By Faith: I Am Proud of Franklin Graham


All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance. And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth. People who say such things show that they are looking for a country of their own. If they had been thinking of the country they had left, they would have had opportunity to return. Instead, they were longing for a better country—a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them.

— Hebrews 11:13-16 (NIV)

Much has been made this week of Franklin Graham’s comments both about the Ground Zero Mosque and Barack Obama’s religion. It has been more than hilarious to watch all the news networks, newspapers, and pundits try to explain Graham’s comments.

All of those who have been talking about his comments have talked about them from a political point of view.

Franklin Graham could care less. I could care less. What Franklin Graham said is dead on.

Specifically, this week Graham noted that Barack Obama was born a muslim.

“I think the president’s problem is that he was born a Muslim, his father was a Muslim. The seed of Islam is passed through the father like the seed of Judaism is passed through the mother. He was born a Muslim, his father gave him an Islamic name,” Graham told CNN’s John King in a televised interview that aired Thursday night.

Likewise, Graham said if the State Department paid him or another Christian to do outreach, there’d be all sorts of outcry. But, due to double standards, there was no outcry over the State Department putting the Ground Zero mosque imam on the payroll.

Lastly, his words about Islam from last year have come back into focus due to his opposition to the Ground Zero mosque. Last year, he said, in part about Islam, “I speak out for people who live under Islam, who are enslaved under Islam, and I want them to know they can be free by Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ alone.”

First, about Barack Obama’s faith — it is clear when he was enrolled in school in Indonesia his parents listed his faith as Islam. The New York Times, in 2008, buttressed that. One is not born into Islam (Rev. Graham got that point technically wrong), but as Streiff has pointed out, at one time his parents listed his religion as “Islam.”

Barack Obama says he converted to Christianity. Just like Hillary Clinton, we will take him at his word. If he claims he converted and has taken advantage of the gifts of the spirit without a true conversion, that is between him and God. I pity him if his conversion is insincere. “For if the message spoken by angels was binding, and every violation and disobedience received its just punishment, how shall we escape if we ignore such a great salvation?” (Heb. 2:2-3a)

I await calls from the birthers for the baptismal certificate.

In any event, it is beside the point. Franklin Graham does not speak as a man of the political world, but a man of faith. His view, and mine, is a reliance, by faith, on the Hope of ages past and yet to come — that is Christ against the world.

We live by faith as pilgrims in an alien world headed home to eternity. There are too many people in this world who, when confronted with questions of faith, opt for the polite answer instead of the real answer.

By faith and history, Franklin Graham understands that there is only one way, one Truth, and one life. No one goes to the Father except through Jesus Christ. No one.

That is what our faith teaches us. Shame on the media for dwelling more on Franklin Graham’s words than on the imam of the Ground Zero Mosque. But there is a reason for that too.

The political elites in this world view Islam as, frankly, primitive. “Well of course those crazy guys would believe in something like Sharia,” think the secular political elites. After all, they are several hundred years behind Christianity. Christians have evolved — go to any Episcopalian church and you’ll see a gay priest, a female priest, or what have you.

Christians like Graham, and me, are viewed with the same suspicion as muslim clerics who defend their faith, but Graham and you and me will be questioned because, after all, Christianity is supposed to be more evolved. Therefore, for us to hold true to our faith means there must be something wrong with us individually, not with the religion. (This, of course, is at a superficial level. Theologically, and I’m not going to explore the depths of this here, it is because the world persecutes Christians because the world is against Christ.)

The problem, of course, is the Truth does not change. Our convictions remain. Christ remains.

By faith we believe, we persevere, and we know that there will be a last day and a final judgment. On that day we who persevere win because Christ wins against this world. It is that simple. It is that offensive. It is precisely that which our secular media and political elites do not understand and cannot grasp. That is why they dwell on Franklin Graham and the political impact of his words. These people live for the now.

Franklin Graham and all those who follow Christ live for eternity.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

201 Comments Leave a comment

Amen!

kaye Sunday, August 22nd at 9:14AM EST (link)

Called to stand our ground and speak the truth. Thank you, Erick, and thank you, Franklin Graham.

There is a mosque 2 blocks from the proposed Cordoba House

renny (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:47PM EST (link)

A mosque was established on Warren St. in 1970 and that’s 2 blocks from the Cordoba House project and 4 blocks from the WTC.

That’s surely enough for downtown NYC which is not a heavily residential area to begin with.

 
 

Amen, Erick. The Sheep will be separated from the Goats. nt

yoyo (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 9:21AM EST (link)

Nemo me impune lacesset
“No one will provoke me with impunity!”
=============================
Pukin’ Dogs – The Fighting 143
Sans Reproache
=============================
The ‘yoyo’ replaced my cigarettes January 22, 2006….

 

Not one on FNS panel mentions NASA or Farrakhan with respect to Obama's

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 9:39AM EST (link)

perceived faith. Incompetent.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Rick Lazio ROCKS! Lays out facts on Imam Rauf's radicalism on MTP! - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:40AM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Gigot is a weenie this am on MTP and Goldberg/Catty are shills for islamists and liars - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:42AM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Finally saw it

finaljeopardy Sunday, August 22nd at 6:50PM EST (link)

Lazio held his own, and he actually makes a good point. Why should those who financed 911 be allowed to build a triumphal monument to Islam right next to their greatest hit? It’s not serving the community, if it was bankrolled by Saudi Arabia and Iran. It’s certainly not building bridges, either. It is just following the tradition of several Islamic victories throughout the ages. This NP’s name “Cordoba Initiative” makes that point explicitly.

I wish Lazio could talk a bit more about that and how there are seemingly two camps of Muslims in America — those who came here to participate in a free society, and those who practice a voluntary apartheid: Immigrate but don’t integrate, infiltrate but don’t assimilate. Rauf speaks for the latter. That’s why he is getting his funding abroad.

By contrast, American Muslims grasp that 9/11 was an attack on their country, too. That’s why so many have spoken out against this mosque, though they are drowned out by the Cordoba Initiative and their allies. Favoring the bullies over the patriot just ensures that Muslim Americans will be intimidated into silence, achieving the opposite of what proponents say is their goal. So, Lazio is right to hammer away at opening the books. I only wish he could elaborate more, but he needed to stay on message today.

 
 

Video, please!

finaljeopardy Sunday, August 22nd at 11:40AM EST (link)

This is an important race, and I would like more attention devoted to it. Carl Paladino has siphoned off a lot of Republican support, while Cuomo enjoys a healthy lead. $10 million is hard to ignore, while Lazio’s fundraising is weak. But if Giuliani runs against Gillibrand and Lazio makes headway in the New York governor’s race, Republicans could actually stake out a decent toehold.

How are we going to get Giuliani to run?

renny (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:50PM EST (link)

Whatever Rudy ran for in NY, he would probably win.

Will the Cordoba House dustup bring him out?

I really hope so

finaljeopardy Sunday, August 22nd at 7:13PM EST (link)

He would certainly win, but I wonder what would happen if Bloomberg came into the debate. Giuliani has been clear that he considers the proposed mosque at Ground Zero a “desecration.” But 911 was all he talked about when he ran for President, so this is the election of his dreams!

 
 
 
 
 

And while Obama may not identify as a Muslim, that’s not how the Arab and Muslim Streets see it

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:10AM EST (link)

if your father is a Muslim, so are you. And once a Muslim, always a Muslim. You cannot go back. In Islamic eyes, Obama is certainly a Muslim. He may think he’s a Christian, but they do not.

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2750/barack-hussein-obama-once-a-muslim-always-a-muslim/

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

For someone to renounce Islam is for them to become apostate - and that's a death sentence. [nt]

acat (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:32AM EST (link)

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

 

The most significant poll finding is the INCREASE in those that don't think he's a Christian and why

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:33AM EST (link)

I think it relates mostly to those indie voters that covered their ears in the campaign to the news of his 20-year-pew-parked-butt in Rev Wright’s hate-America church, esp including that Church’s past exaltation of the most famous black muslim racist, Louis Farrakhan, as well as his policies (see esp NASA mission to the space between Morocco and Indonesia instead of out space) that BOW to radical muslims.

Now, those voters that voted on HOPE and to purge white guilt forever, now see Black panther thugs allowed to wield bill clubs, bowing to muslim leaders, etc.

And then, the mosque…

Now those that simply could not believe that democrats would nominate a black radical realize that they did…

and NONE of that is consistent with being a Christian.

more later

http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2010/08/14/obamas-friday-the-13th-ground-zero-mo/

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 

But izoneguy, he supposedly denounced his Muslim faith

Scope (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:38PM EST (link)

and said he became a Christian. Christianity is so against the Muslim religion it involves hanging or decapitation as a punishment. Doubtful the Pres. of the US will suffer beheading any time soon. But from what I have read here by a Muslim, it’s OK to lie about religion, if it will save the lives of others. For me, that is the statement of the century for the O. He has been excused by the Muslims.

 

Obama's so-called Christianity

alamo294 Monday, August 23rd at 2:09PM EST (link)

- as described in what he wrote for the campaign – bears no resemblance to the Christianity of Scripture. Obama has been openly Muslim for at least a year now and I haven’t heard him defend his “Christianity” for longer than that.

He’s Muslim, through and through.

And yes, people ARE born into Islam. If a Muslim becomes a genuine Christian – regenerated, transformed, a new creation in Christ – he is totally excommunicated from Islam, and in many cases his life is in danger. (Anyone remember Riqfa Bary?)

Obviously Muslims here and anywhere don’t take Obama’s conversion to Christianity seriously or he’d be a total outcast among Muslims, president or not. If genuine Muslims believed he had converted to Christ, there’s no way he would have been elected president – instead he might have been dead by Election Day of 2008.

Comment from acat below is absolutely correct.

 
 

A minor correction Eric

kyle8 (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:21AM EST (link)

The professional left has far more fear and loathing of Christians than Islam.

That is because in their little world, Muslims are mostly brown people and so can be excused for being backwards.

And since a lot of Muslims hate America or at least parts of our culture, Well, you know the old saying, “the enemy of my enemy…”

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

The secular left is pragmatic

finaljeopardy Sunday, August 22nd at 11:51AM EST (link)

They hate the Christian right, because they insist on freedom and personal liberty. To a morally decadent and unscrupulous political elite, they are a pain in the rear, and to such an extent that they have made their bed with Islam. Not just the religion, but with virulently anti-American, radical Islam. These Muslims, the Wahhabists and Salafis, have a rapidly exploding (sorry for the pun) population that will tolerate anything, fight over scraps and are easily led.

Look how nimbly Bloomberg LLC and taxpayer-funded AIG are jumping to get in on sharia-compliant finance aka dhimmitude. There’s a lot of money to be made selling our country to our enemies, and the ruling class is enjoying calling a majority of the populace “intolerant” “racist” “bigoted” “fascists.” It is the same glee with which they support Obama, who apparently has no soul. “It’s so cool. He will say or do anything.” We have a dangerous cult of personality as President during uncertain times.

Which is ironic

indylawyer (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 1:31PM EST (link)

Because the scary stereotype they have of Christianity is actually a whole lot closer to Islam.

The left is more narrow-minded than they realize

finaljeopardy Sunday, August 22nd at 2:58PM EST (link)

This is what happens when you inhabit an echo chamber and exclusively surround yourself with people who agree with you. They travel and “only frequent the best places.” And don’t you forget it! They don’t know their enemies any better than their new allies. Wait till they find out.

Exactly right Final

Warrior (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 11:38AM EST (link)

Groupthink — “I don’t know anybody who didn’t vote for Obam…”

“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma

 
 
 

Exactly

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:22PM EST (link)

In continental Europe and Ibero-America, most of the religious have been co-opted into supporting some form of statism — it really wasn’t that far a chasm for most of them, who lost their land holdings and political power to classically liberal reforms, and had a grudge to settle. Where progressives can co-opt the religious, they will, for the most part. Problem is, the religious in the US have mostly preferred to not seek the golden ring of political power, with some grasping exceptions.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 
 

A minor correction Eric

kyle8 (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:21AM EST (link)

The professional left has far more fear and loathing of Christians than Islam.

That is because in their little world, Muslims are mostly brown people and so can be excused for being backwards.

And since a lot of Muslims hate America or at least parts of our culture, Well, you know the old saying, “the enemy of my enemy…”

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 

Maureen Dowd thinks we are all full of crap

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:40AM EST (link)

Going Mad in Herds

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/opinion/22dowd.html?ref=opinion

The country is having some weird mass nervous breakdown, with the right spreading fear and disinformation that is amplified by the poisonous echo chamber that is the modern media environment.

The dispute over the Islamic center has tripped some deep national lunacy. The unbottled anger and suspicion concerning ground zero show that many Americans haven’t flushed the trauma of 9/11 out of their systems — making them easy prey for fearmongers.

Many people still have a confused view of Muslims, and the president seems unable to help navigate the country through its Islamophobia.

It is a prejudice stoked by Rush Limbaugh, who mocks “Imam Obama” as “America’s first Muslim president,” and by the evangelist Franklin Graham, who bizarrely told CNN’s John King: “I think the president’s problem is that he was born a Muslim. His father was a Muslim. The seed of Islam is passed through the father, like the seed of Judaism is passed through the mother.”

Graham added: “The teaching of Islam is to hate the Jew, to hate the Christian, to kill them. Their goal is world domination.”

A poll last week by the Pew Research Center tracked a strange spike in the number of Americans who believe, despite all evidence to the contrary, that Obama is a Muslim. And even the ones who don’t think he’s a Muslim don’t necessarily believe he’s a Christian.

That’s funny Hillary’s camp thought that Obama was a Muslim also.

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2899/hillary-clinton-agrees-with-schlussel-obama-suspicious-deceptive-on-muslim-background/

Hillary’s Team Has Questions About Obama’s Muslim Background. Are the American people ready for an elected president who was educated in a Madrassa as a young boy and has not been forthcoming about his Muslim heritage? This is the question Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s camp is asking about Sen. Barack Obama.

So, Maureen Dowd thinks our Secretary of State is mad????

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

Yeah, Maureen, we have NOT "flushed the trauma

janis (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:49AM EST (link)

of 9/11 out of our systems,,,” And we’re not going to either. I hope we never do. Because if we do as this idiot wishes, then we’re going to be every bit as clueless and vulnerable as we were in the Clinton years.

Which is what bought us 9/11. Guess what, Maureen? We still get upset when we think about Peal Harbor, too. But we know now that the Japanese are not out to still conquer us. The same cannot be said of radical Islam. So get your useless head out of your liberal hindquarters and try using it for thinking again. Or maybe not “again”, maybe for the first time ever.

 

The real nervous breakdown

finaljeopardy Sunday, August 22nd at 11:58AM EST (link)

… was November 4, 2008 when 52% of the country, including Maureen Dowd, voted for Barack Hussein Obama II. America lost its mind when the economy collapsed September 15, 2008. They got superstitious and suicidal just like the Democrats had planned.

 

If you listened to Barack Obama and the progressives

qurys Monday, August 23rd at 8:54AM EST (link)

during 2008 ad 2009 and into 2010, we have had one gigantic nationwide therapy session with Barack Obama as the healer trying to get us to fess up to our racism and bigotry, to our feckless disregard for our fellow citizens, to our callous historical imperialism and the shame we have brought upon ourselves in the eyes of the enlightened ones across the globe who see us for who we truly are while we agonizingly cling to our guns and Bibles. The patient notes probably started out listing us as “uncooperative”. The doctors mocked us slighly and thought it was a phase. Even the doctor-assisted media was disdainful and thought it their responsibility to jar us to our collective senses. The patient notes more recently have probably moved to “truculant” and “prognosis grim”. The physician has moved from hopey changey platitudes to direct confrontation and still the patient is unmoved.
Physician heal thyself! Because the flushing sound I hear in the background is the executive toilet and I think it just might be the economy.

 

Just like Peter Jennings

Warrior (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:51PM EST (link)

analogizing us to two-year-olds throwing a temper tantrum in ’94 for electing a Republican Congress, now comes Maureen calling us mental cases for not lying down for the construction of a Mosque at Ground Zero.

It seems to me that it’s the lib journalists who are the two-year-olds and mentally unstable when they can’t get their way. Listen to her cry about the “modern media environent.” What she means of course is an environment she and her lib cronies in the legacy media cannot control or manipulate as easily as they did for the first, say, sixty years of electronic broadcasting. People are actually talking back and the lefties are near apoplexy because of it. Gee, talk about a grown up, rational response to changing events.

Anyway, I digress. So MoDo thinks it’s “national lunacy” to be suspicious of a gang of thirteenth-century zealots who have proven time and again they are willing to die to kill as many innocent Americans as possible without hesitation or conscience?

Let’s see, MoDo doubtless lives in the Big City right? (She couldn’t possibly live with the provincials anywhere else!) Is it “lunacy” for her to double and triple lock her doors at night? To have a big, beefy Doorman escorting her in and out of her likely pricey and trendy apartment bldg? What abut wanting to live in a neighborhood where folks usually do not urinate in public during the daytime and common street crimes are rare? What if they wanted to build a half-way house for felon murderers and rapists in her neighborhood. Shouldn’t she just “flush away the trauma”? Does the fact that she doesn’t make her “easy prey for fearmongers”? And who might they be? The Good Rev. Jeremiah “God Da_m America” Wright?

And how is it that “many people have a confused view of Muslims”? Does she even know “many people”? Yes, Mo, we realize that some Muslims are peaceful. So what? Most pit bulls will not bite you unless provoked. Do we all suffer Pitbullphobia for harboring a healthy fear of them?

Oh yes. Speaking of fearmongoring, let’s never fail to bring up Rush Limbaugh, much less Franklin Graham. Wasn’t Rush the radio personality who was slandered as “racist” without a shred of evidence when he wanted to buy part of a pro ball club? Oh, yeah, that’s right. He’s the one. And the other frightening character? Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham who brought thousands if not not millions of the Lost to Christ and making them members of the true religion of peace? Yeah, I think I know to whom she is referring now.

And since when is it news that the Qu’uran teaches subjugation or death for anyone who doesn’t convert to predetory Islam? Could the Pulitzer prize winning Dowd never have heard of “dhimmitude”? “Jihad”? “Honor killins”? Etc.? Gee, it was in all the papers. Is MoDo really so out of touch with the basic tenets and realities of one of the most violent religions on earth?

Then she cites a Pew poll which indicates more Americans now believe Obama is a Muslim “despite all evidence to the contrary.” Really? Really Maureen? ALL evidence to the contrary? You know, you really ought to seek out the services of a good shrink if you think it beyond imagination that this muslim-appeasing, sheik-genuflecting, madrassas-educated, muslim-daddy-having character named BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA is a Muslim!!!

“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma

 
 

Something that is rarely pointed out about

throwback59 Sunday, August 22nd at 11:42AM EST (link)

Obama’s conversion to Christianity is that he converted in Rev. Wright’s Trinity church. This is NOT a mainstream Christian church, rather ist is a radical off-shoot of Christianity, much like Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam is an off-shoot of “mainstream” Islam.
Wright was his mentor. When they sat down and discussed religion do you think Rev. Wright said: “Barack, black people had it tough in this country but America is a great nation and with the Grace of God we perservered” or do you think he said “Barack, America is a racst, evil country, but God is on our side and that’s why we perservered.”
Never forget, Obama only quit the church for political necessity during the campaign.
So while Obama is technically a Christian, we should not be fooled into thinking he holds the values & beliefs that the typical Christian holds.

So while Obama is technically a Christian

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:49AM EST (link)

Huh? You cannot technically be a Christian.
You can pretend to be a Christian. And only the person who believes can be a true Christian. I don’t know what Obama believes. We can only see the surface of the man. No one knows what is in Obama’s heart, only God knows that. In the end God will be the judge.
Obama from a political point of view does not help himself by being so obtuse about his beliefs. I say this, as a Christian, I have never supported Obama and never will. He is bad for America and what America stands for.

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

Uh, yeah, "technically" was a poor choice of

throwback59 Sunday, August 22nd at 11:58AM EST (link)

words. Should’ve left that out. But you get my point.

I do get the point.

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 12:05PM EST (link)

And so does Charles Krauthammer

Krauthammer: Obama Has An “Affinity” For Islam

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/08/20/krauthammer_obama_has_an_affinity_for_islam_.html

Dr. Charles Krauthammer: “Given the fact that you don’t see him coming out of a church with the Bible in hand, as you would a Bush or a Clinton and the fact that he’s had this emphasis on Islam, I can understand why the numbers have widened.”

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

 
 
 

Not to put too fine a point on it

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:29PM EST (link)

but Christianity is completely and entirely politically agnostic. One’s love of and loyalty to the US, while a good thing, is irrelevant to the question of whether or not one is a Christian, and one cannot “technically” be a Christian, at any rate. I don’t think that Obama’s a Christian, but his anti-Americanism is completely independent of whether or not he does.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 

Who cares if he was "born a Muslim"

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:45AM EST (link)

ask any Evangelical, they will say they were born sinners and were destined to hell, if not for being “born again”.

My goal is to win this next election by as wide a margin as possible. My goal is to take the Senate and the House so as to do as much as possible to stop Obama and the weakening of America.

I think the Muslim issue is out there now, the Mosque issue is out there now, and the Dems are self destructing. In my humble opinion, if we are shrewd we would now take out the bowl of popcorn and let THEM struggle with this.

We are not going to win majorities in both houses saying Obama is a closet Muslim or bad Christian. We are going to win if we focus on the nanny state, the weakening of America at home and abroad, and Obama’s anti free enterprise stances.

We Republicans have a history of taking a good thing too far. We don’t get the leeway liberals do, even among independents. If we overplay our hand on this religion stuff, we might one day realize it was we who got hoisted on our own petard…again.

Molon Labe!

I agree Doc

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:56AM EST (link)

I go back to the question all the lib reporters are asking Republicans.
“Do you think the President is a Muslim?” – Just answer – “That is a question only the President can answer.”

Hillary during the democratic primary kept bringing up “Obama’s Muslim faith.” – Look where that got her.

The focus should be that America is a turning point. Do we keep going down the path of bigger Government? Or do we take the path to smaller Government and let the American people decide for themselves the best way back to growth & prosperity…..

As Mark Levin says – Liberty or Tyranny?

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

Here, Mark Levin

badnewzbearz Sunday, August 22nd at 5:25PM EST (link)

provides a great snapshot view of what conservatism is all about. What separates us from them. He is indeed The Great One.

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. Thomas Jefferson

 

555 Izone -nt

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:27PM EST (link)

Molon Labe!

 
 

Problem is Doc...Graham never said Obama is a closet Muslim and/or a bad Christian

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 2:58PM EST (link)

It’s a distortion. He’s been taken completely out of context and the press is LYING about what he actually said. Se my post below with the Video.

The other thing is this…evn if her weren’t having his comment twisted 180% from what he actually said….Graham wasn’t talking as a Republican and he was speaking as a politician. He’s speaking of a minister of the Gospel of Christ Jesus as such he has an obligation to tell the truth as he sees it. That’s partly what Erick is saying here I think….He’s not speaking for the Tea Party, the Republican Party or as a candidate for political office…Period!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

I was responding to what Erick wrote

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:08PM EST (link)

I did not know about Graham’s comments until this diary. I have been focusing on our economy and liberty. I never said Graham said he was a closet Muslim or bad Christian, I said if conservatives push this, it could come back to bite us. It is out there, we should let Obama and the Dems worry about it. Of course I already said all this.

It is fine what Graham said was religious and not about politics etc. Of course that is not the case because he was talking about how the Muslim world sees Obama. I don’t even think Graham is right about that.

This is a political site, I will continue to speak on politics. I don’t really care who the president prays to, I care that my freedoms and your freedoms are protected.

Molon Labe!

 
 

It is Gallup and the libs that made this an issue this week due to the CHANGE in poll numbers on this question

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:11PM EST (link)

and their correct conclusion that such a growing perception dooms any chance for Obama’s re-election.

That he was born a Muslim is of a piece of why there has ALWAYS been a large percentage that think he’s a Muslim. Other things from the campaign that feed that opinion and that he is not a Christian are his associations with Rev Wright, Farrakhan. Then after taking office, his bowing to muslim leaders etc

What is feeding the recent increase? How about that NASA’s main mission is to explore the space between Casablanca and Jakarta rather than Outer Space. His apology tours. The way he doesn’t Americanize foreign words like everyone else.

Sometimes I wonder if the freak is human.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

lol, he is a caricature of the left

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:18PM EST (link)

but they are caricatures. I am glad people are finally questioning Obama, why do they always wait to question libs AFTER they elect them? I am glad people don’t trust him, they shouldn’t.

He is an apologist for America, his picture among the other presidents will always be a stain on us, we fell for it as a nation, we questioned our own being.

Molon Labe!

5555555555 - slam dunk Doc - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:57PM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 

One of the saner commenters

wilfranc Sunday, August 22nd at 11:53AM EST (link)

I think Franklin’s words are formed with integrity, a rare quality today.

And after reading his words, don’t know what the fuss was about. The words didn’t appear contentious, but actually a good example of clear, concise language.

Yes, but that's not allowed with regard to anything about Obama, you see.

janis (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 12:07PM EST (link)

We are supposed to fall for the obfuscations, the wee, tiny white lies, and the outright whoppers. Tell the truth in “clear, concise language” and you’re going to get smacked all over the place.

That was something that we learned the hard way in the primaries leading up to the disastrous election of 2008. Did O “hang out with terrorists”? Of course not, why would you even THINK such a thing? Was he a socialist? Oh, no, Heaven forbid you should call him something so awful! Were there campaign financing irregularities on his side? NOOOOOOOOOOOO, you racists!

They are still using the same playbook. The difference is that too many Americans in flyover country aren’t buying what they’re selling anymore.

 
 

Amen Erick

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:55AM EST (link)

I really like this post about Christian faith. I stand by my previous post discussing the political aspect of this, and would likely quibble on an issue or two, if we had a deep theological discussion (I will by the beer), but I am refreshed by the meat of your diary, the true meaning of our shared faith.

Molon Labe!

 

While we're on the subject

finaljeopardy Sunday, August 22nd at 12:01PM EST (link)

His obvious antipathy towards Israel, the report that he told an Egyptian diplomat that he is a Muslim, granting his first presidential interview to Al Jazeera, his “alleged misstatement” that John McCain “hadn’t talked about [his] Muslim faith,” bowing to Mayor of Tampa Pam “CAIR Day” Lorio, NASA muslim outreach, Nicholas Kristof writing in the New York Times that he recited the Arabic call to prayer in a “first-rate accent,” his 57 states comment, his statement in the Audacity of Hope that he will “stand with [Muslims] should the political winds shift in an ugly direction,” his odd interest in the long-term consequences of al Qaeda’s actions vs. the “short-term tactical gains” of these actions, etc. Now the Ground Zero mosque. Someone who had to be prodded to denounce Rev. Jeremiah Wright and his “God D*** AmeriKKKa” sermon, and someone who launched his political career in the living room of William Ayers, who had his picture on the cover of the New York Times on September 11, 2001 stomping on the American flag and saying he had no regrets about setting off bombs in the US — hadn’t blown up enough, in fact. It’s obvious Obama sees 911 differently than most Americans. Is the American President a closeted practicing Muslim? Perhaps not. Do his loyalties lie with Islam over this country? A whole lot of smoke says that they are at the very least divided.

the faith we KNOW he has is left wing progressivism

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 12:23PM EST (link)

They are mostly atheists and “agnostics” (cowardly atheists). Their faith is in the state, in their belief they are superior and should lead us all. This is the Kos crowd and MSM, the hard left that supported Obama and carried him to victory.

These people are not Muslim, they just hate America. They support Muslims in the same way Hanoi Jane supported North Korea. It is the same reason they go out of their way to point out claims against our troops. They see the troops as America, and when they are embarrassed, it helps those against America.

I don’t believe Obama is Muslim at all. I think those that enjoy when America is taken down a peg will always support our opponents. The left supports the Palestinians against the Israelis because America supports the Israelis. I really wish it were more complicated, but it just is not.

I don’t know what is is Obama’s heart, hell I don’t even want to know. But I do know his actions, I do know what he says. His actions and statements are standard lefty tripe, tear down America, tear down Western Civilization, and tear down patriotism.

Molon Labe!

north Korea? lol, I think that was Vietnam

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 12:26PM EST (link)

I am not Sheila Jackson Lee, as far as you know. :)

Molon Labe!

As the comedian said LOL

finaljeopardy Sunday, August 22nd at 1:11PM EST (link)

“Thank God we won here in Vietnam… I don’t know what this country would have done if we lost. It might have torn itself apart, you know?”

You probably have a point about Obama being a faithful Muslim. Praying to Mecca five times a day would ruin his golf game. But progressivism is a lazy philosophy, too, and a far cry from a religion, more like a temp job, much like being a “constitutional law professor” at U of C or a “community organizer.” The professional left are bums. That’s not Obama’s faith, what drives him. It has aggravated many in his base, actually. “Dreams of My Father.” Obama’s got daddy issues, and that makes him lean Muslim in his own narcissist way.

 

5, Doc

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:39PM EST (link)

US leftists don’t really support something because it is right, noble, or good in and of itself (particularly in the foreign policy square), they support it because it is against the perceived values of America. Pretty much none of the Latin American natives, Middle Eastern states, or African states are particularly progressive, but they all have one thing in common: they are inimical to American interests, or prop up the whipping boy of imperialist America.

It’s pretty horrifying to read lefty rhetoric when they see a progressive state that agrees with some of their values. Conservatives can sometimes be blindsided by allies, but they don’t shill for totalitarian states that superficially agree with their views (Chile comes to mind) in the same manner that the left does (USSR, Venezuela, Nazi Germany, and N Korea are the start of a very long list that matches these characteristics).

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 
 
 

The left

rdelbov Sunday, August 22nd at 1:14PM EST (link)

was all over Bush43 having bible studies in the white house. Those same lefties are now talking up Obama’s Christian faith.

I recall Obama’s 1st speech and shudder a bit. He mentioned the six great religions with a nod towards the Christians-the Jews-the Muslim-the Hindu-the buddists and those who believe in no God at all. The 5 great faiths and then the equally great non faith.

I don’t know Obama’s heart. I pray for him and our country. I am a sinner saved by grace. This is a hard terrtory for the Christian to cover. Let me just say that in his outward political speeches and his actions Barack Obama is covering new ground. I don’t like.

I have friends who are missionaries in an Islamic country where spreading the Gospel is punishable by death. I personally would like a little less deference to Islam from our President. He is sending the wrong message in so many ways.

 

Amen, Eric, and thank you for stepping up!

Bill Sunday, August 22nd at 1:18PM EST (link)

The lapdog progressive media that would not know the truth if it bit them, will answer to the Almighty at “judgment” as we all will. I have read the BOOK and in the end, I KNOW WHO WINS! Thank you Jesus, praise be to GOD!

Thank God! November 3, 2010. U.S. House, GOP 290, DEM 145; U.S. Senate, GOP 70, DEM 28, IND 2. Keep on praying!

 

Barack may be a Christian

oblio Sunday, August 22nd at 2:05PM EST (link)

but I’d like to know where he gets his Theology. What you believe IS important after all* and I’ve seen nothing to indicate that he has been marinated in anything other than rank heresy.

* And he said unto them, But who say ye that I am? And Peter answering said, The Christ of God. – Lk 9:20

Obama gets his theology from Rev Wright, Karl Marx and Minister Farrakhan. He did become a sort of Christian by joining a cultish version of Christianity, but

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 2:48PM EST (link)

I doubt enough evidence of his faith could be gathered to prove him guilty of being a Christian in a court of law.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 

The Press has distorted what Graham said and why he said it.

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 2:38PM EST (link)

you beat me to the punch on this because I was going to write on it today so I’ll just point this out as an addendum to your post because you covered everything else exquisitely.

Graham didn’t just out of the blue say Obama is a Muslim thus proving himself to be the ignoramous the press is portraying him to be.

The reason Graham said what he said was because he was asked why so many Americans believe Obama is a Muslim. Only then did he say Obama was born of a Muslim father and the seed of Islam was passed down from father to son. What’s deliberately gotten lost in what Graham said is that he went on to say the Obama had renounced Islam and professes Christianity thus those who believe Obama is a Muslim are mistaken.

The Nazis and Propagandists in the so called objective media have take the one half of his statement that makes it sound like Graham believes he’s a Muslim and deliberately left out the beginning where it’s clear he’s talking about why people have a mistaken impression…and the end where he says Obama is a Christian because he’s renounced the Muslim faith of his father and professed Christ as King of Kings and Lord of Lords!

all I can say about the press in this matter is DAXX them….DAXX them all to Hell!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Here's the whole thing for those who haven't seen it

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 2:46PM EST (link)

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

thanks for adding the context Ace, but...

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:01PM EST (link)

IMHO, Graham should have said he believed him. That is what ministers are supposed to do. Sure, we can’t even be 100 percent sure about others, we can not see into their hearts, but Graham made a point to NOT say he believed Obama.

I think we on the right are very close to getting distracted here. Sure, anyone can say anything, but we as a movement do not have to get all caught up in it.

We have a Congressional election in a few months. Obama will be the president until 2012. I say we need to focus on things other than whether Obama is a Christian or not. I only get one vote, just like everyone else. I just have a bad feeling we are being led into a trap.

Molon Labe!

I may be mistaken but I think he said specifically that Obama had renounced Islam...and that he believs him

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:23PM EST (link)

I saw it on another clip somewhere but I can’t find it anywhere.

secondly, why does Graham have to say he believes him? maybe he does, maybe he doesn’t….the point is…he was asked a pointed question and gave an honest answer as he sees it. He didn’t say Obama was a Muslim as he’s been portrayed to have said…and he didn’t say he wasn’t a Muslim.

Again, the question Graham was asked is, “why do you think so many Americans believe Obama is a Muslim.” (paraphrased)…

The Answer that Graham gave is what he believes and is a perfectly reasonable explanation.

The thing I found amusing more than anything Friday I think it was is ABC Nightly news used the Graham clip out of context and then the reporter went on in the piece to say exactly what Graham had said that ended up on the cutting room floor as if it were the Reporter had said it and Graham never had… i.e. that Obama had renounced Islam and therefore was a Christian!

This is yellow journalism at it’s worse and the Press needs to be called on it!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Oh...I forgot to address your last....I would argue we aren't getting caught up in whether Obama is a Christian or not

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:27PM EST (link)

at least I’m not…I’m getting caught up in the fact that the so called “Objective Media” is out and out LYING about Franklin Graham’s comments and turning it 180% from what he actually said

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

I haven't checked the media clippings yet Ace

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:30PM EST (link)

but I believe you, no doubt there :)

Molon Labe!

 
 
 

Focus on the important things

NewTexanDave Sunday, August 22nd at 3:26PM EST (link)

I’m a buddhist. I am also a liberatian like Clint Eastwood.
I could care less whether BHO is a muslim or not especially that BHO is not on the ballot. I’m going to vote 100% for Republicans in this election regardless but we need to focus on the economy, jobs, and the man-made healthcare disaster.
One thing I disliked about Bush junior was that he focused too much on social conservatism, which could get very divisive. If you want to broaden your base you should never go that route. We need to talk more about how the Democratic controlled congress is destroying the economy and preventing a recovery. Just ignore those baseless attacks.

That's utter balderdash

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:33PM EST (link)

Bush didn’t focus any more on social conservatism than any other president has number one

Number 2 you big tent people always like to talk about how addressing social conservatives concerns is divisive as if your insistence that we ignore those concerns isn’t just as divisive!

I’ve said it before…and I’ll say it again…try winning election as a republicans without social conservatives. Dole, the elder Bush and McCain tried it…and look where it got them

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Precisely, Ace. There may be some sufficiently "red states"

acat (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:48PM EST (link)

where ya can win the big prize without some “social conservative” (or, to be a tad more precise and less polite, nose-in-the-bedroom bible-thumping, won’t-say-no-to-a-theocracy republicans*) backing but .. they’re mostly in the west and the northeast.

So, to win the whole country, one must avoid McCain’s mistake – for the social conservatives have a long memory. (McCain stuck several knives in the backs of social conservative heroes over his career… and who stayed home come election day?)

Mew

* and while I have seen a few who fit this description on red state, somehow they don’t seem to last long … and it tends to be the other christians calling them out.

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

McCain had that unique talent

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:44PM EST (link)

to tick off everyone. I can’t think of an issue, be it natl. security, small government, or social conservatives, where McCain’s knives haven’t been sticking out of people’s backs.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

McCain is neither dead nor unemployed... so "McCain has that unique talent" is more appropriate...

acat (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:12PM EST (link)

And you’re right – he leaves knives in backs the way smokers leave cigarette butts.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

Alas, acat, you are correct

aesthete (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 1:18AM EST (link)

Perhaps the use of past tense was overly wishful on my end.

(Kidding: I wish McCain a speedy and happy retirement, with the accouterments implied.)

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 
 
 

Ace, stop trying to start a fight

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:50PM EST (link)

We need a “big tent”, it has to be big enough to win the elections. But there are big tents and big tents. I want a big tent focused on a very SMALL list of shared principles. Those principles are stated clearly in the Declaration and the Constitution. We can have a big tent based on just a few principles. We are not adding views we don’t believe in, we are adding by subtraction of divisive views giving power over others that is not warranted.

Bush DID focus on some things that could be called “social views” that hurt us. No child left behind was a social program and a huge federal takeover of education. GWB’s views on amnesty for illegals were based on social views in part. Bush was most supported by social conservatives and least supported by libertarian conservatives, there is a reason for that.

The point is most of us have gone beyond the social vs fiscal, vs neocon, vs libertarian battles that got us nothing but losses. Bush was not the worst offender by far, if you want to see the worst check out Frist and Kyl.

We as a movement, a party, and even a website know that the battle is between lefty statists and those who love liberty. This is clear, this is working, we really will be less than bright to blur the issue at this late date.

I know where you stand Ace and I know you will not change. I respect that, and respect you. But I am telling you 90 percent of us have, we are focused on liberty and freedom. We are going to win, and I want guys like NewTexan IN the tent.

this is the last I am going to say on this out of respect for Erick’s diary.

Molon Labe!

OK...lets parse this out...I was responding to NewTexanDave saying we need to ignore social issues altogether...so I'm not trying to pick a fight.

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:00PM EST (link)

so what I said was aimed at that statement.

If I really wanted to start a fight, do you realy think I of all people would have a problem getting one started?

.

As for you comments…I don’t consider No Child Left Behind (NCLB) as a social issue and I don’t know anyone who does in my socially conservative circle of friends. To the contrary, NCLB is pretty much universally opposed by social conservatives because it takes control of our children’s education away from the local level and farther away from the family where SoCons thing it should be…and puts it in the hands of far away, unapproachable, unaccountable bureaucrats

That’s a fail on point 1.

Second, Amnesty is almost universally opposed by SoCons as well. Yeah Rove and Bush patronized us by talking about how socially conservative Latinos are so they are a natural fit for the Republican Party…but that was never more than talk. For instance, why would they including McLame and Grahamnesty say that at very same time they are trying to down play social issues heading into the 2008 elections. Amnesty is and always has been about getting more votes for the Democrats and for the Country Club Republicans it’s always been about importing a cheap labor pool and driving down wages.

That’s a fail on point 2

Yes Bush fooled us and we did support him and turned out for him en mass in 2004 and Republicans won in the biggest second term landslide election in the twentieth century yet we still get to listen to the big tent preaching that our issues lead to Republican defeats.

Fail on Point 3

I agree right now we’ve moved beyond the social issues to stop Obama…but we won’t be ignored. 2008 is proof of what can be expected when the party pisses down the legs of SoCons while talking about the rain. McClame sawed off the SoCon leg and now we have Bambi in the White House. Point the finger at SoCons if you wish…and pleanty here do…but McCain made the calculation that he could ignore them so now we live with the consequences…McCain shares at least half the blame and NewTexanDave wants a redux

That’s what I was responding to.

As for the last, I want NewTexanDave in the tent as well…so long as he isn’t insisting I have to stand outside which he was…and what I was responding to.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

I could play your game Ace,but I have better things to do

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:15PM EST (link)

if you want to stay in your comfort zone and divide conservatives that is fine. I could say “my side won, so their is your fail”, but I won’t do it.

No Child Left Behind, amnesty, and a host of other big government ideas were supported by many for false social conservative reasons. They might not be in your circle of friends, but the do exist.

I feel like I am dancing on a grave here, because my side already won the debate. See the Tea Parties, Santelli, Beck, Hannity, Rush, Steyn, Levin. You can stay a “social conservative”, that is fine with me, but your side lost. But most social conservatives did not lose, they just realized the limits of government and man, they just realized the real threat is statism.

The fact is you asked us to try to win without social conservatives. That is a political threat. But it is a hollow one because we have the social conservatives. Why are you threatened by those who want to focus on liberty, freedom, and the end of the Federal Leviathan? Why don’t you spell out the issues you think we are ignoring?

You seem to think there are all these people that just can’t wait to stop social conservative plans. This is wrong, what this party and movement are trying to do is focus on what unites Americans against socialists. We are not against social values, we are against the federal leviathan and socialism.

Again, since you asked us to try to win without social conservatives, please explain what social conservative views we are ignoring? You don’t speak for all social conservatives, I can promise you that.

Molon Labe!

I don't know who you know who's a social conservative, Doc,

eburke (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:45PM EST (link)

but I am one, and hang around a ton of them, and belong to SoCon organizations and I’ve yet to meet a single SoCon entity or person who was/is in favor NCLB or amnesty.

As a 3-legged stool conservative who believes that Bush’s lack of spending restraint led the GOP to the state it’s in today, I’ll continue to assert that if you look at voting records, it’s a lot easier to find SoCon legislators who are also FisCons then to find those mythical and virtually non-existent critters who are social moderates and fiscal conservatives (starting with the Muffin Sisters, Scott Brown, and Mike Castle).

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

but I don't support those people eburke

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:54PM EST (link)

the libertarian conservatives to me our the true conservatives. I am not saying others are not conservative, but if you peel it down to the core what we stand for is liberty, just like the Founders.

I think if you had to make an argument, the RINO’s have more in common with some so called social conservatives than they ever would have in common with libertarian conservatives ala Goldwater. The faux social conservatives relied on an all powerful state to push their pet projects just as the liberals rely on the state to push theirs.

What I stand for is individual freedom, I stand for the Constitution as written. There is not a moderate bone in my body, I am a conservative, I believe in liberty, and I am radical about it.

Molon Labe!

 

eburke

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:12PM EST (link)

recent link about social conservatives supporting amnesty here

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/7133027.html

nice overview of compassionate conservatism and growing the federal government

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/31/AR2010033102630.html

more mentioning big government conservatism and NCLB

http://www.yaliberty.org/yar/the-end-of-big-government-conservatism

look eburke, I agree that most conservatives of all stripes NOW are against NCLB and most conservatives are against amnesty. But there were some and there are still some that have misplaced their faith in government, that is my point.

I think we have moved on. change will always cause some friction. But I believe conservatives are focusing on what really matters now, I hope we all focus our fights on our opponents.

Molon Labe!

Hey Doc...thanks for the links.

eburke (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 9:58PM EST (link)

First, I want to emphasize that I am much more interested in what unites us than what divides us (plus, we ain’t that far apart)

As to the articles you linked I’ll take them briefly and in order

1) as far as evangelical ‘leaders’ wanting amnesty, that is, once again, an example of ‘big’ everything against the ordianry common folk. There’s a reason that Ras is showing a humongous divide between the electorate and the ‘political class’. Big government, big business, big labor, and, yes, big religion are more interested in perpetuating themselves than they are looking out for their constituency.

You’ll notice that the article talks about people like Land losing their congregational members over their support for amnesty. That would be because the average person in the pew understands better than their leaders that when the Bible talks about being subject to the higher powers (i.e. the government) that includes people who come across the border and break our laws as their first act on our soil.

2) Please do not ever conflate Karl Rove w/social conservatives or any conservatives again in my presence :-) Not only was Karl the architect of the ‘please trash our party while we say absolutely freaking nothing’ strategy, as a SoCon I was/am highly offended by his cynical view of SoCons as being nothing more than a group to be satiated so that he could retain power. I can’t *stand* Karl Rove.

3) If I *ever* hear the term “compassionate conservative” again from the lips of a Republican, my head will explode. GWB was great on the WOT, he nominated (for the most part) good judges, but his ‘compassionate conservatism’ was about as conservative as beckers dead white cat. I hold GWB and a bunch of pork barreling K Street Republicans responsible for the 2006 and 2008 electoral debacle. And while I won’t deign to speaker for someof the so called religious ‘leaders’, all the SoCons that I know are also fiscal conservatives because it is part and parcel of our belief system.

Now, having said all that, let’s go kick some lib arse this fall.

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

well said Eburke, I am with you! -nt

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:44PM EST (link)

Molon Labe!

Then let's roll, baby! -nt-

eburke (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:02PM EST (link)

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

 
 
 
 
 

Whose deviding? I'm responding to someone saying SoCons need to sit down and shut up

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:05PM EST (link)

I’ve tried to explain that…I made the point a while back when Governor Ryan declared we need to get away from social issues that we’ve put our issues aside for the moment and are busy pulling the wagon yet the big tent crowd insists on kicking us while we’re in the yoke pulling the wagon.

NewTexanDave did just what I’m describing and I responded.

Again…who is dividing whom…We’re not demanding the rest of the party abandon their issues….especially now….those of us pulling the wagon are pulling the wagon…and we still have the Charlie Basses, and the Paul Ryans, and the rest of the crowd that brought 2008 on us kicking us on a constant and continuous basis…it seems to me that you and your crowd would do well to practice a little of what you are preaching…especially when it’s your side of the arguement that has had a long sting of acolytes quit the Party and play for the other Team i.e. Specter, Scozzafava, Bennett, (Whose son is now working for the Democrat), Crist, and most Recently Boob Dole who decided to moon the Republican Party and give money to the turncoat Crist who is busy praising GOD that he’s not a Republican any more.

Your side hasn’t won squat because most of the Tea Party are comprised of Social Conservatives…Oh…and we love liberty as well we just realize you can’t have liberty and be Libertine at the same time…

As to what is being ignored…lets try the fact that we’re having memorials to police officers taken down in Utah because of the so called separation of church and state. Let’s talk about the case working it’s way through the courts now to disallow Christian Soldiers from having a cross on their graves in national cemeteries and the fact that it’s not been summarily dismissed as foolishness. Lets try the fact that we’ve had federal judges forbidding us from holding church services at camp grounds on national parks because of that lie. Let’s talk about the cases of students being denied the right to point to their creator as the source of their success because of same. Let’s talk about students suspended from school for carrying a Bible with them!

Then let’s try Abortion and the butchery of children happening in abortion mills every day. Let’s talk about the born alive children of Abortions who are being thrown on the floor then stuck in trash bags and hidden from authorities and the fact that a prosecutor refused to prosecute the perpetrators only citing them for not having a doctor on hand while the baby was stuffed in the trash bag.

Let’s talk about the desecration of the institution of Marriage in California and the judicial tyranny of a judge singlehandedly thwarting the will of 70% of the voters of that state. Or what about the Courts ordering state legislatures to vote a certain way and said legislatures going along with the court order without even a whimper of protest. Oh…and let’s not forget the Republican Governor who signed the law and expects to be our next nominee for POTUS.

Yeah…you can play my game…but to me it’s not a game…because I’m the one that’s under assault….it’s my speech they’re restricting with their lie about a separation of church and state….it’s my children they are indoctrinating in our schools with their hedonistic drivel…It’s me that is having my GOD given right to practice my religion restricted at national parks. It’s me that is having a mockery made of the institution of marriage which I consider a holly sacrement between GOD and his children and all you can think about is whether you’ll be able to take the next bong his without worrying about a misdemeanor charge for possession.

But hey…I should just sit down and shut up…make room for every Tom, Dick and Harry that wants to come into my party and tell me I have no place at the table right?

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

I quit reading half way through

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:41PM EST (link)

after all this time, you still don’t know me from a hole in the ground. For anyone to think I am a moderate, to think I am in anyway similar to Specter or Scozzawhoever, or Crist tells me I am wasting my time with them.

You cling to your hyphenated conservatism for a reason sir. I am a libertarian-Conservative only when debating those who have warped the the meaning of the word conservative.

you came here to represent social conservatives and asked us how we could win without them. That is a political threat, like your team wants its share or you will quit. I asked what you think your hybrid conservatism side wants that the Constitution does not give and you have yet to reply.

I said we should team up, I said all factions should call a truce. But know, some just have to be in a clique. That is fine with me, my side won. And I am part of the Tea Party movement, my only issue is a joined it about 30 years early.

Molon Labe!

I'm not a hyphenated Conservative Doc...I AM A CONSERVATIVE

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:00PM EST (link)

Across the board….I am a fiscal, social and Nat Sec Conservative….I put equal weight behind all….YOU are the hyphenated Conservative because you choose to focus on the libertarian side of conservatism and refuse to acknowledge you liberty without the self governing mechanism of morality is a fools errand.

it’s nice to know you think so little of me and my opinions that you can bother yourself to read what I wrote. just answer this one question:

I ask, what is libertarian about the Judicial branch ruling religious services at a nation campground a violation of the so called separation of church and state thus banning the assembly of believers restricting their freedom of worship, right to assembly, freedom to practice their religion, and freedom of speech all specifically guaranteed in the first amendment.

That’s just one small issue out of the laundry list I gave you above….tell me I shouldn’t have my grievances on that one issue addressed by my government and why I shouldn’t have my party seek an answer to that question….and don’t tell me because it’s divisive because divisiveness is not sufficient reason to deprive me of every right guaranteed me by my GOD and enumerated in the First Amendment save the right to freedom of the press

I’ve made this point over and over again as did the founders and others down through the ages that liberty without morality leads to chaos and as a result, government intervention to control men’s passions when men refuse to govern their own. I am under assault because of my religious beliefs from my government…and you want me to ignore my issues because they’re divisive?

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

no Ace

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:08PM EST (link)

you just don’t know where I stand, and you know nothing about libertarian leaning conservatives. You have shown that to all. I stopped reading because I realized the debate was fruitless. You made claims about me and what I believe based on nothing, like I just joined today. I realized there is no point in this.

btw, I support your religious freedom, I am not encroaching on any of your beliefs and will not support anyone who does. have a good evening sir.

Molon Labe!

Doc- What exactly is a libertarian leaning conservative?

Scope (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:17PM EST (link)

Is it one that is fiscally conservative, but, socially left of center? Maybe if you laid out your beliefs, it would go a long way to what you hold dear.

Scope, as I said to Ace, I think this is a problem of nomenclature

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:46PM EST (link)

I told Ace what he considers to be a “social conservative” value, I might consider to be a libertarian or American value. I think we sometimes just decide to divide ourselves into these small groups and fight for God knows what reason. I admit I do this too, it is a mistake. to be sure I differ with you and Ace on certain issues, but I bet they are the rare exception.

I can’t go over all my ideas here on the spot but I will list some to give you an idea of where I stand.

1) reduce the size of government, federal, state, and local. It is wrong that the only governmental abuses are federal, some of the worst are at the state and local level. See Mike Nifong, the attempt to charge Rush, the destruction of Tom Delay’s political career.

2) make real changes to the government, like cut all but defense by 30 percent over time. Cut the Department of Education by 80 percent, only fund a think tank that can advise on education plans that relate to our national security and economic relevance.

3) Get rid of the tens of thousands of absurd federal laws untrustworthy organizations such as the DEA, ATF, and IRS. Law should have meaning, if I don’t hurt you, there should be no law against my doing it.

4) keep our military strong and reward our allies, don’t pay penance to our future adversaries.

5) change our immigration laws so that they benefit us. Increase immigration for those highly skilled and educated, seal the borders, don’t let any single nation take more immigration slots than another based on population size.

6) it is time to decriminalize marijuana use and gambling. If someone harms another, there are laws to punish that, if another is not harmed, it should not be illegal. I still think hard drugs should be illegal but new ideas need to come up to deal with them.

7) we need to go to a sales only tax. the only reason the tax system exists as it does is the tax lobby of accountants, lawyers, bureaucrats etc.

8) whenever there is a problem, we should lean to to free market for a solution. An example is medical care. If not for insurance, medicare etc, no doctor would charge $50 for two aspirin.

9) Get rid of social security. It is a waste of people’s income with returns less than CD’s. It has become just one more slush fund for Democrats to hand out other people’s money and get the plaudits.

10) repeal the tens of thousands of gun laws that don’t relate to shooting someone. This idea can be applied throughout the federal government, we must stop the government from trying to prove its relevancy by constantly creating new laws.

11) Cut the time Congress is in session drastically. Congress should only come together when an national need is at hand.

12) make serious tort reform, in lawsuits, loser must pay what they ask for. The legal system has damaged capitalism by making law a lose lose proposition for corporations. You can be sued over and over and at best you just spend a lot of money to not lose.

13) repeal Roe v Wade, send it back to the states. Reduce abortions through education and social mores, but at some point the state probably can’t end them all.

14) I believe we must have laws and the Ten Commandments are a good start. However, morality can not exist at the point of a gun. We do our best, but we can not “make” people moral. That is done through the family, the society etc.

15) get rid of the NEA and other unions that do nothing but focus on self propagation. how we do that is unclear, but I am sure there are benefits they get from our wallets.

16) marriage is a tough one. I support only traditional marriage, but I have been considering the idea of getting the state out of the marriage business entirely. If marriage is a sacred act, then why do we need the state involved at all? This is a hot button issue, and I am certainly not with those who want the state to allow same sex marriage.

ok, there are some ideas of the top of my head. I doubt they seem so radical when spelled out. I hope they are radical to the left, or I am doing something wrong :)

Molon Labe!

Fair enough...I agree with all that except Marriage and legalizing Mary J

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:19PM EST (link)

so please tell me what it is Social Conservatives are supposed to put on the back burner so we can win elections which is what this has all been about?

I’d like to know what NewTexanDave meant as well.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

I don't know what he meant Ace

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:27PM EST (link)

but it set you off and that set me off lol. Like I said, I think we tend to get into divisive camps and fight sometimes. It is like an army with nothing to do, it causes fights. I just hope we all focus on the real enemy. And I still think we need a big tent because our views deserve one. Let’s end the reign of the statists, THEN we can argue over our differences.

I can’t think of a thing social conservatives need to put on the back burner, but I don’t see a need to say, claim this election is about abortion for example. The left loves to find wedge issues to ruin us with those who would normally support us. This election is about the economy, this election is about Pelosi, Reid, and Obama.

I

Molon Labe!

Look....I commented on what he said and from there it's been you and I

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:52PM EST (link)

I said Big tenters and you put yourself in that category whether you did it intentionally or not. I never intended to call you Libertine and I’ve apologized for throwing you in with Crist and Company.

On the flip side…and what get’s me going is when you insist on saying SoCons supported NCLB and all the other crap you keep bringing up.

You have a point on the internet gambling bill because that was supported by SoCons….there was another you mentioned that you had a point on and I can’t remember what it was.

But let’s get this straight once and for all…Compassionate Conservatism isn’t the same as Social Conservativism.

I remember the first time I heard the term and it was not long after the 1994 elections. Ariana Huffington was one of the ideas first proponents and GW Bush was in the mix from the beginning.

Anyway…When Arianna and people like Kemp’s to Renew America and other groups started the movement within the party, the whole focus was on using the government to acheive Conservative ends.

I knew that and I’ll be the first to admit I was an idiot where he was concerned because by 2000, I had forgotten it and went all in for Bush to stop McCain, (I loathed McCain even then) I fell for Bush’s crap about being a Social Conservative and gave him a pass on all the big government bull crap until he signed that $300 Billion Farm bill…but by then it was too late. .

anyway…what get’s be going is being thrown in with the crowd that thinks you can achieve Conservative ends with bigger government…that’s like saying you can cure a stomach ache by taking cyanide!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 

Then why did you wade into the middle of this since it was NewTexanDave's comment and my reply

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 9:05PM EST (link)

I can’t think of a thing social conservatives need to put on the back burner, but I don’t see a need to say, claim this election is about abortion for example. The left loves to find wedge issues to ruin us with those who would normally support us. This election is about the economy, this election is about Pelosi, Reid, and Obama.

My whole issue is with the people who preach big tent are usually talking about tacking left on social issues to attracts moderates and independents. I’m excluding you from this camp since you say that’s not what you are advocating.

What hacked me off about Paul Ryan and his comments…and the one from NewTexanDave is and the RMSP crowd is that they just keep saying we need to stay away from social issues when no one is even demanding we address them right now….they just have to keep taking a switch to our backs I guess.

No one is demanding we make this election about abortion….abortion isn’t even being discussed unless it’s one of these out of the blue attacks on SoCons by people who can’t stop picking the scab instead for focusing on our common enemy.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 
 
 
 

I consider myself a Libertarian leaning conservative

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:45PM EST (link)

you’re the one that’s not listening Doc.

I just refuse to believe that liberty can exist without a population rooted in strong moral principles. To me, a government that is detrimental to morality and fostering morality in the population is a threat to my liberties….you can’t have one without the other.

The founders believed it too…

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

the Constitution does not change

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:14PM EST (link)

but society has changed. The Founders were part of a much more close knit society. We hared a shared heritage, shared religious beliefs etc. I am not saying everyone was the same ethnicity or should be, I am saying there was a common bond, a common core of knowledge and beliefs in what was good.

I heard a story not long ago about one of the old time tv hosts who quoted the Bible. He was amazed that thousands called in to find out where the great quote came from. He said 30 years before, everyone knew that quote regardless of education or background. We as a nation once had a core of knowledge even among those who were not formally educated.

Now we are as splintered as ever. We don’t watch the same shows, read the same news, it is like the country shares a land mass and nothing else. Like America is just a place, like any other.

I refuse to change strong moral principles, but we must realize there are new challenges. I have always said the greatest threat to our nation is decadence. If you doubt that, search the site for Doc Holliday and Decadence. Then see if I am a libertine.

I just don’t believe that government should be a moral arbiter. Of course we must have laws against crimes etc. But if we want morality, we need to take on the left, the MSM, the NEA etc. We need to instill pride in country through the teaching of history, civics, and celebrity because of success, not success because of celebrity.

In the end, we must stop asking for government to fix things, we must do it ourselves. these our ideas I have been saying for four years here. yet I am still called a moderate, a liberal, a fiscal con, a “libertine”. Oh well, it gives us something to do on a Sunday night :)

Molon Labe!

 
 
 
 

as for Cliques...

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:13PM EST (link)

I’m not working for one leg of the stool exclusively…I’m objecting to being told one leg needs to forget it when it comes to representation from my party.

As for Threats…I’m not making a threat…I’m pointing out a simple fact…McCain and his clowns decided they could ignore SoCons and go after the Libertine middle…and win…he was wrong….was it the fault of those who didn’t turn out…or was it his fault for telling them they didn’t matter…I’d say there is equal blame to go around.

as for what the Constitution gives me…I will take issue with the semantics of your question…the Constitution doesn’t give me anything…The Constitution enumerates rights that are mine by divine right. GOD is the source of my liberties and if there is no God…and I have to depend on a piece of parchment to give me liberties…I’m in trouble because Parchment can be shredded, re written, ignored, and reinterpreted out of existence

The answer to your question…with that in mind is this….NONE…I have all my rights as enumerated by the Constitution…I am just being restricted from exercising those rights by an over reaching judiciary and government.

As for the Truce…We called the truce a long time ago….your side refuses to abide by it….again I responded to this:

Focus on the important things
NewTexanDave Sunday, August 22nd at 3:26PM EDT (link)

I’m a buddhist. I am also a liberatian like Clint Eastwood.
I could care less whether BHO is a muslim or not especially that BHO is not on the ballot. I’m going to vote 100% for Republicans in this election regardless but we need to focus on the economy, jobs, and the man-made healthcare disaster.
One thing I disliked about Bush junior was that he focused too much on social conservatism, which could get very divisive. If you want to broaden your base you should never go that route. We need to talk more about how the Democratic controlled congress is destroying the economy and preventing a recovery. Just ignore those baseless attacks.

I won’t stop saying it…that way leads to defeat…I can point to Ford, Bush the elder, Dole, and McCain to Prove it. Bush the younger played to SoCons and was rewarded with a historic election unmatched in a century…too bad he didn’t live up to hos promises and chose the compassionate conservative statist path instead.

Where is your proof to the contrary?

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Ace please quit with the "libertine" line

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:48PM EST (link)

I barely even know what that means, I heard it first here from you I think. I know I am not one lol.

Molon Labe!

simply to explain...there is a difference between Libertarian and Libertine

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:02PM EST (link)

A libertine is one devoid of most moral restraints, which are seen as unnecessary or undesirable, especially one who ignores or even spurns accepted morals and forms of behavior sanctioned by the larger society. The philosophy gained new-found adherents in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, particularly in France and Britain. Notable among these were John Wilmot, 2nd Earl of Rochester, and the Marquis de Sade.

“Libertine” is defined today as “a dissolute person; usually a person who is morally unrestrained”

I believe true libertarians believe in the necessity of morality to govern the passions of men so government doesn’t have to.

Unfortunately….Libertarians of today are more libertine in my view than Libertarian…such as Howard Stern as a prime example.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

let me add, I'm not calling you Libertine so please don't go there

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:05PM EST (link)

my larger point however is that a libertarian society that is devoid of a morale order becomes libertine over time.

I’m speaking of society as a whole.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Oh...and I can't quit using it...it's one of my best lines

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:06PM EST (link)

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Ok ace, maybe I will start talking about Dobson then

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:37PM EST (link)

:)

Molon Labe!

We're not that far off on Dobson lately....he's been duped a couple times lately

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 9:08PM EST (link)

let’s hope he wises up

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Heh

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:27PM EST (link)

Most libertarians would simply say that the morality of a government’s citizens is none of its business. Though there are certainly morally degenerate libertarians out there, progressives are the ones who want to shove moral relativism down the rest of our throats. Libertarians just don’t want the government making people into stuck up prudes or atheistic relativists (you won’t see much love for the USSR’s repression of religion on any libertarian board).

I’d also say that, anecdotally, most libertarians don’t see Howard Stern as much of a libertarian, or care about him any which way.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 
 
 
 

McCain as a libertine?

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:23PM EST (link)

Now I’ve seen it all :)

McCain has pushed the War on Drugs for years, and is a strong advocate of more funding for it.

He supports the Defense of Marriage Act.

He supports Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

He is universally reviled among libertarian circles, mostly for the same reasons conservative hate him (McCain-Feingold being one).

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 

Doc, maybe this would be a good time to list the ways you see the word conservative being "warped"

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:33PM EST (link)

But first let me call Cockstradamus at his sabbatical roost in The Azores. Phone ringing…murmuring sounds….

Is Doc-defined non-warped conservatism is mainly pre-1929 economic, i.e. small government, low taxes, and minimal regulations on business, etc and pre-1941 isolationist foreign policy?

Probably not quite that un-warped, but

Reagan signaled the acceptance of a safety net for the truly needy at the federal level and also built a strong deterrent defense, aided freedom fighters abroad and showed he was willing to act in Grenada and Libya. Ia m convinced that a Reagan would have either finished the job in Iraq before 911 if he had been President then, and also would have removed Saddam after 911 and probably Iran’s mullahs too.

And I doubt if after liberating nations under tyranny and also a threat to the US, he would have re-installed strong men. Rather I think he would certainly have given them a chance for liberty ala MacArthur and stayed on as in Europe and Korea.

Closer?

Also, you understand the only reason there wasn’t a need for a party to stand up on social issues in the past was because the Sup Ct hadn’t ruled in Roe v Wade et al.

You also know that the GOP didn’t stake over DC until the pro-lifer and SELF-IDENTIFIED social conservative (listen to the Evil Empire speech and be wise to this) Reagan brought in his own kind to form majorities that could win Congress for the first time in two generations.

more later

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

GC, you know me

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:55PM EST (link)

we argue from time to time for sure, but you know me. I think the word conservatism has been warped in the recent past by those who thought they could use the power of the state to impose their views on others and to spend others money.

Look at bans on internet gambling, look at bans on so called “assault weapons”. Look to the steel tariffs, NCLB, smoking bans, etc. See people think I am talking the big things, when I am really just fighting the small things. I think the small things tell us who we really are. Too many that believe themselves to be conservative have in the recent past used the most expedient method (big government), to put out small fires, and it is there that they show their true selves.

Molon Labe!

ok, so the warping is really just some small dents? Now as to internet gambling

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:16PM EST (link)

Is your objection to the federal intrusion into states rights? Because states have always, I think properly to a certain extent, regulated pornography, gambling, etc.

I hate the federalization of drug laws in the 90s so that the Dems could look tough on crime.

Wasn’t the assault weapons ban push by democrats when they were in the majority and repealed by the GOP when they took over? I think so.

Wasn’t NCLB a conservative accountability standard that moved fed education policy to the right a bit? But yes, I do think it would be best of the feds got out of the education business, save possibly for national security purposes.

Steel tariffs at certain levels wouldn’t bother me. I certainly don;t think it is a conservative position that one should never use tariffs to raise revenue and to protect nascent/infant and/or security-related industries. I do thin it is the government’s business to make sure we have an ongoing steel industry in this country for national security purposes.

I am against smoking bans as is well documented.

But Doc, yes, I “know” you to a certain extent, much like I “know” scores or hundreds of others, and so naturally can’t always remember everything about everyone.

Ace’ is also limited in omniscience as well, so be patient if our remembrances of you aren’t as vivid as Washington’s refusal to lie after chopping down the Cherry Tree!

smile

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

actually I don't care whether you know me or not GC

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:36PM EST (link)

like you said you “know” hundreds of others here. My point was what is the point of debate if we just start over every time like we have no memories?

I am not really sure what your post here is about but I will respond to one of your claims.

“Wasn’t the assault weapons ban push by democrats when they were in the majority and repealed by the GOP when they took over? I think so.”

You might think so, but but to paraphrase Reagan, it is not you know a lot that isn’t so. In fact the Clinton Gun Ban lasted for ten years then expired. President Bush said he would sign a new ban if Congress passed it, but they never did. The AWB was never repealed.

I am not omniscient, but I seem to recall you being relatively weak on 2A rights, yeah I believe that was you. The guy that talks about himself in third person, thinks he is Nostradamus, and doesn’t realize USC is a second tier football team. And you used to be a Democrat right? yeah, I am wracking my brain but I think I have it right.

smile

Molon Labe!

Yes, your last paragraph makes clear exactly who you are - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 11:18AM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

it should

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 5:06PM EST (link)

when someone insults me for no reason and they act like they are all that, I will give it back to them, that is a small part of who I am.

Molon Labe!

Doc, it was a Clemson joke man. whew and exactly where did I insult you brother? by pointing out

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 5:54PM EST (link)

that no one is omniscient! come on man…chill or not, I don’t care

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

ok man, forget it

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 6:23PM EST (link)

you offended my by saying you don’t know me (by internet posting standards). We have talked hundreds of times here, certainly you know I am not a moderate Republican.

Hell I am not so easy to forget!!! :)

Molon Labe!

Yes, only by a very, very broad definition would you be a moderate

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 7:03PM EST (link)

I totally agree with. God bless, and by the year 2111, I suspect the Gamecocks will have finally won SEC and NCAA football championships, BUT we did end the 1801 “chicken curse” with our first NCAA men’s championship by beating UCLA in the College World Series….smile

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

if that broad definition included radical

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 7:20PM EST (link)

lovers of the Constitution, the Founders, and liberty, then I agree. On the political compass test I am called “libertarian right”, I fall right on the spot held by Milton Friedman. There is not a single modern elected leader in the world to my economic right by political compass ratings. In fact, there is not a single modern executive in the “libertarian righ”t quadrant. Uncle Milt is the only person in it.

Molon Labe!

His "Free to Choose" was a major influence on me while majoring in economics

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 7:47PM EST (link)

Love his negative income tax vs the welfare bureaucracy. I would just mail people checks too. Love Freidman all the way.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

the states did not ban internet gambling, in fact

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:39PM EST (link)

no one has ever been charged for internet gambling as a player. But the Feds believe they control the internet, and they made would be criminals out of millions. These are small things to those who don’t see tyranny works best when taken in small steps.

Molon Labe!

to be technically correct

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 10:58PM EST (link)

a few states did ban it, one was Nevada for obvious, non social conservative reasons. But no player has ever been charged for gambling on the internet. The issue was the Feds needed a new law because the wire act did not apply. The fake conservative Frist pushed it thinking it would ingratiate himself with socons in Iowa; he hoped to become the president. In the end, he left the Senate, unwept, unhonored and unsung.

Molon Labe!

 
 
 
 
 
 

actually new Texan Dave was right

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:43PM EST (link)

he said we should drop divisive social issues among conservatives in this election. He was right about that. You have made a lot of attacks on this guy for one freaking line in a post. You sir are wound up, and I think you should apologize to him.

Molon Labe!

No...my long list is a response to you beyond my initial post to NewTexanDave

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:18PM EST (link)

I don’t get where you say I’m characterizing you…you are the one that says we need to walk away from my issues because they are devisive…

My proof?

you just said it again here

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

you called me libertine

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:57PM EST (link)

you said “my side” supports Crist, Specter, et al. You said all I care about is my next bong hit. yeah, you did not characterize me at all.

Molon Labe!

Fair enough...I did refer to your side in refering to Crist and I offer my sincere apology

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:30PM EST (link)

LOL…and the bong hit was a twist of the blade meant to be funny…I’ll apologize for that too

I won’t concede that I called you libertine…I was making the larger point that libertarian societies devoid of a strong moral order descend into libertinism as happened in Revolutionary France and grew to become the reign of terror.

I’ve oftern considered doing a thesis or book about the differences between the American Revolution and the French Revolution it inspired. Why France descended into utter Chaos, Ruin and the despotism of Napoleon Bonaparte.

I believe, and I think Tocqueville bears me out that it was the Christian/Puritan influence in America as opposed to the lack of a religious populace in France.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

problem with revolutions is they often

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:43PM EST (link)

don’t know when to stop. Certainly the French took the worst parts of ours and none of the best. We had the Founders, we had the Protestant ethic etc. I think the three class system in France hurt as well. The Euros have always looked angrily at the rich man and wanted to bring him down. Americans used to look at the rich man admiringly and say “I want to be like him”. today, well, not so much.

Molon Labe!

Amen nt

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:56PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Here's the thing, Ace

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:39PM EST (link)

There’s no such thing as a “libertarian society”. There is such a thing as libertarian philosophy designed to organize society in a non-coercive fashion. Last time someone tried that (“libertarian paternalism”, I believe was the phrase), they were laughed out of town by the libertarian movement. Libertarianism is a governing philosophy which can theoretically be implemented for a society of militant atheists or strident Christians. As it so happens, the closest that the world has gotten to that philosophy being enacted has been mostly in Christian countries (Switzerland, United States, Chile, and the UK). Does that mean that libertarianism is Christian? Well, no, because libertarianism is purely a governing philosophy that that be arrived at via many philosophical paths. A libertarian could be concerned with all of the problems mentioned by social conservatives without being philosophically impure.

The term you are looking for is Objectivism. For the sake of accuracy, I implore you to use this term in your next scathing attack on libertarians and anti- social conservatives. :)

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

that is the key point Aesthete

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 5:43PM EST (link)

“A libertarian could be concerned with all of the problems mentioned by social conservatives without being philosophically impure.”

now matter how often we explain this, we still get lumped in with social liberals by some who don’t understand our philosophy or just don’t want to understand it.

Molon Labe!

 
 
 
 
 
 

Ace, seriously, take a break

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:48PM EST (link)

we have not discussed a single issue in this argument, only nomenclature. You are projecting what you want to project on me and this new guy Texan. You obviously don’t know where I stand on any of these issues although I have discussed them for over four years here. What else needs to be said between us? Why even waste the bandwidth?

Molon Labe!

I'm responding to you because you are engaging me. I would also point out...you aren't hearing me either

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:25PM EST (link)

because I’ve tried to explain to you that I think you are wrong that we can just put social issues aside and not address them and expect to win the support of SoCons….I’ve also tried to express my belief that I believe is borne out through history that “religion and morality are indispensable supports” where liberty is concerned as Washington said in his inauguration….and we emphasize social issues and morality at the expense of our liberties.

if you can’t bother yourself to read what I’ve written and refuse to acknowledge that I’m not the single issue person you insist I am…then to answer your question, I really don’t know what we’re accomplishing.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Correction...We DE-emphasize social issues at the expense of our liberties nt

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:26PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

555 amen and the GOP and conservatives never held power until social conservatives

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:47PM EST (link)

were brought into the party by Reagan. So ZERO conservative policies get enacted absent the votes of social conservatives, who, btw are mostly also war hawk conservatives that also want smaller government (even if not as small as Doc?).

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

5*5*5*5*5* nt

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:07PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

mcCain was a statist

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:23PM EST (link)

what social conservative values did he stand against? He is pro life, he is pro man and wife marriage. McCain’s problem was he was not strongly pro freedom. Mccain has a 0 percent rating from NARAL and a 0 percent rating from the ACLU.

McCain lost because GWB and Frist left the party in a shambles. He lost because of the MSM and jerks who sat on their hands to their own detriment. He lost because he ran a weak campaign. He did not lose because he was not socially conservative enough.

Molon Labe!

OK...we can agree on that distinction...McCain is a Statist....and their are So Con Statists

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:25PM EST (link)

But not all SoCon Statists and more than McCain is a Libetarian Statist…

as far as pro traditional marriage…wasn’t he a Johnny come lately on that issue….like…right around the time he realized he couldn’t be pro gay marriage and win the Republican Nomination?

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

ahhh...But not all SoCon are Statists

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:34PM EST (link)

any more than McCain is a Libetarian Statist…

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

no such thing as a libertarian statist

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:51PM EST (link)

and I agree not all social conservatives are statists. In fact, at this point, I would say a large majority are not statists.

Molon Labe!

Thank you...that's one of the points I keep trying to make nt

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:32PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Sorry for the confusion

NewTexanDave Sunday, August 22nd at 9:08PM EST (link)

I really did not mean that we have to ignore social issues altogether, especially within our own circle. I’m just saying that if we want to get more votes from independents and moderate dems, focusing on social issues are not going to help much and may have negative impacts. Besides, BHO is not on the ballot in 2010!

This whole issue sounds like a set up by the MSM to attack conservatives.
Mccain lost in 2008 mainly because he could not convince voters that he would manage the economy better than BHO. Remember he voted for TARP and said bluntly on the TV that he would spend taxpayers’ money to buy mortgages. Also he could not remember how many houses he owns.

For the record, I don’t like abortion but don’t think it should be illegal.
I’m also neither for or against gay marriages.
For most social issues, I am not on Dem’s side but rather be “indifferent”.
I agree with Bill O’Reilly that people can do whatever they want as long as they don’t hurt others…

Maybe it’s time to work together instead of attacking each other?

 
 
 
 
 
 

Ace what you consider to be a "social issue"

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:41PM EST (link)

I might consider to be a libertarian issue. The point I am making, and I think Texan agrees with, is we need to go with the winning hand here. We can win this election based on liberty, free markets, and American values. Like they teach salesmen, once you have made the sale, shut up.

I have not engaged in the social vs libertarian con fights for a long time, you got me to break that streak. I am now going to start a new one, it is been at least 20 minutes lol.

you can get the last word, but I am done with this, We both should be licking stamps and making calls, not arguing over the same old thing hoping for a different result.

truce.

Molon Labe!

What you call American Values ARE social issues

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:19PM EST (link)

and again…I can point to 2004 when Bush played to the SoCon Base and we swept the election reelecting a president to a second term and expanding majorities in both houses of Congress for the first time in History…

What can you point to as a success when the party has decided to de-emphasize social issues?

And don’t Patronize me by acting like McCain ran a campaign on Social Issues….his whole Shtick was being a maverick and avoiding divisive social issues. He was going to be the respectfull candidate and he never took Obama on about abortion or anything else.

And don’t re write history on NCLB…nationalizing our children’s education has never been on the SoCon agenda EVER….

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Specifically...Bush's message to SoCons in 2004 was ending Judicial Tyranny

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:30PM EST (link)

we put him up there and then McLame and your big tent heroes threw Janice Rodgers Brown and Miguel Estrada under the bus…

You know the Big Tent Heroes I’m talking about don’t you…they’re the ones happily rubber stamping every single one of Obama’s judicial nominees mouthing platitudes about a president being entitled to his nominees as if the Dems won’t torpedo the next Republican President’s nominees as thery come up for a vote

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

it's all good....if you hadn't noticed, I like sparring with you and enjoy the point counter poin

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:54PM EST (link)

Much like Jefferson and Adams I suspect…though I’m no Jefferson…and your no Adams…or Visa Versa

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

you would be more Adams

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:46PM EST (link)

I would be more Franklin.

Molon Labe!

Heh...I'm not sure I'm not closer to Jefferson than Adams...

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 9:13PM EST (link)

Somewhere in between the two I think.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

So long as you don't get tempted

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:44PM EST (link)

To sign the Alien and Sedition Laws in, we’re good :)

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

LOL...yeah...a dark blot that was...heh nt

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:52PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 
 
 
 
 

How did Bush "fool" us?

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:02PM EST (link)

This has always been the most vexing argument I’ve seen on why social conservatives didn’t back away from Bush. From the 2000 campaign onwards, President Bush campaigned on “compassionate conservatism”, and co-opted several progressive ideas (NCLB, Medicare Pt D, and others were largely Democrat ideas retrofitted onto a Republican platform). Yes, he betrayed us on some issues (his foreign policy wasn’t as isolationist as originally promised, and he signed McCain-Feingold into law), but on the whole, the portrait his campaign and governance painted of himself was not one of a small-government Republican.

Ace, it really depends on how you define social conservative: if you define it as a movement that broadly seeks to repeal areas where progressives have overreached (which was mostly the case when the movement started up), then you’re mostly right: social conservatives aren’t to blame for Bush’s missteps, except in as far as they were ignorant of Bush’s various un-conservative turns. (Though under that expansive definition, this libertarian conservative is a step away from social conservatism!) Unfortunately, modern-day social conservatives who have a pro-active agenda (those who ask for more government regulation to solve perceived social maladies) are very much to blame for the current situation: those who cheered when the ban on internet gambling went through, who looked to get “tougher” in the War on Drugs, or who joined forces with the feminist harpies in the 90s to ban pornography, had their concerns met more fully than any other constituency of conservatives, for the reason that they supported him more fully and were more vested in his Presidency.

However, as Doc says, it’s far more important to unify behind cutting government than to get trapped in the internecine squabbles that get nothing done.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

Look, would you mind just calling a statist a statist?

acat (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:19PM EST (link)

I don’t give a rat’s left nut why a government type wants to expand government – to put sensors in my trashcans to tell if I’m recycling or not – to measure how much of 6th grade government class students retain – to build bridges to nowhere – but if someone wants to expand government control, they’re a statist, plain and simple.

It gets much simpler to call your hypothetical “social conservative with an agenda” a “socially conservative statist”, and also more accurate.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

Well, that's true

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:55PM EST (link)

The only reason I bring it up is not really because I want to pin the blame on the Bush Administration on social conservatives (which would be both inaccurate and self-defeating), but because social conservatives need to realize two things:

1) Their movement is currently populated by many disaffected progressives who believe in expansive government, but who migrated to the right as the progressive attack on tradition escalated. That’s all well and good, but given that many of them are trying to assert leadership roles, it is to the benefit of everyone if the social conservative movement’s upper leadership, strategists, and logistics are not of this ilk. That requires both “followers” of the movement to reject ersatz conservatives who rely heavily on social/cultural conservatism, for those same “followers” to attempt to replace said leaders, and for the leaders to recognize that this problem exists, to respond accordingly.

2) Social conservatives are seen as representative of conservatism, and as long as social statists (or intellectually lazy “conservatives” banking on social creds) permeate their ranks, that is what the public will see us as. In 2008, we were, for good or ill, the party of soaring deficits, unnecessary wars, and prudes turned hypocrites.

In summation, I would love to call social “conservatives” who pursue government activism statists, and am happy that you as a social conservative do, but more people need to start doing the same before that is possible. Right now, it’s best to avoid the argument.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

yeah well...that's where we part ways then...I shouldn't have to worry about my 9 year old browsing porn sites when my back is turned

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:08AM EST (link)

We don’t allow people to post pornographic images in billboards but we allow them to make it just one mouse click away for my boys….if you want to make a point about SoCon over reach…you’ve picked a bad one there and you just proved my point on the Libertarian verses Libertine ethos…

Nicely done!

and if the state of Texas does not allow gambling…who is going to make it possible for the state to enforce it’s laws if gambling is allowed on the internet….internet gambling crosses interstate borders and represents an elicit trade in states that have laws against public gambling

Enabling state and local governments to set basic community standards of decency is a far cry from over bearing socialism.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

That's funny, Ace

aesthete (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 1:15AM EST (link)

I didn’t know that enforcing Texan laws required New York to give up its power to regulate pornography as its populace demands (which, make no mistake, is what a bill criminalizing pornography would do). It is the same sort of activism behind the Dred Scott decision: this idea that a law enacted by some state gives it precedence over other states’ laws and regulatory environments. It’s pretty much impossible to ban pornography without censoring the internet and putting it under the control of a proactive government agency (which is *dun dun dun* what they do in China), and since tools exist to prevent the occurrences with minors that you note (K-9 Web Protection’s a good one), it seems that this is another case of the federal government overreaching to do the job of parents.

If Texas wants to ban internet porn, all power to them, but don’t tell me that AZ has to do the bidding of Texas, as a result.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 

What's your privacy worth, Ace?

acat (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 11:01AM EST (link)

We could require people to prove to their computers who they are, likely by fingerprints, and then for their internet service provider to filter content based on the user. In other words, your service provider would agree to not let your kids see porn.

You can, I hope, see where the problem is here – further erosion of internet anonymity – which is literally life and death in some parts of the world, and I suspect in our own country. (www.zombietime.com – don’t think they’d kill the zombie to shut down this site?)

Yes, I agree that kids shouldn’t be able to find porn at the click of a mouse – but are you really saying they should have to raid their older brothers’ stash or their friends’ fathers’ stash like we had to do back in the day, or should we peep at our neighbors taking a bath on the roof like that David kid had to do?

Solomon got this one right, Ace, and there’s no way any non-draconian scheme is going to stop the several hundred thousand teenage boys in their quest to figure out the opposite sex. Better they should learn at home. Sad they should have to learn so young, but such is the world we are in.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

Acat, I get what you and Asthete are saying...and I struggle with it...but it's not quite as complicated as you make it

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 8:34PM EST (link)

You can’t put Porn on broadcast TV, You can’t post porn on billboards or on a public wall…so why are you allowed to put it on the front page of a web site….

Here’s the flip side….if you post it in your home, or all over your bedroom….if you put it in a private club where people have to go there with the express purpose of seeing it…then that’s fine

As far as I’m concerned…a web site is a public space and posting hard core pornography on the first page of a web site is like posting it on your door and handing in your windows inviting every kid in the neighborhood to come by and check it out.

What’s wrong with saying you can’t post pornography to a public access web site….if you want to post porn….or view porn…you should be able to….b ut you should require a sign in for access.

I’ve spent a small fortune on software to filter out the filth on the internet so my kids can surf the net without being exposed to it…and it’s impossible….because you’ve got scumbags out there doing everything they can to beat the filtering software.

My wife got caught in a “Porn Storm” recently because she clicked on a link she thought would take her to focus on the family and it ended up opening 20 or more windows with graphic porn all over it.

If I could get my hands around the throat of the scum that sets stuff up like that…I’d strangle the life out of them!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Re: your last sentence, Ace

qixlqatl (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 8:50PM EST (link)

I totally agree, even though I have no wife or kids, the inconvenience of having the stuff splattered all over your screen and windows popping faster than you can close them brings on quite a load of stress*

It’s invasive.

*stress (n): that confusion which arises when the brain overrides the body’s natural desire to choke the living $#!* out of some @$$#%!# who richly deserves it

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

Amen nt

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 8:57PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 

come on, I never "accidentally" run into internet porn

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 9:09PM EST (link)

the socially conservative answer to ‘net porn is to find a way to stop your kids from viewing it. You can teach them why it is wrong AND use technology to prevent it. How can the government do this for you? If the answer is no one can access porn, then that is against free choice. And even if the gov was told to do it, they couldn’t.

btw, some modern historians have argued that internet pornography actually built out the net to what it is. These were the first companies to actually make money on the ‘net and they helped finance the infrastructure.

Do i check out porn? actually no, I would rather tangle with Ace and GC. Other than that, my idea of cheap thrills is a good Western on Netflix or a good public company conference call. yes, sad I know lol.

Molon Labe!

I have, though, Doc

qixlqatl (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 9:53PM EST (link)

and more than once. Internet ‘rabbit trails’ have led me some strange places….

I understand that there is no government/law-enforcement fix, and I’m not sure I would advocate for it if there were, just saying that since I have had “free samples” of their “product” displayed before me in a most annoying fashion, I’d like to give the purveyors of those samples a free demonstration of my skill with power tools….outside their bedroom windows while they are attempting to…focus on other pursuits ;)

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

 

I have and so has my wife...and I guarantee you she wasn't looking for it nt

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 11:45PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

well I could give her a list of search terms to avoid

Doc Holliday (Diary) Tuesday, August 24th at 12:30AM EST (link)

but I can’t list them here or Moe would get after me.

Molon Labe!

 
 

Oh...and I suppose this means we chould hold the Internet Porn industry up as heoes now?

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 11:55PM EST (link)

btw, some modern historians have argued that internet pornography actually built out the net to what it is. These were the first companies to actually make money on the ‘net and they helped finance the infrastructure.

and I’ll point out you ignored my idea of defining public verses private space on the internet…

You can display porn in your house any way you see fit in your own home…but you can’t paste it all over your house…you can pay for porn on your tv if you want but you have to buy it, it can’t be sent over the airways….why should the internet be any different.

As for whether you can accidentally run into Porn on the Internet or not, try surphing christian sites some time and turn off your filters…there are degenerates out there that think it’s funny to set up dummy links with Focus On the Family or some other Christian Sites that link back to porn…the afore mentioned Porn Storm I’m telling you about is just one example….try explaining things to a 6 year old when you click on a link you think is going to takeyou to a game site for Christian Kids and having XXX sites popping up on your screen faster than you can close them…

As for the blocking software…again there are people out there who are always working on getting. I would think even you could agree that should be treated as a crime….as far as I’m concerned these scumbags are no better than a flasher

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

well ace, I think you are wrong about public vs. private space on the 'net

Doc Holliday (Diary) Tuesday, August 24th at 12:35AM EST (link)

no avoidance in that point right? Ace, I can’t speak to your experiences but don’t speak to mine. I NEVER accidentally access porn, and I am on the net 5 hours a day at least.

I don’t want to give your family advice, that is not my place. But this is the political realm. Instead of carping about a problem you think exists, why not say what you think the government should do to fix it to your liking? I already said what I would do personally if I had a family problem with this.

BTW, McCain was a crusader against internet porn in 2000, so you might agree with him more than you know.

Molon Labe!

 

I don't search "focus on the family" as you know

Doc Holliday (Diary) Tuesday, August 24th at 12:39AM EST (link)

my serious advice would be for you to prescreen sites that you kids can then go to. Other than that, I am not sure what you want from me. If you have a problem, ask your congressman. I just don’t face that problem, but I am always willing to give ideas to friends or anyone else that asks sincerely.

Molon Labe!

 
 
 
 

Several problems with the analogy, Ace...

acat (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 9:16PM EST (link)

I can, as you say, put up whatever signage I want on my own property, although local obscenity laws will prevent, as you also say, putting up anything too graphic or sleazy for the area.

The internet, though, is global, so are you talking about enforcing the obscenity laws of your city on a web site in France or Russia or even King of Prussia PA? How’s that work?

In “meatspace”, i.e. the real world, if I were to – for example – set up a video projector to put images on my garage door and start showing “best of {magazine}”, my neighbors would have me arrested – and likely if I were a shopkeeper I’d be out of business.. and my family would be shunned, etc. etc.

If someone glued the july issue of {magazine} all over your car, you could call the cops, who would have jurisdiction, and get the punk arrested.

The internet anonymity and international nature mean, as you saw, some punk in another country, can vandalize your machine. There’s no local enforcement since who has jurisdiction, and there’s no meatspace equivalent of “neighbors” to “shun” the punk.

I have an idea for a technological, private industry fix, but it’d require pretty much junking every camera and scanner and DVD-ripper currently in existence… In short, every photo or video clip gets tagged *at time of creation* with a source-ID, your local computer can be configured – by local account (so yo can configure your kids’ accounts) – to not show photos that you don’t approve, and you can subscribe to a “purity police” outfit that can maintain a much larger database of “clean” digital images.

Easy on paper, no government involvement required, but with all the legacy hardware out there, it’d be impossible to actually build for the next 5-10 years.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

it's a vexing problem I'll admit...but how do we handle Keeping Kiddie Porn of the internet?....

AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, August 24th at 12:04AM EST (link)

Why couldn’t we use the same system of laws to ratchet down on porn in General? I’m not saying ban it altogether, I’m saying define public and private space and make it illegal to have it up on public space.

How about requiring Porn to have a tag like I’m forced to put on my marketing. I have to put adv on any ads I send out for Real Estate so people can filter it out….why can’t we have a .prn as an example so you can set your computer up to view it if you want and I can set mine up to lock it out? don’t make it illegal to display…just restrict where it can be displayed.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Well, that's something like what I said...

acat (Diary) Tuesday, August 24th at 12:34AM EST (link)

but, yeah, that’s likely where we’re going to end.

The problem is still one of jurisdiction.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

I'll gladly take the blame for "the situation", then.

Bill S (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:35PM EST (link)

All of those things you mentioned – internet gambling, war on drugs, porn, etc. should have been addressed.

I’m all for it. That’s what differentiates libertarians and conservatives. Conservatives, per Kirk’s first principle of conservatism, believe there is an enduring moral order. A conservative strives to retain that moral order, and working to eliminate those things that interfere with it is legitimate within the bounds of conservatism.

Kirk pretty much sums it up in “The Chirping Sectaries“:

What else do conservatives and libertarians profess in common? The answer to that question is simple: nothing. Nor will they ever have. To talk of forming a league or coalition between these two is like advocating a union of ice and fire.

Yup. And read his six key differences that begin on page 5 of that PDF, as well. His fifth difference is key (bold is mine):

The libertarian takes the state for the great oppressor. But the conservative finds that the state is ordained of God. In Burke’s phrases, “He who gave us our nature to be perfected by our virtue, willed also the necessary means of its perfection. – He willed therefore the state – He willed its connexion with the source and original archtype of all perfection.” Without the state, man’s condition is poor, nasty, brutish, and short – as Augustine argued, many centuries before Hobbes. The libertarians confound the state with government. But government – as Burke continued “is a contrivance of human wisdom to provide for human wants.” Among the more important of those human wants is “a sufficient restraint upon their passions. Society requires not only that the passions of individuals should be subjected, but that even in the mass and body, as well as in the individual, the inclinations of men should frequently be thwarted, their will controlled, and their passions brought into subjection. This can be done only by a power out of themselves; and not, in the exercise of its function, subject to that will and to those passions which it is its office to bridle and subdue.” In short, a primary function of government is restraint; and that is anathema to libertarians, though an article of faith to conservatives.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

As a reader of Kirk

aesthete (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 1:00AM EST (link)

since EPU recommended him, and as a fan of his mastery of the turn of phrase, I must nevertheless say that his largest failing was understanding ideologies apart from his own (though he did a pretty good job of defining his own). That failing is most evident in articles like this one. From the passages that you excerpt, I find two major problems:

First of all, libertarianism does hold to an “enduring moral order” and holds a moral core, which is articulated by the Harm Principle. Lest you think that he means a non-secular “enduring moral order”, he later goes on to say that conservatives and socialists have more in common than conservatives and libertarians… because socialists hold to the existence of a moral order: “The socialists at least declare the existence of some sort of moral order; the libertarians are quite bottomless.” (p. 351) Though there is more that Kirk hews to (incorrectly) on these grounds, I’ll leave it at that.

Second, libertarians are not anarchists, and if I had a dollar for every time someone expressed such a sentiment, the inflation that would occur as a result would make Zimbabwe’s government leaders blush with envy. In fact, Kirk contends that libertarians “would deprive government of effective power to undertake the common defense”(p 350) which, as any student of the philosophy knows, is the one thing that all libertarians and monarchists agree is a legitimate government function. Indeed, the header to your second excerpt is puzzling, given that many conservatives rail against government abuse as much as do libertarians. Regardless, libertarians do not see government as a whole as entirely oppressive: it is simply a sad fact that many governments do oppress their citizens through various forms: or would you have us believe that all government is beneficial, and that the only difference between N Korea and the US might be the level of benevolence achieved? Not only is that a bizarre viewpoint for a libertarian to take, it is a vexing position for an American and a student of history to adopt as his own, as Kirk claimed to be.

Leaving aside the mischaracterizations of libertarian philosophy, it is also most odd to find the idea of government as the architect of human perfection evident in Kirk’s quoting of Burke (“He willed its connexion with the source and original archtype of all perfection”). If such a belief was conservative at some point, it certainly is not now. At any rate, it is a foolish belief without merit, as government has never been the source of anyone’s salvation or moral perfection, at least as such terms are defined in Judeo-Christian thought.

Even under Kirk’s premises, articulated nebulously (if in characteristically lively and entertaining fashion) here, it is interesting that one may apparently trample the most conservative of American institutions (the federalist system) to squelch pornography, illicit drugs, and the odd game of chance with nary a protest. Was it not Burke himself who (to paraphrase) said that we should approach the flaws of a government and society as those of a father? That idea certainly isn’t being adhered to by conservatives bypassing the Constitution to enact their “socially conservative” provisos! It is fascinating that even state powers are not sufficiently conservative, nor their success in this arena sufficient lure, for those bastard children of US traditionalism and statism to leave leave the Constitutional system be.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

wow, what a post Aesthete!

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 6:09PM EST (link)

too high minded for me, my brain is filled with too much Civil War trivia to follow lol.

I would just ad to one point you made here. I would say it is libertarianism that MOST depends on a functioning government. We can’t think of government as an evil because government is the only way to preserve liberty.

People need to remember that democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is the right of the lamb to not be on the menu. The government must be the ultimate enforcer of that right to liberty.

Libertarians and libertarians conservatives only question government when it itself becomes a threat to liberty.

Molon Labe!

Heh, thanks

aesthete (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 6:19PM EST (link)

Also, good point: there has never been a libertarian who saw Mad Max and said, “hey, they’ve got the right idea”. Libertarianism is about maximizing liberty, and that’s not possible without a (constrained) government.

(Though I do think that pure libertarianism, especially in national security/borders, is ill-advised for various reasons.)

Also, I would add that Civil War trivia is never a bad thing to have in your repertoire; I wish I knew as much about the Civil War and the antebellum South as you, Achance, and several of my Southern friends do!

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 
 
 

I'll admit...I turned a blind eye to it for his first term

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:56PM EST (link)

I think most SoCons would….it was a drip….drip….drip….it’s like….yeah he passed NCLB…but look…he cut taxes….yeah he passed a 300 Billion Dollar Farm Bill but look how he sends Democrats into fits of apoplexy….

I wouldn’t say he fooled us per se….just that he played us so the things he did that were unconservative just didn’t seem to be that big a deal….looking back….how wrong we were

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

That has the ring of truth

aesthete (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 1:04AM EST (link)

My whole family is socially conservative, and they mostly didn’t pay attention, ditto those conservatives I knew in Georgia (read: everyone with a hunting license).

Generally, I would advise social conservatives to be more vigorous in their defense of liberty: given that the philosophical basis of modern social conservatism supports government intervention in society, the movement must be self-regulated so as to prevent it from becoming wholly inimical or apathetic to freedom.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 

Bush was coronated, we didn't really have real primary

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 6:11PM EST (link)

Republicans were just so enamored with what he did in Texas, they thought he would bring in a lot of Hispanics. He actually did well with that group the first time around.

btw, I love how the left hated him, heck I still have a Bush sticker on my truck because I respect him as a man. I need to take it off, but have not had the heart to do it yet. My McCain sticker went off the day after the election.

Molon Labe!

heh...I never put a McCain sticker on in the first place...i'd have felt dirty

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 8:38PM EST (link)

I got yard signs to put out and never got the heart to put them out.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

lol Ace, well I was a good soldier

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 8:58PM EST (link)

I put out the flag as long as we had a chance to stop Obama. BTW, obama did not surprise me, I “knew” he was going to run after his 2000 demonrat convention speech and I knew they would go with him.

Molon Labe!

yeah...well...I was a soldier too...I just felt like I was walking to a firing squad

AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, August 24th at 12:08AM EST (link)

instead of onto a field of battle….I knew we would take a bullett either way it just depended on who’s gun oit would be fired from…McCain’s or Obama’s

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Looks to me like we got it from both sides [nt]

qixlqatl (Diary) Tuesday, August 24th at 12:34AM EST (link)

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

You cannot have true Conservatism

oblio Sunday, August 22nd at 3:58PM EST (link)

without God, from Who our rights are given to us, rather than any man to be taken away on a monarchical, judicial or legislative whim. If Barack (or anyone else) believes in a false god then the rights given to us are as specious as the god that he believes in.

Liberty and Morality are symbiotic

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:12PM EST (link)

You can’t have one without the other because liberty without morality always leads to chaos which then leads to in increase in government to deal with the Chaos and causes the loss of Liberty.

On the flip side, you can’t have a powerful government without morality because those wielding power with no moral restraint always end up corrupt and despotic.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

no Ace

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:25PM EST (link)

“n the flip side, you can’t have a powerful government without morality because those wielding power with no moral restraint always end up corrupt and despotic”

you can’t have morality with a powerful government.

Molon Labe!

on that we agree...but your conclusion is the resulty of mine nt

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:20PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

You're right on target on this thread, Ace

Bill S (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 5:52PM EST (link)

Ignore the libertarians. You will never come to agreement with them. It’s not worth the effort.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Bingo Bill S, that is the best comment on this thread

Scope (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:08PM EST (link)

and it does back up Ace’s vehement arguments against those that promote ultimate freedom, as long as you do it their way, under their conditions, and with full agreement with their platform. If you don’t subscribe to their level of intelligence, you need to go away and hide, because there is no one more deeply intelligent than they are. Common sense takes a back seat to nirvana and utopia.

It's the attitude that we need to address their issues and forget ever having ours addressed nt

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 7:36PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Asv of this writing, 132 comments in this thread, 85* devoted to this argument

qixlqatl (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:18PM EST (link)

Which, it seems to me, boils down to “I’m a better conservative” and “Nuh-uh, I am!!”

LOL Carry on, but do save **something** for the bad guys, eh ;)

* as it dragged on, I tried to count, but I was just scrolling down quickly, so I could be off, but not much

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

I told Ace to give it up.

Bill S (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:40PM EST (link)

But he wouldn’t listen…

The libertarian/conservative argument will never be won by either side. It is a fruitless, unproductive one to fight.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

But....but....but...

NightTwister (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:57PM EST (link)

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill

I am stunned by this evidence

mriggio (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:23AM EST (link)

that you’ve hidden a webcam in my computer den!
Cheers!

mriggio
SMSgt, USAF (Ret)
Precinct Committeeman (R)
Tazewell County, Illinois
Save the Cheerleader Party, save the World! (Heroes, ed.)

Heh, no kidding

aesthete (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 1:05AM EST (link)

He got me, too.

I didn’t know that they sold such sophisticated spying equipment in Colorado :)

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

Actually, I'm in Malaysia right now.

NightTwister (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 2:39AM EST (link)

You can pretty much get anything here.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill

 
 
 
 

I suppose it's a healthy enough debate

qixlqatl (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:05AM EST (link)

so long as it remains civil. I’m just a bit bemused by the length of it.

I’m somewhere between the two of them, so I’m not taking sides.

It’s true the more libertarian minded need the so-cons, but the so-cons also need the libertarians. Neither side is going to get all they want, which leaves me perfectly happy, so long as they don’t savage each other to the point that the progressives (statists, communists, whatever you want to call them) win.

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

 

what's wrong with the discussion? why the fussing over it?

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:12AM EST (link)

it’s a friendly discussion for the most part and there is something to be gained from it….it sharpens our debating skills so we can cream the Democrats in any argument.

This used to be common in Conservative circles…and is why we used to argue circled around the dummycrats….now we’re too nice and gentile and avoid the discussion and it’s made us fat and lazy….that’s as much to show for why we’ve lost our edge over the Dems as anything

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Your call, man.

Bill S (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:19AM EST (link)

I was just trying to save you some time and effort. Again – it’s a fruitless discussion, as you’ve obviously already noted.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 

I'm not fussing Ace

qixlqatl (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:19AM EST (link)

just commenting. I think we’re finding some entertainment value in it…I know I am. ;)

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

 
 
 

This might help

gekster (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:20AM EST (link)

When Building a Dam

If you can bring a large rock for the dam,
that will help get the dam built.
If you bring a few pebbles for the dam,
That too will help get the dam built.
Does it really matter who brings what and how much they bring?
The dam still gets built.
And when building a conservative dam to stop the flood of liberalism,
Every piece of rock helps.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

Amen, Gekster

qixlqatl (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:32AM EST (link)

The GOP need both wings right now, all moving those pebbles and rocks and boulders.

I was just poking a bit of fun at Ace and Doc, as I agree with some points from both sides.

I mean,seriously, it isn’t like either wing is gonna get any help from the dems, is it?

“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”

George Gordon Noel Byron

 
 

555 -nt

Doc Holliday (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 6:14PM EST (link)

Molon Labe!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Agreed, that only God can judge a man's heart.

oblio Sunday, August 22nd at 3:25PM EST (link)

But since Teh 0ne had no problem reciting the muslim call to prayer, I would ask him to recite the Nicean Constantinopolitan Creed (which I doubt he knows, or has even heard of, given the caliber of his ‘Christian’ upbringing), I would even ‘look’ the other way should he include the Fillioque in deference to my Western Christian friends here @ RS ;)

 

Graham was absolutely right

georgeinla (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:54PM EST (link)

In most of the world, religious identity is more akin to how we see Jewish identity. Even here in the West, we understand perfectly well that if you were born a Jew you will die a Jew, and nothing you do in the meantime can change that. Same thing goes for Muslims . . .

Hi. I am a moby Greenie lawyer from Los Angeles who was not nearly smart enough to hide my tracks. Please assess my opinions accordingly.

wrong -nt

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 3:56PM EST (link)

right about Jewish ethnicity, but wrong about Muslims and wrong about religion in general.

Molon Labe!

dang it!

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 4:02PM EST (link)

always write NT last, for this reason lol.

Molon Labe!

 
 
 

2 teams

pantera Sunday, August 22nd at 4:08PM EST (link)

the reason ”whoever” gets a pass pushing islam, or any of the other false religions, is because theres only 2 teams,GOD of the bible and the fallen angel satan with all his counterfeits/deceptions.

the worlds system has 1 purpose,to deny jesus’es deity. View everything through the light of biblical scripture and identifying sides becomes easier.

even the crazy rapture,new Jerusalem stuff seems true when you realize the writers of the new testament suffered horribly for the message of a crucified jesus and his resurrection. People dont died for what they know is a lie.

so choose a side…eternity is calling.

it all warfare waged in unseen heavens

 

For myself, I identify myself with Christ..

jederrick (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 6:32PM EST (link)

As a Christian, I believe there is one and only one way to Heaven (redemption) and that is through accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. You are free to choose something else if it doesn’t infringe on others, including the right to practice no religion whatsoever. But realize that our system of law and sense of right and wrong historically was based on Mosaic law. (the bible and teachings of Jews and Christians)

As our country was founded by peoples that had suffered under government rule churches (Church of England among others) they recognized the need for believers (citizens) to be protected from a Government restricting their right to free practice of religion. Freedom from intrusion by Government and intrusion by the dominant religion (church) itself. For the founding fathers, variations of Christianity and some Judaism was mostly what they understood.

Some religions and their practices are incompatible with personal freedom and responsibility. There are some religions that seek to impose a different social system and morality. It was our founding fathers’ beliefs and understanding of individual choice (personal relationship with God) that enabled our country to be formed in the first place. Islam is largely incompatible with our system of rights and individual freedoms and as such should not be accepted lightly even if you are agnostic of some other religion.

 

*blows acme police whistle*

pamela1631 (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 8:17PM EST (link)

I’ve been reading this thread and the various responses.

Will you all please stop.

God asked “Believe in Me”. A real simple request.

Anything else added, if it makes a person feel closer or more able to worship, ok. Do so. Belaboring the minutiae of how to believe or what to believe further widens the chasm between us. It weakens us as a nation. We need to pull together so we as a nation and people can continue to worship freely. Without oppression or forced into a state sanctioned religion.

So set aside the differences and get back to the beginning.
The theological discussions can come later.

I for one do not want to end up having to wear a burqa because too many were arguing who was more devout in their belief in God or Christ.

Oh, as an aside, no matter what religion Obama practices, he’s a spiritual idiot. Were God to show himself, Barak would start in on a campaign speech hoping for a donation.

This republic was not established by cowards; and cowards will not preserve it. ~~Elmer Davis

I am stone forged from the fires of creation into flesh ~~Pamela1631

The greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.~~Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret.)

If you believe "wearing a burqa" is all that's at stake here

Bill S (Diary) Sunday, August 22nd at 11:02PM EST (link)

go back and watch the videos of planes being flown into the WTC.

Then ask yourself “what difference does it make…it’s just God?”

The chasm between Muslims and Christians could not be greater. Franklin Graham knows this and won’t give in just because of Rodney King-esque calls for us all to “get along”.

Like yours, for example.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

555^ -nt

texasgalt (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:52AM EST (link)
 
 

Burqa=Slave Shackles

pamela1631 (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 12:56AM EST (link)

That’s what it means to me if you must know.
That half of God’s children have no place in his sight under those teachings.

It means Enslavement It means the Deliberate destruction of Israel’s people, land and history.
It means the wanton takeover and subjugation of parts of the world through history in the name of a misogynist maniac claiming to be the only representative of God.

I am well aware of the results caused by those demon spawn and of the acts they continue to perpetrate against all people. I still see those planes crash into the Towers and into the Pentagon. I pray daily for the murdered dead and the survivors. And I pray for Justice. Both Temporal and Heavenly.

How a person believes is up to each of them.
How we worship, the words we speak and pray are different.
We were given free choice and spiritual awareness.

Our differences are our strengths and weaknesses.
Do not let those differences be used against us and be the reason we fail in this fight to maintain our freedoms and liberties.

Reverend Graham has great faith and can forgive transgressors.
I’m not sure I can just “get along” or forgive. An eye for an eye come to mind more often than naught. But then it goes back to prayers for Justice. Both Temporal and Heavenly.

This republic was not established by cowards; and cowards will not preserve it. ~~Elmer Davis

I am stone forged from the fires of creation into flesh ~~Pamela1631

The greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.~~Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret.)

p.s.

pamela1631 (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 1:04AM EST (link)

Some of my ancestors had to live under those invaders for centuries.
So I know what is at stake!

This republic was not established by cowards; and cowards will not preserve it. ~~Elmer Davis

I am stone forged from the fires of creation into flesh ~~Pamela1631

The greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.~~Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret.)

 
 

Coulter

atillathehun Monday, August 23rd at 7:46AM EST (link)

Ann Coulter is again correct when she calls OBama an Athiest.
A leader of Marist ideology is almost neccesarily Athiest.

 

Amen!

stephaniet Monday, August 23rd at 8:39AM EST (link)

Also, seeing a baptismal certificate wouldn’t prove anything to me. One can be baptized in a church without ever undergoing a true conversion to Christianity. I once met a man who had done just that. He came forward in church one night and said, “I got baptized on the wrong side of being saved.”

“*They* say the best weapon is one you never have to fire. I respectfully disagree. I *prefer* the weapon you only have to fire *once*. That’s how Dad did it; that’s how America does it… and it’s worked out pretty well so far.”

 

Heh. Now I know why *they* say never debate Politics or Religion....

yoyo (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 9:12AM EST (link)

ALL 160+ of these comments prove it.

Nothing like having a discussion on Politics AND Religion to get the words-a-flowin’.

After EVERYTHING that he has done these last 18+ months, does it REALLY matter what religion he is? IF he were muslim, would calling him out on it make him change his policies? IF it turned out he was Pastafarian, would that REALLY make a difference?

He is a horrible President: he has to go. We can’t vote him out till 2012, but we can stop his idiotic and destructive policies this fall.

Nemo me impune lacesset
“No one will provoke me with impunity!”
=============================
Pukin’ Dogs – The Fighting 143
Sans Reproache
=============================
The ‘yoyo’ replaced my cigarettes January 22, 2006….

 

THANK YOU!

jbben Monday, August 23rd at 10:15AM EST (link)

I’m so grateful for your words today and those of Franklin Graham. You have helped me refocus on the truth that really matters.

Yes, it’s upsetting to see what’s happening in our country. But “we fix our eyes not on what is seen but on what is not seen. For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.” 2 Cor 4:18.

And just before those words, Paul wrote “Therefore we do not lose heart. Though outwardly we are wasting away, yet inwardly we are being renewed day by day. For our light and momentary troubles are achieving for us an eternal glory that far outweighs them all.” 2 Cor 4:16-17

What a remarkable perspective changer!

 

What about Arabia?

jamo (Diary) Monday, August 23rd at 10:54AM EST (link)

Here, here! for Franklin Graham.
What I want to know, while all the proponents of the mosque are shouting about ‘Islamophobia’, – which is just blackmail anyway – and condemning America, which without question is the most open and tolerant society on Earth is, what about Arabia?
The entire sub-contenant does not permit a single Christian chursch anywhere, never mind a prayer book or cruifix or the sign of the cross. It is a crime to practice christianity all aver the Moslem lands.
I want to talk about intoleranbce. You bet I do. here is plenty of intollerence. But it isn’t here in America, it’s in Arabia it’s by the Moslems.