I worked for Dominos Pizza. My title was “Shift Leader”. I still remember the store number.

Nope, not buying it Jane. Sorry.

Norton left AARP before Hillarycare up for its non-votes in DC plus it was before the national council of AARP endorsed Hillarycare.

Norton apparently worked in the state office of AARP as opposed to DC?–not sure about that?

Norton had worked for HHS during the Reagan years in DC–could it actually be that she was lobbying AARP to change its ways?

DC insider and lobbyist are such hard to define terms. Is Tom Coburn a DC insider? He would say no but others would say yes.

As to Norton leaving it off her resume that’s apersonal/ political decision. She may have worked at McDonalds when she was 22 years of age and does not want to be called a third shift fry cook. I suspect that with the reputation AARP has now she would does not want to spend time defending her work there. I suspect she did yeoman’s work there but lets be honest after AARP endorsed Hillarycare and Obamacare work expirence there is not a plus.

That being said its fairgame–politics is a contact sport. Buck hit at Norton then Norton hit back at Buck over his “ethics class”. Buck or whoever hitting Norton over working for the AARP back in 1993 is alot like Norton telling folks that “Buck matriculated at an Ivy league school”. Yes that happened–Buck matriculated at an Ivy law school. He has to live with that the rest of his life.

She is toast. There are no two ways about. Ladies and gentlemen, the word is out and the facts are clear- Jane Norton is a compulsory liar and a very poor one on top of it. This is definitely not the year for Jane Norton. I would be surprised if she even gets 40%. There is no argument to vote against Ken Buck. In general election polls, he is just as good as her, so she can not use the “electability” pitch. And calling him “the washington insider in this race”. IS ABSURD!

as a busboy for 1 day. I quit that same day because the guy running that shift was, up to that moment, the most perfect A** H*** I had ever encountered. I was 16 years old at the time. I’ve encountered quite a few since then but he is still very near the top of the list. That was 46 years ago and I can tell you virtually EVERYTHING I did during that 1 eight hour shift.

No, I cannot tell you the name of my Nemesis.

The radio ad starts out with Jane saying she approves it, then never talks about her substantively again.

It’s all attacks on Ken Buck as a “government lawyer” who was kinda fired (it sounds like) amid ethics scandal(s).

Of course I’ve read about the incident, and Norton’s ad is as far from Reagan’s 11th as you can get by using distortion and absurd exageration about Ken Buck’s record years and years ago instead of saying positive things about her own campaign, or, for that matter, the most pressing need which is to make sure the seat becomes Republican again.

Jane Norton has attacked Ken Buck on his ethics. Let’s put it in perspective. Ken Buck did something wrong 10 years ago. When confronted did he deny it or own up to it and take the reprimand?

Fast forward to 2010. Jane Norton is asked if she was a lobbyist. She states that she was not, even though her employer stated she was a paid lobbyist. Now she is interviewed regarding her time as a lobbyist as AARP and says she cannot remember as it has been too long ago. Wait one minute….It was not too long ago she left 1993 off her resume.

I’ll take the candidate who choses “I cannot tell a lie, I chopped down the cherry tree.” over the candidate who declares: “Cherry tree,,,,hmmmm, where was it at?….I don’t recall, Can I get back to you?

Accusing Norton of being a lobbyist is just the latest Buck smear. Jane Norton has never, ever been a lobbyist. I heard Ken and Perry come up with the idea of calling her a lobbyist and tying her to McCain last year after the Fountain Parade. They both knew they were not true, but they did not care. Whenever another Buck malfeasance breaks, Buck and his supporters come out with another smear on Norton. The story breaks about Buck being fired from the US Attorney and sent to ethics classes, and a day later Buck supporters sue Norton about her petitions. The FEC charges Buck with campaign finance violations this week. Buck comes up with the lobbyist smear. Buck has serious ethical problems. Buck and his supporters think it will make him not as bad if he can drag Norton down in the mud with him. It is going to backfire in a huge way. Norton has the proven, conservative record. As she said recently, she has not had to take ethics classes. She is electable and Buck is not!

She is the quintessential insider, and money-girl, whether she technically ever was hired by an industry association or was paid as a registered lobbyist — she still has lobbied — she HAS dealt for years in K Street influencing, wheeling and dealing with the big boys… She was recruited for this vacancy so all the usual establishment RINO consultants can plunder and fleece the grassroots, and wind up with “their gal” to do their bidding in DC after they have made a bundle off the campaign, to boot. Good grief, her RINO record is as plain as the nose on your face, and so is her present performance. Look at her campaign, who is funding and running it, who has her ad buys, and how she is scripted. For crying out loud, what do people need to draw the most obvious and inescapable conclusions? NO more RINOs, NO more cozy DC fat-cat, establishment GOP business as usual. Save the Republic — throw the rascals OUT! And that includes the #$% consultants like Charlie Black, his relations, and the rest of his ilk. They do not have a principled bone in their bodies that has showed up once in an important fight these last twenty years. We deserve better in America. Ken Buck is the guy.