<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor as Toto-deny-or [updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:13:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5881</guid>
		<description>Soto as a lawyer for a cause; a false analogy with Alito and some fairly strong arguments about deference to the President, but that I think can refute. Either today or Saturday. I hope they don&#039;t vote today, but even if they do, the column will be relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soto as a lawyer for a cause; a false analogy with Alito and some fairly strong arguments about deference to the President, but that I think can refute. Either today or Saturday. I hope they don&#8217;t vote today, but even if they do, the column will be relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5880</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5880</guid>
		<description>cockstradamus, who still does alright in the prognostication racket and who has his own hen house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cockstradamus, who still does alright in the prognostication racket and who has his own hen house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stang</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5879</link>
		<dc:creator>stang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5879</guid>
		<description>They are unwilling and unable to confront that which is wrong or evil even when it&#039;s slapping them in the face.

What unabashed moral cowardice, esp from our so called leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are unwilling and unable to confront that which is wrong or evil even when it&#8217;s slapping them in the face.</p>
<p>What unabashed moral cowardice, esp from our so called leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5878</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5878</guid>
		<description>about the final vote (I predicted more than 30 and probably more than 34 GOP votes and 2-3 dem votes against her with outside chance of more than 40 total), but that is my nature and will always be my nature. I loathe those want to give up before the fight. I&#039;ve won too many fights after being told I couldn&#039;t win so I don&#039;t listen to naysayers.

But overall, I think we have done well exposing her and have a lot of material to use against dems in 2010, esp when one considers that she dropped in the polls 30% and was opposed by women and hispanics on Sunday, before the hearing.

The people have heard the racist statements and don&#039;t like her. We can hang her around the dems&#039; necks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about the final vote (I predicted more than 30 and probably more than 34 GOP votes and 2-3 dem votes against her with outside chance of more than 40 total), but that is my nature and will always be my nature. I loathe those want to give up before the fight. I&#8217;ve won too many fights after being told I couldn&#8217;t win so I don&#8217;t listen to naysayers.</p>
<p>But overall, I think we have done well exposing her and have a lot of material to use against dems in 2010, esp when one considers that she dropped in the polls 30% and was opposed by women and hispanics on Sunday, before the hearing.</p>
<p>The people have heard the racist statements and don&#8217;t like her. We can hang her around the dems&#8217; necks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stang</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5877</link>
		<dc:creator>stang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5877</guid>
		<description>The point I was trying to emphasize was Graham&#039;s  &amp; Cornyn&#039;s  complete lack of vertebrae.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point I was trying to emphasize was Graham&#8217;s  &amp; Cornyn&#8217;s  complete lack of vertebrae.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5876</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5876</guid>
		<description>he would deem it grounds to oppose Sotomayor because she had been an &quot;advocate on issue&quot;. That he would have loved to have been the lawyer on the other side.

The issue involved? The definition of slavery to include the refusal of the government to pay for poor peoples&#039; abortions

On the court, Soto will be able to define slavery.

boggles the mind

Some say that Sotomayor should be opposed for lying, but she she should also be opposed for telling the truth if the truth is to affirm what she said in the past. She simply will not uphold the Oath based on her wise latina; court makes policy; and slavery quotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he would deem it grounds to oppose Sotomayor because she had been an &#8220;advocate on issue&#8221;. That he would have loved to have been the lawyer on the other side.</p>
<p>The issue involved? The definition of slavery to include the refusal of the government to pay for poor peoples&#8217; abortions</p>
<p>On the court, Soto will be able to define slavery.</p>
<p>boggles the mind</p>
<p>Some say that Sotomayor should be opposed for lying, but she she should also be opposed for telling the truth if the truth is to affirm what she said in the past. She simply will not uphold the Oath based on her wise latina; court makes policy; and slavery quotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5875</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5875</guid>
		<description>find it amazing how much more vocally conservative Hutchinson&#039;s get when they are leaving DC for their state&#039;s where their efforts in their state&#039;s have much less of an impact. Its so much easier to be conservative when all you vote on and deal with are puny issues the federal government hasn&#039;t taken over.

pot holes
water bills
etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>find it amazing how much more vocally conservative Hutchinson&#8217;s get when they are leaving DC for their state&#8217;s where their efforts in their state&#8217;s have much less of an impact. Its so much easier to be conservative when all you vote on and deal with are puny issues the federal government hasn&#8217;t taken over.</p>
<p>pot holes<br />
water bills<br />
etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5874</guid>
		<description>statements that indicated he would cave. I actually was never optimistic about him from Day One, as on Day One he recited the old Hatch standard that I think even Hatch has now repudiated re deference to the president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>statements that indicated he would cave. I actually was never optimistic about him from Day One, as on Day One he recited the old Hatch standard that I think even Hatch has now repudiated re deference to the president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5873</guid>
		<description>I always liked Cornyn a lot and thought Hutchison was passable. Cornyn has gone way downhill this past year or two. Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always liked Cornyn a lot and thought Hutchison was passable. Cornyn has gone way downhill this past year or two. Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izoneguy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5872</link>
		<dc:creator>izoneguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5872</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t vote for Cornyn....

Cornyn needs to be sent out to pasture...

We need a REAL conservative for Texas....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t vote for Cornyn&#8230;.</p>
<p>Cornyn needs to be sent out to pasture&#8230;</p>
<p>We need a REAL conservative for Texas&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5871</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5871</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a hint for those GOP Senators. If you found her testimony &quot;troubling&quot;, &quot;surprising&quot;, &quot;evasive&quot;, &quot;contradictory&quot;, &quot;incomplete&quot;, &quot;misleading&quot;, or any of about a dozen other adjectives, IT&#039;S BECAUSE SHE WAS LYING HER BUTT OFF.

People like Graham and Cornyn admit that she repeatedly lied in her testimony, but that they&#039;ll vote for her anyway. Obama and his Congressional colleagues must get a good laugh out of how stupid our side is. Why the heck are we bringing Ricci and others to testify if we&#039;ve already stabbed them in the back and raised the white flag and cried &quot;Tio&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a hint for those GOP Senators. If you found her testimony &#8220;troubling&#8221;, &#8220;surprising&#8221;, &#8220;evasive&#8221;, &#8220;contradictory&#8221;, &#8220;incomplete&#8221;, &#8220;misleading&#8221;, or any of about a dozen other adjectives, IT&#8217;S BECAUSE SHE WAS LYING HER BUTT OFF.</p>
<p>People like Graham and Cornyn admit that she repeatedly lied in her testimony, but that they&#8217;ll vote for her anyway. Obama and his Congressional colleagues must get a good laugh out of how stupid our side is. Why the heck are we bringing Ricci and others to testify if we&#8217;ve already stabbed them in the back and raised the white flag and cried &#8220;Tio&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stang</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>stang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>How else are they gonna get reelected?

“A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.”

James Freeman Clarke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How else are they gonna get reelected?</p>
<p>“A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.”</p>
<p>James Freeman Clarke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izoneguy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5869</link>
		<dc:creator>izoneguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5869</guid>
		<description>If the dems have their way - there won&#039;t be future negotiations....

Pelosi Censors Republicans

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32718

....Representative democracy works when a U.S. Representative listens to the input of their constituents, and votes the way the majority of their district would vote. Only a Representative can’t listen if no one has ever seen the bill, or had time to provide input. They have to vote blind, which for too many, is voting the way their leadership tells them.

This is what Republican House Members were going to the floor to say Monday night. We were set to decry the loss of openness in the House. 

Instead, we were met with a slammed door by Democrats, who are now committed to burying truth along with democracy. 

The Democrats are the majority -- for now. They chose to silence debate on the floor by gagging House Republican Members from using their historical right to speak after the close of the day. But they cannot stop us from speaking outside the halls of Congress and letting the American public know the truth about their ongoing attack against the very foundations of a free Republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the dems have their way &#8211; there won&#8217;t be future negotiations&#8230;.</p>
<p>Pelosi Censors Republicans</p>
<p>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32718</p>
<p>&#8230;.Representative democracy works when a U.S. Representative listens to the input of their constituents, and votes the way the majority of their district would vote. Only a Representative can’t listen if no one has ever seen the bill, or had time to provide input. They have to vote blind, which for too many, is voting the way their leadership tells them.</p>
<p>This is what Republican House Members were going to the floor to say Monday night. We were set to decry the loss of openness in the House. </p>
<p>Instead, we were met with a slammed door by Democrats, who are now committed to burying truth along with democracy. </p>
<p>The Democrats are the majority &#8212; for now. They chose to silence debate on the floor by gagging House Republican Members from using their historical right to speak after the close of the day. But they cannot stop us from speaking outside the halls of Congress and letting the American public know the truth about their ongoing attack against the very foundations of a free Republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eburke</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5868</link>
		<dc:creator>eburke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5868</guid>
		<description>decided to have the NRSC endorse Snarlin&#039; Arlen and Charlie &quot;Show Me the Stimulus Money&quot; Crist?

Sigh!! And I *really* thought he was one of the good guys when he snagged the NRSC slot. What happens to these people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>decided to have the NRSC endorse Snarlin&#8217; Arlen and Charlie &#8220;Show Me the Stimulus Money&#8221; Crist?</p>
<p>Sigh!! And I *really* thought he was one of the good guys when he snagged the NRSC slot. What happens to these people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stang</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5867</link>
		<dc:creator>stang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5867</guid>
		<description>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99FKD6G0&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99FKD6G0&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stang</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5866</link>
		<dc:creator>stang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5866</guid>
		<description>(Not picking on you GC but I couldn&#039;y do a diary without getting banned for profanity. And you were optimistic vis a vis Graham opposing Sotomayor. I share your disappointment. Leopards don&#039;t change spots I guess.) 

Graham and Cornyn declare Soto &quot;mainstream&quot; in their abject abandonment of any semblance of standing for anything but themselves.

&quot;Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., described Sotomayor&#039;s judicial record as &quot;generally in the mainstream&quot; and said he thought she would keep an open mind on gun rights. He proclaimed her &quot;not an activist.&quot; &quot;

&quot;On Thursday, another Republican member of the panel, Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, also called Sotomayor&#039;s rulings &quot;pretty much in the mainstream,&quot; although he said her assertions of impartiality at the hearings were strikingly at odds with her past remarks.&quot; [but I&#039;ll vote to confirm anyway.] 

I guess voting against would complicate their future negotiations with the Dem&#039;s. Is this the signal to other Repubs to do the expedient thing and vote to confirm?

In the hands of such as these, our republic is surely doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Not picking on you GC but I couldn&#8217;y do a diary without getting banned for profanity. And you were optimistic vis a vis Graham opposing Sotomayor. I share your disappointment. Leopards don&#8217;t change spots I guess.) </p>
<p>Graham and Cornyn declare Soto &#8220;mainstream&#8221; in their abject abandonment of any semblance of standing for anything but themselves.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., described Sotomayor&#8217;s judicial record as &#8220;generally in the mainstream&#8221; and said he thought she would keep an open mind on gun rights. He proclaimed her &#8220;not an activist.&#8221; &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;On Thursday, another Republican member of the panel, Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, also called Sotomayor&#8217;s rulings &#8220;pretty much in the mainstream,&#8221; although he said her assertions of impartiality at the hearings were strikingly at odds with her past remarks.&#8221; [but I'll vote to confirm anyway.] </p>
<p>I guess voting against would complicate their future negotiations with the Dem&#8217;s. Is this the signal to other Repubs to do the expedient thing and vote to confirm?</p>
<p>In the hands of such as these, our republic is surely doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5865</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5865</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common_Cents</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator>Common_Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5864</guid>
		<description>If Barack Obama can attend Rev Wrights cult, oops, I mean church for 20 yrs? and not be influenced one bit negatively, so can Sotomayor be on the board and not know anything is going on.

/sarcasm off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Barack Obama can attend Rev Wrights cult, oops, I mean church for 20 yrs? and not be influenced one bit negatively, so can Sotomayor be on the board and not know anything is going on.</p>
<p>/sarcasm off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5863</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5863</guid>
		<description>2010 and 2012

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332459784951127</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 and 2012</p>
<p>http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332459784951127</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olsmithie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/07/15/sotomayor-as-toto-deny-or/comment-page-1/#comment-5862</link>
		<dc:creator>olsmithie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=1004#comment-5862</guid>
		<description>It has always bugged me how federal law trumps state law except when the 2nd Amendment is involved. 
Then they seem to pick federal or state law, whichever is more restrictive.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has always bugged me how federal law trumps state law except when the 2nd Amendment is involved.<br />
Then they seem to pick federal or state law, whichever is more restrictive.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

