<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Last Time We Tried A Terrorist In New York, Classified Documents Went to Al Qaeda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42224</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42224</guid>
		<description>NT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mustango</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42205</link>
		<dc:creator>mustango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42205</guid>
		<description>then by definition KSM won&#039;t be getting a &quot;fair trial&quot;.  Not that he deserves or has the right to one in my view, but Obama is the one making hay about staying true to &quot;our values&quot;, whatever that means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then by definition KSM won&#8217;t be getting a &#8220;fair trial&#8221;.  Not that he deserves or has the right to one in my view, but Obama is the one making hay about staying true to &#8220;our values&#8221;, whatever that means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: americanmale</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42200</link>
		<dc:creator>americanmale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42200</guid>
		<description>This trial is all about a stipulation as to the legal definition of torture.  Both attorneys, because they are cut from the same cloth, will agree to a very weak definition.  Then, with that in hand, Obama will hand it over to the unrecognized, pathetic, and paticularly inept international court which will then indict Bush and Cheney on crimes against humanity.

The world will issue a resounding cheer.  Obama, the narcissist, will then get his oh so coveted world wide accolade and adornment (the true goal of all of this), and we, the people, will once again be the brunt of global scorn and ridicule.............great foreign policy O&#039;bow-er.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This trial is all about a stipulation as to the legal definition of torture.  Both attorneys, because they are cut from the same cloth, will agree to a very weak definition.  Then, with that in hand, Obama will hand it over to the unrecognized, pathetic, and paticularly inept international court which will then indict Bush and Cheney on crimes against humanity.</p>
<p>The world will issue a resounding cheer.  Obama, the narcissist, will then get his oh so coveted world wide accolade and adornment (the true goal of all of this), and we, the people, will once again be the brunt of global scorn and ridicule&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.great foreign policy O&#8217;bow-er.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus_Traianus</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42198</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus_Traianus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42198</guid>
		<description>One point to ponder- this trial will drag on for awhile. Now rest assured it will be a travesty of justice- a virtual cornucopia of the contra-intellectual and theater of absurd. It will take every potential &quot;flaw&quot; of our justice system and turn it into a dragged out, front page mockery.

Don&#039;t forget that Holder&#039;s old pals at the firm will help represent these terrorists and they can&#039;t help themselves. They will chortle like kids left at home by their parents for the first time, as motion after motion is filed. Most of those motions, the resulting ruling and the affect (e.g. the release of classified intelligence methods, lack of evidence from the battlefield, etc.) will provoke outrage from the public as terrorists responsible for killing 3,000 Americans laugh in our face, eat Duck l&#039;Orange from Le Cirque, watch HBO and get free Swine Flu shots

My opinion? This could be Democrats and Obama&#039;s worst nightmare. With the whole 3 ring circus happening in the background , they will be trying to get reelected. I am guessing one of the talking points won&#039;t be how they finally got KSM &quot;justice&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One point to ponder- this trial will drag on for awhile. Now rest assured it will be a travesty of justice- a virtual cornucopia of the contra-intellectual and theater of absurd. It will take every potential &#8220;flaw&#8221; of our justice system and turn it into a dragged out, front page mockery.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget that Holder&#8217;s old pals at the firm will help represent these terrorists and they can&#8217;t help themselves. They will chortle like kids left at home by their parents for the first time, as motion after motion is filed. Most of those motions, the resulting ruling and the affect (e.g. the release of classified intelligence methods, lack of evidence from the battlefield, etc.) will provoke outrage from the public as terrorists responsible for killing 3,000 Americans laugh in our face, eat Duck l&#8217;Orange from Le Cirque, watch HBO and get free Swine Flu shots</p>
<p>My opinion? This could be Democrats and Obama&#8217;s worst nightmare. With the whole 3 ring circus happening in the background , they will be trying to get reelected. I am guessing one of the talking points won&#8217;t be how they finally got KSM &#8220;justice&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthete</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42195</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42195</guid>
		<description>I doubt that Obama would allow for the possibility of KSM walking or getting a light slap on the wrist, if for no other reason than that he still isn&#039;t done with his domestic agenda. OTOH, he&#039;s already done several things that just don&#039;t make any kind of sense (Olympics and the like), and I, unfortunately, have to consider the possibility that Obama might not care enough to keep a close eye on how the case develops, or worse, that he wants KSM to walk/serve a light sentence and will take action to make sure that it happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that Obama would allow for the possibility of KSM walking or getting a light slap on the wrist, if for no other reason than that he still isn&#8217;t done with his domestic agenda. OTOH, he&#8217;s already done several things that just don&#8217;t make any kind of sense (Olympics and the like), and I, unfortunately, have to consider the possibility that Obama might not care enough to keep a close eye on how the case develops, or worse, that he wants KSM to walk/serve a light sentence and will take action to make sure that it happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthete</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42193</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42193</guid>
		<description>if catering to a defunct ideology trumps your concern for the rate of success of said ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if catering to a defunct ideology trumps your concern for the rate of success of said ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthete</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42191</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42191</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglaswarren</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42188</link>
		<dc:creator>douglaswarren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42188</guid>
		<description>The public will not stand for it. If they walk, in all seriousness, Obama is done. That WILL wake up the rest of the sleeping masses. 

I think they know this. I really don&#039;t think they&#039;ll let him walk. I think they&#039;ll make it difficult and make a show of it to rub their agenda against Bush&#039;s practices in everyones face. But I don&#039;t see they going free. 

All I can say though is, God help Obama if they do, cause he&#039;s gonna need it. I think he knows his ass is on the line. And frankly, it would take an invesigation of the absolutely worst sort and I mean terrible, basically zero case at all, against this guy in order for his defense to be able to beat it. 

He&#039;s done IMO. It&#039;s how all this is going to affect US as it goes on that worries me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public will not stand for it. If they walk, in all seriousness, Obama is done. That WILL wake up the rest of the sleeping masses. </p>
<p>I think they know this. I really don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll let him walk. I think they&#8217;ll make it difficult and make a show of it to rub their agenda against Bush&#8217;s practices in everyones face. But I don&#8217;t see they going free. </p>
<p>All I can say though is, God help Obama if they do, cause he&#8217;s gonna need it. I think he knows his ass is on the line. And frankly, it would take an invesigation of the absolutely worst sort and I mean terrible, basically zero case at all, against this guy in order for his defense to be able to beat it. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s done IMO. It&#8217;s how all this is going to affect US as it goes on that worries me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglaswarren</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42187</link>
		<dc:creator>douglaswarren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42187</guid>
		<description>The usual rationalizations of limits of access and a non-public trial apply here. Or so they say. 

I don&#039;t know. Yeah, I&#039;d hate to see a lawyer go traitor I just don&#039;t really see that happening. I think the scenario I laid out for howthe documents would or could get out because of the trial would be more likely. 

And my point still stands, I don&#039;t like this, I think it&#039;s not a smart idea. I don&#039;t think the sky is falling but it does raise a great number of issues with possible negative outcomes. I&#039;m not so convinced all of a sudden this makes NYC a bigger target. It is, has been, and always will be a target as one of our flagship cities with such an expansive direct global reach. The possibility that it would be attacked JUST BECAUSE KSM is there is marginal. 

It will however create a press circus and be forced to deal with heavy political issues that have been controversially debated on their own. So, I think is a bad idea no matter what. 

But again, why did we not try him under Bush?!! I&#039;m so upset with him over this. He did a lot of great things but KSM had admitted it and said he wanted to die!! He had how many years and now we&#039;re stuck dealing with this!! 

I mean, the decision has been made now. They&#039;re coming and are gonna be tried here. All we can do is hold on now, because Bush dropped the ball. 

I hope we&#039;re all wrong and this turns out to be a model of our justice system. Odds are what on that though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The usual rationalizations of limits of access and a non-public trial apply here. Or so they say. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. Yeah, I&#8217;d hate to see a lawyer go traitor I just don&#8217;t really see that happening. I think the scenario I laid out for howthe documents would or could get out because of the trial would be more likely. </p>
<p>And my point still stands, I don&#8217;t like this, I think it&#8217;s not a smart idea. I don&#8217;t think the sky is falling but it does raise a great number of issues with possible negative outcomes. I&#8217;m not so convinced all of a sudden this makes NYC a bigger target. It is, has been, and always will be a target as one of our flagship cities with such an expansive direct global reach. The possibility that it would be attacked JUST BECAUSE KSM is there is marginal. </p>
<p>It will however create a press circus and be forced to deal with heavy political issues that have been controversially debated on their own. So, I think is a bad idea no matter what. </p>
<p>But again, why did we not try him under Bush?!! I&#8217;m so upset with him over this. He did a lot of great things but KSM had admitted it and said he wanted to die!! He had how many years and now we&#8217;re stuck dealing with this!! </p>
<p>I mean, the decision has been made now. They&#8217;re coming and are gonna be tried here. All we can do is hold on now, because Bush dropped the ball. </p>
<p>I hope we&#8217;re all wrong and this turns out to be a model of our justice system. Odds are what on that though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42184</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42184</guid>
		<description>They have to turn all the evidence over whether they intend to use it or not because they&#039;ll have all sorts of motions going to try to get the charges dismissed.

Fundamentally, there is no way that KSM et al. can be tried on the evidence adduced by the CIA and the military.  At most it can form the basis for a complaint and then the US has to gather new evidence &quot;untainted&quot; by allegations of torture, due process issues, speedy trial issues, right to counsel issues, etc.  Basically, they either start over or he walks and I think he walks anyway; it is just too difficult to put the toothpaste back in the tube.

I don&#039;t know what there is like this on the criminal law side, but there&#039;s a lot on the employment law side.  Actually, it is harder in due process terms to fire a permanent public employee than it is to put one in jail and there are lots of court cases.  The seminal due process case is Loudermill v. Cleveland Board and Garrity v. New Jersey addresses use of compelled evidence.  Both are USSC cases on strictly Constitutional grounds.  It is easy to argue that the evidence against KSM et al. was compelled and violated both his right to due process and his right to refuse self-incrimination.  Ergo, no evidence and they walk.  And I don&#039;t think it would bother Comrade Obama a bit; he&#039;d just blame Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have to turn all the evidence over whether they intend to use it or not because they&#8217;ll have all sorts of motions going to try to get the charges dismissed.</p>
<p>Fundamentally, there is no way that KSM et al. can be tried on the evidence adduced by the CIA and the military.  At most it can form the basis for a complaint and then the US has to gather new evidence &#8220;untainted&#8221; by allegations of torture, due process issues, speedy trial issues, right to counsel issues, etc.  Basically, they either start over or he walks and I think he walks anyway; it is just too difficult to put the toothpaste back in the tube.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what there is like this on the criminal law side, but there&#8217;s a lot on the employment law side.  Actually, it is harder in due process terms to fire a permanent public employee than it is to put one in jail and there are lots of court cases.  The seminal due process case is Loudermill v. Cleveland Board and Garrity v. New Jersey addresses use of compelled evidence.  Both are USSC cases on strictly Constitutional grounds.  It is easy to argue that the evidence against KSM et al. was compelled and violated both his right to due process and his right to refuse self-incrimination.  Ergo, no evidence and they walk.  And I don&#8217;t think it would bother Comrade Obama a bit; he&#8217;d just blame Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwilson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42181</link>
		<dc:creator>cwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42181</guid>
		<description>1) The prosecution must turn over all evidence it intends to use in the trial to the defense.
2) The defense can also subpoena any documents (technically, subpeona a person to produce documents) that they can convince the judge are necessary for the defense.

Then ... the defense team has them. That means KSM has them. The only missing link is how does KSM get those documents to his friends. Frankly, that seems almost trivial in comparison to the normal protections afforded such documents -- you&#039;ve already bypassed all that, and a bad guy has them in hand, and you&#039;re relying on a team of defense lawyers -- HIS defense lawyers -- to prevent him from getting them into other hands.

Yeah, good luck with that.

And that&#039;s assuming that none of the lawyers actually slides from normal defense lawyer &quot;slimeball&quot; to actual traitor, like Lynne Stewart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) The prosecution must turn over all evidence it intends to use in the trial to the defense.<br />
2) The defense can also subpoena any documents (technically, subpeona a person to produce documents) that they can convince the judge are necessary for the defense.</p>
<p>Then &#8230; the defense team has them. That means KSM has them. The only missing link is how does KSM get those documents to his friends. Frankly, that seems almost trivial in comparison to the normal protections afforded such documents &#8212; you&#8217;ve already bypassed all that, and a bad guy has them in hand, and you&#8217;re relying on a team of defense lawyers &#8212; HIS defense lawyers &#8212; to prevent him from getting them into other hands.</p>
<p>Yeah, good luck with that.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s assuming that none of the lawyers actually slides from normal defense lawyer &#8220;slimeball&#8221; to actual traitor, like Lynne Stewart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42180</link>
		<dc:creator>bs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42180</guid>
		<description>Obama is a radical leftist.  I wouldn&#039;t put anything past him to make a point.  As with the health care vote, we assume these guys are rational.  I don&#039;t believe that&#039;s a correct assumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is a radical leftist.  I wouldn&#8217;t put anything past him to make a point.  As with the health care vote, we assume these guys are rational.  I don&#8217;t believe that&#8217;s a correct assumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwilson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42171</link>
		<dc:creator>cwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42171</guid>
		<description>.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwilson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42170</link>
		<dc:creator>cwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42170</guid>
		<description>exactly WHICH adults are you talking about? The rogues gallery of czars? Axelrod? Congressional &quot;watchdogs&quot; like Pelosi or Reid? Sorry, I&#039;m not confident that there ARE any actual adults in this administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly WHICH adults are you talking about? The rogues gallery of czars? Axelrod? Congressional &#8220;watchdogs&#8221; like Pelosi or Reid? Sorry, I&#8217;m not confident that there ARE any actual adults in this administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave_in_atl</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42160</link>
		<dc:creator>dave_in_atl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42160</guid>
		<description>The Bush administration had 7+ years to prosecute KSM.  If they had done their job Obama would not be in a position to screw up his :)

Thankfully I have a ton of faith in our justice system, and I suspect KSM will be tried, convicted, and put to death with little to no effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush administration had 7+ years to prosecute KSM.  If they had done their job Obama would not be in a position to screw up his <img src='http://www.redstate.com/erick/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thankfully I have a ton of faith in our justice system, and I suspect KSM will be tried, convicted, and put to death with little to no effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tbone</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42119</link>
		<dc:creator>Tbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42119</guid>
		<description>To which adults are you referring?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To which adults are you referring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10ksnooker</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42118</link>
		<dc:creator>10ksnooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42118</guid>
		<description>Number one on Al Qaeda&#039;s target list. How cool is that, the best place to bomb, for their next 15 minutes of fame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number one on Al Qaeda&#8217;s target list. How cool is that, the best place to bomb, for their next 15 minutes of fame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masterthief</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42113</link>
		<dc:creator>masterthief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42113</guid>
		<description>How many times have we seen judges make completely irresponsible calls?  I don&#039;t even see how the civilian courts in NYC have the jurisdiction to try this case. So much relies on the choices of judge and jury. On top of that, I whole-heartedly distrust trial lawyers. Look at our Congress and it becomes pretty obvious why. There are so many ways for the defense to postpone trial and loopholes to avoid being judged by the intent of law. The effectiveness of this relies on so many different choices: judge, jury, prosecutor, and defense. I believe that the administration will do what they can to get a guilty verdict out of this, but my question is how much damage they will do in order to score political points.
More than likely this circus will be used as motivation to put Bush administration officials on trial after they publicly release classified information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times have we seen judges make completely irresponsible calls?  I don&#8217;t even see how the civilian courts in NYC have the jurisdiction to try this case. So much relies on the choices of judge and jury. On top of that, I whole-heartedly distrust trial lawyers. Look at our Congress and it becomes pretty obvious why. There are so many ways for the defense to postpone trial and loopholes to avoid being judged by the intent of law. The effectiveness of this relies on so many different choices: judge, jury, prosecutor, and defense. I believe that the administration will do what they can to get a guilty verdict out of this, but my question is how much damage they will do in order to score political points.<br />
More than likely this circus will be used as motivation to put Bush administration officials on trial after they publicly release classified information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsallverbatim</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42112</link>
		<dc:creator>itsallverbatim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42112</guid>
		<description>The adults would not allow that to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The adults would not allow that to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsallverbatim</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/16/the-last-time-we-tried-a-terrorist-in-new-york-classified-documents-went-to-al-qaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-42111</link>
		<dc:creator>itsallverbatim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4834#comment-42111</guid>
		<description>would not allow him to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would not allow him to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

