Do you believe that conservatives can win general elections?
Do you think that the GOP has the best chance since 1994 to make gains in the House and Senate this coming year?
If you answered yes to both questions, let me ask you another one: why shouldn’t the GOP try to nominate viable conservatives in its primaries instead of just going with the candidate the conventional wisdom thinks can win up front?
Look at Marco Rubio. He started the race at 8% and is now tied with the incumbent Governor of Florida for the GOP nomination.
I keep hearing that we need to back X candidate because that candidate can win. Really? Isn’t that what the NRSC said about Crist?
Why exactly must we support Jane Norton in Colorado instead of Ken Buck? I’m not saying I am or am not, but why must I? Lots of people think we must because the same guys in Washington who said Charlie Crist was our best hope in Florida say she is in Colorado.
Why exactly must we support Mark Kirk in Illinois? Lots of people think we must because the same guys in Washington who said Charlie Crist was our best hope in Florida say he is in Illinois.
When we examine those two races, we find that people are probably right about Mark Kirk. The race is only a month and a half a way, his challenger is in the single digits, like Rubio was nine months ago, but is not aggressively campaigning and has little chance of raising the needed money to win with only a month and a half to go. There is no sign of a unified conservative movement push for Hughes. So we go with Kirk unless something changes pretty immediately.
In Colorado, that is not the case. Ken Buck has a very real shot and Norton is about to suffer some very serious high dollar blows about her support for suspending TABOR a while back. We need not go with the inside the beltway wisdom just because the beltway wisdom wants us to go with Norton. We should watch, study, observe, and see where things are heading before going with either Buck or Norton.
That brings us to New Hampshire.
“Everyone” says we should go with Kelly Ayotte.
Why exactly?
Kelly Ayotte has never run for office, was appointed Attorney General twice by Democratic Governor John Lynch, serving in his Democratic Administration from 2005 to 2009.
Ayotte has acknowledged that as a Senator, she would have voted for Judge Sonia Sotomayor. (Politico ‘Scorecard’, 8/12/09)
As Attorney General for Democratic governor John Lynch, Ayotte and her office willingly and gladly administered the Obama stimulus bill.
Ayotte refused to acknowledge whether she voted for the Republican candidates for Governor in either 2006 or 2008. (New Hampshire Union Leader, GOP Senate Hopefuls Look to Cut Through the Noise, 11/15/09)
Ayotte lobbied Governor Lynch to reject legislation expanding the ‘Castle Doctrine’, which justifies homeowners using deadly force to defend themselves against intruders. (Concord Monitor Capital Beat Column, 8/30/09)
“[Ayotte] is still going to have to convince Republican voters of her loyalty because she has never been in a position where she’s been active in the party,” according to NH Political Consultant Mike Dennehy. (GOP Senate Hopefuls Look to Cut Through the Noise, 11/15/09)
Ayotte has patently refused to say what kind of Senator she would be if she were elected.
Ayotte’s office issued a legal opinion to enable Governor Lynch to steal $110 million in private medical malpractice insurance funds in what is now known as the “JUA Case” (see this Concord Monitor article) That theft has been challenged and the case is pending in the Supreme Court.
Ayotte opposed an important market-based health care reform – allowing small businesses to pool resources to purchase insurance – in 2006; only now is she in favor of it after she announced her candidacy, acknowledging she had “changed her mind” (see this Concord Monitor article).
So why must we support her? What makes her the best candidate?
I’m not convinced. In fact, when I talk to reporters in New Hampshire, GOP activists in New Hampshire, and elected officials in New Hampshire, more and more of them are telling me that Ovide Lamontagne has a very real chance of winning the primary and, in this climate, has a very real chance of winning the general election too.
It seems to me we should consider the difference between 20 years of a conservative record with Lamontagne vs. 4 months of rhetoric with Ayotte.
Now, I’m not really upset if some of you disagree with me. But please tell me why we should line up behind Ayotte? The only people I know of who are trumpeting her loudly are the exact same people who told us we had to line up behind Charlie Crist.
I’m not convinced. In fact, I am increasingly convinced we should go with Lamontagne. If this is a banner year for the GOP and we believe conservatives can win, let’s go with the real deal.
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
Given that the Tea Party is outpolling both parties,
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 12:59PM EST (link)and crushing the piddling numbers of the Republican Party, it seems clear to me that the road to decisive victory goes through the conservative Tea Party.
Tens of thousands show up at local Tea Party events. To the establishment Republicans, I say keep telling your message to the tens you’re able to draw to your events.
Exactly!
uttles (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 2:31PM EST (link)You’re exactly right! The Tea Party movement is so popular because it revolves around PRINCIPLES. Those principles being:
1) Individual Rights
2) Small government
3) LOW (or NO) Taxes
4) Responsible defense
etc
Simple principles that can be applied consistently to any issue. This is what America needs. This is what America used to be.
The pundits say the Republicans need to cave on their principles and find people who are “electable.” Electable why? Because they fit some mold the media and the democrats have designed?
That’s a recipe for failure. Just look at John McCain. The statists want us to run candidates like that because a) they’ll mostly lose and b) even if they win, what will they actually do to fight the statist agenda? NOTHING!
The Republicans need to learn from the Tea Parties and run candidates to have solid American principles. If they don’t, they will fail, and the entire country will fail.
~~~ www.itsmyblog.com
Bingo.
rec0n Monday, December 21st at 2:40PM EST (link)“The pundits say the Republicans need to cave on their principles and find people who are “electable.” Electable why? Because they fit some mold the media and the democrats have designed?”
Because they let the DNC dictate what our principles should be, which in turn look a lot like THEIRS. It’s a win/win for them ,and idiotic BEYOND BELIEF that it’s ACCEPTED. Drives me absolutely insane.
Why indeed would we accept direction from these fools. I don’t take marching orders from anyone, but I’ll ride on Ericks shoulder light-years before I ever listened these people.
To illustrate:
edwlstr Tuesday, December 22nd at 9:52PM EST (link)1) individual rights – you (not me) must sign up for national health insurance or face fines or imprisonment. (If they can find me)
2) Small government – National socialiized Health (NAZI Health) will increase the size of government very significantly, at least as much as the Homeland Security fiasco (28% in Bush’s term).
3) Low (No) Taxes – National Health Insurance will add $800 billion in immediate taxes with another $547 billion stolen from medicare.
4) Responsible Defense – If the General asks for 60,000 troops give him the 60,000 else tell him we’re getting out of Afghanistan. If we’re not going to try to win let’s come home! $173 billion/year is a lot to spend on a war you don’t intend to try to win. NOT TO MENTION SOME OF AMERICAS FINEST SONS AND DAUGHTERS.
The same
Wes_W Monday, December 21st at 1:00PM EST (link)Don’t forget that the same people endorsing Crist and Norton are also the same people that said McCain was was good presidental candidate because he would attract the independent vote.
Exactly. 2008 killed the "x is the only candidate who can win" meme
Darin_H (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:09PM EST (link)It’s was McCain’s primary campaign strategy.
A visionary coward says that anger can be power, as long as there’s a victim on TV – Flat Top, Goo Goo Dolls
Who are the "same people"
letswinsomeelections Monday, December 21st at 5:40PM EST (link)Who are all of these “same people” … I don’t know them. It seems the VOTERS are endorsing Norton in Colorado – she has almost double the lead as Buck has over the Democrats. MORE IMPORTANTLY she is a conservative. Take 3 minutes to read her issue positions — available in print — real black and white — on her website.
Not so fast.
NightTwister (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 10:17PM EST (link)There are many people that are very skeptical still. She’s got a lot of work to do to win over the grassroots. Ignoring them like she did in Loveland a couple of months ago isn’t the way to do it either.
Besides, in 2010 if things stay the same or get worse, mbeckers dead white cat could be Bennet. Isn’t it important that we get the best possible candidate who will represent COLORADO conservative values?
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill
Now the Time ...
fpete13527 (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:05PM EST (link)…to DYNAMICALLY shift the MINDSET and prior LIBERAL/RINO complacency and passive mode of the GOP…….regarding both current actions in congress and future candidate support.
AND….to stop the argument that in a certain areas of the country, only a candidate that supports SOCIALISM can be elected as a Republican and that we must keep a “Big Tent”……..WRONG.
Empower CONSERVATIVE actions and candidates and then ENROLL and MAGNETIZE (As Ace Puts it So Well) …..NOT FILL THE TENT WITH RINO’s
Excellent post Erick
Thanks for finally mentioning Norton.
NightTwister (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:06PM EST (link)We really don’t know that much about her. I’m really not opposed to her specifically, I just hate outsiders (NRSC & John McCain) telling us who should be selected. I read recently (still trying to confirm) that Norton came out and said the Dept. of Education should be abolished. If it’s true, that’s a gutsy statement to make in a primary, and something I’m actually happy to see. The jury’s still out though. She’s not the only conservative that came out in favor of suspending TABOR. The common excuse is the schools needed the money. Then we hear they misused the money and it didn’t go where they originally said it would. But I have to ask, isn’t that the best we can hope for when the government gets its hands on money? If they don’t misuse it they steal it outright. Those that voted to suspend TABOR should’ve known this.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill
Ignore outsiders
letswinsomeelections Monday, December 21st at 5:43PM EST (link)NightTwister, ignore the outsiders and look at Norton yourself. She seems to be running on her own bio, her own statements and her own record. As I said in another reply above, just take 5 minutes to read her issue statements right on her website. They are in black and white. She is not hiding from her conservative positions like others.
I do my own research, thanks.
NightTwister (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 10:14PM EST (link)She supported Ref. C. That’s a problem for me. She’s not the only conservative that did, and they’re all having to answer for it now.
I’m also aware of some interviews she’s given, and there’s too much typical politician nothing to too many of her answers. I have a problem with that too. She has no record to run on, so I just gotta take her word for it? Where has that gotten us before?
Lastly, can someone give her a cappuccino or something? When she speaks she sounds like she’s taken way too many sleeping pills. The only one less exciting to listen to is Michael Bennet.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill
Answers
letswinsomeelections Tuesday, December 22nd at 7:50AM EST (link)A little calm in the voice could go a long way towards finishing this long race and allowing a conservative to actually have a victory in CO. Independents will sometimes listen to reason if they are not screamed at. She has put her positions in writing… down in FL Crist doesn’t even have anything on his issues page! It is a lot better than someone claiming they are going to do something verbally and they you have nothing to fall back on. She is out front and center with her beliefs and they are not mild, but direct.
If you are running for election / reelection in 2010,
Old_Crow (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:09PM EST (link)will you pledge to reverse EVERY piece of health care legislation passed since 2009?
If not, shut up and move along.
You are neither a Conservative nor republican.
We need to not only stop the socialists trying to push this legislation, but, at the MINIMUM, reverse the legislation passed.
“Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” — James Madison
5!
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:18PM EST (link)they have to make that pledge, whether it is possible or not, attempt to repeal or at least greatly change the Obamacare, or we will not even consider you.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Kristol of Weekly Standard
earlgrey (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:14PM EST (link)suggests Pence run against Bayh. I called Pence’s office hoping he’ll do it.
What we also need
gnomechumpsky Monday, December 21st at 1:20PM EST (link)is to look beyond our own districts and states. I’d love to see a site that would help people put donations where they are needed most be if for a senate candidate in Colorado or a congressional candidate in Florida.
I thought we were on it lol
rec0n Monday, December 21st at 2:48PM EST (link)I live in WA. I donate anywhere but here, whenever I can. Which at this point won’t be until after Christmas, but who’s counting.
Club for Growth...
audax (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 3:29PM EST (link)DOT COM!
Audeamus pro audere est facere
If the GOP thinks that Conservatives cannot win
guyaverage (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:29PM EST (link)and the GOP acts accordingly with the nominations that it proposes and the support that it gives, then we will see a continuation of what we are seeing now.
Why?
Because we have gotten to where we are by following that exact route!!!
The ONLY way that there will be a different result is to follow a different path, and Conservatism is the only different path.
Democrats are going farther Left from the Left. Republicans are going father Left from the Center-Left, with VERY few exceptions.
Compromise is what the Tories did at the time of the War for Independence. (Tory = RINO) They saw the British Army and the Power of the Crown as being unbeatable. The Founders of Our Country saw it otherwise.
Why?
Because they had faith that their cause was just in the eyes of God, and they trusted God for the choices they made and the policies they pursued. They heard from the pulpits of the Colonies from men who delivered sermons and then tore their robes off, revealing military uniforms beneath. Their leaders knelt in prayer, not just at Valley Forge but everywhere. They prayed when The Constitutional Convention was deadlocked. They recognized God in our Founding Documents, and they took action in the face of overwhelming, impossible odds because they chose RIGHT and TRUTH over compromise, and they did not care if they lost, even though they knew that if they lost it would cost them their lives, literally!
If we choose any less than that level of commitment, we are not fit to continue in the USA they founded. If we choose any less than that level of dedication, the USA that they founded will cease to exist before our very eyes no matter what anyone does.
As for me, I don’t care if anyone thinks that Conservatives can win or not, I am not going to compromise with the idea of being pragmatic in order to win a political gain. The USA has been heading Left since FDR, and now we do not have the time for pragmatism. We need to choose what we really believe in, stand for it, and pray for God’s mercy to enable victory, just like the Founders did.
It is time for the GOP to stand for something, because right now they stand for everything and anything, and for nothing all at the same time.
http://guyaverage.blogspot.com
guyaverage, I sure hope you are a Republican precinct committeeman
ColdWarrior (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 2:07PM EST (link)If you aren’t one, I hope you’ll become one.
Go here to learn more:
www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com
I like your blog.
Thank you.
ColdWarrior
In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?
Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Unified Patriots.
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and
that was absolutely inspiring, guyaverage
rec0n Monday, December 21st at 3:05PM EST (link)n/t
The Founding Fathers *prayed*? GASP!!! I hope the ACLU doesn't find out. (nt)
eburke (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 4:05PM EST (link)“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
Unified Patriots
Connecticut
TC Robinson (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:40PM EST (link)Hey Erick, what’s your take on the all but assured Republican primary contest between Rob Simmons and Linda McMahon coming up in August in Connecticut?
Join the RedState Strike Force
I know very little about McMahon
Erick Erickson (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 1:54PM EST (link)but she seems to all of a sudden be polling better than Simmons.
Who will stand on either hand and keep this bridge with me?Follow @EWErickson
McMahon
Daniel Horowitz (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 2:20PM EST (link)is a left wing rino. If we are going to go with a RINO lets go with the respectable, army veteran Rob Simmons than the porn promoting political nobody. I happen to think that Peter Schiff, has the money, skill, name recognition (hero of the financial collapse) to go all the way.
By the way I think we should add Utah to the list. Cherylin Eagar vs RINO Bennett.
Don't blame McCain
mikefromglendale (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 2:24PM EST (link)It would be a mistake to use the McCain/Palin campaign as an example of running a RINO ticket instead of a true conservative one.
Don’t forget, McCain was three points ahead of Obama in the polling until the economy tanked in September. Given that and also the dissatisfaction with the outgoing administration, I’m not sure Lincoln or Reagan could have won that election.
O for Pete's Sake...Are you seriously going to make the argument NOW that McCain is a conservative and not a RINO?
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, December 22nd at 9:35AM EST (link)I think we’ve been through this once or twice!
I’ll bring this up to date and move along…McCain is using his war chest to support RINOs like Ayotte, Crist, Kirk, Fiorina, and on and on…
Those Are All Ovide's Talking Points
Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 2:51PM EST (link)Seems like you made your decsion already.
“Kelly Ayotte has never run for office, was appointed Attorney General twice by Democratic Governor John Lynch, serving in his Democratic Administration from 2005 to 2009.”
Wrong. She was re-appointed. Lynch kept her as a hold over from the previous admininstration because she was so competent and popular. He wouldnt dare force her out.
“As Attorney General for Democratic governor John Lynch, Ayotte and her office willingly and gladly administered the Obama stimulus bill.”
This argument is the worst. Every single Governor gladly administered stimulus funds including Mitch Daniels, Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin. And she wasnt even a governor, she was Attorney General with no power over such matters. Its absolutely ridiculous.
“Ayotte refused to acknowledge whether she voted for the Republican candidates for Governor in either 2006 or 2008. (New Hampshire Union Leader, GOP Senate Hopefuls Look to Cut Through the Noise, 11/15/09)”
Classy and professional. Her job was to be the objective, unbiased Attorney General for the state. She worked under a Democratic Governor. She did not want to politicize the Office of the AG. Good for her.
“Ayotte lobbied Governor Lynch to reject legislation expanding the ‘Castle Doctrine’, which justifies homeowners using deadly force to defend themselves against intruders. (Concord Monitor Capital Beat Column, 8/30/09)”
She is a strong supporter of gun rights and NH has some of the best lasw involving gun rights and property rights.
“[Ayotte] is still going to have to convince Republican voters of her loyalty because she has never been in a position where she’s been active in the party,” according to NH Political Consultant Mike Dennehy. (GOP Senate Hopefuls Look to Cut Through the Noise, 11/15/09)”
Hahaha. Nice to see you again Ovide after 13 years of doing nothing after gettting your *ss handed to you by Jeanne Shaheen. How does a Republican lose by 17 points in NH in 1996? Pathetic campaign and politician. That’s how.
So why must we support her? What makes her the best candidate?
Why, because Ovide is a phony and loser. He’s never won anything.
This is from July:
Fav/Unfav Ratings
Gregg 53/24
Shaheen 50/36
Hodes 32/23
Ayotte 40/8
Bass 33/23
Tausch 5/4
LaMontagne 5/4
Ayotte favorable 8 times higher than Ovide. Her unfavorables 2 times. Ovide ran for Governor and people still either dont know him or like him. Everyone knows Ayotte and she polls single digit unfavorables. That’s amazing.
And he is no real conservative. I’m tired of people trying to won that label. He’s super social conservative who tries to legislate morality. That is one reason is his unpopular. He is king anti-gambling crusader. He belongs in the Bible Belt. Not New Hampshire.
Well argued
red_oakster (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 3:49PM EST (link)While I find the arguments of Mr. Walsh of NRSCC weak (that is about as charitable as I can be), some of the arguments in this blog entry seem to be a sort of mechanistic calculation that the enemy of my enemy, namely the candidate lacking the blessing of the Cornyn and his minions, is somehow my friend.
I like Rubio and I like Toomey, but it’s not some mortal sin to think that a DeVore looks unelectable in a long shot blue state like California or that Fiorina appears to be the most conservative candidate in the race who also can win. And when it comes to supporting a Rand Paul who seems to be coming straight out of truther/isolationist central casting, I think Erick’s argument collapses.
Better to find good opponents for Bayh and Patty Murray and even Schumer (yes health care is unpopular even in New York). It’s something the Cornyn gang in DC doesn’t seem to be doing, and something where Red State could make a huge contribution.
Nice rebuttal.
shadowtax (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 4:39PM EST (link)I know little about Ayotte, but I do know that she is an appointed AG. We conservatives trace authority and blame for Eric Holder’s decisions back to Obama. Why would we not do so for Ayotte and Lynch? We expect cabinet members. If serving in a Democrat cabinet should disqualify a Republican for office, just say so. Don’t make empty insinuations about how “willingly and gladly” she does her job.
From Erick’s post, one would conclude that Ayotte has never done anything good in her life. It strikes me as a work of advocacy, rather than objective criticism. Perhaps this is a preliminary post designed to lay the ground work for an endorsement for another candidate. If so, just do it.
555.
Third Street (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 5:07PM EST (link)Ayotte is, for all practical purposes, the only GOP candidate in the race. I’m for her.
“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”
Actually no
Erick Erickson (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 5:16PM EST (link)My mind is not made up and these rebuttals are helpful. Ovide needs to prove he’s learned from his mistakes the last time around. And if he’s not viable he’s not.
But I don’t think we should be automatic with Ayotte anymore than we were with Crist.
Who will stand on either hand and keep this bridge with me?Follow @EWErickson
Great points...
laxconservative (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 5:54PM EST (link)Folks need to be mindful of the local electorate. Fiscal conservatism can win everywhere, Bible-belt social conservatism can’t.
Primaries vs. the General
Andy Quinn (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 4:51PM EST (link)As a conservative teenager with several years’ experience with political footwork in northern Illinois, I respectfully submit that Erick’s piece completely neglects the entire portion of the electoral process that occurs after February.
Attempting to counter the platitude about backing primary candidates “who can win,” Erick notes the Rubio success. However, when people talk about “who can win,” they are usually referring not to primary viability among the base but in general election viability. I can reassure you that the reason to support Kirk here in IL is not simply because Hughes can’t outraise him in time but is also because Hughes doesn’t have any credibility outside the tea party base. Even if Hughes had a great organization and was well-funded, he wouldn’t stand a snowball’s chance in Hell statewide in Novermber.
A candidate’s success within a primary doesn’t prove anything about “ability to win,” Erick, and remember that Republicans hoping to have a fighting chance in the state of Durbin and The One *must* look very different from Republicans running in the state of Jeb Bush.
I blog.
Norton Should Not Be In This Post
letswinsomeelections Monday, December 21st at 5:46PM EST (link)Norton is different than some of these other candidates. She has not hidden from her principled, tough stands on the issues. Unlike others, she has them posted in black and white right on her website. Take 5 minutes to read over them and it is clear she is a conservative.
Norton absolutely belongs in this post.
NightTwister (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 10:22PM EST (link)She was hand picked by John McCain and was about to get full NRSC support like Crist in Florida until we screamed so loud to the state GOP people that they convinced the NRSC to back off.
It’s not about whether or not she’s a conservative. It’s about OUTSIDERS tell us here in Colorado who should represent us. The national orgs. need to stay out and let us decide. I guarantee the harder those orgs. push her, the less likely it will be that she get full support.
As for her stand on the issues, all we have is what she says. She has no real record to stand behind her, so we just have to take her word for it. Everyone that believes politicians speak the truth when they open their mouth, please raise your hand.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill
Believe
letswinsomeelections Tuesday, December 22nd at 7:55AM EST (link)You should believe what she says because she put it in writing. She is not pretending to take one side and then move to the other. As for the outsiders – who cares. Are you going to let someone else dictate who you do and don’t support? I don’t agree with my neighbor on everything but I am sure glad to have their vote for candidates I support. “Hand picked?” She is not produce at the grocery store. Who called who? Sounds like to me she was being smart and calling everyone she could think of to get financial help if they would answer the phone. Good candidates do that — and properly fund a winning campaign. She hasn’t backed down from her strong positions, she has them right on her website.
...she put it in writing.
mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, December 22nd at 8:08AM EST (link)Heh.
John McCain put HIS conservative principles in writing. So has Charlie Christ.
Personally I know nothing about Norton, but frankly if John McCain supports her that’s enough for me to oppose her.
Crist
letswinsomeelections Tuesday, December 22nd at 8:30AM EST (link)That is simply not true. Last time I looked, Crist had nothing – nothing – on his issues page. McCain didn’t change his positions, he stuck with them whether we liked them or not. I will say he has been great and at least speaking up publicly unlike others in this health care debate. Norton is not McCain, far from it.
Norton is not McCain and we have her word for that.
mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, December 22nd at 1:45PM EST (link)I’ll say again, I don’t know anything about her, but it appears that she’s more than a little thin on the “experience” thingy.
I’ve been around the pole enough times that I really don’t give a damn what people say or write. I’m a whole lot more interested in what they’ve DONE. Take for instance Mike Huckabee. He’s got a good inventory of writing and speeches about how conservative he is. But, when he had the responsibility of actually governing, he was Huey P Long incarnate.
Why should I listen to you?
NightTwister (Diary) Tuesday, December 22nd at 9:54AM EST (link)To use your reasoning, why should I listen to what you have to say about her, especially since you don’t even know the history? Are you even in Colorado? As I said in my other comment above, I do my own research. Fact is, I haven’t made a final decision yet in this race. I’m still looking at the candidates. Ken Buck is from up here in neighboring Weld County. I know about him and his record. Tom Wiens is also in the race, but I don’t know enough about him yet to form an opinion.
The whole point of this diary is to state that we don’t want national orgs. telling us who should represent us. We’re fully capable of deciding that for ourselves.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill
Why, he put it in writing!
Bill S (Diary) Tuesday, December 22nd at 10:03AM EST (link)What other reason do you need to listen to him?
:rolls eyes:
“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
Thats a good point
SirGladiator (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 6:16PM EST (link)I went to Jane Norton’s website, she does seem pretty conservative, plus according to her website she’s got a nice lead on two of the possible Democratic nominees, always a plus
. I think we should be focused on races where theres more of a substantive difference between the two major candidates involved, like the race in Illinois, where the Republican Kirk is really quite liberal, a big supporter of abortion, gay marriage, etc. and yet somehow is way ahead in a GOP Primary against whoever his opponent is. Thats the type of race we should be working on, assuming his opponent is actually a real Conservative of course (I know absolutely nothing about his opponent, including his name). Another good example is the Connecticut race, where you have an ultra liberal in Simmons, a real unknown in McMahon, and a solid Conservative in Schiff. We need to make races like those our top priority, especially given that the Connecticut Senate race is about as close to a ‘whoever wins the Republican primary wins the general automaticly’ as you’ll probably ever see in a LOOONG time, given how extremely unpopular the Democrat Dodd is. Races where both candidates are Conservative but one is just slightly moreso than the other are probably a waste of time when there are important races out there with such huge differences involved, so lets stay focused where we need to!
at this point
RJD (Diary) Monday, December 21st at 6:18PM EST (link)it’s basically do the exact opposite of whatever the GOP idiot-leadership in D.C. is doing.
who is doing the thinking
letswinsomeelections Monday, December 21st at 8:25PM EST (link)You should not let anyone in Washington do the thinking for you. Think for yourself and do you own research. It shouldn’t matter who Washington is or is not supporting. Do you own research and make your own informed decision – don’t just react to Washington.
who Washington is suppporting!
colawman (Diary) Tuesday, December 22nd at 9:08AM EST (link)It does matter who Washington is supporting. Particularly when that support from Washington comes from major lobbying firms and lobbyists. I agree, do the research and see how much money has been poured into Norton’s campaign from the Washington insiders. Do we want a Colorado Senator who is beholding to Washington or to her constituents. You cannot have it both ways. Her electability is not a good reason to support her. The other GOP candidates are polling ahead of the Dems in this race as well. I want a Colorado Senator not a Washington Senator.
Ayotte's record
NH_GOP Monday, December 21st at 6:31PM EST (link)Failed to prosecute Ruth Griffin (liberal republican) Geoff Wetrosky (Kerry worker who committed sign theft and voter fraud) and NHDP Chair Ray Buckley for kiddie porn… allowing him to tidy up before any investigation was done.
The woman is NOT a republican.
My list
proudgop (Diary) Tuesday, December 22nd at 9:50AM EST (link)Ayotte NH
Blunt ( I am worried about him) MO
Grayson KY
Castle DE
Kirk IL
Toomey PA
Norton CO
Carly Fiorina CA
Hoeven ND
Pataki ( I guess I have to he runs now Sigh) NY
Simmons CT
Hostettler in IN at this point ( I hope he takes PAC money this time)
still wish we could target Feingold in WI with Tommy Thompson
Haven’t decided on FL yet or NV
proudgop, you haven't decided to support Rubio over Crist?
janis (Diary) Tuesday, December 22nd at 9:53AM EST (link)Which does not surprise me in the least.
Lamontagne will be strong candidate
georgeedmunds Tuesday, December 22nd at 10:49AM EST (link)Ayotte has no political foundation in New Hampshire. She’s a good citizen and an excellent attorney it seems, but Lamontagne has a well-established record as a Conservative and the fighting spirit to deal with the democrat who has his eye on the Senate seat. Merry Christmas.
George Edmunds
North Sutton, NH
Mark Kirk is a RINO
teridavisnewman (Diary) Wednesday, December 23rd at 10:47PM EST (link)Mark Kirk is a RINO. Look at his voting record to see what kind of “Conservative” he is.
Teri Davis Newman
2010 Republican Nominee for Congress
2012 Candidate for Congress
12th Congressional District of Illinois
www.terinewman.com
CO political news.blogspot.com Rates
flier1 Monday, December 28th at 12:29AM EST (link)Ken Buck as even with Jane Norton at 10:1 and comments that Ken is coming up fast. An anonymous blogger wrote this about Ken:
I like Ken Buck. He has done a magnificent job as Weld County DA. He started with an office that had an abysmal record in fighting crime and built it into a highly effective prosecutorial force fighting crime, supporting victims and promoting crime prevention. He brought together community leaders to create the Juvenile Assessment Center that has helped more than a thousand Weld County youngsters and their families get back on the right path in life.
Ken’s positions on the issues that face our country are strong, conservative and common sense. “The spending increases have to stop and the deficit has to shrink.” Ken is the only candidate for the US Senate that has signed a pledge(Americans for Tax Reform) not to raise taxes. “We cannot meet our energy demands with windmills and solar panels in the near term. We need coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear energy production.” He supports the fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, our troops and their Generals. “We have the best healthcare system in the world and 85% of us are happy with it. “We do not want to throw out what is working well for us and turn over our private healthccare system to the bureaucrats in Washington.: “We cannot be a strong country if we do not control our borders.” Ken believes that we can have a finely crafted guest worker program that can meet the needs of our economy and still deal effectively with the larger illegal immigration problem.
Ken is not supported by John McCain or by big money whose interests may not match with those of the citizens of Colorado. Regardless, Ken has strong character and stellar reputation and can be depended on to make decisions that would benefit the people of Colorado.
Keep those Donations coming.