See, I Told You So?


What was I saying? Something about the GOP Strategy of offering up amendments, all of which died, with reciprocal amendments from the Dems, was just allowing the Democrats to improve the bill and buy time for 60 votes?

Guess what? That’s what happened.

Now the GOP has a choice — keep up the “messaging amendment” or actually fight. Their choice.


Category: ,

RSS feed

106 Comments Leave a comment

What should Senate Republicans do, Erick?

countessolenska Tuesday, December 8th at 9:52PM EST (link)

I don’t know how they can fight this with only 40 votes. It sounds like some of them are resigning themselves to the idea that the Dems will be victorious, and they are just trying to improve things.

And, I understand that Jim Webb has been voting for a bunch of Republican amendments. I guess he’s trying to cover his butt.

Starting now

Erick Erickson (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 10:22PM EST (link)

drag out debate until after Christmas so they have to go home and face constituents.

Who will stand on either hand and keep this bridge with me?

Yes, revolt is in the air

ericstenner Tuesday, December 8th at 10:25PM EST (link)

It’s thick like Ben Nelson’s ridiculous combover. If the GOP can hold them off until Christmas the American people could deal the final blow.

 

From your mouth to Mitch McConnell's ears

countessolenska Tuesday, December 8th at 10:32PM EST (link)

I agree that the public needs more time to digest the latest developments.

The way the Dems set up this Medicare expansion idea was quite clever. Make it sound like you’re accepting this “compromise” reluctantly because you couldn’t get your beloved “public option.”

How are Republicans going to make this idea sound bad to those of us in that 55-64 age group?

Will CBO be any help?

ericstenner Tuesday, December 8th at 10:38PM EST (link)

I don’t know nearly enough to speculate on this, but would there be any chance that the CBO score would indicate that this method would drive up costs? The Dems probably have this already thought out and/or rigged, but just wondering if anyone knows how the score could help or hurt.

 

I dont even get how this "compromise" is supposed to win over Lieberman

Illinicon (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 11:12PM EST (link)

since his reason for being agnaist the Public Option was increased entilement spending, which this still does by adding more people to entitlement programs.

My Potus shortlist

declared candidates:

1. Tim Pawlenty
2. Herman Cain
3. Gary Johnson
4. Rick Santorum

among declared and rumored candidates:

1. Rick Perry
2. Tim Pawlenty
3. Rudy Giuilani
4. Herman Cain

Lieberman wouldn't be consistent...

countessolenska Wednesday, December 9th at 12:01AM EST (link)

…(and basically would be full of it) if he supported this “compromise” of expanding Medicare. You’re right. Lieberman’s whole objection to the public option had to do with not wanting to increase the fiscal burden on the federal government.

 

They don't have to win over Leiberman...since Snowe and Collins are already cooing like love sick doves over these "compromises"...

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 10:44AM EST (link)

The old bird was invited for a private one on one with the golden child this weekend…and she’s been pining for the “progress” and “improvements” that have been made!

mark my words…Snowe will be on board in a final vote…I don’t know yet about Collins…but Snowe is in!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Snowe on record saying no to Medicare expansion

countessolenska Wednesday, December 9th at 10:47AM EST (link)

I don’t see how any sane person could vote to expand a program that is already heading toward insolvency – unless more taxes are passed.

Let's hope you're right...I'd have liked to be a fly on the wall in the oval office when Snowe was there nt

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:58AM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Lieberman just made a statement

countessolenska Wednesday, December 9th at 10:53AM EST (link)

The National Review has Lieberman’s statement from just minutes ago.

http://healthcare.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTJkNzlhZGUwN2E5OTVlMGNlMDZhMDQyMTMxZTc4Y2U=

 
 
 

So is Mitch...

jadedismental Tuesday, December 8th at 11:36PM EST (link)

For the expansion of Medicare??

Or against the expansion of Medicare??

It’s so confusing.

 

You're SO BADLY WRONG

ggross56 (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 2:25AM EST (link)

The public can do handstands & it won’t matter. The public can tell them that voting for this bill will be their political demise & it won’t matter. The Democrats are perfectly willing to walk off a cliff for being part of history.

That’s why, Erick, with all due respect, the amendments that the Repulbicans offered were irrelevant in terms of the bill passing or not. Personally, I think that Repulbicans have fought a smart fight strategically.

The point is ggross...if you could understand what you are reading...

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 10:54AM EST (link)

is that the Republicans went along with unanimous consent requests for the Dem’s to get their bills to the floor for the crumb their Democrat masters dropped from the table of being allowed to offer meaningless messaging amendments that were dead as soon as they were offered.

it kills me to see snarky comments from people about what Erick is saying when it is obvious to everyone who read’s their comments that they don’t have the slightest idea what they are snarking about…

What Erick, and those of us of like mind have said in post after post on thread after thread is to stop with the trading of favors….stop going along with Democrats in exchange for a few crumbs…stop selling the island of Manhattan for a few beads if you will….and force the Democrats to hold a cloture vote on every single amendment to this abomination. Stop going along with unanimous consent requests that the bill and all it’s amendments be entered into the record as read and force the Senate clerk to read it…drag your feet….raise as much hell as you can…the public want’s this killed and the Republicans are gaining NOTHING by playing games in this!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Because some of us

bobtx Wednesday, December 9th at 12:00PM EST (link)

Because some of us, probably not enough, prefer our present health insurance to going Medicare right now. I’d liek to stay with mine for the rest of my life…and, no, I’m not a union auto worker. lol

 

Medicare Expansion Gambit Part of O's Master Plan

danielbdp (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 1:02PM EST (link)

Read Susan Anne Hiller’s very insightful 12/8 post at Big Government

http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/08/a-white-house-power-grab-that-congress-and-america-doesnt-see/

It all makes sense now – Congress (both Dems and Reps) are playing right into the hands of the master puppeteer, Mr. Community Organizer In Chief has succeeded at co-opting Congress out of the loop via stealth changes already being made to the Social Security Act, right under their noses…via the “MedPAC Reform of 2009″.

Mr. O. and his twin health care Czars, Sebelius and DeParle (yet to be confirmed unless Congress stops her nomination), will soon rule Medicare (and by extension all of health care) and get their single payer system “nirvana” on steroids – unless someone wakes up in Congress real soon!!

Seen this happen already with the EPA trumping over Congress with defining CO2 (i.e., plant food) as a poisonous gas.

Mr. O. doesn’t really care what he gets back from Congress – he will build upon it with the other pieces already in place – Congress soon to be made obsolete by King O. – besides, we need everything done yesterday or the economy will collapse, right? Can’t wait for Congress or Democracy to work, noooo…….

 

From where do the Doctors come?

leehazel Wednesday, December 9th at 6:41PM EST (link)

Unfortunately this has to be tackled from the ‘negative’.

Adding the 55 to 64 years olds to Medicare will bring millions of new people into the program. Doctors, Hospitals, and Medical facilities and personnel are stretched beyond limits now.

There is not a community in the country that is not trying to hire trained medical people.

Nowhere are hospitals and clinics not understaffed and/or chronically short of hospital ‘beds’.

This same bill expects to take $500 Billion out of Medicare funding

Just how in the hell do these senators expect to pull off this miracle.

We know that Obama has a Messiah complex. It is time he put it to work. We will definitely need several miracles to pull this off.

PC is Thought Control
LEE

And this would be BEFORE the mass retirements of doctors after ObamaCare. (nt)

Third Street (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 6:52PM EST (link)

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

 
 
 

Drag it out even longer so Obama

joayn (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 11:38PM EST (link)

doesn’t get his state of the union victory dance.

America is an idea; a noble idea that essentially boils down to the shocking belief that the masses are in fact not asses. John Nolte

Victory!

bobtx Wednesday, December 9th at 12:02PM EST (link)

Obama is probably much more willing to use that word in reference to his health care plan that Afganistan!

 
 

Drag it out how?

cari Tuesday, December 8th at 11:45PM EST (link)

How? Should they keep offering amendment after amendment, or wave unanimous consent to have the bill read? What would you recommend?

Exactly. I think that's what's confusing a few of us.

clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 2:19AM EST (link)

I’m all for dragging it out and delaying till after Christmas-( who wouldn’t be?) I’m just not sure what procedures you guys are talking about.

Is the socialist Sanders ok with this public option compromise?

I don’t see how this is going to get Lieberman on board (I’m actually more concerned with the 2 Maine RINOs) but I’m all for bringing things to a halt. Is there a post from the past or what not that explains exactly how that works? If so I’ll read it and call the relevant Senators in the morning.

basically ammendments have to be voted to the floor for debate...

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:04AM EST (link)

if Republicans object to a unanimous consent request that the bill come to the floor for debate. All that is needed for an actual vote to be forced on that bill is for someone to object to the unanimous consent request. a vote in the senate can take up to an hour to conduct. Once the vote occurs to bring the bill to the floor it is supposed to be read so Senators know what the bill is and what they are voting for. There is always a unanimous consent request that the reading of the bill be dispensed with and that the bill be entered into the record as if it had actually been read. All it would take to force another vote is for an objection to be made and a vote would have to be taken…it doesn’t matter whether the Republicans win the vote or not…it’s the time it would take to either vote for the bill to be dispensed with or to actually read the bill…

oince this all happens…then there are debates about what amendments will be considered, whether each amendment will be dispensed with or read…and so on and so on…every vote takes time…every debate about each vote takes more time…if a minority wants to drag this out…they can…

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Thank you.

clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:25PM EST (link)

They should be reading every bill as a matter of routine anyway.

agreed...the problem is...no more laws would get passed if that were to happen...

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:47PM EST (link)

be still my beating heart…LOL

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

They aren't getting anything done anyway!

clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:47PM EST (link)

It’s all Obamacare all the time. Democrats don’t have time for anything else. They’ve presumably been twisting arms for months and can’t get it done.

How gorgeous would it be if the Democrats squandered their 60 vote majority by spending a year trying to pass a horrific bill that (soon) 60-70% of the public hates and failing spectacularly? They may well destroy their credibility, guarantee huge Republican gains and have very little to show for it.

Not to minimize the massive damage Obama is doing single handedly as apologist in Chief by any means – but, assuming Obamacare eventually goes down in flames – the time wasted on it may mean America emerges almost miraculously unscathed when Democrats seemed to have an unstoppable majority.

It would be glorious...

AceInTX (Diary) Thursday, December 10th at 3:15PM EST (link)

but I think in the end they’ll pass almost anything to avoid not having anything to show for all the work

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

But there is no "they" =)

clowngirl (Diary) Thursday, December 10th at 3:27PM EST (link)

Just 60 individuals and Lieberman and Nelson would gain huge prestige in some circles by being the ones to kill this bill. =)

I’m not a Randian but I do think she somewhat has a point about there being no “common good” in some ways there is a common good. Defeating Hitler, for example, served the common good. But there’s no common good that encompasses all 60 Democrats. Harry Reid is desperate – coming unglued- to pass Obamacare – but it’s better for “blue dogs” if it doesn’ t pass.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

What does "actually fight" mean?

tanarg Wednesday, December 9th at 5:43AM EST (link)

This isn’t South Korea, you know…

 
 

Here's to *hoping*

anotherindyfilmguy (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 9:59PM EST (link)

that Leiberman will kill it, if no one else will.

Somehow I don’t see “we tried to improve it” as a good campaigning point for R’s in the next election…

The only “positive” thing about it is that it’s hard to stick the label of “party of no” on them if one of the Dems (or at a former Dem) finally filibusters this national nightmare to death… but then “the party of OK, whatever Dems want” doesn’t sound great either…

Santorum? Well, at least he’s not Romney…
http://www.zazzle.com/enemy_of_the_statist_tshirt-235977043035297478

Somehow I don’t see “we tried to improve it” as a good campaigning point for R’s in the next election…

ggross56 (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 2:29AM EST (link)

How does “Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago” work for you? Or perhaps “The Democrats slashed Medicare home care” works better? Or perhaps “I voted against government-run health care, tax increases & the failed stimulus bill” works better?

 

I agree, I don't Lieberman is going to vote for Obamacare

clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:41AM EST (link)

He isn’t even at the negotiating table. Even Snowe is now saying that she isn’t satisfied with the public option compromise (but she is at the table)

Sounds like they’re throwing Nelson completely under the bus over his abortion amendment which suggests Dems may have given up on getting his vote.

My impression is that Nelson and Lieberman (I think LIeberman indisputably) have the guts to stand against Obamacare and aren’t going to “cave”. They would have to be honestly convinced and aren’t stupid.

The shame of Maine are another story, but mBecker keeps pointing out that they’ve never cast the deciding votes on Dem legislation, they’ve always had cover. So it’s quite likely they don’t have the guts to do it on anything as toxic as this. They don’t seem to have any great passion for Obamacare.

So between the guts of the first two and the gutlessness of the other we may be alright. But that’s dependent on making sure Snowe and Collins don’t feel like they have cover.

What about the socialist Sanders? is he still ok with this new compromise?

he would be wrong in that...since it took Snowe, Collins and Specter to pass the stimulous nt

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:09AM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

His point was that they had cover from Specter. nt

clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:36AM EST (link)

Specter was a Republican then...

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:56AM EST (link)

I’m not sure I follow?

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 
 
 
 

Erick, we should have the Dems fight amongst themselves

Richard Mullins (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 10:02PM EST (link)

Really, fighting in anyway that doesn’t keep up the donk on donk violence isn’t worth it. I see amenditis coming the near future.

Richard Phillip Mullins BlogThe Squash Satire SiteNews on Happy Jet Airlines
Rmullins Pics
Rpmullins Twitter

Joe Biden is like a Decrepit Park owner with a Meth lab that happens to not only be a dealer but a user.

Let’s Bankrupt the Democratic paty. Make spend all the money to defend thier candidates.

 

The Dems Have The Votes For Hell-th Care

Ausonius (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 10:11PM EST (link)

I trust no supposedly “independent” senators, nor “Blue Dog” senators, to stop Hell-th Care.

It will not be stopped: it will pass in some form, and ANY form means a disaster for America’s future. The Dems will buy anyone breaking ranks, including Lieberman.

Republicans should stand firm, point out the contradictions, point out the lies, point out the embarrassments, and devise a strategy to abrogate as much of the bill as possible after 2012. 2010 will be irrelevant for abrogation attempts, unless through a miracle a veto-proof Republican majority takes over next year.

Ausonius: 310-395 A.D. Teacher, Poet, Consul, General, Farmer.

Personal Tutor to the future St. Paulinus of Nola and to young Gratian, heir to the throne during the turbulent final years of the Western Roman Empire. When his former student Gratian was assassinated, Ausonius threw up his hands and retired to his farm in Gaul. Rome was captured by barbarians 14 years after his death.

Cato@rock.com

Uh, No - They Can Strangle It In The Crib By Cutting Off Funding

IJB Wednesday, December 9th at 1:19AM EST (link)

I’m getting quite tired of this line that “nothing can be done about this” if it passes. It’s patently untrue.

If the GOP retakes the House, all they need to do is simple zero-out the funding for setting this whole thing up. That kills it dead, right there, before it gets off the ground. And there’s not a dang thing Obama or Reid can do about that, as funding bills originate in the House.

And, as unpopular as this bill is, and as likely as it is that it will be seen that the GOP retakes the House largely on a pledge to “undo” this mess, I’ve got to think most people will side with a GOP House if they try to end this, so Obama “shutting down the government” to try to force funding for it will likely blow up in his face.

People around here who are acting like there’s nothing we can do if this passes are *not* helping…

Your Hope Is Admirable

Ausonius (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 8:17AM EST (link)

and I really DO hope your prediction comes true.

But given past history with the Republicans when they hit D.C., and their complete failure to scale back government when they had the opportunity, and in fact with their EXPANSION of government in their years of control, you can see why I am not too hopeful that they will have the courage to NOT fund “health care for the homeless, the poor, the elderly, and those of color” (which is precisely how the MSM will spin it).

Ausonius: 310-395 A.D. Teacher, Poet, Consul, General, Farmer.

Personal Tutor to the future St. Paulinus of Nola and to young Gratian, heir to the throne during the turbulent final years of the Western Roman Empire. When his former student Gratian was assassinated, Ausonius threw up his hands and retired to his farm in Gaul. Rome was captured by barbarians 14 years after his death.

Cato@rock.com

 
 

a veto proof Republican Majority would require 65 to 70 Senators nt

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:11AM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

You guys are dense

Kyle-MI (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 10:26PM EST (link)

What are they suppose to say, “Yes, we want to kill health care reform”? Of course they want to kill it, but they can’t say that out loud to a hostile press that is looking for any way to demonize Republicans. It may play well to the conservative base, but it does not play well to the empty-headed swing voters. And now is not the time for nuanced argument.

The only hope the GOP has is to delay and let public opposition grow. The more the public learns about the details, the more support falls. Also, the closer it gets to election season, the more nervous Dems will become.

Even all of this is a long shot. Obama and the Dem leadership is bound and determine to pass some kind of so-call health care reform. They don’t care how much political collateral damage it creates in the 2010 elections. Socialized health care trumps everything.

We do not have the votes to stop this. All of you who are asking the GOP Senate to kill it are asking the impossible. You are setting yourselves up for a huge disappointment. You are setting yourselves up for discouragement in the 2010 elections, and when that happens, you are setting all of us up for permanent Democratic socialist rule. You are letting perfect be the enemy of good.

What's Good?

DerKrieger (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 10:42PM EST (link)

There is nothing about this 2000 pg Trojan horse that is “good”. Or are you referring to something else?

“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” – James Madison

Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” — John Locke, 1690

What is good and what is perfect.

Kyle-MI (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:25AM EST (link)

I am talking about the Republicans in the Senate and their tactics. In this case perfect is the completely misplaced idea that killing this bill is a slam dunk. It is also the idea that all they need to do is spout conservative talking points. It is the idea that they do not need to offer any amendments. It is the idea that the Democrats will not offer amendments of their own.

The good is this case is keeping all (or almost all) of the GOP Senators from voting for this bill. Even in this case keeping Snowe and Collins in line is an extremely difficult task. The good is delaying this bill enough to let public opposition grow. Even played perfectly this tactic is still a long shot at stopping this bill. Dont’ misunderstand me. We should play the long shot. It is the only hope we have.

 
 

Kyle - It's People Like You...

JX12 (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 3:28AM EST (link)

…who will keep the Republican Party in permanent minority status. Do the math, genius. The senate didn’t have 60 votes on board for passage of this bill going in (meaning we actually DID have the votes to stop it for a brief shining moment), but now they just might have their 60 votes (meaning we would NOW no longer have the votes to stop it) due to Republican attempts to fix the bill for the Democrats. What universe do you live in?

As a matter of fact, YES – the Republicans SHOULD be publicly attempting to ensure this monstrosity goes down to flaming defeat in its entirety. Based on the polls of late, it would play precisely to independent voters who, for some strange reason, don’t want to have their FREEDOM taken away, and are bailing on the Democrats in droves. Go figure.

It didn't have 60 votes for passage going in?

Third Street (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 3:43AM EST (link)

Says who?

‘Cause I sure do see 60 Democrats in the Senate. And at the end of the day, as should be abundantly clear by now, a Democrat is a Democrat is a Democrat.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

Says Erick, Apparently

JX12 (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:33AM EST (link)

If it already had 60 votes for passage going in, then what would be the purpose for Erick’s post lamenting the offering of amendments by the Republicans and the reciprocal amendments from the Democrats allowing them to improve the bill and buy time for SIXTY VOTES? Not much point in that if they already had 60 votes anyway.

Sounds like you and Kyle are resigning this bill to certain passage no matter what anyone does.

JX12, I think you and Third Street are talking about different votes...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 10:06AM EST (link)

I may be wrong, but I think Third Street was talking about the vote to open debate and you are talking about the upcoming vote to end debate and move to conference.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


The vote to open debate illustrates my point...

Third Street (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:29AM EST (link)

all of the GOP senators but one voted against cloture to begin debate on this, and even if Voinovich (who didn’t vote) had been there, it would have made no difference. Even Snowe and Collins voted against bringing the bill to the floor.

The Republicans cannot “kill the bill”, as so many want them to. Everything rests with a handful of Democrats. What we are seeing now is the GOP strategy to attempt to do just that, one that has elicited no objections from the most conservative senators (DeMint, Vitter, Coburn, etc.). Maybe it will work and maybe it won’t. But the sad fact is that the Republican senators cannot stop anything on their own. Maybe this will finally teach otherwise-conservative voters in red states who vote for Democrat senators (and I’m looking at you, my fellow Louisianians) that every election has potentially far-reaching consequences.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

 

Yes, Aaron.

JX12 (Diary) Thursday, December 10th at 12:11AM EST (link)

I am talking about the vote to end debate and move to conference. I say “passage” because I suspect that if it gets out of debate, then it will certainly pass (the senate version) and then go to conference.

It could very well die in conference (or in subsequent votes on the final bill), but why even contribute to allowing it to get that far? Why do the Republicans see the need to do things which effectively keep it on life support until the necessary votes to end debate are mustered? Okay, so the recalcitrant Democrats may come around anyway if the price is right (which may be Kyle’s & Third Street’s point), but even if so – who cares? Don’t be seen as contributing to the sweetening of the deal.

I grow weary of hearing the argument that stridently standing on principle is a bad thing, and that the opponents of this bill in the Senate somehow have to play to the press, or to moderate voters, or whoever, in order not to be cast as wingnuts. That’s going to happen anyway. Playing to these groups is what McCain does, and we all know how well that worked out for him last year.

If there was any time in history to stand on principle on a domestic issue (ESPECIALLY if there aren’t enough Republicans to stop it by themselves), this is it. Passage and subsequent implementation of this bill – if it ever gets that far – will effectively end America as we know it. It’s worth opposing with resolve – so just oppose it, and inspire others to do the same.

I don't disagree JX12...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Thursday, December 10th at 8:24AM EST (link)

The only amendments I would offer up would be poison pills to the bill. You just can’t improve a turd, no matter how much whipped cream you put on it.

I just interjected because I thought you and ThirdStreet were talking past each other because of the “which vote” misunderstanding.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 
 
 
 

Not every Democrat was on board going into this Third Street nt

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:20AM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Weren't they?

Third Street (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:33AM EST (link)

You mean you believed all the “the Democrats only have 57 votes” and “Lieberman is digging his heels in” and “Nelson will jump ship” reports?

Don’t get me wrong; I’ve been hopeful all of the above might turn out to be true. But depending on what Democrat senators might or might not do here further demonstrates that they have the power and we don’t.

We are, after all, pinning our hopes on a few guys walking around with giant “For Sale” signs slung around their necks.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

If they'd have had their 60 votes...they'd have voted on it nt

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:53AM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

All in good time. The price just isn't right yet. (nt)

Third Street (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:05PM EST (link)

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

yes and no...they have to improve it to get all the Ds on board....which the Rs are doing...which is the complaint

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:44PM EST (link)

or should I say to get 58 D’s on board and two Rs?

you’re right about the price not being high enough yet because the blue dogs will play at killing it to get more pork out of Ried…then thay’ll pass it

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

The Rs are helping I mean...which is the complaint nt

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:45PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The Democats have control, completely

Kyle-MI (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:37AM EST (link)

They have control of the schedule. They will keep the Senate going until enough Democrats (or Snowe and Collins) get in line. They will offer amendments until they have enough votes. They will compromise and sell out all of their own principles. All the Republicans have is delay and growing public opposition.

What are we going to do to the Republican Senators if this passes? Are we going to use all of our resources primarying them all? Are we going third party? Any of those strategies will likely result in more Democrats and further sinking of conservative influence. We need to target Democrats by fighting for conservative challengers and candidates in open seats, not form a circular firing squad.

 

I think you

LibRick (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:44AM EST (link)

and Kyle are actually on the same page. Re-read his post. He just outlined a coherent strategy to achieve the same result as you would like, sans rhetoric.

 
 

5 Kyle

mom2oneson (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 8:29AM EST (link)

You are letting perfect be the enemy of good.

I don’t know about this bill but what a great quote!!!!!

Attribution

Kyle-MI (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:38AM EST (link)

I think it comes from Voltaire.

 
 

Thoughtful post...

LibRick (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:37AM EST (link)

and in line with what Erick advocated. Delay is the only viable way to end this bill. This year, every iteration of health care reform has lost support when time was allowed for the public to consider and debate the issue.

For those who believe it can be fixed after the 2010, I think it’s wishful thinking. The Republicans will likely gain seats in 2010 and less likely, but maybe doable, a slight majority but that won’t give them the ability to overturn this health care legislation.

Maybe, maybe not.

LibertarianHawk (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:06PM EST (link)

For one thing, that’s why the budget process is so important. Nothing says they’d have to keep the funding in place, either. And it doesn’t take overturning something to throw a monkey wrench in it by starving it of funds.

But I don’t think it’s too much of a reach to speculate that public sentiment against this reform could be even stronger after it’s implemented than while it’s being debated. A cynic might suggest that this is precisely the reason that 2013 has been chosen as the year to implement it.

Why not 2012 or even 2014?

A cynic? I suspect that's

LibRick (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 1:27PM EST (link)

rhetorical on your part. It’s pretty clear to me that 2013 was selected for political reasons coinciding with the electoral calendar. Promises given but no fiscal pain yet.

The leaked info indicates that they want to give boomers (55+) a buy-in to Medicare in 2011. That’s just slightly over a year from now. That is one big ultra-juicy carrot to depress dissension. Our legislators have always pandered to the 55+ block for votes and while this might not influence overall public sentiment, it sure might influence votes.

 
 
 

Kyle...that's the problem...who cares about the MSM

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:16AM EST (link)

when majorities approaching 60% in this country want this thing STOPPED!

On top of that…no matter what happens…anything bad that stems from this will be blamed on Republicans by the MSM anyway.

Stand up for what you believe in…fight for it…and be a man…stop trying to be sneaky about what everyone knows you want to do anyway…and just do it for Pete’s sake!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Neoliberalism?

neoavatara (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 11:05PM EST (link)

You think liberals are going to keep quiet with a dead public option? I think not. No matter how they spin it in the Senate. This is going to create a war in the Democratic Party.
http://neoavatara.com/blog/?p=8916

www.neoavatara.com/blog

 

Well, if our children ever need a definition of "Overton Window"

roscopico (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 11:07PM EST (link)

They might just look at what the hapless Senate R’s just had crammed up their… whatever.

While a definitive example, they’ll rue the cost.

Some lessons are unfortunately quite expensive (and quickly forgotten).

Im Himmel gibt’s kein Bier…

 

Isn't That A Good Thing?

BigGator5 (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 11:09PM EST (link)

Wait, I thought the idea was to kill the “Government Opinion”? Isn’t that the goal? Sure we now have to try and stop this, but the wind is in our sails and we have yet another win in our column.

In fact, we should be exploiting this new front as quickly as possible. The KOS Kids are outraged. We should keep up the pressure.

Educated (About The Issues Facing Us Today), Dedicated (To Making A Difference), And Highly Motivated (To Getting Things Done)
@biggator5

Gator, yes and no...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 11:17PM EST (link)

Is it a good thing that there is no public option? In theory yes, but in reality no.

Stopping the public option is only good if it causes the entire bill to collapse. If stopping the public option allows for our more liberal Republicans to use that as cover to vote to send this bill to conference…then that would be bad politically and bad practically. The reason why is that in conference they will add it back.

Delaying the vote to send it to conference is the strategy that will allow the constituents to raise holy hell again over the Christmas break. Pushing this into next year will also drive more blue dogs to our side as they stare down the days to the mid-term election.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


So, Aaron,

LibRick (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 10:03AM EST (link)

what do you think about the alleged proposal for Medicare extended to those 55 and over. Isn’t this a bigger movement toward single payer than any iteration put forth of an anemic public option?

I agree that deferring to conference without delay is dangerous and delaying the bill to 2010 is the best way to it.

Do you think there is a potential danger, if delayed, the carrot of Medicare for those 55 and over might have traction?

LibRick...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 10:15AM EST (link)

I am against the expansion of medicare on principle…and I bet you knew that already. ;)

As an electoral issue, if we can delay this until next year and possibly get the public groundswell to force this to collapse, then we will have time before the 2010 election to educate medicare recipients how a transfer to privatization of medicare could lead to more choice and less costly care.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


The bill can only be dealyed

LibRick (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 10:42AM EST (link)

for a short time (a month or two), If that is successful, then the D’s will drop it and declare the R’s as obstructionist. So, I don’t see a scenario where Republicans try to convince medicare recipients on privatization as relevant to the 2010 elections.

One danger, as I see it, is that a short term delay, if it does not actually kill the bill, might bring those 55 to 64 (all boomers) on board with this plan (a huge voting block)

What are your thoughts on that possibility and how would you counter it to preclude this?

LibRick, first the obstructionists bit is a total lie and easily exposed as such.

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:33AM EST (link)

The Republicans simply don’t have enough votes to obstruct.

On medicare, I misunderstood what you said sorry about that. I don’t really think expansion of medicare to those 55-64 will actually gain as much traction as one might think. Especially with 66% of those polled believing that free market competition between insurance companies will do more than government regulation to reduce health care costs [3rd para].

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


Whether it's a lie or not...

LibertarianHawk (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:25PM EST (link)

…the Republicans should gladly welcome the tag on this issue.

In fact, should the bill fail, they should take credit for killing it. If it passes, they should say that they tried their hardest to stop it but just didn’t have the numbers.

And, what’s more, they should start campaigning posthaste on overturning the healthcare reform.

The thing’s at 40-60, Aaron. And it’s the most consequential domestic policy reform in a long, long, LONG time.

You think voters are going to punish a party for trying to stop something that’s both this major AND this unpopular?

Republicans shouldn’t be running away from the obstructionist tag. They should be begging for it.

LibertarianHawk....I meant the bad version of obstructionist...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:38PM EST (link)

I don’t think we should call ourselves obstructionists because that term implies that we are obstructing the will of the people, when in reality we are fighting for the will of the majority.

And if you read my comments it should be clear that I understand the consequences of this bill and that I am wholly against it.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


An example...

LibertarianHawk (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 1:13PM EST (link)

…Social Security reform c. 2005.

Remember that? Remember the Bush Administration and the Congressional GOP trying, and failing, to get it through?

Remember them calling Democrats obstructionists, “The Party of No”, etc.?

Remember how the reform got increasingly unpopular with voters as time went on?

Remember the 2006 election result?

I’m telling you: on this issue, the GOP should welcome with open arms the “obstructionist” tag. They not only have voter sentiment on their side, they’ve got it *strongly* on their side.

And, from the looks of it, the Dems are going to pass a reform bill that lacks a public option (which their base strongly, strongly wants). And I’d venture to guess that this is the worst of all potential outcomes for them politically.

They’ll suppress support from their base and do absolutely nothing to win back independents, etc.

I don't think the Dems took the House in 06 because they were called obstructionists by Republicans...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 5:42PM EST (link)

And I am not really sure why you want to argue this point. To me it seems rather silly. If the people are with us, as they are, the labels put on us by others aren’t what is making that so. What makes them with is is that they don’t like what the Dems are doing, plain and simple.

If obstructionist is some sort of magical word that leads one to electoral success we should just change our name to the obstructionist party and just vote no on everything. Get rid of the platform and offer nothing to the voters other than a guaranteed no vote on all bills no matter what it is.

Should we obstruct a bill that will change the tax code to a 10% flat tax and no capital gains tax just so we can hold on to the magic obstructionist mantle?

Yeah, sounds stupid to me too.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 
 
 

Some already talking about repealing it

countessolenska Wednesday, December 9th at 1:14PM EST (link)

Saw this over on realclearpolitics.com.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/09/the_politics_of_repeal_99476.html

That's a Very Goof Piece...

IJB Wednesday, December 9th at 6:13PM EST (link)

…And punctures the “we can’t stop it if it passes” canard that some around here are peddling.

What's So Goofy About It? n/t

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 6:15PM EST (link)

Argh. Supposed To Be "Good" Not "Goof". Sorry. (nt)

IJB Thursday, December 10th at 1:02AM EST (link)

Snark

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Thursday, December 10th at 2:10AM EST (link)

I hope you know I was kidding.

 

Snark

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Thursday, December 10th at 2:10AM EST (link)

I hope you know I was kidding.

 
 
 
 
 
 

I agree that the obstructionist card

LibRick (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:59PM EST (link)

is a lie on exactly what you pointed out. But since when has that stopped a meme from being played and peddled on national media?

I brought up the point about this new wrinkle — “Medicare for all Boomers” merely to query to your insight. I was thinking about the possibility that the boomers, with their diminished 401K accounts and job prospects, might forgo any ideology just to get something.

LibRick, I am not saying it won't be played...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 5:35PM EST (link)

I am saying it won’t be effective. So I ignore it.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 
 
 

Considering the reform's lagging numbers...

LibertarianHawk (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:19PM EST (link)

…the Republicans should be praying hard to be painted as obstructionists on it. If a Dem says that the Republicans are “The Party of No”, the Republican should proudly retort that on this matter, they’re not simply the “Party of No” but the “Party of Hell No!”.

It’s about like Schumer coming out a couple weeks ago and telling Senate Republicans that the Dems can pass this reform on their own if the GOP doesn’t come to the table.

If McConnell & Co. were smart, they’d have said “Do you promise?”

Right now, the Dems are banking pretty much entirely on this being a short-term political sacrifice for a long-term political gain. Because there really isn’t a scenario where this thing comes out well for them in 2010….and I’m sure they realize that.

 
 
 

We'll see.

LibertarianHawk (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:13PM EST (link)

Thus far, older folks have been among those most vehemently opposed to the legislation….and with reason.

I suppose it’s possible their support could be miraculously wrested back at the 11th hour. But, typically, that’s like trying to get toothpaste back in the tube.

When debate was happening over in the House, Chuck Todd tweeted “Want to stump a GOP strategist: Ask them their preference: health care passes or fails?”

For the near-term political consequences anyway, I think it’s a win-win for Republicans. If it fails, then the Dems suffer with their base. If it passes, then they suffer with independents.

The particulars of the actual bill, IMO, don’t matter as much.

You make good points

LibRick (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:49PM EST (link)

and your best is ” The particulars of the actual bill, IMO, don’t matter as much.”

The whole issue of health care, mostly on the Democratic side but with some Republican inclusion has, for sometime now, devolved to political gamesmanship. That’s probably why most, according to the poles, don’t like this legislation.

 
 
 

Good point AG...and let's not forget everything else that's wrong with HCR

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:32AM EST (link)

I’ve always thought the leadership was making a mistake in only running against a public option/nationalized health care system because all the Dems would have to do in order to flank the argument woulds be to throw away the “public Option” and achieve their goals in a completely different way…

One of the things I think we’ve missed is an opportunity to outrage the public over the individual mandate in this…the idea that the Federal Government could force an individual to buy a federally approved health care plan or face fines or imprisonment is anti American and as repugnant a concept as any I can think of…but it is laying there like a rotting corps for everyone to see…and noone will point it out…

I can’t help but think Romney 2012 isn’t a big reason why the party isn’t running against this…but that’s a different story for a different day…

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Incrementalism

DerKrieger (Diary) Tuesday, December 8th at 11:18PM EST (link)

If the entire thing isn’t killed the Progressives will back for the public option at a later date. The entire history of their movement is one of slow but steady advances. And after all these decades the GOP still hasn’t caught on to the strategy. The Democrats always ask for a mile, the GOP buys into the illegitimate premise and gives the Dems half a mile. Years later the Dems ask for another mile. The GOP gives them half a mile and presto, the Dems have their whole mile. Works every time.

If they aren’t stopped dead and turned back, they WILL eventually get what they want.

“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” – James Madison

Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” — John Locke, 1690

 

No, the idea is to kill the whole damned thing

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:45AM EST (link)

The “public option” is a bad thing, but the bill as a whole is worse. There are many, many objectionable items in this bill. The whole bill needs to die, die, die. Apparently Mitch McConnell has yet to figure this out.

The GOP strategy of hanging their/our hats on one or two items (ie. abortion & the p.o) is and was risky and foolish. Anyone with an ounce of sense should have seen that all Reid/Pelosi had to do was water down those controversial items and strong-arm their people to accept the compromises. They knew also that one or two defectors could be overcome by squishy GOPers like SnoweCollins. We should have been going after the bill as a whole all along. Furthermore, we should have been doing more to bang the drum for a GOP alternative to avoid the “demonization” mentioned earlier. The “party of no” strategy does not have an infinite life span.

It ain’t over, but it’s ominously close. A couple of my colleagues have an interesting list of key differences between the House and Senate bills, and they will not be easy to reconcile in conference.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Amen to that! nt

clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 2:22AM EST (link)

Amen BS...and I suggest a comapaign slogan to nationalize the 2010 elections..."Embrace the NO!"nt

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 11:43AM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 
 

I'm not sure if this is a done deal just yet.

joayn (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:06AM EST (link)

Russ Feingold is making noises of discontent, and Nelson has updated his previous comments that sounded like a cave (HotAir). Between now and the time the CBO gets the numbers together, I sense some unraveling will begin. But maybe that’s just wishful thinking. The Dems are such a big, fat party of crazies you never know.

With only 10 Dems putting this thing together, there’s still time to contact Repubs and get them in the fighting spirit (spears with pointy tips, perhaps?) to prolong the pain for the Dems. They have to throw everything they’ve got at these zombies, just to create some obstacles at least.

Everyone start calling/faxing/e-mailing. Do. Not. Wait.

We are not the party of no, we’re the party of HELL NO!

Mitch McConnell:

http://mcconnell.senate.gov/contact.cfm

Jim DeMint:

http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home

Tom Coburn:

http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorCoburn.Home

Judd Gregg

http://gregg.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm

Olympia Snowe

http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorSnowe.Email

Susan Collins

http://collins.senate.gov/public/continue.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorCollins.EmailIssue&CFID=25267582&CFTOKEN=58963435

I started about 45 minutes ago, but will continue. Add to the list! The more the merrier – be sure to e-mail Collins and Snowe.

America is an idea; a noble idea that essentially boils down to the shocking belief that the masses are in fact not asses. John Nolte

I called the RNC (202-863-8614) & VAGOP as well - nt

strikeeagle (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 1:30PM EST (link)
 

I we get through this entire process

Mayhem (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:10AM EST (link)

without a single objection to a unanimous consent request, or without the bill being read in its entirety, I will have an aneurism.

James Madison, Jim DeMint, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan… You get the picture.

Better have 911 on auto-dial then

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 1:09AM EST (link)

because Mitch and his merry band of eunuchs aren’t going to do jack squat.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 

Its Republican-Assisted Suicide of our Country

strikeeagle (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 7:21AM EST (link)

Just what is the down-side of fighting this?
- They’d be with the Majority of the American People– that’s not “obstructionist” and the polls show they are not listening to the mainstream media on this issue
- They’d show everyone they are “re-branded” and not the party of ’04-’06 aka “Democrat-lite”
- They’d be killing a horrible, monstrosity piece of legislation – Senators should do that regardless
- They’d keep thier base fired up rather than demoralize it

60 for Cloture, 50+Biden to pass (10 Dems get cover), over to Pelosi and her “bunch of miss nancies” (ref UrbanDictionary), 218 there, and onto Obama for signature by Christmas

IF NOT THIS BILL – WHAT ISSUE WOULD THEY “GO TO THE MATS” FOR?

‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ — Edmund Burke

PS – Is McConnell so naive to believe the Dems will be this “gentlemenly”, if he is the Majority Leader?!

 

The longer the debate goes on, the better!

teridavisnewman (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 8:41AM EST (link)

The longer this health care drags on, the more people are fighting it and there will be no chance of it passing. Every day more people in my district find out what an attack this is on America. The Obamunists are pushing this because they are in a now or never scenario–if they don’t get it soon, they never will. The Obamasiah’s numbers are dropping like a rock and once we get in the election year this pig of a bill is toast. Heads are going to roll in November. Mary Landrieu, D-LA, Blanche Lincoln, D-NE, Arlen Specter, D-PA are certainly going to lose their bids for re-election. I’m going to win my election against a long-term Democrat who was considered unbeatable a year ago–but then he voted for Pelosi-care. No amount of PAC money is going to buy back that huge mistake and the people are very angry–and we are coming.

Teri Davis Newman
2010 Republican Nominee for Congress
2012 Candidate for Congress
12th Congressional District of Illinois
www.terinewman.com

 

My Wife Had To.....

hk40cal (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:09AM EST (link)

…..We were watching Hannity’s interview with VP Cheney last night….Sean interrupted his commentary and told the breaking news….Democrat Socialist have come to an agreement on Government Controlled Health Care,,,,,,,Like a trained special forces solider, my wife moved like a cat.

My wife had to get my daughter out of the room before a string of profanity shot from my mouth….

Like a high ballooning slice….I can unleash incoherent combination of profanities before the ball hits the ground. NO different from seeing Harry “the Monster” Reids face on t.v. last night….then my attention turned to the Republicans……I am have always loved Gen. George S. Patton….his attitude about politicians most of all his theories on combat and the battles at hand. His most famous comment…..ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK…..

I don’t know what is going on with the republicans, I know this….McConnell should step aside and let Demint take the wheel. For god sakes who’s running the show. Steele is trying to be tough but getting no where, come on, fight…..this country is being flushed down the toilet. Do the republicans think letting the DNS turn this country inside out and waiting until next Novembers election is a good strategy….The DNS has multiple Billions of dollar in a slush fund (called TARP & Stimu’theft) to fight to the last lib. Plus billionaires like Soros…..Soros is now eying Secretary of State seats, you wonder why……TO STEAL ELECTIONS…..ie Minnesota….the SoS would let thousands of ballots be counted same thing happened in Missouri………

Next is Third Stimu’theft, Crap and Trade….then Amnesty for illegals.

Be completely certain of one thing….The Democrat Socialist do NOT care what the citizens of this country think….

ARRRRRRRRR…..I so PO’d

that too secure these rights,Governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers form the consent of the Governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the RIGHT of the people to alter or to abolish it….

 

Codify their promises

mschmitt (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 10:37AM EST (link)

Off the top of my head, here are a set of amendments that might be worth while:

1. No tax-payer subsidies. The Democrats are so smart, so let them run this beast without any ongoing infusion of cash. Give them their trillion dollars, but don’t let them come back to the well. They’ve promised their plan saves money — let’s see if they vote like they believe it.

2. Remove all regulations from private insurers (allowing individuals to purchase the coverage they want and insurers to sell the coverage they want to sell), and make it impossible to outlaw private insurance. If insurance companies are so evil, so abusive, then people won’t do business with them — and will run to embrace government insurance at the first chance they get. They’ve promised we can keep our insurance — let’s see if they vote vote like they believe it.

usque ad finem

 

Expansion of Medicare has been goal all along

countessolenska Wednesday, December 9th at 10:40AM EST (link)

According to Marc Ambinder at The Atlantic and Ezra Klein at the Washington Post.

“Indeed, for some health care activists, expanding Medicare has been the primary goal of the entire exercise.”

 

Kill The Bill - PLEASE

scubadiver49er Wednesday, December 9th at 11:00AM EST (link)

IMHO, ANY Healthcare Bill passed and signed into law is just flat out bad for this country, due to the enormous cost of this monstrosity. I am still trying to figure out whether or not GOP amendments to this thing is a good idea. To me, ANY association with this “thing” by the GOP is bad news, just due to the fact that it can be construed by the Dems that this Bill, with GOP modifications is now ok? Me thinketh not. My hope is that the Dems will continue to squabble internally, and not get this thing passed so they are forced to go back home AGAIN, as Erick has suggested, and face the music once more. It would be really great if this thing could be trown back into Committee by amendments the Dems come up with, WITHOUT GOP intervention. Wishful thinking, I’m sure.

“I Just Can’t Wait to be King” – Simba from “The Lion King”, 1994
Barry Soetoro – ???

 

Dick Morris "Must-Read" column today

countessolenska Wednesday, December 9th at 1:16PM EST (link)

I don’t really like Dick Morris, but this column just captures a lot of the emotional intensity behind the opposition to ObamaCare.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/09/_the_charge_of_the_280_dems_99475.html

 

Just heard on Rush of a Code Red Rally

joayn (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 2:06PM EST (link)

to be held on December 15th in D.C. He said various groups are putting this together but wasn’t specific on which ones.

It’ll be an anti-health care rally, I believe, but probably also a stop-the-spending theme will be prominent as well.

America is an idea; a noble idea that essentially boils down to the shocking belief that the masses are in fact not asses. John Nolte

Okay. Via Michelle Malkin to Laura Ingraham's

joayn (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 2:21PM EST (link)

site to High Noon for Health Care website:

http://www.highnoonforhealthcare.org/

http://www.lauraingraham.com/blog?categoryID=5

America is an idea; a noble idea that essentially boils down to the shocking belief that the masses are in fact not asses. John Nolte

 
 

This bill can be defeated

john_barry Wednesday, December 9th at 8:14PM EST (link)

The GOP must use all means possible to destroy this evil bill which supports the culture of death. Delay it for as long as it takes to allow public opinion to develop to such a point that conservative Dems will bolt. The handful of Democrats likely to defect must be subjected to incessant pressure. The GOP must sharpen its message so as not to appear obstructionist. It must articulate its position in positive terms. But it must kill the bill. Obama has crossed the Rubicon by supporting taxpayer funded abortion. Obama and Pelosis leftward drift is a threat to Democrats seeking re election in 2010. Turkeys will not vote for Christmas

john barry