Comments on: H.R. 6257 – June 2008 – Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008 – Am I seeing things ? http://www.redstate.com/etcartman/2008/11/17/hr-6257-june-2008-assault-weapons-ban-r/ Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:54:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Grim http://www.redstate.com/etcartman/2008/11/17/hr-6257-june-2008-assault-weapons-ban-r/#comment-63 Grim Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:49:02 +0000 #comment-63 <p>...that the previous assault weapons ban actually accomplished anything. Want to ban the $1,000 AK-47? No problem, I'll buy the $100 Chinese SKS that uses the same round.</p> <p>Grim</p> …that the previous assault weapons ban actually accomplished anything. Want to ban the $1,000 AK-47? No problem, I’ll buy the $100 Chinese SKS that uses the same round.

Grim

]]> By: jsteele http://www.redstate.com/etcartman/2008/11/17/hr-6257-june-2008-assault-weapons-ban-r/#comment-62 jsteele Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:17:25 +0000 #comment-62 <p>... is that this piece of unconstitutional malarky was produced by people who claim to be Republicans! Forget the subject of the bill for a moment, Republicans proposing to ride roughshod over a constitutionally guaranteed right? </p> … is that this piece of unconstitutional malarky was produced by people who claim to be Republicans! Forget the subject of the bill for a moment, Republicans proposing to ride roughshod over a constitutionally guaranteed right?

]]> By: tcgeol http://www.redstate.com/etcartman/2008/11/17/hr-6257-june-2008-assault-weapons-ban-r/#comment-61 tcgeol Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:58:17 +0000 #comment-61 <p>actually cared what the Constitution said. They will have to answer to God someday for the enormous lie most of them tell when they are sworn into office. </p> <p>The Heller case helps some here, but Congress will use the excuse of "reasonable" laws that was mentioned by the court. There was some interesting discussion on The High Road (firearms forum) concerning a reading of Heller that might be more pro-gun that normally thought. It probabl won't be much help, but you never know.</p> actually cared what the Constitution said. They will have to answer to God someday for the enormous lie most of them tell when they are sworn into office.

The Heller case helps some here, but Congress will use the excuse of “reasonable” laws that was mentioned by the court. There was some interesting discussion on The High Road (firearms forum) concerning a reading of Heller that might be more pro-gun that normally thought. It probabl won’t be much help, but you never know.

]]> By: DONTREADONME http://www.redstate.com/etcartman/2008/11/17/hr-6257-june-2008-assault-weapons-ban-r/#comment-60 DONTREADONME Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:14:46 +0000 #comment-60 <p>Yeah, I saw that and the date and figured it was DOA. Whoa, maybe I overlooked it because, do I think I see the dash R's near the names of the sponsors? </p> Yeah, I saw that and the date and figured it was DOA. Whoa, maybe I overlooked it because, do I think I see the dash R’s near the names of the sponsors?

]]>