Left Wing Reporter Can Barely Muster A Credible Defense of Ezekiel Emanuel


Michael Scherer is Time Magazine’s White House Correspondent. Prior to working for Time Magazine, Michael Scherer wrote for a host of left-wing publications including Salon, the Nation, and Mother Jones.

It should be no surprise that Time put an Obama fan in the White House to serve as an Obama apologist. And it should be no surprise that Scherer would try to apologize for Ezekiel Emanuel, the man whose advice is rapidly leading us to a country that balances its budget with assisted suicide.

What should be surprising is just how poorly Michael Scherer is able to defend Ezekiel Emanuel, Rahm’s brother.

One particularly egregious misrepresentation of the legislation is this passage from Scherer’s article:

The health-care bill that recently passed the House does not contain, as some have suggested, any provisions that would deny treatment to the elderly, infirm or disabled like Sola’s son. One provision allows doctors to be reimbursed for voluntary discussions of so-called living wills with patients, but does not in any way threaten to deny treatment to dying patients against their will.

Sure, a doctor will be reimbursed for “voluntary discussions”, but a senior citizen will go through these discussions every five years minimum.

Then there is this bit about Betsy McCaughey whose article in the New York Post exposed Emanuel:

In her Post article, McCaughey paints the worst possible image of Emanuel, quoting him, for instance, endorsing age discrimination for health-care distribution, without mentioning that he was only addressing extreme cases like organ donation, where there is an absolute scarcity of resources.

Note the slight of hand. What Scherer does not mention is that the Democrats’ healthcare plan will expand the scarcity of resources to more than “extreme cases like organ donation.” We see this already in socialized medicine countries like Britain and Canada where long lines and long waiting lists mean more and more people die without getting life saving treatment.

We also see it in places like Oregon where people are referred to assisted-suicide specialists because the state won’t cough up the money to pay for treatments.

She notes that he has criticized medical culture for trying to do everything for a patient, “regardless of the cost or effects on others,” without making clear that he was not speaking of lifesaving care but of treatments with little demonstrated value.

Put another way — and the way Michael Scherer and Ezekiel Emanuel would prefer you not to think about — McCaughey pointed out that Emanuel was talking about treatments with some demonstrated value, but not enough value to, in his opinion, be worth the state spending money.

In a January 2009, Ezekiel Emanuel wrote a white paper that health care should be rationed in a way that “promot[es] and reward[s] social usefulness.” An older person, however useful and valuable to a family, may not have social usefulness. In those cases? Emanuel would deny the senior citizen treatment.

No one is saying that Obama wants to shoot granny. Obama and Ezekiel Emanuel want granny to shoot herself when she becomes, according to government bureaucrats, a burden on the state.


RSS feed

12 Comments Leave a comment

Dr. Emanuel's Article in The Lancet

Ausonius (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 6:26PM EST (link)

which I mentioned today in my diary entry on him (q.v.) explains his attitude on this.

“Complete Lives” is the Orwellian/Huxleyan term for his view.

See:

http://www.redstate.com/ausonius/

Ausonius: 310-395 A.D. Teacher, Poet, Consul, General, Farmer.

Personal Tutor to the future St. Paulinus of Nola and to young Gratian, heir to the throne during the turbulent final years of the Western Roman Empire. When his former student Gratian was assassinated, Ausonius threw up his hands and retired to his farm in Gaul. Rome was captured by barbarians 14 years after his death.

Cato@rock.com

 

It's the approach that matters.

billyoblivion Wednesday, August 12th at 6:30PM EST (link)

There is a BIG difference between scheduling an appointment to discuss “Death with Dignity” and having a HCP discuss creating an “advanced medical directive” or “living will”.

Dying with dignity means refusing a blindfold, not meekly accepting the dictates of ones betters.

 

Scherer also says "health-care bill that recently passed the House"

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 6:34PM EST (link)

What a dolt.

A wishful-thinking dolt.

IIRC, it’s been voted out of 2 of the 3 committees it has to traverse. It has not “recently passed the House”.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

 

The one thing

10ksnooker (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 7:31PM EST (link)

That the town hall meet ups have taught me is how uninformed the congressional clunkers really are, and how lacking in reading comprehension they seem to be.

I assume they thought there were not Americans left who could read and comprehend the gobble gook in the House bill. They were wring. Maybe that’s why they want to kill off the old folks.

 

Does this not promote the unauthorized practice of law by doctors?

ddstrain (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 7:39PM EST (link)

Not an expert on the topic, but I would tend to think that providing advice on a living will or health care directive for compensation, would violate the laws of more than a handful of states.

Yes?

Sounds like doctors who do this will need another layer of malpractice insurance.

 

Mooooooooo

Robert A. Hahn (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 7:41PM EST (link)

One can understand a lot about liberals by merely observing the various ways they try to practice animal husbandry on human beings.

From making sure we eat our spinach to euthanizing us when we’ve “outlived our usefulness,” the Democrats are always thinking of us as barnyard animals.

Drink Good Coffee. You can sleep when you’re dead.

 

Medical Ethics

ss396 Wednesday, August 12th at 7:46PM EST (link)

Emmanuel’s article in the Lancet was an evaluation of the varied ethical considerations attendant to medical treatment in the face of insufficient, or even scarce, resources.

But among the eight applications that he discussed, he never addressed the single, most important ethical consideration – that all life is precious. Every consideration that he made had the underlying premise of someone making a value judgment to the worth of the life of the person confronting the doctor. Every one of them was an attempt to bring a rationalized answer to the question “is this person worth it?”

Every one of his considerations deemed some lives to be more valuable than others. And this value was determined by social worth and social investment. It really had nothing to do with life as life; only life as social worth. Life, per se, is not of any value in and of itself, he proclaims.

That assignment of lesser worth is the fundamental rationale for every genocide, for every enslavement, for every denial of equal right. If you do not have equal worth, you do not have equal rights. It is just that simple. Mr. Emmanuel’s arguments work as nicely for someone who wishes to justify slavery, or untermenschen, or caste. And that (yes, ex-Gov. Palin) is evil.

If you pay someone to sit on his butt, you can’t be surprised when he does.

The Phony Choice in Dr. Emanuel's Article

Ausonius (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 9:57PM EST (link)

is that there cannot be enough medical care to go around: note how he mentions specifically the UK system.

You are quite right: everything in the article is geared to force a choice where people are graded other than by their intrinsic humanity.

What is monstrous is the language of bureaucratic nonchalance used to mask such an opinion.

Ausonius: 310-395 A.D. Teacher, Poet, Consul, General, Farmer.

Personal Tutor to the future St. Paulinus of Nola and to young Gratian, heir to the throne during the turbulent final years of the Western Roman Empire. When his former student Gratian was assassinated, Ausonius threw up his hands and retired to his farm in Gaul. Rome was captured by barbarians 14 years after his death.

Cato@rock.com

Read the Article by Dr. Emanuel from The Lancet

Ausonius (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 10:01PM EST (link)

The link is here:

http://www.redstate.com/ausonius/

Ausonius: 310-395 A.D. Teacher, Poet, Consul, General, Farmer.

Personal Tutor to the future St. Paulinus of Nola and to young Gratian, heir to the throne during the turbulent final years of the Western Roman Empire. When his former student Gratian was assassinated, Ausonius threw up his hands and retired to his farm in Gaul. Rome was captured by barbarians 14 years after his death.

Cato@rock.com

 
 

Good post, ss396

redneck_hippie (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 10:12PM EST (link)

The leftists are doing themselves major harm the longer this debate goes on because their ideological skeletons are being thrust out into the stark light of day.

BTW, mine was a ’69, white, 3 speed, with a special-ordered sedan body for street race stalking.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 
 

Rage against the dying of the light

fisk2521 Wednesday, August 12th at 9:23PM EST (link)

“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

What words do these people not understand??? Life is God given, unalienable not to be taken away from anyone … not Terri Shiavo, not babies in the wombs, not the elderly at the end of their lives. It is the most personal thing a human being can own, and only they can decide when to give up…not their husband, nor their children nor their siblings…no one. Respect for that right for every individual should be basic to a decent society. those societies that have no regard for all life represent the very worst in us.

Obama’s is duplicitous, he lies and then denies what he said. He certainly does mean to make decisions or nondeicisons about all of our lives. He has not respect or caring for our fundamental rights as Americans.

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Dylan Thomas

LDavis

 

Meanwhile support out in the country

redneck_hippie (Diary) Wednesday, August 12th at 9:54PM EST (link)

has dropped like a stone. And I heard today Obama flat-out lied, saying that the bill does not allow payment for abortions.

Unless the bill restricts abortion funding, then it is allowed. And this guy has a law degree and a phalanx of legal advisors. Almost makes me believe he’s lying in order to get passage. Nah that couldn’t be it.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots