The Horserace for January 26, 2012


This is it. The final debate before Florida will be tonight from Jacksonville, FL on CNN. It may be the final debate of the primary season. If it becomes just Mitt, Newt, and Ron, there is no way that MItt Romney will want to share the stage with them after tonight.

I’ll be on CNN for post debate coverage, though I’ll be in Atlanta tonight. All you need to know is that the latest CNN poll has something like a 22 point swing toward Newt Gingrich, but a lot of post South Carolina polling settled back down from irrational exuberance to Romney still ahead.

Tonight, expect a concerted Romney effort to bring out the really angry Newt. Expect Gingrich to try to throw off Romney. In fact, we may not hear from Santorum and Paul unless they get called on. This is all the Mitt and Newt show. They don’t like each other and both have a lot on the line.

One wild card factor — does Rick Santorum stay in? There are rumors circulating he may drop out before Florida because he is out of money. His campaign says no. But we’ll see. If he leaves, polls show most of his voters go to Gingrich, but I’m not sure that’s actually right.

We’ll get into it all below the fold.

Newt Gingrich

Gingrich must perform well tonight in the debate. Debates help Gingrich with momentum and the NBC debate has not fully been factored into polling. He did not do well in that debate. He must shine tonight and he’ll have an audience to help him along.

But it is not just polling and I think a lot of people have been complicit in saying “debates won it” when there is more to the story.

I’ve talked to a number of people in South Carolina and they are all stunned at how the press has missed the story about the Newt v. Romney ground game in South Carolina. According to a number of people I and others have talked to, Newt relied on the traditional grassroots network in South Carolina, outsourcing it to the Speaker, various sheriffs, etc.

Romney’s campaign bussed in volunteers from out of state including a heavy contingent from Brigham Young and they were sign holders and phone bankers, but they didn’t do traditional GOTV operations.

I think the polling bears out this reality.

In my experience from running campaigns, a well run campaign can match its polling. A well run campaign with well run GOTV can exceed its polling. A well run campaign with a poorly run GOTV operation will never reach its polling. This bears out time and time again in campaigns.

If we look at South Carolina, the final RCP Average was Newt at 33.5% and Romney at 28.5%.

The final results were Newt at 40.4% and Romney at 27.8%. Debate performance cannot explain Newt topping the polling average by 6.9%. The only thing that really explains it is ground game getting the people wowed by the debate performance to the polls.

In Florida, Newt needs a good ground game, not just good debate performances. His related Super PAC has some heavy lifting to do.

Ron Paul

Ron Paul will not be the nominee and does not expect to be the nominee. But he is going to do better than many have expected and he’ll get a prime spot at the Republican National Convention to bore us all with Austrian economics.

Mitt Romney

It is his race to lose. If he wins in Florida, the conventional wisdom will be that he is the nominee. The races after Florida up to Super Tuesday favor Mitt Romney, including Arizona, Nevada, and Michigan. But Gingrich will have Georgia on Super Tuesday and they’ll be able to fight over the rest.

Romney is on all the ballots, has the most money, and has the best organization. But the Republican base continues to bristle. If he cannot win Florida, he cannot win the nomination. There is much at stake in tonight’s CNN debate and there is much at stake for Romney on Tuesday. He’s the favorite to win, but Newt can draw it close.

One good thing for Romney — he is better at throwing Newt off his game in a debate than Newt is at throwing Mitt off his game.

Rick Santorum

He will not be the nominee. He is out of money. He cannot put in the time in Florida or elsewhere that he put in in all 99 counties in Iowa. There are rumors he may drop out.

Santorum’s support, polls suggest, would go to Newt. I think it would probably be a wash, which is an advantage to Romney. There’d be one less guy fighting him and when forced to confront Newt Gingrich’s personal issues, a lot of Santorum’s support would slowly shift to Mitt Romney or stay home. That’s all Romney needs.

There is an effort to keep Santorum in the race out of Washington on the theory that he keeps Gingrich from consolidating conservatives. That is the most likely scenario. The question for Santorum is who does he want as his nominee. If we wants MItt, he stays in. If he wants Newt, he gets out. Ultimately though, I still think his supporters trickle to Mitt. Maybe not in Florida, but I think it happens even with Gingrich still in the race.


Category:

RSS feed

94 Comments Leave a comment

Stick a fork in Romney. If he loses Florida

Tbone (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:06PM EST (link)

Newt becomes the frontrunner and Romney will start smelling a lot like a loser.

Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.

 

I think you called it, Erick

NickDeringer (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:11PM EST (link)

“It is his [Romney's ]race to lose.”

InTrade has flipped in the last few days.

They are now showing for the Florida primary.

Romney 81.6%
Gingrich 19.0%

If there’s a thrid coming of Newt, it will be follod by a thrid collapsing of Newt.

Shocker. The candibot speaks. (nt)

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:07PM EST (link)

.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 
 

My Head Is Spinning

carmen Thursday, January 26th at 12:12PM EST (link)

I have read pro-Newt stuff. I have read pro-Mitt stuff. I’d read more about Santorum if I thought he had a realistic shot. And I know enough of Paul to not bother education myself about his voting record; his foreign policy stuff is just THAT coo-coo.

I CANNOT wrap my brain around a “conservative” backing, and signing into law, an individual mandate – states’ rights not withstanding.

I CANNOT wrap my brain around a “conservative” who believe such a mandate would be the answer at the federal level – going so far as to advocate it through the mid-2000s.

I CANNOT wrap my brain around a “conservative” backing Tsongas in 1992.

I CANNOT wrap my brain around a “conservative” declaring that Bush 41 abandon Reagan (who was, in his words, “a failure”) or risk losing his election bid.

I CANNOT wrap my brain around a “conservative” believing in man-made global warming, advocating for cap and trade or sitting on a couch with Stretch Pelosi.

Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera…

Is it just me, or is YOUR head spinning too???

So, this becomes a “stop Obama at all costs” election, in which case, only Romney seems to have the appeal (and national polling numbers) to have a shot at it.

I’m just beyond sick.

I think you've got it actually

In The Hook (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:19PM EST (link)

Your choices are between two guys with inconsistent at best records when it comes to conservatism. The main difference is that one is an egomanical demagogue who trails all head to heads by 10+ points and the other is basically a Republican John Kerry who is basically tied in head to heads.

What an awesome choice.

“Hello? You play to win the game.”
Support conservatives that can win.
http://www.marcorubio.com

yes/not, but

levinsaidso Thursday, January 26th at 3:44PM EST (link)

I’m never voting for another RINO, this stopped since 2010 when I voted for everyone but the RINO on the ballot. I’m doing this if Romney is the nominee.

Personally I think the base is more pissed off of the establishment game that is going on than anything else. Either we get a “good enough” Conservative like Newt or I’m helping to take down Romney in the the general.

His mere nomination is going to be the downfall of the GOP, let alone if we let him win. Better to lose this one, galvanize the movement around solid Senate and House members and stop obama’s every move from there.

It is these John Boehner type Republicans (Cantor, McCarthy, McConnell, Romney, Dole, McCain, etc) that aren’t doing their damn job now.

I say we go third party in 2016, scrap the electoral college I don’t care, but I’m not voting for the piece of crap Romney.

 
 

Carmen

conservativeparrothead Thursday, January 26th at 12:31PM EST (link)

I think one thing that we know, is that if you have been in politics long enough, you are probably going to have inconsistencies in your efforts to be conservative along the way.

Reagan, is the perfect example of this, but I think we all knew despite his record as Governor in CA, he wasnt going to Washington to “manage” the Carter damage and “manage” a standing in the world for America. He was going to there to reverse the course of history and this nation.

When I see Newt, I see the same type of figure, yes he has done things that arent somewhat conservative, but he has been there, he knows the game and he knows how to take an argument and shape it in a way that will win the argument for conservatives. The things we are knocking him on now, arent going to diminish him in the general, in fact may actually help.

Mitt on the other hand, CEO type who probably wont change much and essentially “manage” what is there now. His general election electability I think will be much worse, he cant articulate and draw those contrasts that Newt can with Obama.

As for Santorum, I would love to see him partner up with Newt, get the VP slot and work some of his proposals in with Newt and have a true partnership moving forward.

I found it interesting in his Red State Diary, it was all Anti-Mitt. Could be a couple reasons for this, I dont think a Romney win in Florida is a good thing for Santorum.

 

Carmen

conservativeparrothead Thursday, January 26th at 12:31PM EST (link)

I think one thing that we know, is that if you have been in politics long enough, you are probably going to have inconsistencies in your efforts to be conservative along the way.

Reagan, is the perfect example of this, but I think we all knew despite his record as Governor in CA, he wasnt going to Washington to “manage” the Carter damage and “manage” a standing in the world for America. He was going to there to reverse the course of history and this nation.

When I see Newt, I see the same type of figure, yes he has done things that arent somewhat conservative, but he has been there, he knows the game and he knows how to take an argument and shape it in a way that will win the argument for conservatives. The things we are knocking him on now, arent going to diminish him in the general, in fact may actually help.

Mitt on the other hand, CEO type who probably wont change much and essentially “manage” what is there now. His general election electability I think will be much worse, he cant articulate and draw those contrasts that Newt can with Obama.

As for Santorum, I would love to see him partner up with Newt, get the VP slot and work some of his proposals in with Newt and have a true partnership moving forward.

I found it interesting in his Red State Diary, it was all Anti-Mitt. Could be a couple reasons for this, I dont think a Romney win in Florida is a good thing for Santorum.

Newt's inconsistencies wrt conservatism ...

Freedoms Truth (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:00PM EST (link)

Include claiming in the Monday debate that he was a Goldwater supporter, when in reality …

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJQsLFhuyOY
(describes the Goldwater/Rockefellar divide and then says “I was a Rockefellar state chairman in the south…”

When you see Newt, you are looking at a guy who has progressive convictions as well, but neglects to point it out, except when he starts running to Mitt’s left like he did on immigration. Newt is more like Mitt than he would admit.

 
 

I totally agree -- almost

soljerblue Thursday, January 26th at 7:28PM EST (link)

“So, this becomes a “stop Obama at all costs” election, in which case, only Romney seems to have the appeal (and national polling numbers) to have a shot at it.”

Here’s where we part company. I think Romney is McCain-light, and will go down in flames in November if he’s the nominee. Newt — with all his negatives(several dumpsters full) — MAY lose, but I’d rather take the risk with Newt than see a sure loss with Romney.

I also think that if Romney runs badly he hurts our chances for a strong Senate GOP majority, and costs us seats in the House.

As Erick has repeatedly pointed out, the Republican base doesn’t want Romney, only the party elites — which is why we’re sucking wind politically. Romney is damaged goods, a loser. But, he’ll come out on the night of November 6th, smile, and concede like the gentleman he is.

We need a knife fighter — Romney ain’t it.

 

Spinning here too

tankertodd (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 7:35PM EST (link)

As much as I don’t like or trust Romney we now have a small set of choices. I actually would prefer Ron Paul (here comes the blamming from RedState, I know) but he can’t win and he’s too different, even if he’s right on most stuff.

Gingrich also thinks FDR is the history’s best president. The guy who fixed prices on whims and screwed up the economy for over a decade. He’s just got too much baggage, and not the marital kind.

Romney is a technocrat, but Governor Snyder is probably a technocrat too and he’s accomplished a TON in Michigan in his first year. Snyder has no political experience but tons of business experience. Business leaders know how to select key metrics, measure performance and problem solve, or they get fired. (Unless they’re working for Fannie and Freddie or GM.)

Of course if there were some way to get Mitch Daniels to run…I’d walk a half mile on broken glass with a liberal on my shoulders to fix it for him to be the nominee.

———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race – Chief Justice Roberts

 
 

the Santorum factor in Florida

lizzie Thursday, January 26th at 12:29PM EST (link)

If Santorum does drop out before the vote (or even if he does not), his hard-core social conservative supporters may just sit home, even if S endorses Romney because Santorum may be deluded into believing a backroom promise as Romney’s AG. a promise Romney will never keep.

Perry’s ground troops in SC turned on a dime to help Gingrich.

I just wonder if they are doing same in Florida. The veteran and active military vote could be Gingrich’s key.

Plus, I do not care what today’s polls say, the news reports have Romney with foot-in-mouth on every issue that Florida cares about. The only way Romney wins the Miami Cubans is if his congressional endorsers (Diaz-Balarts and Ros–Lehtinen) are in overdrive mode. I still can not believe Ileana Ros-Lehtinen will go into GOTV overdrive for Romney. She is too smart for that. Of course, I still do not understand her Romney endorsement in the first place.

Too bad ECI never broadcast their “We Can do better than Ron Paul” ad in SC after Gary Bauer endorsed Santorum. Y’all can view that ad here:
http://www.committeeforisrael.com/

My impression was that Santorum had raised some money

red_oakster (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:33PM EST (link)

But if he does drop out and Newt wins Florida, you’ve got a race between a well-funded and organized establishment moderate who has lost three of the first four races, and an effective, but weakly organized candidate who has won South Carolina and Florida.

I’m not sure who has the edge in that case. Obviously, Romney would have a huge advantage and if he came back to win Florida after everything, he would be in very strong shape.

My thought, red_oakster, is that we won't know until the convention...

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:40PM EST (link)

if Romney loses Florida.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 

My humble advice to Newt.

NeoKong (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:32PM EST (link)

And the other candidates as well.
This debate belongs to the GOP candidates and the GOP audience. Not CNN.
Do not let CNN control the debate.
They are not your friend and are a tool of the Obama reelection team.

Do not allow the moderator to present false narratives about financial inequality.
Do not indulge the moderator by answering dopey question as if they are not stupid.
Do not let them silence the audience.

There is no downside to ridiculing the moderator if he starts asking lightweight or fluffy questions that have nothing to do with our nation’s pressing issues.

Finally, if the moderators are not asking the questions that GOP want to talk about then seize control while you have the spotlight and say something like “This country is $16 trillion dollars in debt and the Senate led by Harry Reid has not passed a budget in over a 1,000 days. Is there some reason you haven’t brought that up yet…?”

I do not doubt for a second that CNN wants to make Newt crash and burn tonight as this is sort of the Alamo for his campaign.
He cannot allow them to define him or his campaign in their terms and needs to push back hard when they do.
Also he cannot allow them to waste time by attempting to pick fights between him and Romney.
He needs to take it to Obama even if he has to go right around the moderator.
He needs to throw the audience some red meat.

He needs to show us a president who will stand up for conservatives.

Follow me on Twitter.

 

For The Life Of Me...I Can't Understand This

carolynr Thursday, January 26th at 12:35PM EST (link)

Romney is good at throwing Gingrich off his game and yet Perry got Romney so flustered that it was obvious that Romney will be an easy target for Obama.

I don’t like any of the candidates I have to vote for. I know this…however, I prefer any of them over Obama.

Romney is a liar. He lied through all the debates and the press never hit him on ANY OF IT. Sounds like another pimp job by the press as it was for Obama.

Now, Gingrich, according to his own words, lied in the debates. So…let’s see…who is going to win the coveted Liar in Chief. The one currently occupying the throne is a liar and anti-American. Gingrich has been all over the playing field and I don’t know what position he takes. Will he be for the American people or will his “I know better” attitude come out? Romney..he’s a cookie cut out of a Hollywood version of what a president should look like. However, the man lies. He lied with Perry, he lies about his record, he’s for…GET THIS…REPLACING OBAMACARE. This legislation alone will bankrupt America…Forget Dodd Frank and all the other crap…this is a TAX bill…redistribution…and we are listening to Romney tell us that he will “replace” it. Throw out the Constitution…let’s just give him the title KING WILLARD.

The tea party movement just sits there…no words about Obamacare…no position…just silence. And…if you do not think this is all orchestrated…try reading Drudge and see that the House has introduced a bill TO REPLACE OBAMACARE.

If the housing market didn’t stink so bad…I’d be ready to pack up and leave. No…I’ve done my bit, my demonstration, my blogging, my e-mailing, my calling Congress, my giving money that was literally burned the minute it left the envelope for “insider” ideas. Guess what…this is exactly how Obama has played this…counting on me to “surrender”…and yet…tea party and all…WHO do we have as candidates? LIARS Feel betrayed…join the crowd…it won’t do any good.

carolynr - look at the treatment of McCain in 2006/2007 ...

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:38PM EST (link)

…and tell me it’s not exactly what’s happening with Romney today.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Unreal that people don't see that.

Common_Cents (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:46PM EST (link)

romney=mccain. Just last cycle too, not like it was 20 years ago.

All the knives will be unloaded on romney if he is the nominee, or anyone for that matter. We are being intimidated to nominate the “cleanest” meekest candidate.

So the real choice is who is best to fight back and respond?

Obama=Golfer in Chief, Leading from, behind, the Back Nine.
Leaders don’t create movements. Movements create leaders. Get involved. Your future depends on it.
Govt “invests” YOUR tax money for POLITICAL return rather than economic return.

The demographic that has to be courted by both parties is different this year

fightnright Thursday, January 26th at 1:47PM EST (link)

than it was in ’08.

Romney=McCain is a failed analogy in this cycle. The indies, (R) and (D) moderates who voted D last time did so because without fixed ideologies, they chose the candidate that would deliver them from the flat-lining economy they believed was the product of 8 years of an Republican administration. There were a boatload of other reasons McCain was a failure as a candidate, too, a list of which I’ve posted here recently, but Romney is already beginning to take it to Newt in a way I disapprove of in an (R) primary, yet we will need against the leftist machine in the general election. And the miserable realities of the current state of the union will greatly limit the numbers of stay-at-home voters this time out.

The former moderates were fooled by Obama, and many have learned that a) the O was a radical in moderate clothing, and b) a radical lefty in the WH has made the economy, jobs, and business picture even worse.

But that doesn’t mean that a turn to someone clearly presenting himself as far right will not worry these center voters even more. Mitt Romney cannot be sold to anyone, right or left alike, as a radical in any sense at all.

The worst mistake that Republicans can make (*if* their prime objective is winning the election) is offering as an alternative to a failed radical moderates know, is someone who will be portrayed in the MSM and pop media as a scary radical in the bedroom closet they don’t know. I’m leaning Romney again (and getting dizzy from all these turns) though my heart belongs to Gingrich, and my head belongs to ‘none of the above’ because I fear that the more Gingrich breathes fire – not as an anti-liberal, but as a champion of the far-right Tea Party base, the more of those few vital percentage points Newt will lose us in the general.

The country may be done if drastic measures are not taken, but to do anything to save it, or even to keep it alive in the ICU for another four years, we have to win first.

Where is the tea party?

kopen Saturday, January 28th at 7:39PM EST (link)

when they put McCain up for Pres I thought the repubs had lost their senses. then he had the good sense to bring Sarah into the mix .. It was the Repubs that trashed her chances ..I believe that the repubs wanted Obuma to win .. why else would they back a milktoast like McCain .. now they are doing it again Rommney is more like Obama then not ..They are both excellent liers, and I suspect tax cheats .. but then name me a politician who doesn’t lie and cheat ..Rommney will not do a thing to get this our Country back to greatness ..He is a big Government guy .. I am not hearing much rumble from the tea party why are they so silent on the candidates ..Maybe they don’t think any of them can do the Job .. BUT any would be better than obama .. personally I think Newt might give it the best effort .. But we have to give him a closer split in congress .. there has to be a balance . or it’s going to be the same old tune ..Get out and vote folks “We the People” can turn this country around .. but we have to get rid of that nanny state mindset .. go stand in line for a job not welfare .. GOD Bless America

 
 

Face it.

cbartlett Thursday, January 26th at 6:00PM EST (link)

Either of them – Mittens or the Newt – will give us a Republican Progressive on the ballot – we don’t have a choice since Perry left the stage. We DO, however, have a choice between the Republican Progressive and the current Democratic Marxist. The problem now is to try to detemine if one or the other of the two progressives have a better chance against Obummer.

IMHO, Newt has the slight edge for two reasons – (1) Newt is much more intimidating in a debate, especially against someone so dependent on a teleprompter. BHO’s staff is probably smart enough to try to avoid as many of those confrontations as possible, so this may become a mute point – but I think Newt might find a way to exploit Obama for NOT doing it. Romney would probably just say – Oh well. (2) The Dems and MSM have been setting the stage for “class warfare” for months now. There is no better target for that issue than Romney. It won’t take anything to sneak in a “he made $42 million last year – is that fair? He should share it with you!” in every single TV ad – no matter what other issue the ad is about.
Yes – Romney=McCain. It is SO obvious.

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” Abraham Lincoln

 
 

Media harping on Romney's negatives

Freedoms Truth (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:52PM EST (link)

… a lot more than they did with McCain.

Liberal MSM is in the tank for Obama, not Romney.

Cites please, Freedoms Truth. Specifically, for mainstream coverage on Romney's flip-flops or Bain.

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:09PM EST (link)

The major media are not covering it, just as they didn’t cover McCain’s issues in 2006/2007.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

WTF ... you need a cite?

Freedoms Truth (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:18PM EST (link)

For the media coverage on Mitt’s taxes, his offshore accounts, his Bain years, etc.? Google news hits ar abundant. Mitt has not been spared much of the media microscope as compared with the other candidates, ALL of whom have gotten ‘the treatment’.

Go look at the diary I posted where AP/Yahoo reported “Mitt paid 15% in taxes” and went into gory detail, except for the minor detail that 15% qualified dividends are at that rate because the money was already taxed at corporate level.

Now go look for the media mentions of White House staffers behind on taxes. Much less.

Yes, Freedoms Truth. I want a cite.

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:23PM EST (link)

For the flip-flops on abortion.
For the Bain problems.

The mainstream media seems to be ignoring these.

Yes, they poked a bit at Willard’s taxes, but so what? They also poked Gingrich’s. They haven’t mentioned Obama’s, of course. One would like to know that he paid taxes on his Nobel prize money, eh?

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Romney hit piece cites are abundant

Freedoms Truth (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 2:31PM EST (link)

Do your own homework.
Here’s just one hit piece from ABC on the offshore accounts – never mind that ROmney paid his taxes in full and on time and did not use tax avoidance scheme – the ABC lead sentence says that Romney parked millions in a ‘tax haven’:

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/romney-parks-millions-offshore-tax-haven/story?id=15378566#.TyGqcXJaPkJ

So, Freedoms Truth ... you can't cite a hit on Bain or flip-flopping ... ?

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 2:45PM EST (link)

Because I’ve asked specifically for those.

And you’ve thrown the offshore accounts answer both times.

If you don’t have one, you can go ahead and retract your mis-statement.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Rumor is Santorum is leaving FL

Common_Cents (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:38PM EST (link)

“Santorum is scheduled to participate in Thursday night’s debate in Jacksonville along with the other three remaining Republican presidential candidates.

But then he’s set to head north this weekend for a pair of fundraisers in Virginia, where he owns a home, and he plans to prepare his tax returns for release. He told reporters this would be the first time he’d slept in his own bed since Christmas, ”

I hope Santorum drops today and endorses Gingrich. Reports are Santorum is leaving FL after tonights debate. Or if he stays in the debate, go after Romney then endorse Newt right after. FL is winner take all so Santorum is done.

People are so stuck in the past, falling for the intentional plan by the media.

We must look at candidates like investing in stocks. It’s not so much where they’ve been(although impt) but where they are going, given current and future anticipated environment.

The media narrative on Gingrich is he has no organization. It was never reported that Gingrich had the LARGEST organization of all candidates in SC. Gingrich was reported to have the LARGEST paid staff in FL, more than Romney, as well. But that doesn’t fit the media narrative so its not widely reported. I read about it online and have not seen one single reference on TV.

The race is Newt/Mitt – tea party&outsiders vs. DC establishment.

Obama=Golfer in Chief, Leading from, behind, the Back Nine.
Leaders don’t create movements. Movements create leaders. Get involved. Your future depends on it.
Govt “invests” YOUR tax money for POLITICAL return rather than economic return.

Santorum will stay in

Freedoms Truth (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:49PM EST (link)

Santorum, like other Congress-folks, will not endorse Newt. He’s not the only one who called Newt’s leadership ‘erratic’.

Santorum knows that newt is liable to implode at any time and is biding his time, hoping to catch lightning in a bottle to be the not-Romney.
odds are very low it will happen, but its not zero.

Definitely

In The Hook (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:06PM EST (link)

If Gingrich immolates in Florida then Santorum can say everything new is old again and see if he can’t bolster the not-Romney forces. Paul is already fading a bit so there’s a bit more support to consolidate there as well before he slips back to his customary 5-6%.

Rick has to hope for a very, very narrow win for Romney in FL and that Newt goes utterly ballistic either just before or just after that. The odds aren’t high that all of Newt’s support would go to Santorum but you never know I guess.

“Hello? You play to win the game.”
Support conservatives that can win.
http://www.marcorubio.com

With what money, In The Hook or Freedoms Truth? Santorum ...

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:12PM EST (link)

is broke.

He can’t expect to win the Sunshine State, and if Gingrich doesn’t win it, Romney can pretty much declare himself the nominee.

Santorum ends up as the religious-right protest vote at best.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Who needs money ...

Freedoms Truth (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:20PM EST (link)

Santorum beat Romney in Iowa being outspent 20 to 1.

If / when the choice is a conservative vs a non-conservative, the votes will come, money or not. The money will re-emerge as well, if/when Newt implodes and Santorum is left standing.

Very unlikely but non-zero probability.

Santorum didn't bubble up in the Iowa polls until he bought Vander Pantaloons. (sp?)

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:33PM EST (link)

Blew most of his remaining war chest on it, too… and what did it get him, other than bragging rights that have not impressed in South Carolina, let alone New Hampshire?

I make no attempt to hide my concern that Gingrich could, as he has in the past, step on his wedding tackle on the way to Super Tuesday. It’s a long lull, and Newt historically has a problem when idling.

I am not concerned that Santorum would be swarmed with support if Gingrich does implode. It’s not going to happen, any more than it happened for Huckabee in 2008 when Romney bailed… and for much the same reason.

Santorum doesn’t connect outside of religious voters who don’t understand what “statist” means …. and those circles are in the minority, both in the GOP and in the nation.

The only role left for Santorum to play is an anti-Gingrich spoiler in FL. After FL, whether Gingrich or Romney wins, Santorum’s done.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 

Who needs money? Santorum, he is going to VA for fundraisers

Common_Cents (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 2:16PM EST (link)

and to do his taxes.

I wouldn’t doubt Rick would stay in for awhile if he had the money. He is a wild card. He repeatedly says he loves Gingrich, but goes after him as well. I could see him trying to stay in thinking Gingrich might implode.

If romney does win FL, its largely over, Santorum won’t get a dime.

I’m saying it is now time Santorum should endorse Gingrich, but not sure he would. I think Bachmann held out endorsing thinking she’d get some deal, but has announced going back to congress. Her phone probably didn’t ring. Cain also wasted his chance at influence, waiting to endorse, then endorsing the people. Fail.

Obama=Golfer in Chief, Leading from, behind, the Back Nine.
Leaders don’t create movements. Movements create leaders. Get involved. Your future depends on it.
Govt “invests” YOUR tax money for POLITICAL return rather than economic return.

Santorum's going to fundraise in a State he didn't even try to get ballot access in?

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 2:20PM EST (link)

Yeah. That makes about as much sense as claiming the nanny-statist* is a True Conservative.

Mew

* no, still don’t feel like re-arguing the definitions with J. Sobieski.

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

There's nothing boring about Austrian Economics

moodyboots Thursday, January 26th at 12:52PM EST (link)

There’s a reason why Reagan and Thatcher were such big fans of Hayek.

I’m mainstream, not an Austrian, but they provide some very valuable insights – and many of their good ideas have become part of mainstream theory – and if there’s something I wouldn’t call Austrian School theory is boring. It’s actually very exciting and deserves to be studied.

I already got banned once for religious bigotry, then came back under an alias and a Portuguese proxy.

Have you listened to many Ron Paul speeches, moodyboots?

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:14PM EST (link)

The guy could make just about anything sound dull, sprinkled with little bits of insanity.

Giving him a chance to headline the convention isn’t going to go over well with the independents and the squishy-middle.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

No, I agree with Senator DeMint

moodyboots Thursday, January 26th at 1:37PM EST (link)

Also, Paul has consistently done well with Independents in the primaries and also in every poll. Actually general election polls show him doing better than any other GOP candidate with the middle. The rest of the world doesn’t see Paul as Red State does – just like it didn’t see Perry.

I’d prefer if it was his son making the speech, obviously. Better delivery and doesn’t follow his dad insane extremism on foreign policy.

I already got banned once for religious bigotry, then came back under an alias and a Portuguese proxy.

No, moodyboots, Paul does *not* do well with independents. He does well with lying democrats and college idiots.

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 4:09PM EST (link)

This has been proven, repeatedly and consistently, since the 1980s.

I’d also much prefer Rand Paul give the speech. I’d even be happy, if Kentucky had a suitable replacement for Rand in the wings, to see Ron throw his weight at an attempt to get Rand the veep slot.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 

Paul and Austrian Economics

Sean (SIConservative) (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:52PM EST (link)

I don’t think “boring us all with Austrian economics” is a bad thing at all. More people need to hear that message, and the convention’s as good a place as any to present it.

5 @ Sean (SIConservative) (nt)

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:59PM EST (link)

No, no we don't need crackpot theories at the RNC

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:08PM EST (link)

I still say we need to rig it to silence the Paultard delegates.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Austrian Economics is not a crackpot theory

moodyboots Thursday, January 26th at 1:11PM EST (link)

Maybe some other stuff Paul says, especially the Rothbard stances on foreign policy, but not his message on economics (or course, one can agree or disagree, entirely or partially with it). I’d also welcome a speech based on Austrian Economics at the convention.

I already got banned once for religious bigotry, then came back under an alias and a Portuguese proxy.

Yes it is

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:13PM EST (link)

It’s worthless and contrary to American values.

We need to purge every freaking Rockwell/Paul/Mises worshipper from the party.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Eh?

texashistorian (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:17PM EST (link)

How about we concentrate on purging all the Keynesians in the Republican party instead? All of the GOP “fiscal conservatives” who supported TARP, and the various stimuli packages over the past 80 years? They are the real problem here, not Austrian school adherents.

The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false.

- Paul Johnson

See, that's why we need to purge the Austrotards

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:30PM EST (link)

They run around calling everyone who questions their theories “Keynesian.”

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Wow Neil

texashistorian (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 5:06PM EST (link)

eat an extra helping off a**hole flakes this morning?

The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false.

- Paul Johnson

 
 
 

Well, as I said, Reagan was a big fan of Hayek

moodyboots Thursday, January 26th at 1:32PM EST (link)

Called him one of the 2 people who most influenced his views and invited him to the White House.

And von Mises was a tremendous and innovative economist. The critique of economic interventionism and socialism that any conservative candidate does – at least in public interventions – was first designed and developed by Mises.

There are so many stuff developed by Austrian School economists that are part of today’s conservatism – from the economic calculation problem to the business cycle and its interaction with real wages/unemployment/inflation – that I don’t see how can one call Austrian economics a crackpot theory without saying the same about conservatism. And again, I don’t consider myself an Austrian economist or anything close to to that.

I already got banned once for religious bigotry, then came back under an alias and a Portuguese proxy.

 

As for Lew Rockwell, I do agree

moodyboots Thursday, January 26th at 1:38PM EST (link)

But Rockwell is just a propagandist and a blogger. You can’t blame Austrian economics for him, I’m sure there are plenty of nutjobs who are monetarists or Keynesians.

I already got banned once for religious bigotry, then came back under an alias and a Portuguese proxy.

Mmm hmm.

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:52PM EST (link)

Not convinced. Purge ‘em all.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 
 

Ya know, Neil

Sean (SIConservative) (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 2:23PM EST (link)

If the GOP were to purge everyone you want to purge, it’d pretty much be you.

Not really

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 5:19PM EST (link)

Purge that one fringe and we should be good to go.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

The real problem with Paul is...

rattlerjake Thursday, January 26th at 10:24PM EST (link)

that most people feel he is too far over the hill! If he was 20-30 years younger, he would be easier to listen to and more fluid in his speaking. Many of his views are realistic, with minor exceptions as with any candidate, but his age and choppy blabbering is the turn off.

 
 
 
 

It's boring

texashistorian (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:15PM EST (link)

only in the sense that a lot of people don’t understand economics and the nuances that attach to the various theories. Thus, their eyes glaze over and they tune out. Be honest, how many people do you know in your daily life who have an actual clue about what Austrian economics are? Or really, any of the competing economic theories?

The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false.

- Paul Johnson

 
 

That would be even better.

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:18PM EST (link)

Still, though, to my eye, Austrian economics = privatizing stuff and moving to fee-based services. That doesn’t seem crackpot to me since we already do that stuff all the time.

Some of their ideas are in outer earth orbit, though – meant apparently for a much different political and economic world than the one we live in. I don’t see insurance companies solely funding national defense anytime in the coming millennium, for instance.

That's not really Austrian economics

moodyboots Thursday, January 26th at 4:50PM EST (link)

Austrian economics is a school of economic thought based on certain epistemological premises and a rejection of modern neoclassical economics. It’s generally identified with the work of economists like Ludwig von Mises, FA Hayek and Murray Rothbard.

Insurance companies solely funding national defense is a public policy option that can be defended by a mainstream economist and rejected by an Austrian economist just as easily. For example, von Mises defended universal and compulsory military service (aka draft).

I already got banned once for religious bigotry, then came back under an alias and a Portuguese proxy.

Thanks, moodyboots! Austrian economics does seem crackpot

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 5:33PM EST (link)

Now that I’ve read the cliff notes.

 
 
 
 
 

1. Gingrich wins FL / 2. establishment dumps Romney / 3. brokered convention

ragnarthepirate (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:53PM EST (link)

Someone else wins.

Write it down.

 

Erick - why would Santorum voters go to Romney?

unclefred (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:54PM EST (link)

Santorum seems much closer to Newt. The marital issues? Or what?

It's kinda obviously unclefred

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:09PM EST (link)

The supporters of one northeastern moderate will back the other northeastern moderate.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Santorum more conservative than Newt

Freedoms Truth (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:24PM EST (link)

on a host of issues: Immigration, AGW, healthcare policy, support for cut-cap-balance and Ryan roadmap, etc.

If Santorum’s conservative supporters and voters go with Romney, its because of the personal character issue and other concerns they have with Newt.

Not really

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:31PM EST (link)

They both talk right but governed left.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Inverse-Daschle rule, Neil?

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:37PM EST (link)

Press releases back home lean right.
Voting record and arm-twisting in D.C. lean left.

Thune won by being well funded and thus able to point out the obvious disconnect, IIRC.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Inverse how?

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:46PM EST (link)

They’re doing the same thing. Swing right, shoot left

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Good point (nt)

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:50PM EST (link)

I am corrected. Thank you, Neil.

acat (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 2:50PM EST (link)

I did have it backwards.

Must’ve been that Daschle’s a Dem that got me mixed up.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 

That's true of all 4 of them, isn't it, Neil?

lineholder (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:52PM EST (link)

Any of the four candidates still remaining in this race are guilty of this in one way or another. Truth being told, I suspect we will get some left-leaning decision-making from any of the four candidates still in this race if they get elected President.

That particular reality stinks, IMO. It’s also why I’ve gotten to point of being ready to focus more on down-ticket races.

All three, you mean? But no.

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 3:24PM EST (link)

Gingrich ran right and governed right.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

In 1994, he most certainly did...and I agree about 3 candidates not 4 as well.

lineholder (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 3:49PM EST (link)

Please excuse my lapse in stating four, LOL.

When it comes to considering POTENTIAL, and which of the remaining candidates has the greatest potential to govern to the right, particularly in regards to economic policy, I believe it is Newt. Warts, failures, previous compromises, infidelities and all, I still believe it is Newt.

I also think our Repub “leaders” in Congress knows that he does have that kind of potential. He did succeed in it before, and if he sets his mind to it, there’s a chance he could succeed in it again. If that is the position he takes, then he’s also the kind of person who would be more inclined to the “push the envelope”, so to speak. Romney and Santorum would both be more complacent in that regards than Newt would be.

My impression at this point is that these “leaders” are afraid of this kind of potential, Neil. They may be throwing anything and everything left-leaning and derogatory about Newt that they can find out to the general public right now, but I think they ARE afraid that he would go hard right!!

 
 
 
 
 

very incisive retort, Neil

texasref (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 6:47PM EST (link)

I like your line and it does make sense. I wouldn’t be surprised if The Angry One went with The Slick One at all.

Newt Gingrich 2012

 
 
 

1. Romney wins FL / 2. conservatives accept Gingrich

ragnarthepirate (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:55PM EST (link)

Romney wins.

Write it down.

I mean Romney

ragnarthepirate (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 12:56PM EST (link)

Freudian slip much, ragnar?

texasref (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 6:50PM EST (link)

Not in a billion years will we accept Romney.

I’ll phone bank for Newt in the primary and the general. I will vote for Romney in the general because unlike the moderates in the party, I actually am a team player and won’t take my ball and go home if I lose the primary. I wonder if the Romneybots will do the same.

Newt Gingrich 2012

 
 
 

CNN will allow applause

codenametimna Thursday, January 26th at 1:00PM EST (link)

CNN is going to allow the audience to applaud the candidates so it should be much more lively than the NBC sleeper.

Honestly, all the candidates have their flaws and after researching all four candidates in depth I decided to throw my hat in the ring for Rick Santorum. I feel he’s the most conservative of the bunch, although he probably won’t get the nomination because he’s low on money and he doesn’t have the comprehensive campaign organizational skills in place to go it for the long haul. I did put my money where my mouth is and donated recently to Santorum’s campaign, but I realize it may have been in vain. At least I have the satisfaction of knowing I supported a true social conservative. If Santorum bows out I would expect many of his supporters to support Newt Gingrich but we’ll see.

Having said that, my next choice would be Newt Gingrich because he’s a Reaganite and he accomplished quite a lot when he was Speaker of the House. Balancing the budget was obviously one of them. I feel Newt is also getting a bad rap from Mitt Romney and also from the Romney Super-pac ads, with many of them being downright dirty and chock full of untruths. If Mitt Romney or his cohorts would willingly lie and/or distort the truth concerning Newt Gingrich, what would stop Mitt Romney from lying to the American people or from “flip-flopping” back and forth like he’s done so many, many times previously if he indeed became President? Just saying. I really have trouble trusting Romney and obviously his propensity to distort the truth and/or tell outright lies is one of those reasons. But if Romney gets the Republican nomination I’ll certainly do my part to vote for him for president. I might have to pinch my nose when voting for him though. But obviously the main goal is to get rid of socialist Obama and his disastrous, failed administration.

I feel much the same way

goodgovernance Thursday, January 26th at 1:13PM EST (link)

I’m not supporting Santorum (I was a Huntsman supporter) but I have much the same reservations about Newt and Romney.

I’m supporting Newt now because whatever his actual record as a consistent conservative, he’s at least bled for the cause at some point in his career. To give the nomination to Romney is to reward someone who has done absolutely nothing for the conservative movement beyond give it lip service in the past few years.

Another factor that helps me support Newt: if you dislike both Newt and Mitt and want a brokered convention to find someone better, the only way we get there is supporting Newt, the man the Establishment will never get behind. But if we get behind Romney the process is over next week and the Establishment wins again.

Yet a third reason to support Newt.

cbartlett Thursday, January 26th at 6:21PM EST (link)

The GOP Establishment loses. That actually might be the best reason to put the anti-Romney on the ticket.

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” Abraham Lincoln

 
 

codenametina, do you live in FL?

texasref (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 6:51PM EST (link)

If so, you are throwing your vote away. It’s winner take all, and you have a decision to make: Newt (your 2nd choice, hint, hint) or Mitt.

If you’re not in Florida, I doubt Santorum will still be around as a choice in February, so you could still vote Newt.

Newt Gingrich 2012

 
 

I don't quite understand

simplethinker (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:15PM EST (link)

Erick says that if Santorum drops out, he thinks it will be a net benefit for Mitt Romney.

Then Erick says “If [Santorum] wants Mitt, he stays in.”

It sounds like no matter what Santorum does, he is set up to be in the tank for Mitt Romney.

Could it be instead that like Erick, Santorum has his own opinions about where his supporters would turn, and that dropping out or staying in isn’t necessarily a good predictor for those of us who can’t read Santorum’s mind?

——-
Disclaimers for the attack trolls: Yes this is an honest question/thought, no it is not meant to denigrate Erick or anyone else. Yes I am happy to be corrected or shown better insight. And no I am not a Romney or a Santorum supporter.

 

Austrian economics isn't boring!

BillC (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:55PM EST (link)

“But he is going to do better than many have expected and he’ll get a prime spot at the Republican National Convention to bore us all with Austrian economics.”

It’s exciting and fun and…ok, it’s boring. But it is also a pretty good model of our current economic situation.

 

Not for Newt, but I hope he wins FL

Whacker77 Thursday, January 26th at 2:05PM EST (link)

I would recoil at the thought of Newt as the nominee, but Romney as the nominee does nothing for me. For that reason, I want to see Newt win in Florida. If he wins in Florida, the race will continue and I think it might just scare a new candidate into the race.

Rush made a good point today saying if Mitt wins Florida and becomes the defacto nominee, Obama will have nine months to carpet bomb him. Mitt will be a burned out hulk by the time November rolls around. In other words, we’ll lose.

The establisment forces, and I hate to use that phrase, have dropped daisy cutters on Newt today so it will be tough for him to win. Still, I hope smart people realize the race must go on, otherwise we’ll be stuck with buyer’s remorse.

As I said though, I admitt I’m hoping a Newt win scares a better candidate into the race.

You point out a conundrum that is double-bitter for Perry supporters.

jakeofalltrades (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 2:12PM EST (link)

“See I told you so” doesn’t really help when we’re all on the same sinking ship together.

Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, and Mitt Romney. I’m living in the Twilight Zone.

555 - jake!

cbartlett Thursday, January 26th at 6:16PM EST (link)

This sinking ship is IN the Twiilight Zone. Sigh.

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” Abraham Lincoln

 

"I told you so" goes both ways

JSobieski (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 6:23PM EST (link)

As a Perry supporter I tried to soften up the “nobody else can win” meme, but unfortunately 1 out of every 2 comments at RS stridently declares the unelectabilty of most of our candidates, and some assert that none of our candidates are electable.

It we apply linear progression to the negativity, all RSers will have committed suicide by March 1, 2012.

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

 
 
 

None of the above?

thinkfirst1 Thursday, January 26th at 2:31PM EST (link)

This sounds like the same talk-down manipulation that helped to drive
Rick Perry from the race … leaving us with four guaranteed general election-losers.

Since Newt is such a dismally-poor candidate why not suggest that Newt
could crash and burn in Florida and it become a Paul-Romney-Santorum
race?

Or even better – they all lose to Rick Perry – who is still on the FL ballot,
and they all get out!

Then Perry recruits Allen West as his running-mate and we have a landslide victory in the General.

How long will it take for pundits to realize than None Of The Above is the best answer to these four?

 

Romney's Liberal Tactics

scottishjew Thursday, January 26th at 2:51PM EST (link)

Having your surrogates like Dole and company to go out and savage a fellow Republican is not the act of a true conservative. More like a candidate whose only core belief is that he be President. Romney=Blumberg. He’s one of those liberals who couldn’t break into the Democratic Primary line to be be governor. So, he ran on the Republican ticket.

Eric, every reason not to vote for Romney can be found in this video. How low will someone pander to be president? Who let the dogs out?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDwwAaVmnf4

 

How did it come to this?

BigRedConservative (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 3:11PM EST (link)

2012 could have been the year the GOP destroyed the left permanently and saved America by choosing a really strong candidate. Instead, we’re left to choose between the amoral serial adulterer and the phony flip-flopping elitist. Pathetic. Is it too late to draft Jindal or Daniels?

And two and two always makes a five
It’s the devil’s way now
There is no way out
You can scream and you can shout
It is too late now

Radiohead

 

The perfect Television Ad

creinstein (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 3:40PM EST (link)

Obama

He support the healthcare law
He hates gun rights
He is proabortion
He raised taxes after saying he would not
He cost his voters jobs
One of his biggest fans was Ted Kennedy
Another fan is John Kerry
He has nominated Liberal Judges
He has no remorse for any of these actions.

Oh.. did we say Obama? We meant Mitt Romney

OBAMA = One Big Ar**d Mistake America!

Are you man or woman enough? Prove it!

Running for office in North Portland – Oregon! State Representative or Bust!

Veteran, Truck Driver, and Permament Conservative Activist!

 

Did Any Of You Hear This On Rush Today?

carolynr Thursday, January 26th at 3:55PM EST (link)

Some blogger looked into Gingrich’s statement concerning Reagan AND ONLY HALF of the statement was quoted with the rest of the statement nullifying what the headlines on Drudge claim.

Newt just responded on Kudlow; Romney supporters lie

carolina Thursday, January 26th at 7:49PM EST (link)

and was taken out of context. People who pump those kind of outright lies should be held accountable.
I give Newt credit for not blowing a gasket.
Newt was a steadfast Reagan supporter and part of the initial supply-side group that Reagan eventually bought into. Newt was fairly young at the time, and I’m sure he has been honestly influenced for life. He was taught by the best.

 

Romney slammed by Micheal Reagan as a LIAR

Juggernaut (Diary) Friday, January 27th at 10:03AM EST (link)

I’m so sick of this Massachusetts moderate/progressive that I’d like to see him thrown out of the party after losing to Newt. This liberal style campaigner has gone way to far as has Drudge and the moderate gop tools who back Romney.

Congressman Jason Chavetez heckled Newt at a rally Wednesday, looks like we have a secret moderate who needs to be primaried.

RomneyCare is Right Wing Socialism – please feel free to use is as often as possible…….it will kill his campaign.

Romney “severely conservative”? That’s the opposite of a “compassionate conservative” like George W. Bush? Actually, we know what a severely conservative is. It’s Dick Cheney and Mitt Romney is no Dick Cheney.

 
 

It was also heavily edited...Rush has become lazy

david1313 Thursday, January 26th at 4:00PM EST (link)

Sometimes success does that. He knows better than that. He ran with it because he wanted to. The whole of attack was full of half-truth and both Rush and Drudge.

And, Rush has his radio program on Clear Channel..looks like the news is finally getting out.

avagreen Friday, January 27th at 2:25PM EST (link)

http://www.examiner.com/elections-2010-in-wilmington/rush-limbaugh-broadcasts-on-clear-channel-clear-channel-is-owned-by-mitt-romney

And,
http://www.truthistreason.net/mitt-romneys-bain-capital-owns-clear-channel-radio-rush-limbaugh-sean-hannity-glenn-beck-michael-savage-etc

Drudge did, too, until he retired from his radio program in 2007 to focus on his internet site…….apparently, the influence, if not the contract with CC, is still alive and well.

Rick Perry STILL! doesn’t have or need blood. He is filled with magma.
Rick Perry uses his bare hands to hunt.

Countdown Until Obama Leaves Office.

 

Rush admitted as much!

WillWong (Diary) Friday, January 27th at 3:06PM EST (link)

In his radio program, he asked his assistant to listen through the entire tape of Newt’s speech and she was too lazy to do it!!!!!!

 
 

There's another path. A truly conservative one

wearethevigilant Thursday, January 26th at 7:49PM EST (link)

I understand many of you are leery of Rep. Dr. Ron Paul’s foreign policy. But need I remind you there was a day and age where conservatives were leery of foreign entanglements. Remember men like Sen. Robert Taft (R-OH) were opposed to joining NATO on constuitional grounds. These wars cost money we simply don’t have.

Gingrich lost my trust when he was unfaithful to his wife. Mitt is a serial flip-flopper. Santorum would have my support if not for opposing Right to Work (which will be law in Indiana within the next month) and his overly aggressive foreign policy. Agree with him or not Dr. Paul is the consistant conservative and should get your support.