Comments on: Graham unwittingly gets liberal admissions against Cap and Trade via NYT editorial

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:46:48 +0000

By: mbecker908

mbecker908 — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:08:32 +0000

He IS a major problem.

By: kyle8

kyle8 — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:06:12 +0000

would you call lack of spine, being an ingrate, being politically tone deaf, constantly insulting your core constituency, being a media attention whore, and being unconnected from reality major problems?

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:02:49 +0000

By: redpens

redpens — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:24:52 +0000

1. The eco-wackos will try to block any & every new oil rig and nuclear
power plant planning to be built, allegedly in the public interest. But really, it’s for their selfish interest of killing the economy.

2. Cap-and-trade will send oil companies & their jobs overseas to countries that don’t have cap-and-trade restrictions, so they won’t drill here, drill now.

3. Congress has control of the purse strings, so the EPA can have their
funding cut to nothing and the agency dissolved.

4. Cap-and-trade is based on a climate hoax.