<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoohoohaa</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-42044</link>
		<dc:creator>hoohoohaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-42044</guid>
		<description>BTW, the veal is excellent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, the veal is excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4life</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-42039</link>
		<dc:creator>4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-42039</guid>
		<description>This is what I heard another media person say, I think on NPR:  &quot;Hasan is a religious extremist who just happens to be Muslim.&quot;  Now this is just crazy!  What other religion preaches &#039;holy war&#039;?  None.  What other religion has respected leaders with large followings preaching hate that must be carried out by suicidal terrorism?  None!  Yes, we can distinguish between Muslim Jihadists and Muslims who don&#039;t believe in Jihad, but the fact that Muslim Jihadists are at war with the West is well established.  Hasan&#039;s Muslim Jihadist beliefs are the reason he did what he did and nothing else.  So he&#039;s not a crazy who &#039;just happened to be Muslim&#039;.  So now we have a question that needs answering.  If he doesn&#039;t get the death penalty, does he still get the 70 virgins?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I heard another media person say, I think on NPR:  &#8220;Hasan is a religious extremist who just happens to be Muslim.&#8221;  Now this is just crazy!  What other religion preaches &#8216;holy war&#8217;?  None.  What other religion has respected leaders with large followings preaching hate that must be carried out by suicidal terrorism?  None!  Yes, we can distinguish between Muslim Jihadists and Muslims who don&#8217;t believe in Jihad, but the fact that Muslim Jihadists are at war with the West is well established.  Hasan&#8217;s Muslim Jihadist beliefs are the reason he did what he did and nothing else.  So he&#8217;s not a crazy who &#8216;just happened to be Muslim&#8217;.  So now we have a question that needs answering.  If he doesn&#8217;t get the death penalty, does he still get the 70 virgins?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharonmcp</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41702</link>
		<dc:creator>sharonmcp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41702</guid>
		<description>From a Sept. 22nd article at The American Spectator

&quot;Today, House Republicans have issued a report providing evidence that AARP is in a position to recieve tens of millions of dollars in &#039;kickbacks&#039; if Democratic health care legislation becomes law.&quot;

&quot;...If the House Democrats health care bill becomes law, the report argues, it would be a boon to AARP, because while Medicare Advantage plans will be required to pay out 85 percent of the money collected in premiums to claims made by policy holders, the requirement would only be 65 percent for the kind 
of Medigap policies sold by AARP.&quot;

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/09/22/gop-report-charges-aarp-gettin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a Sept. 22nd article at The American Spectator</p>
<p>&#8220;Today, House Republicans have issued a report providing evidence that AARP is in a position to recieve tens of millions of dollars in &#8216;kickbacks&#8217; if Democratic health care legislation becomes law.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;If the House Democrats health care bill becomes law, the report argues, it would be a boon to AARP, because while Medicare Advantage plans will be required to pay out 85 percent of the money collected in premiums to claims made by policy holders, the requirement would only be 65 percent for the kind<br />
of Medigap policies sold by AARP.&#8221;</p>
<p>http://spectator.org/blog/2009/09/22/gop-report-charges-aarp-gettin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mom2oneson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41662</link>
		<dc:creator>mom2oneson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41662</guid>
		<description>The lights out night was really fun on here. Can we have a use red plastic disposable cups for Sunday dinner day? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lights out night was really fun on here. Can we have a use red plastic disposable cups for Sunday dinner day? <img src='http://www.redstate.com/erick/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Born Again Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41643</link>
		<dc:creator>Born Again Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41643</guid>
		<description>.. Maj. Hasan is not an extremist, just misunderstood.  Aww, he was picked on.  The poor guy had to Overcome Adversity (TM).  And, of course, he&#039;s not caucasian.  If a white conservative Christian bombs an abortion clinic, he&#039;s the next Hitler (not that I would ever approve of that kind of terroristic attack, mind you).  But when a radical Muslim extremist with a history of anti-American rhetoric plans out and carries a devastating attack - we just need to be more sensitive!  It&#039;s really the military&#039;s fault for not giving enough diversity training! [/sarcasm off]

The &quot;mainstream&quot; media makes me sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. Maj. Hasan is not an extremist, just misunderstood.  Aww, he was picked on.  The poor guy had to Overcome Adversity (TM).  And, of course, he&#8217;s not caucasian.  If a white conservative Christian bombs an abortion clinic, he&#8217;s the next Hitler (not that I would ever approve of that kind of terroristic attack, mind you).  But when a radical Muslim extremist with a history of anti-American rhetoric plans out and carries a devastating attack &#8211; we just need to be more sensitive!  It&#8217;s really the military&#8217;s fault for not giving enough diversity training! [/sarcasm off]</p>
<p>The &#8220;mainstream&#8221; media makes me sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberta</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41594</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41594</guid>
		<description>via: http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1227206/Nato-Labrador-Sabi-safe-YEAR-lost-fierce-Afghanistan-battle.html

So this dog is found, 14 months after it disapeared during a firefight, safe, happy, and healthy. Hurray. Im a sucker for stories like this. Its a black dog too, which is even better. 

But what I would have done, had I been in charge of the PR? Pictures people! The story says they found the dog with an Afghan at an isolated post. Why wasnt the Afghan, the dogs handler, the guy who found the dog, and the dog, put in a group together and photo op? I think it would have looked great, been a good story, all that. 

Are good stories not allowed about Afghanistan anymore? I mean, maybe I missed it, but Im linking to a British paper, not an American one. Was it not in an American one? I hope I missed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>via: http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1227206/Nato-Labrador-Sabi-safe-YEAR-lost-fierce-Afghanistan-battle.html</p>
<p>So this dog is found, 14 months after it disapeared during a firefight, safe, happy, and healthy. Hurray. Im a sucker for stories like this. Its a black dog too, which is even better. </p>
<p>But what I would have done, had I been in charge of the PR? Pictures people! The story says they found the dog with an Afghan at an isolated post. Why wasnt the Afghan, the dogs handler, the guy who found the dog, and the dog, put in a group together and photo op? I think it would have looked great, been a good story, all that. </p>
<p>Are good stories not allowed about Afghanistan anymore? I mean, maybe I missed it, but Im linking to a British paper, not an American one. Was it not in an American one? I hope I missed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: throwback59</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41593</link>
		<dc:creator>throwback59</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41593</guid>
		<description>How do KSM and uninsured (and insured) 20 year olds differ?

In Barack Obama&#039;s America they both get flu shots, but KSM (and his co-horts) get them first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do KSM and uninsured (and insured) 20 year olds differ?</p>
<p>In Barack Obama&#8217;s America they both get flu shots, but KSM (and his co-horts) get them first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41590</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41590</guid>
		<description>ABORTION: Democrats don’t follow the Laws they pass (Abortions, as promised to PP - WILL BE COVERED)

HR3296, even with Stupak Amendment -- the HHS Secretary is the one that will have the sole discretion and is tasked with setting up the criteria of what is minimum coverage as a qualified HC plan under these Laws. They can and will use this alone, if they feel they need to, and if you want to step up and call out that as a conflict with Stupak they&#039;ll just refer you to the LIBERAL ACTIVIST JUDICIAL system (lower Federal courts before it would ever get to SCOTUS) where they&#039;ll tie it all up in the mean-time.


Regardless of what Final Bill comes out of all their wheeling and dealing to get any old Liberal Incremental-ism BS passed so they can bury (read:hide and pass) more that the Nation doesn&#039;t want in some other Bill (like they already had passed the &quot;Health Panel Oversight&quot; in the Stimulus Bill prior to all the official Oba&lt;i&gt;mao&lt;/i&gt;care debate)...

As if they are going to actually care what the final Laws say, they WILL be funding Abortions anyway REGARDLESS…. The LINE ITEM CHARGES that will be paid WON’T SAY: “ABORTION” THEY WILL BE “BIRTHING SERVICES” but there just won’t be any LIVE BABY DELIVERY in those “Services” ….. I mean really…. We gonna wake up from this usual “RE-Define the Terms” dodges/scams the Democrats are allowed to get away with?!?!?! Or Planned Parenthood will begin the new &quot;Get 5 visits, get FREE Abortion&quot; Program - so they can inflate costs of visits for any reasons and basically just pre-pay Abortions!

THERE CAN BE NO COMPROMISE WITH THESE PEOPLE! and these &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1193&quot;&gt;The Senate HC &quot;Gang Of Sicks&quot;&lt;/a&gt; ARE STILL the most dangerous in DC right now!!!! They may still waver -- pressure cannot be let up!!!!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/wmiar/2009/04/28/obamas-chilling-reflection-on-the-holocaust/#comment-68&quot;&gt;Kathy Ireland: best anti-abortion comments ever made&lt;/a&gt; and more on her words &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/wmiar/2009/04/28/obamas-chilling-reflection-on-the-holocaust/#comment-13&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABORTION: Democrats don’t follow the Laws they pass (Abortions, as promised to PP &#8211; WILL BE COVERED)</p>
<p>HR3296, even with Stupak Amendment &#8212; the HHS Secretary is the one that will have the sole discretion and is tasked with setting up the criteria of what is minimum coverage as a qualified HC plan under these Laws. They can and will use this alone, if they feel they need to, and if you want to step up and call out that as a conflict with Stupak they&#8217;ll just refer you to the LIBERAL ACTIVIST JUDICIAL system (lower Federal courts before it would ever get to SCOTUS) where they&#8217;ll tie it all up in the mean-time.</p>
<p>Regardless of what Final Bill comes out of all their wheeling and dealing to get any old Liberal Incremental-ism BS passed so they can bury (read:hide and pass) more that the Nation doesn&#8217;t want in some other Bill (like they already had passed the &#8220;Health Panel Oversight&#8221; in the Stimulus Bill prior to all the official Oba<i>mao</i>care debate)&#8230;</p>
<p>As if they are going to actually care what the final Laws say, they WILL be funding Abortions anyway REGARDLESS…. The LINE ITEM CHARGES that will be paid WON’T SAY: “ABORTION” THEY WILL BE “BIRTHING SERVICES” but there just won’t be any LIVE BABY DELIVERY in those “Services” ….. I mean really…. We gonna wake up from this usual “RE-Define the Terms” dodges/scams the Democrats are allowed to get away with?!?!?! Or Planned Parenthood will begin the new &#8220;Get 5 visits, get FREE Abortion&#8221; Program &#8211; so they can inflate costs of visits for any reasons and basically just pre-pay Abortions!</p>
<p>THERE CAN BE NO COMPROMISE WITH THESE PEOPLE! and these <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1193">The Senate HC &#8220;Gang Of Sicks&#8221;</a> ARE STILL the most dangerous in DC right now!!!! They may still waver &#8212; pressure cannot be let up!!!!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.redstate.com/wmiar/2009/04/28/obamas-chilling-reflection-on-the-holocaust/#comment-68">Kathy Ireland: best anti-abortion comments ever made</a> and more on her words <a href="http://www.redstate.com/wmiar/2009/04/28/obamas-chilling-reflection-on-the-holocaust/#comment-13">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41589</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41589</guid>
		<description>We look for clues to prevent it ever happening again, Liberals look for excuses
Maj. Nidal Hasan was every bit the Military equivalent of the Robert Redford character in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/10/26/hollywood2009/#lions&quot;&gt;Liars For Losers&lt;/a&gt; (what I call &quot;Lions For Lambs&quot;), using a protected position and trying to convince them we are our own enemy, and should have been dishonorably discharged but instead was promoted. The message that &quot;We Are The Evil&quot; is not a question of &quot;Diversity of Opinion&quot; it is stupidly counter-intuitive to a Force that VOLUNTEERS to fight our Nations enemies. Sally Quinn, was on O&#039;Reilly, still going on and on about how we cannot tell yet and must INVESTIGATE, which she really means time is needed by Liberals to investigate the best way to SPIN the situation rather than deal with REALITY! We Conservatives warned endlessly about the discrepancy of how the Liberals would rule (this yet another, treating Terrorism as Criminality like Bill Clinton did) over their conflicting Campaign rhetoric to lie their way into Office.

Liberals are trying to turn the FBI BA Division into the PC BS Division</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We look for clues to prevent it ever happening again, Liberals look for excuses<br />
Maj. Nidal Hasan was every bit the Military equivalent of the Robert Redford character in <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/10/26/hollywood2009/#lions">Liars For Losers</a> (what I call &#8220;Lions For Lambs&#8221;), using a protected position and trying to convince them we are our own enemy, and should have been dishonorably discharged but instead was promoted. The message that &#8220;We Are The Evil&#8221; is not a question of &#8220;Diversity of Opinion&#8221; it is stupidly counter-intuitive to a Force that VOLUNTEERS to fight our Nations enemies. Sally Quinn, was on O&#8217;Reilly, still going on and on about how we cannot tell yet and must INVESTIGATE, which she really means time is needed by Liberals to investigate the best way to SPIN the situation rather than deal with REALITY! We Conservatives warned endlessly about the discrepancy of how the Liberals would rule (this yet another, treating Terrorism as Criminality like Bill Clinton did) over their conflicting Campaign rhetoric to lie their way into Office.</p>
<p>Liberals are trying to turn the FBI BA Division into the PC BS Division</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firstfreedom</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41571</link>
		<dc:creator>firstfreedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41571</guid>
		<description>going to buy lead today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>going to buy lead today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4life</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41554</link>
		<dc:creator>4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41554</guid>
		<description>Did anyone notice that the media was reporting that Nidal Hasan was yelling &quot;God is Great&quot; when he was shooting?  Even on FOX they said something like &quot; He was shouting God is Great, or Allahu Akbar.&quot;  The use of &quot;God is Great&quot; was much more common in the media than &quot;Allahu Akbar&quot;.  Now, Hasan was an American and English is his native language, so his intentional use of &quot;Allahu Akbar&quot; should mean something to people.  Why did the news media feel the need to translate?  As a Christian I am offended that &quot;Allah&quot; is translated as &quot;God&quot; because Allah is not the same God that I worship whose name is God.  Why didn&#039;t they translate it as &quot;Allah is Great&quot;?  Is this a new angle on political correctness when talking about Islam?  And really, do the Muslims even want it translated as &quot;God&quot; and not &quot;Allah&quot;?  Don&#039;t American Muslim&#039;s refer to their god as Allah?  So, if the Christians don&#039;t like it and the Muslim&#039;s don&#039;t like it, then why are they doing it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone notice that the media was reporting that Nidal Hasan was yelling &#8220;God is Great&#8221; when he was shooting?  Even on FOX they said something like &#8221; He was shouting God is Great, or Allahu Akbar.&#8221;  The use of &#8220;God is Great&#8221; was much more common in the media than &#8220;Allahu Akbar&#8221;.  Now, Hasan was an American and English is his native language, so his intentional use of &#8220;Allahu Akbar&#8221; should mean something to people.  Why did the news media feel the need to translate?  As a Christian I am offended that &#8220;Allah&#8221; is translated as &#8220;God&#8221; because Allah is not the same God that I worship whose name is God.  Why didn&#8217;t they translate it as &#8220;Allah is Great&#8221;?  Is this a new angle on political correctness when talking about Islam?  And really, do the Muslims even want it translated as &#8220;God&#8221; and not &#8220;Allah&#8221;?  Don&#8217;t American Muslim&#8217;s refer to their god as Allah?  So, if the Christians don&#8217;t like it and the Muslim&#8217;s don&#8217;t like it, then why are they doing it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41534</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41534</guid>
		<description>Robert Louis Stevenson, with whom I share a birthday, &lt;a href=&quot;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9805EED9143DE733A25757C2A9619C946797D6CF&quot;&gt;willed his birthday to Annie Ide&lt;/a&gt;, who had the misfortune of being born on Christmas Day.  Hence, I now make the same offer to anyone born on December 25: please feel free to celebrate your birthday on November 13, six weeks before Christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Louis Stevenson, with whom I share a birthday, <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9805EED9143DE733A25757C2A9619C946797D6CF">willed his birthday to Annie Ide</a>, who had the misfortune of being born on Christmas Day.  Hence, I now make the same offer to anyone born on December 25: please feel free to celebrate your birthday on November 13, six weeks before Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41532</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41532</guid>
		<description>Twenty-eight years ago, my thirteenth birthday was on Friday the 13th.  You can do the math to figure out my age.  (-:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty-eight years ago, my thirteenth birthday was on Friday the 13th.  You can do the math to figure out my age.  (-:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheetah772</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41530</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheetah772</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41530</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to make a bold predication!

Packers is going to wake up from sleep and destroy Cowboys in the upcoming game this Sunday!  Pretty soon, Packers will run all way to Super Bowl, steamrolling over teams like New Orleans or Steelers!

You heard it first here!  ;)

Nah, I was just kidding.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to make a bold predication!</p>
<p>Packers is going to wake up from sleep and destroy Cowboys in the upcoming game this Sunday!  Pretty soon, Packers will run all way to Super Bowl, steamrolling over teams like New Orleans or Steelers!</p>
<p>You heard it first here!  <img src='http://www.redstate.com/erick/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Nah, I was just kidding&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scipio62</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41521</link>
		<dc:creator>scipio62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41521</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been looking for any information on a foreign enemy combatant being tried in the American civilian courts for committing an illegal act of war, such as what KSM and his band of terrorists did.  I couldn&#039;t find any and was wondering if anyone here knew of any of these trials?

It seems to me that Obama has decided all by himself to end the War on Terror and terrorists committing an illegal act of war will be considered no different than someone who commits a moving violation.

Except for those who don&#039;t buy health insurance under ObamaPelosiCare.  That &quot;crime&quot; will be considered a crime against humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for any information on a foreign enemy combatant being tried in the American civilian courts for committing an illegal act of war, such as what KSM and his band of terrorists did.  I couldn&#8217;t find any and was wondering if anyone here knew of any of these trials?</p>
<p>It seems to me that Obama has decided all by himself to end the War on Terror and terrorists committing an illegal act of war will be considered no different than someone who commits a moving violation.</p>
<p>Except for those who don&#8217;t buy health insurance under ObamaPelosiCare.  That &#8220;crime&#8221; will be considered a crime against humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streiff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41519</link>
		<dc:creator>Streiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41519</guid>
		<description>not very sporting but very efficient</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not very sporting but very efficient</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mom2oneson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41518</link>
		<dc:creator>mom2oneson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41518</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41516</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41516</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddwarf</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41509</link>
		<dc:creator>reddwarf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41509</guid>
		<description>What do Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Barrack Hussein Obama have in common?

They&#039;re both Muslim radicals that hate America.

(I&#039;ll be here all week).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Barrack Hussein Obama have in common?</p>
<p>They&#8217;re both Muslim radicals that hate America.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ll be here all week).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBeard</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/11/13/question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-41506</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=4796#comment-41506</guid>
		<description>...involved... er... let&#039;s just say it involved detailed insertion instructions.

Oddly enough, I now seem to be off their mailing list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;involved&#8230; er&#8230; let&#8217;s just say it involved detailed insertion instructions.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, I now seem to be off their mailing list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

