http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article6822127.ece

The irony of the article, written by a reporter who wasn’t trying to be cute, but simply reporting the conditions as they are in that country, is so thick you could use a knife to cut it.

We get exhausted here trying to battle those who say if we resist anything the left offers up that we are “intolerant and bigoted.” Well if that prevents what happens in the UK from happening here, sign me up and call me Archie Bunker. We are constantly attacked and laughed at by the likes of Couric and Matthews, and called Nazis by politicians with the stripes of Pelosi and Durbin. We watch as the MSM representatives attack men like McDonnell who asked a question twenty years ago that directly highlights what is happening today.

It is tiring and I get it, but the alternative is letting our nation become a walking and talking example of a carnival freak show. Which would suit the gay marchers in San Fran, I get that, but I think destroys the very fiber of a nation.

Just read the article and take the time to list all of the absurdities you find there. For example:

1. A convicted killer and rapist can sue the government for his right to be called a woman and take government funded treatments in order to become one.
2. That is is an accepted concept, by LAW, that this is normal and should be tolerated.
3. That the doctors won’t do the surgery, not because it is bizarre, but because the man/woman, by law has to “live the life” of a woman,
4. Which means he/she must be transferred to a woman’s prison (he/she is after all a murderer and rapist) so she qualifies as “living the life”.
5.She has served her somewhat short term for murder but is “frustrated” about her condition, which makes her a danger to society and preventing release
6. And part of the argument she is using is that her situation is a violation of the EU laws, which the UK must adhere to.
7 And, because of universal healthcare, the taxpayer must fund it ALL!

There is more, but I leave it to you. As I do this message.
Maybe McDonnell was on to something, and maybe the WP should read this before jumping off that PC cliff with the rest of the freak show.

Then ask yourself if we had chosen a more conservative direction what would the world be like now?

Would your kids be better educated and safer? Would your taxes be lower? Would your families be better?

Would you see arguments on whether or not insurance should pay for transgendered operations? On TV, during the day, when young kids are watching? (Try to explain that deal to them using muppets!)

Would the criminals be running loose, or worse be advisers to the President? Would we have ever had to learn the many uses of a cigar tube in the Oval office? Would we have states going bankrupt largely due to special interests and liberal agendas?

Would you, if you could, chose the world I described over the mad house we see today for your kids to live in instead of the bizarro world full of anger, rage, and corruption? (And I’m just talking about Congress and the White House!)

Would you?

A false argument made by the left is that it is a good thing to try everything new and not to do it is narrow minded and bigoted.

The truth is this, “Just because you can, doesn’t always mean you should.” Sometimes it is just a bad idea.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs offered few signs of support at his daily briefing Friday for embattled White House adviser Van Jones, saying only, “He continues to work for the administration.”

Meanwhile, the chairman of the House Republican Conference, Rep. Mike Pence (Ind.), called on Jones to quit or be fired, saying, “His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this administration or the public debate.”

Jones, author of “The Green Collar Economy” and, since March, the special adviser for green jobs at the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), has faced withering criticism from conservatives for weeks over his activist background. Fox News host Glenn Beck has been a leading voice in the criticism. (Notably, Beck’s advertisers are facing boycott calls from a group Jones helped found.)

The article notes that he has faced withering criticism for weeks — and yet this is the first WaPo article on the controversy. Isn’t that strange?

They note that a group that Jones founded is leading a boycott against Glenn Beck and this is the first they have reported on it? Isn’t that rather big news? The boycott has been going on for a couple weeks.

And the article goes on to note that Gibbs said he apologized — what more do you want?

Maybe they can replace the Today show with an all black cast & crew…..

The MSM will stay quiet about Jones as they do not want to step all over the healthcare debate as they did with the townhall coverage.

IF Jones is still around Tuesday after the holiday, it will be up to Congressional Republicans to raise a stink that will force the MSM to quit running interference for Obama.

My bet is: Jones resigns probably Sunday night with little coverage, and the MSM will treat him like a hallucination that was never there.

The could call this endorsement panel the WAPOUAC…

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/09/04/gibbs_offers_little_support_fo.html?wprss=44

Wasn’t the WP the paper that was going to do a “salon” for money for positive coverage in the paper?

Maybe the Creigh Deeds campaign has paid the WP for all of these stories.

The rest of us just have to wonder about what level of Hell is being reserved for its “journalists”.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090904/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_overhaul_senate

WTH?

Overlooking Van Jones is just another in a long string for them – they overlooked dozens of stories on Obama to protect him, puffed Kerry and Gore. Gore they treated with saintly reverence. Just look at how they overlooked the pornographic writings of now Senator Webb (50.1-49 over Allen).

The Examiner is a good alternative, but the GOP needs its own partisan voice in D.C. and other major cities. Can you imagine the political landscape if we could more effectively get our messages out in D.C., NY, Chicago, L.A. and Seattle? There is no reason Illinois, California and Washington should not be red states.