Comments on: A logical exercise on the issue of racism

By: Max Venom

Max Venom — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:59:45 +0000

It took me several clicks to get here. Could they make it any easier… like putting links to your articles and archives on your profile page.
This is the 21st century fro christ sakes… but navigating RedState is like driving a cadillac on a cobblestone road.

Anyway… this article is brilliant. Just wondering why the wonderful Senator Byrd was omitted, or the articulate Jesse Jackson. Between those two lefties, their are enough racial epithets to line the Sistine Chapel in size 4 font.

Nice piece.

By: olsmithie

olsmithie — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:07:00 +0000

Double standards have always been troubling.
One set of rules for you, another for me.

As soon as one says “My heritage makes me superior to you”, there is a problem.

I tire of these “master debaters” that think they hold the market on logic, “legends in their own mind”. Just ask them.

Streiff, the NO button is clearly indicated, we are wasting a lot of bandwidth on this poster, without hope of improving the outcome.

Regards

By: David Hinz

David Hinz — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:17:36 +0000

FORMIDABLE debater?

Brooks rob was a master baiter, but HARDLY a formidable DEbater.

By: Streiff

Streiff — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:58:43 +0000

the NO vote wins. clint is finding a new home even as we speak

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:24:39 +0000

Wouldn’t that be “required” by the Leftist handbook of definitions? We already know she is a Racist, Sexist, Class-ist (you know what I mean), etc…

Now, we are hearing (Rush is playing with) how she’s “Catholic” [gasp] and that she may be quietly/secretly, despite being a complete Liberal/Leftist hack on everything else, “PRO–LIFE!” The Democrats are “coding” the message that she really is “PRO-ABORTION” by hiding behind the language of “she is strong on Judicial Precedence” while being carefful to do no more than “code” the message and give American another reason to know she is as much a Radical on anything/everything as the Radical-In-Chief that nominated her is.

But, again, to play along with the “she might be PRO-LIFE” does that NOT require the Left to label her RELIGIOUS-ZEALOT? to be added to the list?!?!

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:55:17 +0000

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:53:09 +0000

By: E Pluribus Unum

E Pluribus Unum — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:51:20 +0000

They will do anything, say anything, defend anything needed to accomplish their goals. When it’s handy to be an originalist, they will be so. But the moment it’s handy to be a “living contract” person, they’ll back that to the hilt.

Stare decisis is their favorite tool to use against originalist judges who would correct a faulty judicial fiat from the past. But they themselves are not bound by it, not for a second.

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:42:14 +0000

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:40:49 +0000

as is all of space and it only appears Blue do to reflective…. oh never mind… you know that lol …. everyone gets the point.

/LEVITY

By: janis

janis — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:38:06 +0000

three moons and the sky is a peculiarly dingy shade of puce.

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:37:25 +0000

http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/06/03/so-should-obamas-speech-be-written-so-what-has-been-done/

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:32:26 +0000

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:32:22 +0000

Setting all those hoops up and then jumping through them all to excuse SoSo? SoSo could out-right declare it was a Racist remark... and many would still be going confrim her, confirm her... brawk

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:30:20 +0000

when they have none for the Constitution. The power of judges’ “opinions” and that’s all they are, ultimately depend on their being respected. The rule of law itself depends on same. Liberals lay the groundwork for their own demise for sure, but also the nation’s.

By: janis

janis — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:30:02 +0000

head that it’s over, gamecock. As long as there is still one person willling to respond to him, he’s willing to keep going and going……

All I can figure is that he’s lonely and no one will talk to him in person. Gee, I wonder why?

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:27:53 +0000

By: Tbone

Tbone — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:26:00 +0000

Colleges and universities you say?

BTW, the sky IS blue.

By: E Pluribus Unum

E Pluribus Unum — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:25:15 +0000

I do not see where at any point I addressed “plain meaning”, even obliquely.

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:25:12 +0000