he is most definitely NOT a Christian. A Christian does not open fire on innocent children, murdering people. I will be interested to see what his true connections are.

I keep remembering how the Left initially tried to portray that crazy who murdered people in AZ.

The Oslo terrorist self-identified as a Nazi.

Socialist</em. != conservative

I know the left like to continue to perpetuate the untruth that Nazis were right-wing. Unfortunately for them, we still have their beliefs in Hitler’s own words, and at least 15 out of 25 points in the platform are solidly, nakedly, statist-socialist.

A maniacal, barbarous, deranged, evil, monster would. I’ll bet he didn’t list himself on Facebook thus.

The fact is this: I can’t think of a single Christian Church tommorow that will sing the praises of this bastard, or a single “Christan” convenience store that will hang his photo on the wall as a Martyr of God, as they do all along the Gaza strip, and throughout the flea-bitten outposts of Radical Islam. Our murderers are scorned. Islams’ seem to be praised and offered up as pure examples before “Alah”.

No, this disgusting filth will rightfully be scorned, and denounced, and condemened in Churches as the very antithesis of what Christ Jesus taught– and that he is an example of an extremely fallen, sick and depraved world that He came into to save.

I will also say this: The story is not yet written. As J. Edgar Hoover said to RFK when he first told him about his brothers’ assassination, “we are endeavoring to get details”…

Really, really good.

This is the kind of truth that will cause liberals to spontaneously combust. When one understands this about liberals it helps to understand their mental state, and how it is quite unlikely most of them can be reached and reasoned with. Their twisted belief system is applied to the decisions they make in life. The fruits of those decisions are based on, and result in, more anger and rage – which we see so often why trying to reason with liberals.

This post is why liberalism cannot be reasoned with – it must be defeated outright. Liberals will not compromise. They will always strive to their goals – which I believe are based in Evil. Period.

It’s quite sad when you realize so many are Lost.

n/t

“Never mind that a conservative Christian would not do what the guy did.” (last paragraph)

By having a ‘title’ of conservative Christian doesn’t exclude anyone from doing anything, right or wrong. We’re all flesh and blood and we’re all vulnerable to doing things you wouldn’t be expected to do. Remember a guy named Judas? One of the ‘original’ 12 disciples, you just wouldn’t expect him to betray Christ, and yet he did. Only one man has been able to turn down any and all temptations and that of course was Christ.

Not trying to get ‘preachy’ but I do enjoy your blog and wanted to suggest that maybe your ‘proof-reader’ missed this one. And besides, ‘Never mind that a conservative Blogger would not say what this one said’. LOL.

Keep fighting the good fight and pressing onward to the goal which lays before us.

kaj

Violence of this type seems to stem from two phenomena, either an unbalanced mind that becomes radicalized, or an opportunistic sociopath who takes advantage of radical ideas. It’s not about islam or christianity, because pretty much any zealous system of thought will do. In Britain, they have trouble with violent animal rights activism. It all boils down to two things: people who are crazy, or people who will do anything to get some power.

If there is a lesson about religions here, it is that we cannot paint a whole religion with one brush, based on the actions of nuts or sociopaths. Most people in the world just want to live their life and take care of their families. It’s not healthy to spin this story to be about christianity vs. islam.

The European political spectrum (Oslo) consists of the Social Democratic Labour Party on the left and the Socialist Workers Party on the right as the extremes. Here in the US as declared in our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution took the exceptional direction of less government. The left here is actually the Social Democratic Labour Party and the Socialist Workers Party, or any more government types. The Socialist Workers Party most definitely used the government controlled church for propaganda as self-declared Christian fundamentalists and not true Christians.

However, these facts will not deter those on the left to link the Tea Party, Conservatives and Republicans to Oslo. Let the blame game begin…..

…by the way.

God is envoked by the evil as well as pious. It is up to those that (at least) TRY to live up to a modicum of Christ’s example that we defend the Lord when it is the evil that do the envoking. Otherwise, we scede the ground before the battle is engaged.

Make no mistake: That the left so quickly pounced on the religious-right component of this heartbreaking event is reason enough to engage this political/religious battle at home. God is moving througout the world, and to simply turn away is both dangerous and naive.

I’ve not infrequently seen examples on this fine Web Site of those who engage this battle as somehow hurting the struggle, or distracting from it, or even causing embarassement amongst the comfortably secular elements of conservative Republicanism; I get it. “This is a political, not religious, website”, we are told. But, as the aftermath of (to name two recent examples) both Arizona and Oslo confirm, the face and name of God and politics are inexarable intertwined, and I think it is for the betterment of the Conservative-Traditional-Constitutional Repbulican to not recoil from that reality. It is but a facet of that reality, but a facet, nonetheless.

Anders Behring Breivik Fake Facebook Profile

why they would demonize anyone connected to “The Right” while contorting themselves into a pretzel to avoid identifying anyone not so connected: They KNOW beyond a fact certain that WE will never support them or their reckless schemes while they fervently hope that, maybe, there is some slim chance that the ‘Others’ might, someday, sort of not want to do them in and maybe even support them. THAT is what passes for Reasonableness on the part of the Left.

of either the Christian or Jewish persuasion would pick-up several weapons and shoot innocent young men and women. Nor would that sane person plant a bomb in the middle of anywhere with the intent of simply killing as many as possible.

The only significant difference between the Nazis and the Communists in 1938 was that the Nazis and the rest of the Fascist parties allowed limited private ownership of the means of production, specifically, small business and farming. The Nazis in Germany pretty much controlled what companies employing more than 500 people could produce and at what cost, especially with respect to Government contracts. Both the Nazis and the Commies were totalitarian, single party states. Joe and Hitler were in agreement on most things until Hitler decided he needed more room and more raw materials for his war.

I’m a gun owner and also a Christian, although I’m not very observant in terms of attending church. But nevertheless nothing that this man did has anything to do with my views on gun ownership or Christianity.

I think we need a much fuller discussion of this. I’m happy to contribute to that discussion, because as a gun owner and an advocate for 2nd Amendment rights and also a baptized Roman Catholic (albeit a bit lapsed) I think I could offer some intelligent thoughts on the subject.

It’s impossible to call this man a Christian. His crimes are political. He’s a political desperado and a murderer of innocent children. Everything he has done is diametrically opposed to everything I believe and my friends believe. And yet the label persists.

It would be much more honest if the New York Times referred to him as a self-created Christian apostate.

…was that it was a “Black Metal” type.

I’m not surprised that it wasn’t though, as the Oslo attacks weren’t aimed at churches, and instead at the secular power establishment.

He wants things to be the way they use to be in his country.

Yes, a Conservative,

Maybe this will stop Nikitias and others on RS from hiding behind the generic title of Conservative.

Even some of the old communist still in office are trying to conserve the old ways, making them conservatives.

Nikitias is advocating a new Conservative Party.
What kind?

Traditionalist Conservative
Religious conservative
Limited Government Conservative
Nationalist Conservative
Neo Conservative
Paleo Conservative
Libertarian Conservative
Southern Democrat Conservative
Torie Conservative
Modern Conservative
Representative Conservative
Conservative Democrat
Old Right Conservative
Green Conservative
Communist Conservative
Social Conservative
Fiscal Conservative
Constitutional Conservative

There are as many Conservatives’ as there are people.

Every ones agenda is to conserve their basic principles and ideals, making them a Conservative.

This is why the Republican Party is in such disarray. No two members have the same principles or ideals other than right is better than left.

The Republican Party has failed to rally people under the flag of one ideal.

Most of the Tea Party movement is rallying under the flag of Fiscal/Constitutional conservatism, thus making them a more cohesive and definable group of Conservatives.

Over time, the Tea Party, like the Republican Party will be infiltrated and weakened by the opposition, requiring the need for a new Fiscal/Constitutional movement.

In my opinion, if a person is not a Fiscal/Constitutional Conservative ONLY, on a FEDERAL level whether on the left or the right, they are a direct threat to the ideals of this nation and it’s constitution and will be the cause of it’s collapse.

Not every one on RS has a detailed profile.

I think they do this so they can’t be pinned down, thus allowing them to stir the pot, so to speak.

Maybe this in the signature block would help others see where others are coming from and cut down on some of the assumptions and name calling.

FF/SS
Fiscal Federal/Social State Conservative

Or
FF/FS
Fiscal Federal/Fiscal State Conservative

Or
SF/SS
Social Federal/Social State Conservative

If you are one of these, feel free to use it.
Or just hide behind———–I’m a Conservative.

If you have FF/SS in your signature block and you type you are in favor of Federal funding for a free home for everyone program, we can call you on it right then and there.

This is one day old! Let this thing play out. It’s already been revealed that the guy was a member of the ‘progressive’ wing of Norwegian politics, he’s no more conservative than Reid or Pelosi.

Second of all, that facebook page was faker than a plug nickel. He’s Norwegian! The facebook page is in English! I have at least 20 f/b friends from foreign countries. Their pages and their walls and their postings are in the languages of their own countries! Unless they’re posting directly to American friends. One of whom is a member of the Kommunistische Partei Österreich (Austria). A Norwegian conservative would have said he is Hoyre! On other sites this guy has stated he’s Fremskrittspartiet i Norge (progressive). The f/b page is a fake! All my f/b foreign friends are pointing out the fake.

Don’t let’s be fooled. The progressives in the US have aligned themselves with Islam to attack conservatism and especially Christians. Much like they have in most foreign countries. Watch the foreign press on this one. The US press is desperate for a Christian conservative terrorist, even if they have to lie to get one! They will hide the facts!

Not even to mention that Christians just DON’T murder children indiscriminately like that. Only the Rebludgeon of Peace goes for children! Because they strike at your biggest fear!

Here’s his video manefesto:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=89a_1311444384

And heres where you can get the text version:
https://hotfile.com/dl/124843184/2315d8e/2083-AEuropeanDeclarationofIndependence.docx.html

The short version marxists and islamist want destroy the western world. Gee where have I heard this before?

My prayers are with our brothers and sisters in Norway.

Stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason.

And I’m very confident this pile of dog squeeze did not go around yelling “Jesus Akbar” as he murdered all those children.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/07/who-added-christian-and-conservative-to-norway-shooters-facebook-page-yesterday.html

The nutcase in Norway was definitively Anti-Muslim and a neo-Nazi type, but calling him a ‘Christian fundamentalist’ seems to ONLY be supported a Facebook entry (and we’ve heard of no church he attended, in a country where church attendance is very light- until the last few days). Now is appears ‘Christian Conservative’ was added to his Facebook page AFTER he was captured.

The voice of Racism at Oslo was loud and clear. But that voice will be quieted as the killer spends years in his prison cell. The only sound will be the sound of his voice asking the guard to open the gate, so he can spend some time in the prison yard. He would gladly accept Multiculturalism if given a few less years of prison time.

There was nothing the Oslo shooter hated more than the thought of having to share his living space with a person of color. His worse thoughts are going to become a reality as prison authorities force him to share a mattress with a dark-skinned sexual outlaw. Both will be released after 21 years including the mattress.

It looks like the so-called manifesto was originally penned by Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber. This Norwegian slime-ball couldn’t even come up with an original thought. Free Republic has the translation of the article from Verdens Gang…..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2753209/posts

Why is Christian terrorism largely nonexistent (today) except among a few crazies? Because Jesus (unlike Muhammad) was non-violent; he did not teach nor exemplify violence. It is as simple as that. There was Christian violence in the past but in no way does it accord with the example and the teachings of Jesus. If Mr. Erickson truly believed Christians are “not of this world,” then there would be no need for Christian activism. There would be no need for Christian involvement in the tea party and other political movements. This “we are not of this world” is flat out dangerous dogma! It is in fact (mis)used by too many Christians as an excuse to neglect an important obligation we have toward society and culture.

He might have been a christian but the reason he did what he did was related to his Darwinist view, or so he said

The book associated with this Norwegian begins by saying that all ideology is false; the rest is ideology. Straw men, simplified either-or thinking, paranoia, selected facts, no sense of humor or irony . . . The guys in this book think like Stalinists, extreme born-again Christians, extremist Muslims.

They are against homosexuality, for different roles for men and women, for the nation, for freedom (but not freedom for political correctness or multiculturalism), for the traditional values and morality of their religion. All these they have in common with the Muslims they fear (except the nation stuff), and not in common with the European mainstream they want to get rid of.

Traditional European Christianity defended monarchy and fought to preserve the traditional class structure of Europe. Also, such an animal did not exist — there were Catholic Christians and non-Catholic Christians, and they fought each other for generations. This traditional Christianity still exists in Northern Ireland.

When Europeans took nations seriously, the nations fought. The English, French, Germans, Russians etc. marched to the slaughter in 1914 and again just over two decades later. England and France battled for centuries.

Our Norwegian killed a whole bunch of people because he could see no way of getting others to share his yearning for the good old days. He did not recognize that he was just as brainwashed as the multiculturalists; we get unbrainwashed by listening carefully to each other; you do my brain, I do yours, slowly and carefully.

The reality is that God is waiting for us to stop fighting and killing over which definitions of Him are valid. He is probably going to let us pollute ourselves to death and move on to a planet with better prospects. He probably incarnates Himself and “dies” on each planet; if He only did it once, why here?

Janet said that terrorist are white; I saw the video that showed me so. And miraculously, and very unfortunately for the victims, a white, christian terrorist appears, as if on queue. I am not suggesting anything sketchy here, but the timing is interesting.

I am not a conspiracy theorist but when I heard the reports from our news that the perp was a right-wing extremist, a red flag went up. Something doesn’t seem right with all of this, and I feel there is something larger looming behind a curtain. I am just saying.

Because that was his case. From his compedium:

If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God then you are a religious Christian. Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God.

Other than that, he’d be a conservative in the sense the word was used in Continental Europe a couple of centuries ago – basically a reactionary. He’s anti-capitalist, anti-free speech and in favour of conceding a vast degree of authority and control to the state and the central government.

To associate him with current day anglo-saxon conservatives is just crazy.

Perfectly stated, Erick, both regarding the Oslo killer and what the Bible teaches about such acts and what is expected of His children.

Like Taliban and Osama bin laden, these are not religious people; they sully the religions to which they belong. Jihad was in islam against the pagans(to convert the multigod pagans to their religion) exactly how in Talmud was written that only Jews are people, the non-Jews are cattle with human faces and they deserve to be treated as such. And they applied this 3000??years ago to force the multigod pagans to adopt their mosaic religion. It does not apply today. Charlemagne treated the same way the Anglo Saxons who did not want to convert to Christianity. The Anglo-Saxons fled away to Norse people (aka vikings) and told the vikings what happened and this prompted the vikings’ invasions in Europe. I hope I got my history right. Marx brought back the ancient tactic of the Jews, of treating people as cattle with human faces in communism: abolishing the private property reduced people to cattle; cattle is/are not allowed to have property. This time were not the Jews from antiquity who did this but the proletariat was framed and the red terrorist enforcers were the ones who enforced Marx’ policies. I hope they will burn in hell, together with Marx…Oh! No! Wait! They are the rulers of hell. What pity that I cannot even curse them! Damn!!!!

Jolinar

.