There are several videos like this on Youtube. This one was originally submitted by an Islamic supporter, but you have to wonder what, if any, truth there is to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kKkY5EpVpY

It’s ok to use the word. It’s non-pejorative, in the sense that it is precisely accurate when used to describe the self-destructive behavior we’re seeing in Britain.

Fear is the weapon the Islamist use most effectively, and it works very, very well on timid and submissive populations which don’t have the guts to stand up and shout “NO!”

Which explains why it is still on Youtube. Sad to say that even if you discount for typical Wahhabic hyperbole, exaggeration and disingenuousness, this vid is not far off the mark.

With our depressed housing prices, I wouldn’t be surprised to find hundreds of thousands of non-muslim Brits pouring into the US over the next few years or so. If our job market improves, that trickle could turn into a flood.

They have such a instituted sense of political correctness linked to their “civilized” nature that they are incapable of change.

For example, a number of years ago, we had a London Metro PD commander come here to review a program we were running. He rode with our officers once or twice, talked to the command staff and basically took a look around at our city and our department His only question was “Why are you armed?” (Now our city was full of drug dealing, bank robbing, car jacking felons) We responded it was necessary. He insisted this was the wrong approach. He said, “Why don’t you try to police without weapons?”

I said, “Because none of us want to end up robbed and shoved into the trunks of our own patrol cars. Heck, if we were unarmed out there, we’d be the ONLY ones unarmed.”

He still didn’t get it.

Britain is done for, and just like the band on the deck of the Titanic, they’ll consider it “proper victory for the British way” to stand their with a stiff upper lip while the water laps around their ankles.

Steps

1. Selective use and/or misinterpretation of “freedom of religion”.

2. Introducing Islam as the “Religion of Peace” without going into its main doctrinal details that justify and PROMOTE Jihadism.

3. Introducing Theory of multi-culturalism and World Peace in the mainstream.

4. Formation of small moslem communities.

5. Formation Small NGOs/people’s organization promoting Justice for the Arabs, by aligning with a major political party. This is to protect the young breed of moslem communities (This is the stage of Islamofascism in America. Or worse?)

6. Populating: Building up of numbers to form a political force.

7. Mainstreaming of “secular” Arab communities. (This is the current stage in Great Britain.)

and wallah,

8. Switching back from secular to hardcore Islam again.

8. Political pressure and even black-mailing of the Christian/Secular Government, thus weakening the pillar of its existence. (This is the stage of Paris: Muslim youth mastermining the riots.)

These activities are generally funded by a hidden but highly-coordinated international network that has its roots from Oil-rich Arab nations as its backer.

It can be observed that the liberal, compassionate media for “all citizens of the world” are usually the useful tools.

MULTICULTURALISM is the hidden anti-dote against the current dominance of Christian faith in the West.

… UNLESS CHRISTIANS START TO DEFEND THEIR FAITH.

But that’s what I’ve understood from WND and Pamela. I pray that I’m wrong.

We are NOT that far behind, although we have no doubt will put up more of fight—both figuratively and literally.

On a related note, what exactly are we trying to accomplish in Afghanistan. “Our” side in the war is enacting extreme Sharia-based laws. As you will note from the article below, this was done to win votes (i.e. the perception is that such policies are popular with the voters).

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8204207.stm

If Islamic law ends up trumping secular law in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, our strategy should change to keep a small group of troups to attack terrorist cells and otherwise leave nation building to the inhabitants.

Spencer/LGF rift, I became less of a fan of Spencer, but European appeasement is part of their sad re-enactment of the Chamberlain era.