Comments on: Liberal Fascism: Chapter 2

By: John Brill

John Brill — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:39:14 +0000

that’s the best thanks of all.

By: itrytobenice

itrytobenice — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:28:10 +0000

[i]anarchy is virtually always followed quickly by some form of far left despotism[/i]

Noted and agreed.

By: 4liberty

4liberty — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:02:13 +0000

but I just don’t think that the “extinction” of the White, middle class by way of policies can be compared to extinction of Jews in camps and ovens during WWII.

I agree that Obama, Michelle and their Brown Shirts are fueled by bitter disdain for the white race, middle class, and anyone who believes in the merits of individual liberty and capitalism.

I am aware that their plans include punishing those of us with priniciples, work ethic, personal responsibility, and desire for earned prosperity through carefully crafted Marxist policies that will mislead misniformed, unassuming Americans to believe that these policies are good for them.

I believe Barry called it “redistributive change,” also known as “social justice” in the same circles. Both phrases are seemingly benign, sweet-sounding costumes for “we’ll take your $ since you earned it on the backs of slaves and give it to the rightful recipients.”

I understand that these carefully crafted Marxist policies are intended to control our lives with an iron fist and virtual shackles.

No doubt, he is on the hunt to take as much as he can from us.

Yet at this point, I just don’t think that it’s fair to say that the bondage we’ll face if Obama is successful can fairly be compared to the heinous death and destruction of millions of Jews.

By: The_Gadfly

The_Gadfly — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:25:48 +0000

Mostly he just ordered it, then the apparatus of the state took over. So if we don’t stop what The Big 0 is doing, it will pretty much be a replay, with only the names of the players changed.

By: The_Gadfly

The_Gadfly — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:07:11 +0000

The words may not be quite as inflamatory as 4liberty wrote, but the extent and unavoidable outcomes are the same. All you have to do is look at the number of card carrying communists and avowed Maoists he is choosing for Czars and the pattern emerges. Even the act of appointing the Czars themselves is an indication of the extent to which The Big 0 follows fascist methodologies: appoint personal friends to positions of power with no Constitutional checks on that power.

Personally I’ve concluded that the reason The Big 0 is so intently smearing Fox News is because of Beck. And the reason they hate Beck so much is because he is doing what the fringe media should have done before the election: digging out The Big 0′s old tape and playing it for Americans who aren’t part of the fascist apparatus in this country to see what he really thinks.

By: VinceP1974

VinceP1974 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:52:24 +0000

Lets not forget the great Collectivist Revolutionaries in Asia.. especially since the most murderous of them all seems to be a particular favorite of the people in the White House.

BTW: If you watch the docu “Weather Underground”, I do beleive Ayers calls himself a Maoist.

But I’m sure the US will magically escape the fate of every other nation in history that has been hijacked by these sorts of people,

It would be rude to think otherwise.

By: VinceP1974

VinceP1974 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:48:14 +0000

I suppose we can be relieved that Obama is not like Hitler in the sense that he wont be doing the slaughtering.. instead he’s creating the geopolitical dysfunction that will enable those who will.

By: The_Gadfly

The_Gadfly — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:10:27 +0000

I haven’t decided if he’s a purposeful Moby or an indoctrinated moonbat. I see no reasoned development in either of his two posts (the only ones he’s made in the 48 days he’s been registered). He clearly can’t adjust his perception to reality. Some of us may disagree about exactly where on the right side of the spectrum Hannity is, but there are a couple of things we agree about. He is a conservative even if he does tolerate Dick Morris on his program, and he is not actively lying to the American people as the poster claims. We also acknowledge that language evolves whether we like it or not, e.g. ‘gay’ has not always been primarily associated with a particular type of political activism. When it changes you adapt to the new meanings. Hence the use of the term “classical liberal” in writing by those on the right to describe those who were once known as “liberals” but whose beliefs more clearly mirror conservatives today.

By: The_Gadfly

The_Gadfly — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:54:35 +0000

penchant for shortening names. So the Socialist part of the description went straight down the memory hole. Winston Smith would have been so proud.

By: liddleun

liddleun — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:27:19 +0000

There are comparisons of course between the two megalomaniacs known as Obama and Hitler. Doubtful lineage. Immense ego and the immeasurable willingness to stop at nothing to achieve a goal no matter how nefarious. Hitler had his straw men. Obama has his feigned enemies. Start by giving the people everything they think they need and in short order you have an army of robots so beholding anything may be possible. Anything but libery and freedom.

By: Achance

Achance — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:59:25 +0000

don’t go saying I’m an attorney, she might be looking down! I’m not anyway, but I used to hire an fire a lot of them.

By: Scope

Scope — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:54:30 +0000

and you are practicing your oral arguments here. Most law students, as far as I am concerned, would not hit and run, as you mostly do. They would stay with their arguments, and, expound on them to prove their point, or, lose their oral argument. Are you intimitaded by the more than qualified attorneys here, that could take your arguments down in about a New York minute?

By: Scope

Scope — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:54:30 +0000

By: Achance

Achance — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:36:49 +0000

By: winghunter1

winghunter1 — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:36:23 +0000

Will MSM Report on Obama Membership in Socialist New Party?
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/10/08/will-msm-report-obama-membership-socialist-new-party

New Party (Communists) 1996 Update Running To Win: The Key Races
“Three NP-members won Democratic primaries last
Spring and face off against Republican opponents on election
day: Danny Davis (U.S. House), Barack Obama (State
Senate) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).”
http://barackobamawebpage.com/images/obama_socialist-01a.pdf

Progressive Populist 11/96 Editorial
New Party members and supported candidates won 16 of 23 races, including an at-large race for the Little Rock, Ark., City Council, a seat on the county board for Little Rock and the school board forPrince George’s County, Md. Chicago is sending the first New Party member to Congress, as Danny
Davis, who ran as a Democrat, won an overwhelming 85% victory. New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago.
http://barackobamawebpage.com/images/obama_socialist-01b.pdf

http://barackobamawebpage.com/images/obama_socialist-01c.pdf

By: winghunter1

winghunter1 — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:29:02 +0000

I meant to offer you that Yuri knows that Marxists can’t be talked out of their Useful Idiocy until it’s too late to do anything about it which is why the Commies murder the ones who helped them take a country or region over immediately after they take control.

He should know, it was his job.

By: utahrepublican

utahrepublican — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:25:34 +0000

Anarchy in theory does lie at the right end of a linear spectrum, but just like a vacuum lies at the far end of the density spectrum. However, like a vacuum, anarchy never exists long in the real world. Instead, anarchists virtually always are not establishing a true lack of government, but only a mob rule with themselves at the head of the mob. IMHO, a brief check of history shows that anarchy is virtually always followed quickly by some form of far left despotism. I therefore choose not to think of anarchists as actually “right wing” in any sense, and do not concede that in the real world anarchy itself is more than a momentary illusion.
As an alternative to the whole spectrum thing by labels (by the way where does democracy, republic, non-corporate capitalism or other concepts fit in), I ask myself a more basic question which doesn’t need labels: “If I don’t agree, but I am not trying to make you live my way, how far are you willing to go to make me do it your way?” If you will only present intellectual and emotional appeals, you are for freedom. To the degree you will do more, you are moving left toward whatever your favorite extreme label happens to be.

By: Xasteius

Xasteius — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:25:15 +0000

By: redneck_hippie

redneck_hippie — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:07:12 +0000

I don’t really think it is only information that is lacking here. Art hit on it earlier – nick may have not had the kind of life experiences that would demonstrate what collectivists in this country are really all about. That, and he wasn’t alive when some of us were in fear of The Bomb and practicing the duck and cover under our desks at school. The pervasiveness of moral relativism is tainting our youth to the point that Jeremiah Wright is a well-meaning man of God and Bill Ayers is a distinguished academician.

I can excuse nick because I had my useful idiot days just like he did. Ours is not to convert all those still in the McGovern phase of their lives (although I do try, believe me.) We will win by surrounding them because by and large they only vote in the generals and we are focused on the interim races.

By: kyle8

kyle8 — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:00:50 +0000

Ever notice that the guys who make the biggest messes in history always write a book first outlining exactly what they want to do? and no one ever reads the books or takes them seriously until it is too late.