Comments on: Holder not in Hillary’s league on pardoning terrorists

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:07:21 +0000

the greatest slander is to accurately quote them!

By: olsmithie

olsmithie — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:09:27 +0000

I agree, since he is likely a shoo in , we should get that , at least out of the hearings.

Perhaps the minority leaders will grill Hill, would love to see it.
Might make us look “partisan”, though.

Regards

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:31:33 +0000

By: Mike gamecock DeVine

Mike gamecock DeVine — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:31:16 +0000

is a tangential point I am implying. But my main point is that if the main issue is pardons, then Hillary is the big cahuna.

What I really ant to see re Holder is for the gop to have him confirm his statement in 2002 that genva does not apply to terrorists!

By: boata

boata — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:13:41 +0000

By: olsmithie

olsmithie — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:46:08 +0000

More recently, he got Chiquita International off with a slap on the wrist for funding Colombian terrorists.

I know, I know, there is a debate whether it is better to fund the drug running terrorists that kill drug running communist terrorists or not, but that’s not the point.

Unless he just passed it off, he is defending the wrongful death suit of 393 villagers and banana farmers that Chiquita is allegedly linked to.

No, this guy couldn’t be as evil as Hillary, but he certainly isn’t anyone I would like to see running justice.

Just imagine the grilling with his record if he were a Republican!

Regards