We have met the enemy, and it is you. Yes, YOU.


I am done with Redstate. From Eric to whomever, it has become an echo chamber of discontent. No one is perfect. No one is worthy. No one is electable.  Everyone sucks.

I’m done. Out. Screw Eric, and the lot of you. YOU are the problem. YOU are why we don’t win elections. YOU are why Democrats keep getting elected. YOU are why this country is the way it is.

I have been a magisterial district chairman, I have been a state central committee member; I have even been a state director for a major presidential candidate…..all to no avail. Why? Because of YOU. Because someone wasn’t “pure” enough.  Because someone, back in the day, supported “X”….and now they don’t meet the Reagan test…Reagan, who could not possibly meet the test you have laid forth.

You….YOU…who now insist, after the debacles of Dole and McCain, swear allegiance to “never another RINO” in the justifiable hope that it all burn down under Obama. that somehow the GOP will come out ahead.

Santorum is a big government conservative. Newt, likewise, except with more baggage. Romney is, at best, a liar. Huntsman…who has the best economic policy of the bunch, …is unelectable because he betrayed his employer, Obama himself. Perry is beyond inarticulate, and the rest have dropped out.

Everyone sucks.

And yet the man occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Ave,  is beyond incompetent…he is a traitor and a Marxist. But that’s ok, because he’s better than [insert you least favorite candidate here].

Redstate — as influential and efficacious as it is and has become — is now all about tearing down whoever is leading in some “poll” (and really, has anyone here ever been called???), and — rightly or wrongly — become the arbiter of GOP purity, elections be damned.
If YOU would rather elect Obama, than support the GOP nominee, whoever that might be, YOU are part of the problem. If YOU are tired of nominating RINO’s because the mainstream media says “this is your candidate”, then you are naive at best, because no matter whom we nominate, they will all be subjected to a level of scrutiny that would make even Mother Theresa shudder in embarrassment.

Having watched 4 frontrunners implode — Pawlenty, Bachmann, Perry, Gingrich — at the HANDS OF CONSERVATIVES,  because they weren’t perfect — P E R F E C T — I now see the Internet for what it is: an echo chamber of discontent, with no viable alternative to some Reaganesque utopia which never existed.

Ronald Reagan himself could not escape the vitriol of hate that exists in this environment. I have even see the comment “Better Jimmy Carter, than the milquetoast version of “conservatism” that the “Old Man” gave us”

Burn it all down…purity above reality. And watch the Tea Party become a footnote in history.

As William F. Buckley said, elect the most conservative candidate that stands a chance of winning (to paraphrase). No one said anything about perfection.

My guy is Rick Perry. He’s the only one fighting illegal immigration. He’s got the best record when it comes to taxes and regulation. But he can’t put two sentences together. I don’t care…I’m done with words and spin, and look at performance. My next choice is Newt. But regardless, even if my party should choose Ron Paul, I will support this party’s candidate over THE TRAITOR that now occupies the White House no matter what.

Because, at the end of the day, Redstate doesn’t elect anyone.  If anything, it has devolved into a “how to exclude a candidate from consideration” free-for-all, based on some arbitrary definition of conservatism, and purity, which only goes to ensure the election of liberal, socialistic Democrats.

WE are our own worst enemy. Democrats would never bring up the arcane, ancient, and banal history of any given GOP candidate, in large part because they, too, are guilty of the same. Yet we destroy a man’s reputation, his family, his legacy, and his possibility for greatness by determining, based on one factoid, that “he’s a squish and a liberal”.

Done and out… “X” voted this way 200 years ago, therefore I cannot in good conscious vote for him/her. Better that Obama hasten the decline so we can get about rebuilding in the image of our forefathers”

I’ve seen it a hundred times on this site.

Redstate used to be the loyal opposition…it has now become the “angry and annoyed” Internet version of MySpace…where no reason or logic is allowed, and emotion runs free.

I want Rick Perry ( or Newt Gingrich, or even Rick Santorum). And I will emphatically vote for Mitt Romney if he is our nominee. But I am done with RedState…as Erick has allowed this to become an echo chamber of hate and discontent; where even our fellow conservatives are unfit to draw breath on this planet because at some point in the past they supported [insert least favorite conservative cause here].

This has been some time in the coming. When I realized that even Ronald Reagan, based on his record as Governor of California, was no longer acceptable to the vast majority of contributors, I knew that Erick had let this place “jump the shark”. I was a state director for both Ronald Reagan and Pat Buchanan, and I now find I am in the minority…because no one is perfect. And too many here would rather see it “all burn down” than vote for another RINO.

“All burn down” sounds good on paper. In reality, it means someone’s child goes hungry, or a family gets evicted and is homeless. A liberal argument to the heartstrings, to be sure, but given the dependence that we’ve allowed this government to have in our lives, reality nonetheless.  And that anger has consequences, to the very detriment of the GOP, who will be blamed for everything.

At the end, support whoever, but do so respectfully…as the candidate you loath today, may be the candidate you must vote for tomorrow. And if your RedState inclination is to watch it all burn down, lest a less than pure, perfect candidate get nominated, then yes…you are one of us, and the very enemy we seek to fight everyday.

I have seen the enemy, and they are weak. I have seen another enemy, and it is US, where the enemy of the perfect is the good…led in large part by Erick himself, and others on his “front page” (witness the extensive and exhaustive voting record of Santorum). When we find someone with the looks. charisma, and an Obamba-esque voting record, which entails …what?….then we will have our nominee.

In the meantime, we gots what we gots. Embrace it…or you’ve got 4 more years of “The One”



RSS feed

54 Comments Leave a comment

Bunny needed here.

NightTwister (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 11:01AM EST (link)

Seriously dude, they have pills for this.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill

 

Preview of what Obama will throw at Romney if Republicans are stupid enough to nominate Romney

izoneguy (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 11:09AM EST (link)

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

What do you mean "if", izoneguy?

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 11:12AM EST (link)

Republicans are stupid enough to do anything! Even vote for a big-government nanny-stater like Santourm/Romney/Gingrich.

So here we sit after 3 years of Obama

izoneguy (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 11:24AM EST (link)

And folks are wondering what is going on???
Duh, elections have consequences.

Peter & the wolf was one of my favorite stories growing up.

Some hunters, who have been tracking the wolf, come out of the forest ready to shoot, but Peter gets them to help him take the wolf to a zoo in a victory parade (the piece was first performed for an audience of pioneers during May Day celebrations) that includes himself, the bird, the hunters leading the wolf, the cat and grumpy grumbling Grandfather (“What if Peter hadn’t caught the wolf? What then?”) In the story’s ending, the listener is told that “if you listen very carefully, you’d hear the duck quacking inside the wolf’s belly, because the wolf in his hurry had swallowed her alive.”

The American public is the duck quacking inside the wolf’s belly….
Still alive, but…..

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

 
 
 

Since erinmist is gone, can this be an open thread?

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 11:17AM EST (link)

n/t

Here's an episode of the Smurf's:

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 11:19AM EST (link)
 
 

And still..

erinmist (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 1:19PM EST (link)

no one refutes a single premise.

Michael Shea

We thought you were gone?

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 1:39PM EST (link)

Need some help? I can drop a personal note to Neil if that would help in the transition for you.

 
 

"My guy is Rick Perry. He’s the only one fighting illegal immigration."

humbleconservative Monday, January 9th at 1:27PM EST (link)

Like the time he offered illegals taxpayer-funded tuition? Oh, wait. Face it, guys, we’re stuck in a quagmire. We need a true conservative to lead us out of this mess.

humble, you're simply wrong on this.

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 1:35PM EST (link)

It’s been thrashed out here more than once, look it up. You’re either ignorant of the policy, in which case you need to study up on it and apologize for your ignorance. If you’re not ignorant then you’re simply lying about the issue in which case you should be banned. For stupidity.

 

Hey, humbleconservative. You may want to buy a clue.

acat (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 1:42PM EST (link)

First, under Perry, the Texas Rangers set up naval enforcement units to interdict illegals on the Rio Grande, Falcon Lake, and other places where the border is underwater. The Border Patrol? Not so much.

Second, Texas has no income tax, so the college fund comes out of property and sales taxes. Illegals who have been in Texas for 3 years have paid into the college fund. Idiot.

Further, illegals who qualify must have attended Texas high schools for 3 years, must graduate, and must get into college on their own merit. They also must pay the in-state rate out of pocket, no scholarships or “set asides”.

Let’s try a thought experiment. Let’s take the cost of the in-state vs. out-of-state tuition rate at community colleges – which is where most students go, being broke. Now, compare that to the cost of the legal staff to defend Texas, should the illegals sue to gain in-state rates, as has happened in other States.

It’s too bad, humbleconservative, that you can’t think in more than bumper-sticker-sized pieces.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

It's a matter of principle, something that you wouldn't understand.

humbleconservative Monday, January 9th at 2:06PM EST (link)

We should not be investing money in illegal immigrants. We should be investing money in keeping them out. If they don’t have legal citizenship, tough nuts. They can move back to Mexico or suck it up in America.

No, humbleconservative, that's a Federal vs. State issue.

acat (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:11PM EST (link)

Were you aware that the Federal immigration service stopped shipping illegals found in Texas back to Mexico years ago?

I reiterate – learn to think in terms larger than just a bumper sticker.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

The crappiness of our federal immigration service has no bearing on the fact that Perry offered handouts to illegals.

humbleconservative Monday, January 9th at 2:13PM EST (link)

That alone should disqualify him from the GOP race. I’m not interested in another Reagan-Bush illegal lovefest.

Wrong, humbleconservative. Go ahead and keep posting your bumper-sticker logic, though.

acat (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:16PM EST (link)

There is no handout.

Federal courts have found that States can’t use citizenship to determine who gets benefits.

The problem is in D.C., not Austin.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 

Hey Paultard, crawl back in your hole.

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:18PM EST (link)

nt…

 
 

This guy is an example of why we have three statist front-runners.

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:16PM EST (link)

Can we form a third party for the obtuse and put them all in it?

Actually jack, he's the example of why Neil has a blam stick.

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:19PM EST (link)

nt….

So what you're saying is that we already made such a party,

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:21PM EST (link)

and he’s already in it. Gotcha.

 
 

Umm, jake? Don't go there.

acat (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:21PM EST (link)

Just .. don’t.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 

So the principle is what?

texashistorian (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:18PM EST (link)

The Federal government has since 1965 refused to take immigration seriously, and illegal immigration has been laxly enforced since that time. What principle should Texas follow in light of that?

What we have is a population of people that are not going to rounded up and deported by the Federal government. Texas cannot do that- in my home town in East Texas, the p.d. did a big illegal sweep about 4 years ago or so. What do you think happened? ICE did not process the vast majority of them, and most were released.

Now, there they are, some with children, many of whom are sucking up resources in the form of WIC, AFDC Emergency room services, and other benefits that they cannot or will not be denied. Gov. Perry and many of us in Texas (including the vast bulk of the legislature) recognizes that we need some of these children to become givers rather than takes if they are going to be here anyway.

Fix the illegal immigration problem by securing the borders, and cracking down hard on employers and the majority will self deport because they cannot get work. Then you can round up the rest as you find them. Problem solved. When that gets done by the federal government, the Texas DREAM act becomes a moot point; there will be no need. But until it gets done, states will have to do what they can to make the best of carp situation.

The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false.

- Paul Johnson

No need to round up any

gabs Monday, January 9th at 2:26PM EST (link)

if the employers are uniformly put in jail, whether it’s a business owner or someone hiring a gardener. Mandatory jail time = no more hiring = no more workers coming here. The fact that this hasn’t been done in a widespread or serious way is proof that those hiring and the politicians are in cahoots and the politicians have no intention of actually doing anything. Maybe that’s the reality of the economy, but the solution is simple and cheap, if people really want it. Throw those hiring into jail for about 5 years per employee and there won’t be one job offered to any illegal immigrant. And after a few people suffer that fate, the rest will get the picture and they won’t be clogging up the jails.

Agree, gabs .. but it's still a *Federal* issue.

acat (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:33PM EST (link)

Texas can’t conduct raids and put employers in jail.

Look at the lawsuits the Obama DOJ filed against Alabama and Arizona to block their anti-illegal laws.

I’m all for the Fed allowing States to go after companies employing illegals. Heck, let the States fine employers, and we’ll see some balance sheets looking healthy real quick.

That said, the problem remains in D.C., and we need to focus on fixing it, not on stupidity like blaming a governor for not doing something he or she *can’t* legally do.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 

question: matter of principle

tyman Monday, January 9th at 2:19PM EST (link)

Who pays for illegals since the Fed won’t deport them?

The answer is the state. Texas can’t deport them and they can’t refuse wellfare, etc. SCOTUS also states that the states must educate children of illegals K-12 (if the state pays for this, in-state tuition for 1% of college attendees isn’t going to break the bank, especially since the illegals paid taxes via State Sales Tax): when was the last time you heard Santorum or any of the other candidates cry out against this? Just like Bachmann complaining about Gardasil, but when she was in MN’s legis., she didn’t vote against any vaccination legislation. Hypocrites!

Given that, do you really think that Gov. Perry and the legislators who signed this really want more illegals to drain the state?

While we’re talking money, how much of Texas’ money did Gov. Perry “invest” to secure the border?

The last I heard, it was about $400 million dollars, and Perry even had the nerve to ask the Fed to reimburse them for a job the Fed should be doing.

 
 
 

And what "true conservative" would that be humbleconservative?

conservativemusician Monday, January 9th at 1:58PM EST (link)

Hard to tell who you really support since you are new and don’t have an extensive posting history here yet, but you sound like a Ronulan to me. So I ask again…what “true conservative” of the candidates we have remaining will “lead us out of this mess”?

I like Ron Paul a lot.

humbleconservative Monday, January 9th at 2:11PM EST (link)

I think he’s an intelligent man of solid Christian values. I think he’s a good man committed to his beliefs. However, many of his ideas are out of touch with mainstream America, and his lack of charisma makes him unelectable. I’m anticipating a Romney ticket for the 2012 GOP but I expect Obama to eke out re-election. Hopefully when 2016 comes around we’ll have a better range of options available to choose from.

Bingo. You're not a "humbleconservative". You're a supporter of anti-Semitic racists.

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:17PM EST (link)

You win today’s award for Dumb Post hands down.

Next you’ll be telling us that David Duke is a man of “solid Christian values”. Why not, he believes the stuff Paul published and personally promoted in his newsletter.

Float on excrement.

That sort of namecalling is fit only for liberals and their ilk.

humbleconservative Monday, January 9th at 2:20PM EST (link)

I’m not going to waste my time defending Paul, but screaming “RACIST” and “ANTI-SEMITE” makes you sound like a Democrat. Get a grip.

The only people who object to rightly noting that Paul is a racist

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:28PM EST (link)

etc, are those who hold the same beliefs.

I’ve got a grip. I understand exactly who Ron Paul is, he’s made no bones about it. Oh, and you’re the one SCREAMING, not me. I’m simply making the obvious and factual point.

You’re half life here is about up I’m guessing.

 
 
 

Ah, you're a Paulisitine. Please take your anti-imigration frustration up with Ron Paul....

acat (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:18PM EST (link)

after all, he’s been in Congress for decades now, and there hasn’t yet been a Paul Bill to increase border enforcement.

Idiot.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

I strongly disagree with Paul's views on illegal immigration.

humbleconservative Monday, January 9th at 2:22PM EST (link)

Sorry, bro, just because I like the guy doesn’t mean I support everything he says.

So humble, you go out of your way to tell us you disagree on immigration.

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:25PM EST (link)

So, his views on the destruction of Israel and his overt racism are OK.

Got it.

And, just a quick note, by now NOBODY cares what you say.

 

Cool story, bro.

acat (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:31PM EST (link)

(null)

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 

Time's up.

streiff (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 4:26PM EST (link)

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

streiff, that's just wrong!

acat (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 4:40PM EST (link)

My eyes! MY EYES!

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 

That photo should be censored, streiff.

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 5:14PM EST (link)

There’s a giant dick right on the sign.

Jake you slay me....

texastaxpayer (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 5:25PM EST (link)

Now that’s funny…… Good one bro…

“Texas will again lift it’s head and stand among the nations. It ought to do so, for no country upon the globe can compare with it in natural advantages.” Sam Houston

 
 
 
 
 

We'll see, humbleconservative

lineholder (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 2:25PM EST (link)

I don’t know whether you’re support Ron Paul and are just trying to hide the fact so you don’t get the blam stick here at RS or whether you really support Romney.

If you’re supporting Ron Paul, you’re wasting your breath here at RS.

If you’re supporting Mitt Romney, then you better hope to goodness that all the little skeletons in the man’s closet see the light of day NOW. If not, then he definitely will lose against Obama because the MSM will turn him into mincemeat in about two seconds flat.

 
 
 
 

Good try, still doesn't work for me....

david1313 Monday, January 9th at 1:46PM EST (link)

he said I didn’t have a heart. How did he know?

He knew because he's smarter than you think he is

tyman Monday, January 9th at 1:57PM EST (link)

I can’t believe the amount of people that will accept REALLY bad policy by other candidates and won’t accept an apology from Gov. Perry. I truly think Perry was really frustrated at being ganged up on by the other candidates. Not to mention being in pain from his back surgery.

It was a surprise to me, as well, that once Perry entered the race, the debates stopped being one big lovefest.

It is really a good thing that he is smarter than....

david1313 Monday, January 9th at 2:36PM EST (link)

I think he is. Truely. I accept his apology, but I still allow it to inform my opinion. I think he meant to say that. That is the problem with Perry, his supporters have to spend an aweful lot of time on two things:

1) How in the world can he win now, and not be just someone splitting the vote?

2) What did he really mean when he said _______________?

Perry's supporters' time

tyman Monday, January 9th at 3:14PM EST (link)

I think Perry supporters spend no more time defending him than Flipper’s supporters.

Perry can win. What if the pollsters are geared toward making people FEEL like he can’t win?

I’m still not convinced that Democrats didn’t vote for Santorum and Romney in Iowa. Is there any way to prove this?

Fox has really engaged in a Perry blackout since the beginning. They conveniently left him off of their poll the day after the Iowa caucus and it was just an oversight. It just happens too much that he gets left out of their news.

Why is Perry any more of a longshot than Romney or Santorum in the south? Of all the people that didn’t like Romney last time, will they really change their minds? I’m still concerned about Dems crossing over and voting in GOP Primaries.

I don’t know exactly what Perry meant to say, but then again I don’t know of anyone who says everything perfectly all of the time. Not even Reagan.

I’m not directing this at you personally, David, but I’m incredulous that so many people have let that one line dictate their opinion of Perry versus ALL of the good things that he has done.

Of all the candidates, Perry is the one that so many become absolutely giddy when it comes to reporting his poll numbers, saying “he can’t win” or just bad news for him, in general.

If Perry isn’t the nominee, whether it’s the potential nominee or Obama who wins, I think he’ll go back to Texas and ramp up their dominance of the U.S. economy. If Obama does win, I think he owes Gov. Perry a big thank you for not making the economy look even worse.

The Fox blackout? Do you remember when Perry entered the race?

JSobieski (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 3:40PM EST (link)

Huge buildup beforehand. When his poll numbers took off, there was no “blackout”. The “blackout” happened when his poll numbers tanked.

When he had Huntsman poll numbers, he received Huntsman-level coverage.

I know how you feel, but conservatives are supposed to use reason as well as feelings. People at RS complained about Fox’s treatment of Fred in 2008 when his numbers dropped.

Fox coverage is based on poll numbers. Santorum couldn’t get on a Fox show until his numbers in Iowa popped.

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

Fox coverage

tyman Monday, January 9th at 4:38PM EST (link)

I see part of what you’re saying, but I remember Bachmann still getting coverage after her crash. That immediately comes to mind.

Even before Perry’s poll numbers came down, Fox never gave him a shot to defend himself. The rock story comes to mind.

It’s not just the poll the other day, it’s been over and over again. I don’t watch Fox on a regular basis, but I’ve seen enough in both what I do catch, and what they post on their website.

To tell you the truth, I think that Fox wants Obama to get re-elected. If you look at their numbers, they’ve actually gotten more viewers while he’s been in office…I think that’s when they took over the lead from CNN.

Could it then be said that Fox is handing the election to Obama by pushing Romney? I’ll let you decide, but I believe that Romney’s nomination gives the election to Obama, as well as keeping the Senate in Democrat hands. That’s probably considered good for Fox’s viewership, especially considering that Fox has declared that they don’t want to be considered right leaning any longer.

 
 
 

Actually if you look at the tape of the debate you will see that he was responding to rick santorum.

texastaxpayer (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 3:20PM EST (link)

But you go ahead and throw away the most successful conservative governor in contemporary America and run one if the others. I am sure a failed governor, an inexperienced legislator or an ex speaker with more baggage than American airlines are going to have mega success in an election all about economics. You are heartless, your forcing your children and theirs into the slavery which is Obama and his policies. Hope you enjoy the results.

“Texas will again lift it’s head and stand among the nations. It ought to do so, for no country upon the globe can compare with it in natural advantages.” Sam Houston

texastaxpayer, every Perry supporter needs to lose the word "heartless" from their vocabulary

lineholder (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 3:24PM EST (link)

Seriously. You aren’t helping Perry one bit. It doesn’t focus on the man’s strengths. It doesn’t encourage people to consider him more.

Sorry didnt realize the ministry of communications had decided heartless was an "unword".

texastaxpayer (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 5:02PM EST (link)

Lineholder the “heartless” attack is the last line used by people who have lost the debate of strengths and need something with more.credibility than “I just don’t like him” to respond with. So I will respectfully disregard your “suggestion” whether it “helps Perry” or not. To pick the leader of the free world based on this kind of nonsense is how we ended up with Obama in the first place.

“Texas will again lift it’s head and stand among the nations. It ought to do so, for no country upon the globe can compare with it in natural advantages.” Sam Houston

Your choice, texastaxpayer

lineholder (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 5:09PM EST (link)

I don’t see how it helps Perry in the least. As a matter of fact, it probably makes things worse than they already are. But if you want dig deeper into that hole, that’s your choice to make, not mine.

Fair Enough Lineholder....

texastaxpayer (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 5:20PM EST (link)

Though like I said, I have yet to see a rational person use the attack but I will keep your advice in mind should I encounter one :)

“Texas will again lift it’s head and stand among the nations. It ought to do so, for no country upon the globe can compare with it in natural advantages.” Sam Houston

This is election season---rationality has depressing little to do with anything

JSobieski (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 5:40PM EST (link)

nt

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

 
 
 
 
 

Texas is a successful State, has been for a long..

david1313 Monday, January 9th at 4:19PM EST (link)

time, with or without Mr. Perry. He has been a good enough governor, but let’s not get carried away. I have been in Texas all my life and we have had some good governors, Rick is one I would rate about a 7 on a scale of 1 -10. Same grade that he got most of the time in college. Rick is a smart man, but has never been one to ‘think on his feet’ very well. He is still governor because no one mounted a credible challenge. Kay Bailey was a moderate than I could not support. I will support and work tirelessly to help Rick Perry become President if nominated. I just don’t think he can win, and I do not think he is the best candidate in the field. Period.

Your entitled to your opinion of course...

texastaxpayer (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 5:12PM EST (link)

But as a fellow native of Texas I think you are wrong in a couple of key things.
KBH certainly didn’t run as a moderate, Perry has trailing by 20% in the polls leading up to the vote. Additionally KBH had the support of bush, love and the GOP establishment in her corner. To suggest that she didn’t point a serious challenge is foolish or dishonest, you choose.
Rick Perry inherited a divided government from W. The conservative majorities we enjoy in Austin now are a result of Perry’s hard work and success. W never managed the same level of economic or electoral success as governor so I don’t think your grading is fair unless W was at 5 or 6 on your scale. It’s easy to forget that texas had a democrat governor, house and senate a little over a decade ago.
Rick Perry has managed his successful during the worst economy since the great depression, surely that counts for something.

Finally, by any measure you choose Rick Perry is the most successful governor in contemporary America PERIOD. Who in the field can honestly beat his record in an election about the economy?

“Texas will again lift it’s head and stand among the nations. It ought to do so, for no country upon the globe can compare with it in natural advantages.” Sam Houston

darn auto correct...

texastaxpayer (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 5:16PM EST (link)

Supposed to be support of bush,rove ect…
and she posed not point a serious threat…. Lol…
Hate Android…..

“Texas will again lift it’s head and stand among the nations. It ought to do so, for no country upon the globe can compare with it in natural advantages.” Sam Houston

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Well, well... where shall we start, Skippy?

Bill S (Diary) Monday, January 9th at 4:42PM EST (link)

First, you probably should just stay gone because you’ve burned through any goodwill you may have had.

Second, it appears you live in a tunnel-visioned world, despite all that glorious experience you have in politics, because things are just the same outside Redstate as they are in here. That is, the entire GOP/conservative universe is all about finding THE PERFECT CANDIDATE right now.

I personally have bemoaned that here multiple times. I will spare the readership yet another link to the post I did a couple of years ago about the “Conservative continuum”, where I pointed out that conservatism ain’t binary and there is a broad spectrum of conservatives/Republicans out there. This is why I detest the term “RINO”, because it is rarely used on true “Republicans In Name Only”. Guys like Ron Paul and Arlen Specter, who change parties because they were Republicans out of convenience, ARE RINOs. Others, like Romney or Huntsman or even Rick Santorum are not RINO. The fact that they don’t adhere to every single tenet of conservatism doesn’t mean they’re not GOPers – it means they are not 100% TRUE CONSERVATIVES!!!11! And I use that term derogatorily, as there are so many yahoos here on Redstate who whine about candidates not being “True Conservatives”.

So, in one small way, I am agreeing with what you posted. But I don’t take you seriously because you have decided to whine and cry and be an attention whore who wants us to LOOK AT YOU rather than participating in this community as a productive member.

So…over and out, Junior.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins