RedState Book Notes: A Group Project


Yeah, okay, it is kind of sort of like an online book club, but not really.

Aaron Gardner, a while back, emailed me to suggest RedState start some serious discussion on conservative ideas and thoughts. Being just a diarist and me being busy, I had the convenience of ignoring him.

Now that he is a front pager and has access to my super secret email address, I can’t ignore him anymore and decided I’d be pre-emptive. In all seriousness, I have been thinking for a while that it would be worth doing a series of posts on a collection of conservative great books.

Truth be told, however, I have become a lazy reader of late. I read so much for work, that I rarely sit down to enjoy a book except when I’m on an airplane.

In light of Steven F. Hayward’s column in the Washington Post this weekend, I thought it might be worthwhile to go on and move forward with this.

Hayward wrote, in part, “The single largest defect of modern conservatism, in my mind, is its insufficient ability to challenge liberalism at the intellectual level, in particular over the meaning and nature of progress. In response to the left’s belief in political solutions for everything, the right must do better than merely invoking “markets” and “liberty.”"

I have my disagreements with Hayward’s column, but I do think we, as activists, need to get beyond our gut to the point of being able to articulate why we know what we know and think what we think. In the spirit of Ecclesiastes that “there is nothing new under the sun,” I think we ought to explore the ideas together in a Great Books program of sorts. As I wrote in my rebuttal to Hayward’s column, “[W]e should be excited by the opportunity to begin again with old ideas made new for a new generation of citizen showing itself to be instinctually conservative.”

Here is my proposal:Below is a list of books in no particular order. Some are easy. Some are hard. Some are meaty. Some are light. But they are all thought provoking. They all serve as bedrock for our believes and knowledge.

Aaron and I are going to read each book and we want you to join us. We will read one chapter a week. On Mondays we will write a post with our thoughts on the chapter. It will not be a “book review”, but rather our candid thoughts on the chapter, up to and including “the baby was sick all week and I didn’t get a chance to read it.”

We will pace this out over a good long time so that those of you with jobs, families, and other activities can still participate.

You have three commitments:

  1. Get the book.
  2. Read the assigned chapter or chapters (usually 1, but more if the book is short).
  3. Write a post over the following weekend with your thoughts on the chapter.

You can use the tag “Book Notes” in your post and we’ll track them and engage each other in the comments sections.

Here is the list (again in no particular order):

A Message to Garcia by Elbert Hubbard
Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg
Economics in One Lesson by Hazlitt
Liberty & Tyranny by Mark Levin
The Road to Serfdom by F. A. Hayek
The Conservative Mind by Russell Kirk
Free to Choose by Milton Friedman
Conscience of a Conservative by Barry Goldwater
Federalist Papers
Democracy in America by Tocqueville
Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis
God and Man at Yale by W.F. Buckley
Witness by Whittaker Chambers
The Political Writings of St. Augustine (a compilation available here)

ASSIGNMENT 1:

Read A Message to Garcia. It is extremely short. And you do not need to buy it. As conservative activists, we should set this book to heart. In fact, I keep a copy of it on my desk at all times and re-read it frequently.

You can download it here as a PDF. It is an extremely quick read.

We’ll all post our thoughts on October 12th.

This gives us time to get ready for the next book. Aaron and I decided, though we’re going in no particular order, we’d really kick things off with Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism.

You can buy a hard cover copy here or a cheaper paperback copy here.

We hope you will join us in this endeavor.


Category:

RSS feed

67 Comments Leave a comment

Awesome idea, Aaron and Erick!

azaeroprof (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 10:58AM EST (link)

I’m actually about 2/3 through Road to Serfdom right now, and have 8 of the books you listed. It’ll be fun to re-read them and share thoughts with others here.

It would be really helpful if there could be a separate area, kind of like Redhot, where the book diaries could be collected and easily accessed even after they would normally drop off the front page. That way, folks new to RedState and even new to conservatism could get ideas for reading material.

Books work for me.

penguin2 (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:06AM EST (link)

This idea thrills me. I am a book person. I also agree with Azaeroprof about a separate section, if at all possible. It would be nice to have them separate, especially as they would tend to be shorter posts., and not get lost or distract from the other diaries. It would be easier to track the different takes on the reading. And if their is a lot of participation, then turns could be taken for the posts.

Great idea.

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills

Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

azaeroprof...I think that is the idea of the tag

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:07AM EST (link)

if we include the tag on our diaries they will all be linked by that tag here on RS.

By the way, I loaned you a book back at the RS Gathering…do you remember which one?

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


"The Reagan I Knew"

azaeroprof (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 2:10PM EST (link)

by WFB, Jr. I’ve got it back and it’s sitting in a box on my desk. I keep forgetting to take it to the post office. Will try to get that done in the next day or two.

 
 

Great idea!

larabush Tuesday, October 6th at 11:10AM EST (link)

But what about some fiction? Nonfiction is of course important, but fiction is a very different–and sometimes more powerful–vehicle for ideas. Largely because instead of just stating the ideas of the author, philosophical fiction strives to provoke certain questions and ideas in the reader, and can often help readers articulate more personal versions of a philosophy.

Ayn Rand is a bit of a gimme for conservative fiction, though I still believe Rand gets talked about too much and read too little. (I would recommend the Fountainhead as opposed to Atlas Shrugged, as it is shorter and I find it to be an easier read, though it is the less heavily philosophical of the two).

And for C.S. Lewis, how about ‘The Great Divorce’ or ‘The Screwtape Letters’ instead of Mere Christianity?

There is also One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovitch, by Solzhenitsyn.

Just a suggestion, from a lover of fiction…

Ideas for fiction

suzieQ (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:23AM EST (link)

1. A Call to Service, by John Kerry
2. An Inconvenient Truth, by Al Gore
3. The War I Always Wanted: The Illusion of Glory and the Reality of War by Brandon Friedman

OK, now I’m just being mean …

“Andy Stern, the head of the Service Employees International Union, is the union leader who probably best understands the challenge of the world market and the need to make American union members productive in the face of world competition.” – Newt Gingrich
Newt Gingrich Co-Sponsored a Global Warming Bill Calling for ‘International Agreement on Population Growth’

“I would have signed the assault weapon ban that came to his desk. I said I would have supported that and signed a similar bill in our state.” – Mitt Romney 2008
Gun Owners Of America on Mitt Romney

 

More fiction

aesthete (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 8:38PM EST (link)

Starship Troopers and The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (both by Robert A Heinlein) are good ones.

Tom Clancy, pre-divorce (Executive Orders is a good one; Jack Ryan becomes President in that one), for a light read.

[Insert obligatory shilling for 1984 and Animal Farm to be included here.]

Random, non-political picks? Orson Scott Card’s “Ender’s Game”, and Harry Turtledove’s Southern Victory alternate history series.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 

Yes, Great Idea and I'm in! nt

clowngirl (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 10:56PM EST (link)
 

I'm all for the Book Notes idea...but we Do need a separate section on the page

Tom Anderson (Diary) Thursday, October 8th at 5:59AM EST (link)

The Book Notes idea is a tremendous one. I’m always looking for reading recommendations!

I do like the idea of a separate section of the page for the Book Notes comments, though. A separate section would make it much easier to find the posts/comments than trying to search for a tag. Also, the idea of using tags is a little faulty, since some will invariably forget to add the tag (indicting myself here as well).

“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
- Edmund Burke

 

Read To Lead

G. A. Harrison (Diary) Monday, October 12th at 9:21AM EST (link)

This is a truly great idea! If you are looking for more books to add later, I would suggest that you start with Morton Blackwell’s renowned Read to Lead list. The list has changed some over the years (I remember that von Mises’s “Human Action” was on the list when I took part in an early LI Youth Leadership program), but remains solid.

I might suggest that some books on your list, such as “Democracy in America”, as well as some books on Blackwell’s list (i.e. Richard Weaver’s “Ideas Have Consequences”) may be great books but simply won’t be read by many people.

Goldberg’s “Liberal Fascism”, while long, is written in a plain enough style for most people to be willing to tackle in their spare time. Levin’s “Liberty and Tyranny” is quite possibly the most tightly written piece of conservative political thought since Goldwater’s “Conscience of a Conservative”.

I would suggest that you stay away from “pundit” books for future additions. While great books to read, authors such as Coulter, Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Malkin, etc. are not really “idea” books, despite the protestations of their fans and the authors themselves.

I would also suggest Mickey Edwards’s book “Reclaiming Conservatism”. While Edwards (a former Congressman, former chair of the ACU, and one of the true leaders of the conservative movement from Goldwater through Reagan) took a great deal of heat for this book, I find it ironic that many who criticized him now have volumes out expressing many of the same ideas. It’s not overly long and fairly well written.

G. A. Harrison
Managing Editor, Salisbury News
Editor.SBYNews@gmail.com
410-713-4005

Twitter:  Editor_SBYNews
Twitter:  GAHarrison

Facebook:  G. A. Harrison
Facebook:  Salisbury News

 
 

Can we make suggestions of our own?

suzieQ (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:06AM EST (link)

A couple of my favorite books:

1. Godless: The Church of Liberalism, by Ann Coulter
2. World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism, by Norman Podhoretz
3. Let Freedom Ring: Winning the War of Liberty over Liberalism by Sean Hannity
4. See I Told You So, by Rush Limbaugh

I own a signed copy of Godless that I’ve read three times.

“Andy Stern, the head of the Service Employees International Union, is the union leader who probably best understands the challenge of the world market and the need to make American union members productive in the face of world competition.” – Newt Gingrich
Newt Gingrich Co-Sponsored a Global Warming Bill Calling for ‘International Agreement on Population Growth’

“I would have signed the assault weapon ban that came to his desk. I said I would have supported that and signed a similar bill in our state.” – Mitt Romney 2008
Gun Owners Of America on Mitt Romney

 

I am IN

Jack_Savage (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:14AM EST (link)

What a great idea. Some time ago I made a plea to EPU and others, in the form of a diary, for some books ideas that I could synthesize into a class on basic conservative principles. Well over half the books on your list were in the comments of that diary, and I have bought them and have begun trudging through them.

This will bring some much needed discipline to my work. Awesome.

 

Excellent idea!

shaitra (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:49AM EST (link)

I’ll be reading along too.

 

Count me in!

diakrioi (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 12:18PM EST (link)

I’m in for the same reason I join Bible study groups at church – the group adds a measure of discipline that I don’t muster on my own.

Here is a link to Jonah Goldberg’s thoughts on the subject: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTQ1NDI5NzQ5NmQ5NmVlZjJhMjVlNmYxYzJlNDc5Zjg=

I would add to the list the Federalist Papers, The Law by Frederic Bastiat (short and available free), and Free to Choose by Milton and Rose Friedman.

 

IN!!!

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 12:33PM EST (link)

Although I want to point out, here and now and for the record, that the retorts “markets” and “liberty” are entirely sufficient arguments to rebut fully the manure that the left serves up as intellectual discourse.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

True

aesthete (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 8:40PM EST (link)

“The Road to Serfdom” by itself is a nuclear device to the dull knives that are the intellectual arguments in favor of liberalism.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 

Why am I not surprised?

Bill S (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:05PM EST (link)

I figured you had a hand in this idea – it’s right up your alley!

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Nice tagline, bs -nt

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:51PM EST (link)

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

 
 
 

I hope this venture takes off

DontBanMeBro Tuesday, October 6th at 1:18PM EST (link)

It is a good one. Applause all around.

 

Another must read (or 2)

Matthew Morris (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 1:32PM EST (link)

Thomas Sowell’s “A Conflict of Visions” is extremely profound. It examines what makes a conservative conservative and a liberal liberal, at the rootmost level. In fact, I would argue that it does a spectacular job bridging the gap between a theological perspective of politics and a more sociological one.

Ever wonder why most (ok, pretty much all) serious religious persons (at least of the Judeo-Christian varieties) who are also serious about politics happen to describe themselves as conservatives in the political sense? This book will help you connect those dots too. There is a conflict in two primary visions. One upholds the limitless capabilities of man, the other acknowledges his limitations. (It’s worth noting that the Statists usually believe that it is they themselves that are limitless in capabilities -but, of course, not all the regular folks.)

And if you entertain Mere Christianity being on the list, maybe also consider “Knowledge of the Holy” by A.W. Tozer. Pound for pound that is one of the more dense little books out there. Rarely do people sit down for a prolonged spell and study only the attributes of God. And in my experience this book hits many first time readers like a ton of bricks. I would like to see the reactions of non-believers as well as they read this book. It would be very interesting to see how they respond to such a concentrated, orthodox description of God, as many times the God of their own mind (which they find so easy to dismiss) is rather lacking in comparison.

According to the conservative world view I have adopted, there is no better place to start than here. From God is where it all flows…. and even though a conservative political mind may reject the personal aspect of knowing and being reunited with God, it will still be well served to know more about the ultimate source for principles and virtues which make the world work (as well as it can anyway.) Even if you don’t believe in God the same way you believe the sky looks blue, you can still live and think as if you do.


“I AM WHO I AM”; and He said, “Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”

Ipsum esse subsistens

MrMosis, Tozer's a great author

Warrior (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 9:21PM EST (link)

If you have a firm grounding in actual Christianity, it is almost impossible to be a liberal…just sayin’

“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma

Thanks Warrior

Matthew Morris (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 1:29AM EST (link)

I think that’s pretty much what I was just sayin’ too. But then sometimes something weird happens, like Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton say something that suggests to me that they “get it”. I am not in the business in making judgements, but even so…. it’s quite mind boggling sometimes.


“I AM WHO I AM”; and He said, “Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”

Ipsum esse subsistens

 
 

No, a lot a self-described Christians are anything but conservative.

Achance (Diary) Thursday, October 8th at 8:05AM EST (link)

At the operational level, most of the brand name Prostestant churches and until recently the Catholic Church at all levels in the US were decidedly liberal. It is easy to apply a socialist/communist overlay to a lot of Christian teaching and the Left has done a pretty good job of co-opting much of mainstream Christianity.

In Vino Veritas

Catholics: "Until Recently?"

Joe Cor (Diary) Thursday, October 8th at 8:28AM EST (link)

Not the Catholic Church I know. It’s more like “still, and overwhelmingly.” The Catholic Church has a decidedly socialist mindset, and culture of life issues take a back seat to it. The most stridently pro-abortion members of the House and Senate are predominantly Catholic, but socialist. The Church does nothing about it. (If I hadn’t known already, Obama’s strident pro-abortionism would have lead me to guess he’s probably a Catholic.) Obama received an honorary doctorate from Notre Dame. Seven priests con-celebrated Ted (Senator Abortion) Kennedy’s funeral, and a Catholic Cardinal lavished him with praise at it. Over half of all American Catholics voted for Obama. I’d be interested to know the percentages for priests and bishops, but I’d guess it’s well over half.

At the official level, they've seemed to turn

Achance (Diary) Thursday, October 8th at 8:35AM EST (link)

back to a more conservative stance. I agree with you, though, that in practice, the Catholic Church in the US ranges from liberal to outright socialist/liberationist.

In Vino Veritas

 
 

Thanks Achance

Matthew Morris (Diary) Wednesday, October 21st at 4:15PM EST (link)

but I guess I meant more-so Orthodox Christians as opposed to the broader group of self professed ones. Orthodox doctrine requires an accurate understanding of human nature at the onset- which precludes one from adopting political philosophies built upon an unconstrained vision of man.


“I AM WHO I AM”; and He said, “Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”

Ipsum esse subsistens

 
 
 

I love this idea

Cheryl (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 1:52PM EST (link)

I am in.

“A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America, than the whole force of the common enemy.” –Samuel Adams

“The administrative state has inserted its big paws into our houses, from the toilet bowl to the light socket. Now if it would just stretch those paws from the one to the other at the same time, we might begin to recapture the spirit of ’76.” –Scott Johnson, Powerlineblog.com

 

Great Project & Sowell a Must

javacatsez Tuesday, October 6th at 3:38PM EST (link)

Conservatives must be able to articulate the world view that underlies their ideas. This project is an excellent idea.

I agree that Thomas Sowell’s “A Conflict of Visions” is a must. It is also an excellent place to begin. Read this review by Charles Murray at AEI to see why I say that: http://www.aei.org/article/23586

(“Conflict of Visions” is also available at Audible.com for you other multi-taskers out there.)

Second that

derhoosier (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 3:49PM EST (link)

I’ve no idea how many of Tom Sowell’s books I have, maybe a dozen. Picking any four at random, I got more out of reading them than four years in college.

Cheers, derhoosier

yup

kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 4:19PM EST (link)

Just his two economic books would, if widely read, be the deathknell of economic stupidity and socialism.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 
 

Thomas Sowell is indeed a National Treasure nt

Warrior (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 9:59PM EST (link)

“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma

 
 

Hmmm...Why not include

persiflage Tuesday, October 6th at 3:49PM EST (link)

“On Liberty” by John Stuart Mill. It’s a compact book, though dense with ideas.

“A republic, if you can keep it…” – B. Franklin

second that

kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 4:17PM EST (link)

nt

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 

Please, no John Stuart Mill

Warrior (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 9:46PM EST (link)

Theodore Dalrymple’s “In Praise of Prejudice” describing how Mill’s wrting is indeed a prejudice against prejudice put’s Mill’s work in the dock and convicts it handily. For instance,

“Conformity to any rule is felt as a wound to personal sovereignty, as is the exercise of any authority exterior to that of the ego. Far from settling questions of the rightful exercise of power of one person over another, the attitude engendered by [even] a partial reading of Mill (or handed down as a sort of philosophical rumor) turns all human interactions into questions of power.”

Anyway, Dalrymple (a psuedonymous retired British doctor who healed the physical and emotional wounds of a prison hospital and a UK slum, among other things) has two or three chapters anhialating Mill. Besides, isn’t JSM a hero of the left?

Still, Dalrymple’s “Life at the Bottom”, “Not with a Bang but a Whimper”, “Our Culture: What’s left of it” and other books are highly instructive because they show plainly where Daniel Hannon insists the U.S. surely must not go — into an all powerful, nationalized healthcare, gun-banned, un-Christian, morrally relativistic, post-modern nightmare.

“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma

Maybe Mill, but I'd say only if Art has lead.

The_Gadfly (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:32PM EST (link)

Or someone like him. Studying the enemy and all.

Something in me rebelled against Mill when they tried to teach me that in college. I have the same reaction whenever I try to read Plato as well.

I like Mill's utilitarianism if you consider it in the context

Achance (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:50PM EST (link)

of his being a European Christian. He wouldn’t have felt the need to explain that his philosophy needed to be informed by moral absolutes because nobody in his day would have thought that there were not moral absolutes. The reason the Left likes him is they divorce utilitarianism from morality and get quickly to “if it feels good, do it.”

In Vino Veritas

Okay Art, I'll give him another chance. (nt)

The_Gadfly (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:56PM EST (link)

Also, his philosophy leads to

Warrior (Diary) Saturday, October 10th at 2:58PM EST (link)

every man and woman becoming a sort of Cartesian interpreter of the world, i.e. trying to render every judgement from first principles, a practice which is next to impossible to execute in real ilfe. Not to mention the fact that if everyone has to reinvent the wheel every day, no time will be left for actual knowledge building. (Or anything else, for that matter.)

It also provides a learned segue into post-modern deconstructionism and the susequent assault on our Founding Fathers, not to mention the very tenets of freedom and individual responsibilty, among others, which is so prevelant in today’s neo-socialist academy. It is just such attacks which the left uses to undermine American exceptionalism and makes us, especially our children, suseptible to the cult of personality, i.e. Prez mmmmm Obeyme.

Besides, his contention (in “On Liberty”) that truth can never fully be known (moral absolutes aside for the nonce) is contradictory to the most basic conservative beliefs. Indeed, it was Mill’s father who believed that “moral action could be reduced to a mathematical formula.”

It was only after reading Wordsworth and Coleridge (and after having an existential crisis in the form of a nervous breakdown at age 20) that Mill Jr. attempted to “render radical individualism the most social of creeds and utilitarianism the most individualistic.” He thereby reconciled “the romantic cult of the individual with the puritanical utilitarianism of his father,” basically for his (Mill Jr’s) own sake.

Although rhetorically powerful and therefore highly appealing to the intelligentisia, according to Dalrymple, even a cursory glance at such a contention renders it foolish in the utmost. It revealed a quite “unrealistic view of both human beings and the society in which they lived.”

Philosophical quandaries resolved by handy, yet flawed, rhetorical expedients taken to their logical conclusion are maniacally dangerous to all concerned (think national socialism, communist socialism, etc.) Can you imagine a more “radical individualist” than Obama or a more “moral[ly] utilitarian[istic] policy than the provision of healthcare based on who has the most productive (useful to society) years left?

Unfortunately, most Western social policy can find its roots in Mill, which is the very thing we now strive mightily against. As you point out, without the context of 19th century Christianity, it can easily be, and indeed has been, twisted into a convenient philosophical excuse for license.

I’ve been out of town, thus the delay in my response. Sorry for the inconvenience. (And yes, I was out in the woods with no cell reception, much less internet.)

“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma

 
 
 
 

I can't help but flash to Monty Python

Finrod (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 2:50PM EST (link)

“John Stuart Mill of his own free will of a half a pint of shandy was particularly ill”

Let’s get down to brass tacks here. How much for the ape?

 
 

just finished Letter to Garcia

kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 4:16PM EST (link)

In all I am not that impressed. Yes, what the author says is true, but it is overdone.

I have worked both white collar and blue collar jobs for over 35 years now and I have to say MOST workers I have known do a good job, take some pride in their work, and will go the extra mile. Of course some are lazy and some or stupid, but they don’t last long (unless it is a government or union job).

Now that is not the same thing as initiative, I know that. But let us look at the other side of the story. I have known many stupid, erratic, emotional, or negligent bosses. I have also seen situations where the supervisor was a good guy, but the company had bad and counter productive policies.

It is true that employees should not need any special encouragement to do their jobs. But it is the smart (and rare) supervisor who gives special commendations to those who do their job well. Often, however, it is the loudmouth employee, or the butt kisser who gets the perks.

That, in a nutshell is the greatest problem with socialism. Those who do the most, or best work will not be rewarded, but those who are politically gifted will.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 

Count me in

Warrior (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 6:56PM EST (link)

I’m usually reading two or three books anyway.

However, I can’t believe that clown thought that (socialist type) liberalism has some kind of ringing intellectual argument . I’ve yet to hear one…

Now classical liberalism is different. It is basically what conservatism is now, but I guess we’ll get into that later.

Also, unless it’s been mentioned above, I highly recommend Thomas Sowell’s “The Vision of the Annointed” – a veritable catalogue of leftist failures and philosophical inconsistencies beginning in the first half of the 20th Century (and even before.)

(And sorry, I usually have time to read all the other comments before posting, but not always. Wish I could get paid to do this stuff, but I got to work…)

“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma

 

It's been mentioned

aesthete (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 9:00PM EST (link)

but at least one of Thomas Sowell’s excellent books is a must. I would recommend his book, “Ethnic America”, which recounts and analyzes the story of many of our nation’s immigrant groups in a digestible format, and contains many of the themes found in his other books.

Also, though I’m not his biggest fan and it should really be EPU bringing this up :P , we would be remiss not to have something from Russell Kirk on here.

(BTW, and I ask out of curiosity, but why do you consider Augustine to be “conservative”? Though I haven’t read much from him, my understanding is that he was very statist and reactionary; both being attributes which don’t jive well with American conservatism.)

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 

Here's how I make the reading more

redneck_hippie (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 9:13PM EST (link)

enjoyable. (I’ve read 4 and am 1/2-way through The Road to Serfdom.)

I usually have to read more than one book at a time if one of them is philosophical.

Liberal Fascism, Witness, and Democracy in America are exceptions. They kept me riveted throughout.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

I'll nominate "Reagan in His Own Hand"

The_Gadfly (Diary) Tuesday, October 6th at 11:50PM EST (link)

http://www.amazon.com/Reagan-His-Own-Hand-Revolutionary/dp/0743219384

I bought a hardback copy when it first came out and it is a phenomenal read. Good tonic against the “lacks intellectual heft” people as well. For all their attempts to whitewash their past bile, Reagan was routinely hit with the Hayward criticism the entire time he was in political office*. I think this book demolishes the claim that you need the ivory tower types to establish the fundamentals of your philosophy. I particularly like that the book is published with the edits and omissions from his notes.

You know, I may need to buy another copy since I haven’t been able to find my hardcover.

*It started long before he was President. My mother had an LP entitled “Pat Paulson for President” in which the Smother’s Brothers comedian reprises some of his skits. I particularly remember the one where he is railing against the tv censorship commission:

For instance, I’m allowed to say Ronald Reagan is a lousy actor, but I’m not allowed to say he is a lousy Governor. Which is ridiculous! Everybody knows he’s a great actor.

In his own hand was terrific

Beaglescout (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:52AM EST (link)

I borrowed it from the library, read through all the pieces (though I wanted to take it slowly enough to digest all Reagan’s points), and then read the whole thing again before returning it. That is unusual for me, perhaps unique. Conservative essayists should study this book closely and model their policy essays after the style of Reagan’s talks in this book if they want their message to cross party lines and appeal to Independents, Moderates, and Reagan Democrats.

I’m not sure that it is a book for conservative theory, though, as much as it is a book for conservative popular essayists. Since I am a very minor one of them I think it’s fantastic!

“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”

–Alexander Hamilton
 
 

I'm in!

Beaglescout (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:44AM EST (link)

I’d recommend 5000 Year Leap (yeah I know it’s one of Glenn Beck’s favorites) as an easier introduction to our Constitutional system and the founders than can be found in the Federalist & Anti-Federalist Papers. It is really the Compleat Beginner’s Guide to American Constitutionalism and Limited Government.

By the way, will we be reading just the Federalist Papers, or also the corresponding Anti-Federalist papers as we go through the case for the Constitution?

“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”

–Alexander Hamilton
 

Book Club

ym3393 Wednesday, October 7th at 7:25AM EST (link)

I think this is great idea

One book I would like to add 5000 year leap

 

Another downloadable version

ebmindc Wednesday, October 7th at 7:56AM EST (link)

Barry Goldwater’s “The Conscious of a Conservative” is available in pdf format here http://www.heritage.org/Research/features/PresidentsEssay/PresEssay2004.pdf

 

Great idea

peg_c (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 8:34AM EST (link)

I’m in and will try to keep up.

Hayward’s elitism really rubbed me the wrong way. We need to prove him wrong.

I also vote to add Mark Steyn’s “America Alone” to the pile.

Government cannot be the solution when government is the problem.

 

As a Free State Project activist, I'm in

ct236 (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 8:36AM EST (link)

I’m not a member of the political class, so I have to work for a living, meaning I don’t have a giant amount of time to work tirelessly for expansion of the state and government perks to me. That being said, this is a great idea. Count me in as an activist and self-appointed representative of New Hampshire’s Free State Project.

 

Book club will give me..

rossn Wednesday, October 7th at 9:02AM EST (link)

the added motivation needed to expand my mind through literature. Great idea guys!

 

Book List Now My Christmas List

msgrant7 Wednesday, October 7th at 9:19AM EST (link)

- I currently own only 2 or 3 books on the list, but this will make a great Christmas list for family.

 

Book List Conservative Principles Summary?

msgrant7 Wednesday, October 7th at 9:31AM EST (link)

- Thought: the “Book List” reading lessons could be consolidated into a list of core lessons or conservative principles with links to quotes or key book sections. (e.g. a De Tocqueville quote on why bigger gov’t leads to tyranny.)

 

I am IN!!

AHALgal Wednesday, October 7th at 10:01AM EST (link)

I would love to see:

A separate area of the site

A segment in the next RedState Gathering

A meet-up in Atlanta for the Georgians besides me and Erick who are book reading nerds.

I have most of these and just love them. Thanks for starting this!

 

Sign me up!

dmoyeroh Wednesday, October 7th at 10:15AM EST (link)

Great idea! I’m in!

 

You forgot the anti-federalist papers

astrolite Wednesday, October 7th at 10:48AM EST (link)

Its usually on the same shelf at barnes and nobles, I would recomend A complete copy (including the preamble) of THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION—our first constitution—the origional vision for our country—-finantially inadequate–replaced in 1789 by this one! And to understand “neighborhood organizers” Che Guverra’s Blueprint for a revolution! I translated an origional copy brought from Cuba! But my ex threw it away! It might be available somewhere in english!! It exposes communist methods and goals! Thanks for making available on line those others—I WILL read them too.

MUST READ these also...

cowgirl_from_hell (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:35PM EST (link)

Liberty vs the Tyranny of Socialism by Walter E. Williams
(this one is AMAZING – just bought it yesterday and couldn’t put it down until I was done)

The Revolt of the Masses by Jose’ Ortega y Gasset

The Naked Communist by W. Cleon Skousen

Patriots by James Wesley, Rawles

I know you can get the first 2 @Barnes and Noble, but the others you have to buy on Amazon

 
 

I'm in!!

TxTess (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:08PM EST (link)

I’m a bookaholic and I have tried to get something along these lines going locally, but I don’t know many conservatives in the area. (Austin, TX) I have a few of these in my library and will get the rest as we go along.
Thank you Aaron and Erick! I always learn something knew each time I read a book and discuss it.

Because I walk softly and carry a big Lipstick – Lori_Z at Red State

 

Well Get the magesterial text then: None Dare Call it Treason

Achance (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:40PM EST (link)

By John Stormer, the 1964 version. That one would get you banned from most “polite,” read liberal, company back in the day and was practically a Bible for the Birchers. Nonetheless, the left can’t refute it, they just yell loudly when you point it out. Also, new authoritative scholarship since the fall of the Soviet Union has belied most of the liberal claims that many famous personages weren’t communists or fellow travellers, see, e.g., “Spies” by Haynes, Keller, and Vassilov.

In Vino Veritas

 

s/b reply to cowgirl. Reply to This and I apparently have irreconcilable differences. nt

Achance (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:42PM EST (link)

In Vino Veritas

I think you wrote in a post the other day that you were using IE8

The_Gadfly (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 12:52PM EST (link)

try downloading and installing Firefox.

I've been assimilated into MS Office.

Achance (Diary) Wednesday, October 7th at 1:01PM EST (link)

It is just so handy to flip from program to program and I use all of them, so another browser would pretty much be just for RedState. As long as I clear the history fairly frequently, I can get IE to work.

In Vino Veritas

Hmmm...

The_Gadfly (Diary) Thursday, October 8th at 5:24PM EST (link)

Maybe adjust the settings to a lower threshold?

I’ve been assuming that when you say ‘clear the history’ you mean clearing the local disk cache. I know at least through version 7 IE tended to default to 10% of the disk which these days is way too big. I tend to set it down around 70M. If it is the actual History that you are clearing you should be able to reduce that too.

 
 
 
 

Great idea.

mattikyle Wednesday, October 7th at 3:20PM EST (link)

I definitely want to participate. It is good to believe in what is right, and even better to present it to others with logic.

 

I like this.

mamacee Wednesday, October 7th at 7:14PM EST (link)

I am in especially since I already have 4 of the books and have read 3 of them. I will finally get all the way through the Federalist Papers.

 

Great Idea

andyd (Diary) Tuesday, October 13th at 5:26AM EST (link)

I am in! I am very excited. Some of these books look a little intimidating, but I am excited about reading them.

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

– John Adams

http://politicalfriendsblogs.com
Political debate without the name calling

 

Plaudits on the project.

redneck_hippie (Diary) Saturday, October 24th at 12:01PM EST (link)

Still currently reading Road to Serfdom which will be going back to the library soon. Following Liberal Fascism with The Road would really be an excellent segue both for its concision and its clarity. Although I have sworn off buying any more books until I make room for more, I will be buying The Road to Serfdom.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots