Carnahan leading Blunt 53-44.

This is the Democrats best chance of a pick-up, but Republicans can make interesting comebacks in Missouri. With a medium to major Republican wave, this seat could stay Republican.

Ohio – George Voinovich (Retiring)

Former Rep. Rob Portman appears to have a cinch on the Republican nomination while Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher and Sec. of State Jennifer Brunner are locked in a close race for the Democratic nod. Unfortunately for us, the latest Research 2000 poll, taken in early-July, shows Brunner leading Portman 40-36 while Fisher leads Portman 42-35. This shows a increase of 4 and 2 points for Portman against Brunner and Fisher respectively since a Public Policy poll in mid-June.

The Democrats have a real chance to take this seat even in a minor Republican wave. However, the Republicans also have a good chance of retaining the seat if the Ohio GOP gets its act together. Here’s hoping we pull this one out.

New Hampshire – Judd Gregg (Retiring)

When Judd Gregg announced his retirement, it switched this seat to an almost automatic Democratic pick-up for Rep. Paul Hodes. However, when Attorney General Kelly Ayotte announced her candidacy in early July, it brought back hope to the GOP. Ayotte led Hodes 39-38 in a mid-July Research 2000 poll. However, an older Granite State Poll from late June had her leading 39-35.

At this point, this race could easily go either way. Unless we see a Democratic wave, I expect to see this seat stay Republican. However, if there isn’t a Republican wave, it could possibly be lost.

North Carolina – Richard Burr

Democrats would like to turn this seat competitive because of a mid-June Public Policy poll showing Sen. Burr losing to a generic Democrat by 3 points. However, in an early-August Public Policy poll, Burr leads Democratic Sec. of State Elaine Marshall 43-31, former St. Sen. Cal Cunningham 43-28, and Kenneth Lewis 43-27. In a wave year for the Democrats, this seat might be in play. However, it seems likely that Burr will eventually solidify support.

Louisiana – David Vitter

There is a lot of speculation about who will be the eventual nominees for both parties in 2010. Sen. Vitter cannot count on a free pass since he was involved in a prostitution scandal two years ago. Vitter led the Republican primary back in a Research 2000 poll from early-March, but there are several Republican contenders who could beat Vitter in a primary. Fortunately they all poll as well or better than he does against any Democratic challengers.

Currently, Rep. Charlie Melancon looks likely to get the eventual nod from the Democratic party. In a mid-July Public Policy poll, Vitter led Melancon 44-32.

Unless the Democrats have a serious wave, this seat does not seem to be in serious play for the Democrats. It could materialize, but at this point it leans heavily toward the Republicans.

Kentucky – Jim Bunning (Retiring)

In late July, Sen. Bunning announced that he would not seek reelection. This dramatically increased Republicans’ chances of keeping this seat red. A late-August Research 2000 poll showed Sec. of State Trey Grayson currently leading Rand Paul (son of Ron Paul) 40-25. Lt. Gov. Daniel Mongiardo currently leads Attorney General Jack Conway by 37-30 for the Democratic nod.

Grayson leads Mongiardo by 4 points and Conway by 6. Paul trails Mongiardo by 5 and Conway by 4.

Unless libertarian Republicans pull a surprise primary upset and hand the nomination to Rand Paul, this seat easily stays Republican.

Florida – George LeMieux (Retiring)

This seat will likely stay Republican unless the primary gets particularly nasty or the Democrats see a wave year. The real question is: Which Republican will win it? In a mid-August Rasmussen poll, Gov. Charlie Crist led former Speaker of the St. House Marco Rubio 53-31. Rubio is gaining points against Crist, but it is unclear if he will gain enough in time. Rep. Kendrick Meek currently leads in the Democratic primary polls.

According to various polls, Crist crushes all Democratic challengers by no less than 19 points while a mid-August Rasmussen poll shows Rubio leading Meek 43-30.

Kansas – Sam Brownback (Retiring)

Republican Reps. Todd Tiahrt and Jerry Moran are statistically tied for the nomination. The only Democrat who could make this race competitive is former Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. However, she is likely not as popular as she once was in Kansas since accepting a position in President Obama’s cabinet. Whoever wins the Republican primary should go on to win this Senate seat.

Arizona – John McCain

The only Democrat who could make this race competitive is former Gov. Janet Napolitano. However, she is likely not as popular as she once was in Arizona since accepting a position in President Obama’s cabinet. Sen. McCain should cruise to reelection.

Alaska – Lisa Murkowski

Sen. Murkowski seems cruising to reelection against whoever the eventual Democratic nominee is.

South Dakota – John Thune

Sen. Thune leads potential rivals Tom Daschle 53-40 and Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 51-39.

Oklahoma – Tom Coburn

In a mid-May Public Policy poll, Sen. Coburn leads Gov. Brad Henry 52-40 and Rep. Dan Boren 53-36. Coburn should cruise to reelection.

South Carolina – Jim DeMint

Sen. DeMint seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Georgia – Johnny Isakson

Sen. Isakson seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Alabama – Richard Shelby

Sen. Shelby seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Utah – Robert Bennett

Any Republican would crush a Democratic candidate in scarlet-red Utah. Sen. Bennett may face a tough primary match, but no polls have been taken. However the primary turns out, this is a solidly red seat.

Iowa – Chuck Grassley

Sen. Grassley seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Idaho – Mike Crappo

Sen. Crappo seems to be facing no serious challenges this year.

Synopsis:

Republicans stand to make moderate gains in Democratic-held Senate seats in 2010, with Nevada, Connecticut, and Arkansas all already favoring Republicans. We could also easily take Delaware, North Dakota, Illinois, and New York (Gillibrand) with the right recruits. Pennsylvania and Colorado are more up-hill fights, but it is possible to turn them red. California and Hawaii are the long shots while Washington, Wisconsin, Indiana, Oregon, Maryland, Vermont and New York (Schumer) seem out of the question.

Meanwhile, Republicans playing defense look much safer than they did in 2008. the GOP faces up-hill battles in Missouri and Ohio, but these seats are winnable in a wave year. Seats that are on the verge of being competitive include New Hampshire, North Carolina, Louisiana, and Kentucky. Republican seats seem safe in Florida, Kansas, Arizona, and Alaska but could turn competitive if things head south for the GOP. South Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Utah, Iowa, and Idaho seem locked up for the Republicans.

In a massive Republican wave year, we could gain up to 9 seats while protecting all our endangered seats. In a moderate Republican wave, we will gain between 4 and 6 seats with the possibility of losing 1 or 2 for a net of between 2 and 6.

We should do no worse than gaining 1 seat.



RSS feed

27 Comments Leave a comment

Sorry for the Computer Code

Gandalf (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:13PM EST (link)

I can’t figure out how to edit…

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

go to 'create new diary' -> manage -> 'diary name'

Xasteius (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 12:10AM EST (link)

BTW, I like your order of priorities in your quote line.

Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!

The only poll that counts is the one at the ballot box.

I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be a Chance/Soros hybrid.

Thanks!

Gandalf (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 12:25AM EST (link)

Diary edited to delete code, re-insert my Delaware comments, and put notes on CO and PA as found in the comments below.

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

 
 
 

Great write up

Hooah_Mac (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:22PM EST (link)

I haven’t looked into any of this seriously, but what I do know jives with what you have written.

I would like to see the GOP challenge those seats that they aren’t trying in. Unless things change significantly, President Obama should be good for a 10-20 percent bump for any Republican running. Enough to make previously safe Democrat seats much easier to crack.

-Priorities-
1. Mission 2. Soldiers 3. Everything Else

 

Specter can't run as an indie

redtillimdead (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:30PM EST (link)

Unless he switches before the primary. PA has a sore loser law. Good diary, but I just want to point out that Evan Bayh may face a well funded challenger. Republican former State Rep. and Judge , Dan Dumezich, also a fundriaiser, is on the brink of deciding his run. You also left out Delaware. Great diary though, good read.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

Not sure how that happened

Gandalf (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:43PM EST (link)

I wrote this, but apparently it got deleted before I copied the article to my diary:

Delaware – Ted Kauffman (Retiring)
Delaware provides an interesting pick-up opportunity in a solidly-blue state, though with the sacrifice of the State’s sole House seat. This is the seat vacated by Joe Biden, and Ted Kaufman was appointed with the understanding that he would not seek reelection in deference to Vice-President Biden’s son Beau. Biden, Jr. has yet to announce, but there is little doubt that he will. However, Delaware seems to be a less enthusiastic about dynasty seats than Massachusetts, and Michael Castle, who has also not announced any intention of running, is beating him handily in all polls: a late-April poll by Susquehanna Polling and Research has Castle leading Biden 55-34. This followed an early-March Public Policy poll showing Castle leading 44-36. Christine O’Donnell has announced her intention to run for the Republican nomination but will most likely be destroyed by Biden. Castle’s House seat will almost certainly go Democratic if he does not seek reelection.
Castle has announced that there is a better chance of him running for this Senate seat than another term in the House. However, he has also hinted that he may retire from politics.
If Castle runs, rate this as an almost-assured pick-up. If he chooses not to run, it goes down to the bottom of the list.

Thanks for the note Pennsylvania. I didn’t know about the Sore Loser law.

Not sure Dan Dumezich changes the game in Indiana. I’d have to see some polling before I would consider Bayh anything but safe. He won reelection in 2004 with 62% of the vote and the state went for Obama.

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

Indiana

Hooah_Mac (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:55PM EST (link)

Barely went for Obama, and of out of the states that went Obama, I bet this one has more regret than most. Did Bayh have a real challenger in 2004? I think the only real races we don’t have a pickup chance, as the landscape stands now, is the states we don’t run solid candidates in.

-Priorities-
1. Mission 2. Soldiers 3. Everything Else

I would like that but...

Gandalf (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 12:08AM EST (link)

I don’t think it’s realistic. Bayh is popular in his own right and probably won’t be beat by a former State Senator. But I’ll reserve further judgment till I see a poll or two.

I’m trying to be realistic, but I just don’t see how Republicans could possibly win in New York (Schumer), Maryland, Vermont, Oregon, Wisconsin, or Washington, even if the “perfect candidate” materializes. It would be like the Democrats pretending they had a chance in Idaho or Utah in 2006 or 2008.

But I’ll honestly admit that I would love to be proven wrong!

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

I would not say you were wrong

Hooah_Mac (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 12:12AM EST (link)

Democrats shouldn’t have had a chance against George Allen, but they won.

If we run real challengers in all of these races, we have a chance in 2010. If we don’t run a real challenger, we can’t win. Although our lack of friendly press makes Macaca moments harder for Democrats, they still happen.

-Priorities-
1. Mission 2. Soldiers 3. Everything Else

 
 
 
 
 

Redtillmdead is Correct Regarding PA

quill67 (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:33PM EST (link)

In PA, if you lose in the primary, you can not run as an independent in the general election.

 

Colorado.

NightTwister (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:34PM EST (link)

Of the ones you listed, only Frazier and Buck are running. Owens isn’t going to, McInnis and Penry are running for Governor, and if Tancredo decides to join late and wins it, you can just give the seat to the Dems permanently.

Cleve Tidwell is mentioned, but nobody really knows what he’s doing. Norton and Wiens both have exploratory committees, Norton jumping in just now.

With the current electoral makeup and attitude, Frazier has the best chance to pull together a winning coalition. Buck could also do it, but it’ll take some work. Bennet isn’t getting a free ride either, Romanoff is going to run against him. That actually helps us in the Senate and Governor races, as he’ll likely be going after Ritter (like that’s needed anyway.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill

Correction.

NightTwister (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:38PM EST (link)

Cleve Tidwell isn’t mentioned, but is running.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill

 

Another note here

redtillimdead (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:38PM EST (link)

Tonight Rasmussen came out with a CO poll, and Frazier was actually AHEAD of Bennet. They only tested Frazier and Buck, they left out Norton for some reason

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

Excellent news! nt

Gandalf (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:46PM EST (link)

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

 

2010 Senate Outlook

proudgop (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:46PM EST (link)

Things look a lot better for us but in a lot of these races the primaries are only going to hurt us and help the Democrats

1. If Castle runs in DE I think its the easiest pickup for us

2. It look like FL and KY are looking solid for us

3. I still worry about NH, OH, and MO ( Blunt still concerns me) but all 3 look better then they did and IL is winnable with Kirk

4. We have an excellent shot at knocking out Dodd in CT ( hate bloody primary although; you’d think some of these guys might run for other statewide office races that are open in CT or congress race??), Reid in NV ( State Senator Almodei announced today: I’d still like to see a Republican from Clark County as our nominee), AR Lincoln ( although I hate the bloody primary here), and Bennett in CO looks more vulnerable daily and he is going to have primary on his hands now too and Ritter is unpopular to boot.

5. CA and NY are still long shot. Republicans need people with a lot money to pour into these 2 races.

6. ND and WI can be won only if Hoeven, Scaffer or Tommy Thompson get in.

PA too

proudgop (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:48PM EST (link)

Toomey is looking better and better daily

I hope Specter wins primary to be honest if Sestak wins it more difficult I believe

 

CA

redtillimdead (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:58PM EST (link)

We have a millionaire willing to pour millions of her own dollars in the race, but Red State has to boy-cott her because Chuck Devore says she’s not pro-life, but Carly Fiorina says Carly Fiorina is pro-life, but Chuck Devore knows Carly Fiorina better than Carly Fiorina apparently.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

Carly Fiorina

Hooah_Mac (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 12:04AM EST (link)

WiIl have a serious uphill battle because of her connection to John McCain. All the money in the world won’t get believers to man the phones for you. Also, I believe moderate Republicans are going to have a harder time this cycle than they did during a Democrat wave because the energy is going to be with conservatives and a backlash to the outlandish liberalism of President Obama. A moderate can’t make a cogent argument against a liberal. For example, saying that high taxes are immoral so I’ll only raise them half as much does NOT resonate with voters.

Of course, I am also firmly in the “of course conservatives can’t win if they don’t run” camp.

-Priorities-
1. Mission 2. Soldiers 3. Everything Else

 
 

Personally, I like primaries.

Martin Knight (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 1:41AM EST (link)

I believe the state and national parties can establish rules of decorum to make them less destructive but better with them than without them.

I agree.

NightTwister (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 8:35AM EST (link)

Primaries are where each District (House) or State (Senate) defines what’s important to them. The idea that a National Group can dictate one stand on the issues for every area of the Country by pre-selecting our candidate isn’t the way to go.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill

 

I really don't

proudgop (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 8:58AM EST (link)

I like to avoid them at all costs

When the primaries are over and our nominee is basically broke its difficult to raise the cash ( especially with the economy) and the Dem will have 4 or 5 million dollar advantage. Plus, party unity always takes some time and in some cases never happens.

Take for ex Dodd CT race there are already 5 Republicans in the race and they all have close to a million dollars each. That primary is going to be bloody and then by time we chose our nominee Dodd is going to hit our nominee type cast him and he won’t have chance to defend himself.

 
 
 
 
 

Coming from CT

kyoufuu (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 9:11AM EST (link)

I like the odds of Dodd losing this year. He’s got a lot of money in his coffers, but the vast majority of it has come from out of state or from his banking buddies. The people do not like him very much. Connecticut is interesting though. We’re a left leaning state with large numbers of independent voters. The democratic party here is primarily made up of the real looney toons.

Since we have closed primaries, I can see someone like Ned Lamont coming along and winning the primary over Dodd.

My preference would be to see some of these Republican candidates use their money to take down some of the fools we have in the house, like the condesceding jerks Jimmy Himes and Chris Murphy.

My dream is to see some son or daughter of New Haven come along and actually challenge Rosa DeLauro. Her signature issue has always been universal health care, but yet she’s been absent from any real Town Halls on the issue. Maybe someone intelligent could really challenge her on the merits of ObamaCare, rather than having the state party simply find any Tom, Dick or Harry whose name they can put on the ballot without running a real campaign.

“There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.” — James Madison

“I swear by my life, and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.”

I really agree

proudgop (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 9:23AM EST (link)

I really wish State Senator Caliguri would challenge Courtney

It looks like Himes is being challenged with top tier challenger

I really did wish Courtney was challenged with top tier too

Is Rell running for re-election? she has been very quiet?

I think Rell is running

kyoufuu (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 9:51AM EST (link)

I haven’t heard anything to the contrary. I’m kind of annoyed at how the whole budget process here ended up working out, though. But nonetheless, she’s still better than anything the Dems can put up.

I’m glad Himes is getting a good challenge. He’s the best target being a freshman rep.

“There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.” — James Madison

“I swear by my life, and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.”

 
 
 

Brief Run-Down on 2012

Gandalf (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 2:56PM EST (link)

Democrats face tough reelection bids in Montana, Virginia, Missouri, and possibly Ohio. Democratic retirements could provide opportunities in Connecticut, W. Virginia, Nebraska, and Vermont.

Republican incumbents should be fine after weathering 2006, except for John Ensign in Nevada who will likely not run for reelection. We have a retirement watch in Indiana but should easily keep that seat.

North Dakota, Minnesota, California, Wisconsin, Florida, and Hawaii could all be possible Republican take-overs if severe anti-Democrat feelings remain, unexpected retirements occur, sever scandals are unearthed, or top-tier candidates materialize.

Republicans should be at a low-water mark even in a bad year (except possibly Nevada).

Possible net: 8+ seats.

Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third

Yes, the order is important.

 

Ensign has already said he is running in 2012

redtillimdead (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 6:58PM EST (link)

Connecticut is a very good chance. Joe Liberman isn’t as popular as he was in 2006, and if he runs as in Indy again, he will divide the Dem vote. Lots of people think Jodi Rell is going to tun against him. If not, Tom Foley would be a good candidate. In MN, Kloubacher seems really popular, we might be better off waiting until Franken in 2014, another year we should see huge senate games. After the next 3 cysles, I wouldn’t rule out us getting to a 60 vote majority. CA is only in play if Feinstein retires. Indiana may be a fight. There may be a Dem retirement in WI in 2012 too, and Paul Ryan would be a strong contender, if he isn’t running for Pres. VA- 2 words- Ken Cuccinelli. I also like our chances in MO, preferably with Sarah Steelman.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

2012 too far to look at now

proudgop (Diary) Friday, September 11th at 7:49PM EST (link)

back on 2010 Dodd CT

A new Rasmussen Reports poll in Connecticut finds former Rep. Rob Simmons (R) leading Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT) by ten points, 49% to 39%, in an early look at next year’s potential match-up.

Simmons is the strongest potential GOP challenger as Dodd finds himself essentially even with Sam Caligiuri (R), Tom Foley (R) and Peter Schiff (R).