<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wilson Resolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32653</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32653</guid>
		<description>We need leadership and honesty...not sticking with Joe Wilson for telling the truth sticks in the craw but Cao isn&#039;t a RINO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need leadership and honesty&#8230;not sticking with Joe Wilson for telling the truth sticks in the craw but Cao isn&#8217;t a RINO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32642</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32642</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $peciallist</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32638</link>
		<dc:creator>$peciallist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32638</guid>
		<description>&quot;Today&#039;s vote did not censure him, all it did was condemn his action which he has already agreed was wrong. If he had also apologized to the House there&#039;d have been no resolution. &quot;

http://www.rohrabacher.com/drnews.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Today&#8217;s vote did not censure him, all it did was condemn his action which he has already agreed was wrong. If he had also apologized to the House there&#8217;d have been no resolution. &#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.rohrabacher.com/drnews.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32633</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32633</guid>
		<description>add this one to the list:
Bi-Partisan - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/04/30/specters-first-vote-as-democrat-is-to-kill-top-obama-priority/#comment-4964&quot;&gt;again, Bi-Partisanship has really been Democrats joining with Republicans (here)&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/11/mcconnell-folds-on-stimulus/#comment-17937&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/06/03/hoyer-overrules-pelosi-on-ethics/&quot;&gt;(here again) Brian&#039;s Dems join Rep on Ethics issues&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/blog/2009/06/16/good-newsbad-news/#comment-50597&quot;&gt;How 32 D&#039;s joined R&#039;s on HR2346&lt;/a&gt; How about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2009/06/19/bipartisan-resolution-to-stand-with-iranian-dissidents/&quot;&gt;Dem&#039;s join Republicans to stand for FREE Elections in Iran&lt;/a&gt; view too &lt;a href=&quot;http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll477.xml&quot;&gt;the jackACES Act (Clean Energy) 44 Dems Against while only 8 Reps for&lt;/a&gt; another: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/&quot;&gt;12 D&#039;s join R&#039;s (only 7 defections) on Wilson resolution&lt;/a&gt; plus so many other times I don&#039;t have articles links to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>add this one to the list:<br />
Bi-Partisan &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/04/30/specters-first-vote-as-democrat-is-to-kill-top-obama-priority/#comment-4964">again, Bi-Partisanship has really been Democrats joining with Republicans (here)</a> and <a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/11/mcconnell-folds-on-stimulus/#comment-17937">here</a> and <a href="http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/06/03/hoyer-overrules-pelosi-on-ethics/">(here again) Brian&#8217;s Dems join Rep on Ethics issues</a> and <a href="http://www.redstate.com/blog/2009/06/16/good-newsbad-news/#comment-50597">How 32 D&#8217;s joined R&#8217;s on HR2346</a> How about <a href="http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2009/06/19/bipartisan-resolution-to-stand-with-iranian-dissidents/">Dem&#8217;s join Republicans to stand for FREE Elections in Iran</a> view too <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll477.xml">the jackACES Act (Clean Energy) 44 Dems Against while only 8 Reps for</a> another: <a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/">12 D&#8217;s join R&#8217;s (only 7 defections) on Wilson resolution</a> plus so many other times I don&#8217;t have articles links to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32632</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32632</guid>
		<description>I give Cao a pass on this too.  The guy is a one termer unless he works at it.

And lay off Neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Cao a pass on this too.  The guy is a one termer unless he works at it.</p>
<p>And lay off Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeG</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32626</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32626</guid>
		<description>Mark gives away his audio for free at www.marklevinshow.com/audio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark gives away his audio for free at www.marklevinshow.com/audio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dingo</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32625</link>
		<dc:creator>dingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32625</guid>
		<description>What is most surprising to me is that this resolution to censure, which passed, was the same punishment most of these same Democrats wanted to give President Clinton regarding the Monica Lewinsky affair.

In other words, according to the Democrats it is equally bad for a Republican to call the President a liar on the House floor during a presidential speech as it is for a Democrat President to lie about a civil case in court.  

So much for the rule of law.  Go figure.

(Some might argue that it is even worse because Clinton was not officially censured, although I would not agree with this - the Dems didn&#039;t push censure in the Clinton case partly because Clinton had already been censured through the impeachment vote.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is most surprising to me is that this resolution to censure, which passed, was the same punishment most of these same Democrats wanted to give President Clinton regarding the Monica Lewinsky affair.</p>
<p>In other words, according to the Democrats it is equally bad for a Republican to call the President a liar on the House floor during a presidential speech as it is for a Democrat President to lie about a civil case in court.  </p>
<p>So much for the rule of law.  Go figure.</p>
<p>(Some might argue that it is even worse because Clinton was not officially censured, although I would not agree with this &#8211; the Dems didn&#8217;t push censure in the Clinton case partly because Clinton had already been censured through the impeachment vote.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32618</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32618</guid>
		<description>but this vote means nothing...and why there would be twice as many Dems who voted against it as there are Republicans who voted for it... plus 5 more Democrats who abstained...is beyond me!

All I can say is this to the Republicans in Congress...we need to be tit for tat...Republicans need to file petitions to censure every single Democrat who called Wilson names during this debate...and there should never again be a Democrat heckling a Republican President like they did Bush without Republicans filing bills to censure them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but this vote means nothing&#8230;and why there would be twice as many Dems who voted against it as there are Republicans who voted for it&#8230; plus 5 more Democrats who abstained&#8230;is beyond me!</p>
<p>All I can say is this to the Republicans in Congress&#8230;we need to be tit for tat&#8230;Republicans need to file petitions to censure every single Democrat who called Wilson names during this debate&#8230;and there should never again be a Democrat heckling a Republican President like they did Bush without Republicans filing bills to censure them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xasteius</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32616</link>
		<dc:creator>Xasteius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32616</guid>
		<description>Now &lt;a href=&quot;http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147486738&quot;&gt;Pelosi&lt;/a&gt; will apologize for the resolution....(insert laugh track).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now <a href="http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147486738">Pelosi</a> will apologize for the resolution&#8230;.(insert laugh track).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joliefleurs</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32615</link>
		<dc:creator>joliefleurs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32615</guid>
		<description>he was rock solid. He&#039;s very strong on Defense, that&#039;s for sure. The only thing I can think of is that he is a tad pompous, so maybe he truly was upset about the breach of protocol. I can sort of respect that, accept that Congressman Wilson did apologize, twice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he was rock solid. He&#8217;s very strong on Defense, that&#8217;s for sure. The only thing I can think of is that he is a tad pompous, so maybe he truly was upset about the breach of protocol. I can sort of respect that, accept that Congressman Wilson did apologize, twice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mullins</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32614</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32614</guid>
		<description>he&#039;s just in a solid D district.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#8217;s just in a solid D district.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32613</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32613</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32612</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32612</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Impomeni</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32610</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Impomeni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32610</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s got a hard row to hoe to win re-election.  And he&#039;s reliable for Republicans on votes that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s got a hard row to hoe to win re-election.  And he&#8217;s reliable for Republicans on votes that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32609</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32609</guid>
		<description>NOW can we hammer the ones who can&#039;t be counted on to back up one of their own in a meaningless vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOW can we hammer the ones who can&#8217;t be counted on to back up one of their own in a meaningless vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mullins</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32608</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32608</guid>
		<description>http://wp.me/pzyMi-2Y

Yep, racism brought up by a racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://wp.me/pzyMi-2Y</p>
<p>Yep, racism brought up by a racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deano64</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32607</link>
		<dc:creator>deano64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32607</guid>
		<description>I recently moved to Flake&#039;s district from Colorado-yes I left a lot of work to do up there.  It looks like I have work to do here now.  I was just starting to think I might be able to forgive him for not being present for the cap and tax vote.  But now this?  I emailed and called his office and got voice mail.  I will be calling again tomorrow.  I hope we can find  a viable candidate to challenge him in the primary.  Any takers..??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently moved to Flake&#8217;s district from Colorado-yes I left a lot of work to do up there.  It looks like I have work to do here now.  I was just starting to think I might be able to forgive him for not being present for the cap and tax vote.  But now this?  I emailed and called his office and got voice mail.  I will be calling again tomorrow.  I hope we can find  a viable candidate to challenge him in the primary.  Any takers..??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avatar</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32606</link>
		<dc:creator>avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32606</guid>
		<description>What if Joe had thrown his shoes at the President?  Having read the vitriol about the disrespect of the Office of the President here, I&#039;d expect no less than condemnation toward both.  

Like Obama (and the Dem. in whose district I live) I think the censure was stupid.  The hypocrisy of the comments, however, is even stupider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if Joe had thrown his shoes at the President?  Having read the vitriol about the disrespect of the Office of the President here, I&#8217;d expect no less than condemnation toward both.  </p>
<p>Like Obama (and the Dem. in whose district I live) I think the censure was stupid.  The hypocrisy of the comments, however, is even stupider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redtillimdead</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32602</link>
		<dc:creator>redtillimdead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32602</guid>
		<description>This is something he can take back to his district and look good for. Inglis is inexcusable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something he can take back to his district and look good for. Inglis is inexcusable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitehorse</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/15/the-wilson-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32593</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitehorse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=3572#comment-32593</guid>
		<description>These are the two who have ended up on the wrong end of gut-check things like this but have big defenders on the right. 

What from a conservative Republican perspective have they done to deserve such defense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are the two who have ended up on the wrong end of gut-check things like this but have big defenders on the right. </p>
<p>What from a conservative Republican perspective have they done to deserve such defense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

