Georgia Congressman Claims He Didn’t Know Much About Planned Parenthood Before Voting to Give Them Money


The other day I noted that Congressman Nathan Deal, back in 1993, voted to explicitly fund abortions via Planned Parenthood. I was wrong. The vote was to implicitly allow Planned Parenthood to fund abortions.

As Congressman Deal explained Monday night:

Politicians who vote to give your money to abortion providers can spin it anyway they like, but taxpayer dollars for one service frees up money elsewhere to provide abortion services”

Buried in the comments from Deal about this is not just an admission against interest that his vote for funding offset tax dollars to free up money for abortion, but also an attempt to play dumb on what Planned Parenthood was all about.

Explaining his 1993 vote, Deal initially said “a lot of us were not fully convinced of where … Planned Parenthood was and what they were doing with their money.”

Really? Seriously?

Back in the 1984 Planned Parenthood very publicly refused to comply with Ronald Reagan’s Mexico City Protocol. In fact, the organization went to court and obtained a court order allowing it to ignore the Mexico City Protocol. (SOURCE)

Planned Parenthood also vigorously opposed the nomination of Robert Bork.

During the George H. W. Bush administration, Planned Parenthood actively opposed the nomination of Georgia native Clarence Thomas. (SOURCE)

In 1992, the year the media famously dubbed the “Year of the [Liberal] Woman, Planned Parenthood was active around the country funding pro-abortion candidates. This is the same year Deal ran for office. (SOURCE)

Nathan Deal says he had no clue what Planned Parenthood was really all about. He either didn’t pay attention or is just playing dumb.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

10 Comments Leave a comment

much too bland

paulnashtn Wednesday, July 28th at 7:41PM EST (link)

“Nathan Deal says he had no clue what Planned Parenthood was really all about. He either didn’t pay attention or is just playing dumb.”
should read;
Nathan Deal says he had no clue what Planned Parenthood was really all about. He either is stupid and/or ignorant or he is just playing stupid and/or ignorant .

 

Even taking Nathan Deal at his word...

SoFiMil (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 7:51PM EST (link)

what’s he doing spending money on something he knows nothing about?!

www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com

Kowalski clarification

SoFiMil (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 7:52PM EST (link)

What’s Nathan Deal doing spending *my* money on something he knows nothing about?!

www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com

 

Why should we be surprised given the votes on financial reform and healthcare at the national level? nt

Xasteius (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 8:34PM EST (link)

Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!

The only poll that counts is the one at the ballot box.

I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be a Chance/Soros hybrid.

 

I believe the term is..

Superheater (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 11:40PM EST (link)

dereliction of duty

 
 

GRTL is defending...

wayneinnh (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 8:12PM EST (link)

GRTL is defending their endorsement of Nathan Deal.

In doing so, they are also trashing Karen Handel, claiming she voted to appropriate $1.2 million to (Un)Planned Parenthood.

I’m not familiar with either of these two since I live in NH, but GRTL seems to have a legitimate argument here. Is there something the rest of us are missing? Please shed some light on this for us.

Jon 14:6 –
Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.”

It’s not intellectual to believe we evolved from hydrogen gas.

Karen Handel

ktsub (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 8:30PM EST (link)

Erick has already explained at length. The money was funded prior to Karen taking office, and the funds were for cancer screening.

Karen is a better general election candidate, Nathan Deal will be trashed as unethical.

Could GRTL not find another target, other than a pro-life conservative woman, its really a waste of their time and energy.

Sounds like they are playing the CYA game

Adjoran (Diary) Thursday, July 29th at 1:08AM EST (link)

Which underlines the fact that interest group endorsements (like others) are not always solely on the basis of the group’s stated purposes – personal relationships, old grudges, money, and other factors often enter into it.

We are always best served by checking out each candidate’s record individually, never relying upon endorsements.

 
 
 

Handel

rdelbov Wednesday, July 28th at 9:25PM EST (link)

is the one for the primary and GE

 

My struggle with Handel vs Deal

Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Thursday, July 29th at 3:21AM EST (link)

I think they both have a problem in this area.

I think that any money given to PP is essentially money that will go for abortions.

And I have a problem with Handel’s “domestic partnership” benefits.

The larger issue that I have is “Who can beat Roy?”

At this point, I’m siding with Handel simply because of the latest revelation of potential charges with Deal. The problem is that the last poll I saw had Deal with a comfortable lead over Barnes and the same poll had Handel in the MOE.

********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts