<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama at Waterloo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OccamsRazor</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27618</link>
		<dc:creator>OccamsRazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27618</guid>
		<description>This proposed bill will wipe everybody out. Upwards of 103 million people will be forced to take watered down healthcare they really don&#039;t want; and which by it&#039;s very nature is inefficient,  and this will affect voters on both sides. If passed, the democrats will outright, point blank OWN the worst economic and legislative decision in history. 

  As people suffer more and more and have more time living with their parents/siblings while jobless they will have plenty of time to contemplate who is at fault for the distaster...and the democrats know this. If this passes, which I don&#039;t expect it to, they will be bigger fools than I imagined. The fact that this is being framed as BO&#039;s Waterloo in paralell with building momentum against the bill, is outright great fortune. His ego is too big to admit to himself that he&#039;s wrong on anything, so he&#039;s emotionally and personally trapped. He isn&#039;t self reflective enough to wisely retreat for better timing. This may cost him a second term. Course, he&#039;s also caught in the fact that if he&#039;s ineffectual in reality as POTUS, then that also affects his chances of a second term. I&#039;m giddy.

I agree with EPU in the fact that we must not waiver now and not relax. Let&#039;s at worst stop this afront to our very basic of Freedoms and at best overrun the entire democratic army in a rout. Let&#039;s keep up the pressure RedState.

   or</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This proposed bill will wipe everybody out. Upwards of 103 million people will be forced to take watered down healthcare they really don&#8217;t want; and which by it&#8217;s very nature is inefficient,  and this will affect voters on both sides. If passed, the democrats will outright, point blank OWN the worst economic and legislative decision in history. </p>
<p>  As people suffer more and more and have more time living with their parents/siblings while jobless they will have plenty of time to contemplate who is at fault for the distaster&#8230;and the democrats know this. If this passes, which I don&#8217;t expect it to, they will be bigger fools than I imagined. The fact that this is being framed as BO&#8217;s Waterloo in paralell with building momentum against the bill, is outright great fortune. His ego is too big to admit to himself that he&#8217;s wrong on anything, so he&#8217;s emotionally and personally trapped. He isn&#8217;t self reflective enough to wisely retreat for better timing. This may cost him a second term. Course, he&#8217;s also caught in the fact that if he&#8217;s ineffectual in reality as POTUS, then that also affects his chances of a second term. I&#8217;m giddy.</p>
<p>I agree with EPU in the fact that we must not waiver now and not relax. Let&#8217;s at worst stop this afront to our very basic of Freedoms and at best overrun the entire democratic army in a rout. Let&#8217;s keep up the pressure RedState.</p>
<p>   or</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mullins</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27617</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27617</guid>
		<description>I was thinking of a lot of things and pulling up antietah as well as other bloody battles. I&#039;m reminded in the fact that it only toke 18 min to defeat Santa Anna(with a demoralized and not big on fighting).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of a lot of things and pulling up antietah as well as other bloody battles. I&#8217;m reminded in the fact that it only toke 18 min to defeat Santa Anna(with a demoralized and not big on fighting).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alicelouise</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27616</link>
		<dc:creator>alicelouise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27616</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to pop the champagne now, but, it is still too early.  I agree that Obama does not have the political instincts of Bill Clinton.  Some of his staff may have savvy and advise Obama to do what is politically necessary to survive.  For Bill Clinton it was sacrificing Democrat majorities in the House and Senate to keep himself in office.  The economy upticked in the mid 1990s as well.  Obama may not have those fortunate circumstances.

I have read this in other websites. BO seems to be more the turtle on the fence post.  He is a true believer, mind you, he&#039;s no kindhearted Tsar who if he just knew what was going on...you know the rest.  He is at best book smart.  It was not lost on many people that he had 1 million dollar plus night on the town with his wife on the tax payer dime.  Obama is more akin to Marie Antoinette than Napoleon Bonaparte with his political instincts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to pop the champagne now, but, it is still too early.  I agree that Obama does not have the political instincts of Bill Clinton.  Some of his staff may have savvy and advise Obama to do what is politically necessary to survive.  For Bill Clinton it was sacrificing Democrat majorities in the House and Senate to keep himself in office.  The economy upticked in the mid 1990s as well.  Obama may not have those fortunate circumstances.</p>
<p>I have read this in other websites. BO seems to be more the turtle on the fence post.  He is a true believer, mind you, he&#8217;s no kindhearted Tsar who if he just knew what was going on&#8230;you know the rest.  He is at best book smart.  It was not lost on many people that he had 1 million dollar plus night on the town with his wife on the tax payer dime.  Obama is more akin to Marie Antoinette than Napoleon Bonaparte with his political instincts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aetius728</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27615</link>
		<dc:creator>Aetius728</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27615</guid>
		<description>or sticking with the Napoleon theme, Trafalgar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or sticking with the Napoleon theme, Trafalgar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27614</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27614</guid>
		<description>nt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: civil_truth</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27613</link>
		<dc:creator>civil_truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27613</guid>
		<description>Even if we can stop the Obama offensive at ObamaCare, he&#039;s still got a lot of forces and large majorities in Congress. So it&#039;s not like he would need to surrender if he loses this battle.

While we may be able to stop the advances and perhaps define his high-water mark, we will face many more battles before we could talk about his power being broken. Especially since we&#039;re the side with inferior strength at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if we can stop the Obama offensive at ObamaCare, he&#8217;s still got a lot of forces and large majorities in Congress. So it&#8217;s not like he would need to surrender if he loses this battle.</p>
<p>While we may be able to stop the advances and perhaps define his high-water mark, we will face many more battles before we could talk about his power being broken. Especially since we&#8217;re the side with inferior strength at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aetius728</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27612</link>
		<dc:creator>Aetius728</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27612</guid>
		<description>political death after HillaryCare among other things?  It wasn&#039;t exactly his Waterloo.

I do think that the situation is somewhat different now however.  It is unlikely that the economy will improve like it did in the 90&#039;s, and I believe that Obama does not have the political instincts of Bill Clinton is to wedded to liberal ideology  to reinvent himself as a centrist. 

I think handing him a defeat on healthcare would be extremely gratifying and damaging, not to mention good for the country, but I think that all this talk of the Waterloo of a presidency that is only six months old is a little silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>political death after HillaryCare among other things?  It wasn&#8217;t exactly his Waterloo.</p>
<p>I do think that the situation is somewhat different now however.  It is unlikely that the economy will improve like it did in the 90&#8242;s, and I believe that Obama does not have the political instincts of Bill Clinton is to wedded to liberal ideology  to reinvent himself as a centrist. </p>
<p>I think handing him a defeat on healthcare would be extremely gratifying and damaging, not to mention good for the country, but I think that all this talk of the Waterloo of a presidency that is only six months old is a little silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swamp_Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27610</link>
		<dc:creator>Swamp_Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27610</guid>
		<description>Work through recess:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/pelosi-to-senate-were-not_n_243086.html

or do you have the votes now:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090722/D99JMIVO1.html

I cant stand her, but she&#039;s a feisty old plastic hag. I think she&#039;s posturing for confidence and momentum. But she is dogged and the House Dems are wimps.

We need to rally all Republicans and pick off some endangered Demcorats, deficit hawks and pro-lifers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work through recess:</p>
<p>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/pelosi-to-senate-were-not_n_243086.html</p>
<p>or do you have the votes now:</p>
<p>http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090722/D99JMIVO1.html</p>
<p>I cant stand her, but she&#8217;s a feisty old plastic hag. I think she&#8217;s posturing for confidence and momentum. But she is dogged and the House Dems are wimps.</p>
<p>We need to rally all Republicans and pick off some endangered Demcorats, deficit hawks and pro-lifers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peg_c</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27608</link>
		<dc:creator>peg_c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27608</guid>
		<description>God willing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God willing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E Pluribus Unum</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27607</link>
		<dc:creator>E Pluribus Unum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27607</guid>
		<description>Mainly because Bambi did not (and will not) withdraw when he should have.   Santa Ana is a better one.  I confess to not having all that much knowledge about the Napoleonic campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mainly because Bambi did not (and will not) withdraw when he should have.   Santa Ana is a better one.  I confess to not having all that much knowledge about the Napoleonic campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E Pluribus Unum</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27606</link>
		<dc:creator>E Pluribus Unum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27606</guid>
		<description>I could not speak to the &quot;ambush&quot; aspect of it (I think Bambi is too proud to willingly give the impression of a weakness, even in subterfuge).

But this deal is dead.  It is dead because almost all 535 members of Congress will be going home for a large part of August.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not speak to the &#8220;ambush&#8221; aspect of it (I think Bambi is too proud to willingly give the impression of a weakness, even in subterfuge).</p>
<p>But this deal is dead.  It is dead because almost all 535 members of Congress will be going home for a large part of August.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azaeroprof</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27605</link>
		<dc:creator>azaeroprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27605</guid>
		<description>I may be paranoid (please, God, let that be the case!), but I smell a trap here.  This has all been set up that the ship is sinking and Obama is going to make one last gasp to right it.  His last minute plea will be gloriously worshipped by the lapdog media (see NeoKong&#039;s comment above), some backroom deal will be struck, and just enough &quot;moderate&quot; Dems will come on board.  Obama will be declared the SAVIOUR of healthcare.

Please please PLEASE let me be wrong!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be paranoid (please, God, let that be the case!), but I smell a trap here.  This has all been set up that the ship is sinking and Obama is going to make one last gasp to right it.  His last minute plea will be gloriously worshipped by the lapdog media (see NeoKong&#8217;s comment above), some backroom deal will be struck, and just enough &#8220;moderate&#8221; Dems will come on board.  Obama will be declared the SAVIOUR of healthcare.</p>
<p>Please please PLEASE let me be wrong!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheetah772</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27604</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheetah772</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27604</guid>
		<description>Remember that while Borodino was technically a stalemate, Russian Amry did withdraw to preserve its combat strength, this was the last offensive action Napoleon undertook during his Russian invasion.  Unlike Russians, we should and must continue fighting Obama as much as we can.

So, even if Obama does win, he&#039;ll have spent significant portions of political capital to get what he wants, and he won&#039;t have enough left to do anything for a long time.  And we all know that even if the bill gets passed, the cost won&#039;t stay at $1 trillion, it will climb and climb, eventually disgusting just about everybody except for Obama and Democrats.  That will be his downfall and the end of Democratic Terror regime.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that while Borodino was technically a stalemate, Russian Amry did withdraw to preserve its combat strength, this was the last offensive action Napoleon undertook during his Russian invasion.  Unlike Russians, we should and must continue fighting Obama as much as we can.</p>
<p>So, even if Obama does win, he&#8217;ll have spent significant portions of political capital to get what he wants, and he won&#8217;t have enough left to do anything for a long time.  And we all know that even if the bill gets passed, the cost won&#8217;t stay at $1 trillion, it will climb and climb, eventually disgusting just about everybody except for Obama and Democrats.  That will be his downfall and the end of Democratic Terror regime.  <img src='http://www.redstate.com/erick/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E Pluribus Unum</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27603</link>
		<dc:creator>E Pluribus Unum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27603</guid>
		<description>After his Asculum, he saw he did not have the winning hand, and went home with his army to fight another time.

Bambi&#039;s Asculum was Porkulus.  He is bogged down with Crap-n-Tax halfway passed, and his political capital has already been drained too far to win with BambiCare.

He&#039;s done.  D. O. N. E.

Which doesn&#039;t mean we sit back and watch it happen.  It means we rally and overwhelm the whole Democrat Army.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After his Asculum, he saw he did not have the winning hand, and went home with his army to fight another time.</p>
<p>Bambi&#8217;s Asculum was Porkulus.  He is bogged down with Crap-n-Tax halfway passed, and his political capital has already been drained too far to win with BambiCare.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s done.  D. O. N. E.</p>
<p>Which doesn&#8217;t mean we sit back and watch it happen.  It means we rally and overwhelm the whole Democrat Army.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheetah772</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27600</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheetah772</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27600</guid>
		<description>It is indeed high time for us to reduce Obama to what he is really: an empty suit.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we&#039;re going to destroy Obama once for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed high time for us to reduce Obama to what he is really: an empty suit.</p>
<p>Ladies and Gentlemen, we&#8217;re going to destroy Obama once for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spartan4Life</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27599</link>
		<dc:creator>Spartan4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27599</guid>
		<description>After this stupid house healthcare bill gets rightfully whacked, maybe the Dems will figure out it IS the economy, STUPIDS!

The American people want to see some economic growth, job creation, and fiscal reponsibility before getting loaded up with a $2T entitlement program.

Their timing is horrid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After this stupid house healthcare bill gets rightfully whacked, maybe the Dems will figure out it IS the economy, STUPIDS!</p>
<p>The American people want to see some economic growth, job creation, and fiscal reponsibility before getting loaded up with a $2T entitlement program.</p>
<p>Their timing is horrid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmjune</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27597</link>
		<dc:creator>nmjune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27597</guid>
		<description>While everyone is distracted by Healthcare and Cap&amp;Tax, Obama slips another major boondoggle through that destroys 1st Amendment rights.  
http://is.gd/1HYil 

The latest Obama crackdown is taming &quot;an unruly blogosphere&quot; —the next nail in the coffin of the First Amendment through government control and censorship. Obama appoints someone who believes  government ought to “gently force people to be better human beings.” 

We are now swimming in dangerous waters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While everyone is distracted by Healthcare and Cap&amp;Tax, Obama slips another major boondoggle through that destroys 1st Amendment rights.<br />
http://is.gd/1HYil </p>
<p>The latest Obama crackdown is taming &#8220;an unruly blogosphere&#8221; —the next nail in the coffin of the First Amendment through government control and censorship. Obama appoints someone who believes  government ought to “gently force people to be better human beings.” </p>
<p>We are now swimming in dangerous waters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27595</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27595</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing the president of my country literally become unhinged. He&#039;s made a lot of promises, he&#039;s backtracked or &quot;corrected&quot; himself on his issues (&quot;no, no, no, the stimulus wasn&#039;t meant to spur economic growth, it&#039;s a 2-year plan that&#039;s working as expected&quot;), and right now he&#039;s weak and vulnerable. The GOP and we the people need to continue holding his and the Dem&#039;s feet to the fire on this and make those who think any part of this is a good idea know that any public plan will destroy our economy and our freedom. I&#039;m encouraged by the clips I&#039;ve heard (barring the &quot;birthers&quot; :) ) from the various town meetings where Americans are rightfully angry and making their voices heard.

However, I keep hearing that the fact that Obama and the dems are forced to slow down on this is a good thing. I&#039;ve got to disagree. With Obama &amp; Co. force feeding this and pressing the August deadline, the American people are cautious and tired of hearing him and there are Dems on Capitol Hill that are questioning it. 

My fear is, with them slowing this down, it gives those pushing this the opportunity to calculate and revise the bill in such a way that appeals to Dems who are wary and unlikely to vote for it now, and, heaven forbid, they&#039;re able to pull some from our side with some watered down &quot;bi-partisan&quot; version.

It&#039;s a dangerous time right now, and I pray that we who oppose this disaster-in-waiting continue to fight and fight hard till we have none left in us and the idea of government-run health care is a lifeless corpse on the House floor.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing the president of my country literally become unhinged. He&#8217;s made a lot of promises, he&#8217;s backtracked or &#8220;corrected&#8221; himself on his issues (&#8220;no, no, no, the stimulus wasn&#8217;t meant to spur economic growth, it&#8217;s a 2-year plan that&#8217;s working as expected&#8221;), and right now he&#8217;s weak and vulnerable. The GOP and we the people need to continue holding his and the Dem&#8217;s feet to the fire on this and make those who think any part of this is a good idea know that any public plan will destroy our economy and our freedom. I&#8217;m encouraged by the clips I&#8217;ve heard (barring the &#8220;birthers&#8221; <img src='http://www.redstate.com/erick/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) from the various town meetings where Americans are rightfully angry and making their voices heard.</p>
<p>However, I keep hearing that the fact that Obama and the dems are forced to slow down on this is a good thing. I&#8217;ve got to disagree. With Obama &amp; Co. force feeding this and pressing the August deadline, the American people are cautious and tired of hearing him and there are Dems on Capitol Hill that are questioning it. </p>
<p>My fear is, with them slowing this down, it gives those pushing this the opportunity to calculate and revise the bill in such a way that appeals to Dems who are wary and unlikely to vote for it now, and, heaven forbid, they&#8217;re able to pull some from our side with some watered down &#8220;bi-partisan&#8221; version.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a dangerous time right now, and I pray that we who oppose this disaster-in-waiting continue to fight and fight hard till we have none left in us and the idea of government-run health care is a lifeless corpse on the House floor&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeoKong</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27594</link>
		<dc:creator>NeoKong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27594</guid>
		<description>Obama is going to point his finger at America tonight and lie right through his teeth to America tonight as the state run media give him &lt;i&gt;another&lt;/i&gt; prime time special to hawk his health deform plan. (no typo)
Are we going to hear all about the mean and evil wapubwicans who are causing pregnant mothers to die in the streets or stories of little sick children whose parents must choose between food and medicine to keep them alive.
Obama and his media cohorts will be absolutely shameless tonight in their dishonesty.
&lt;i&gt;&quot;The President really needed to connect with the people tonight Andrea. Do you think he made the sale...?
  Oh absolutely Brian.  He hit it out of the park as many Americans who are desperate for health care and the President&#039;s plan support him by 70%.  All the polls indicate a very strong backlash against Republicans if they try to deny sick people their medicine. 
 Andrea...I just don&#039;t get it.  Why would Republicans want people to die? 
 I don&#039;t know Brian.  It could be because they don&#039;t care about the poor as much as the President does. 
 Yes Andrea.  He certainly does.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

The people have already heard about what is in his bill and they want nothing to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is going to point his finger at America tonight and lie right through his teeth to America tonight as the state run media give him <i>another</i> prime time special to hawk his health deform plan. (no typo)<br />
Are we going to hear all about the mean and evil wapubwicans who are causing pregnant mothers to die in the streets or stories of little sick children whose parents must choose between food and medicine to keep them alive.<br />
Obama and his media cohorts will be absolutely shameless tonight in their dishonesty.<br />
<i>&#8220;The President really needed to connect with the people tonight Andrea. Do you think he made the sale&#8230;?<br />
  Oh absolutely Brian.  He hit it out of the park as many Americans who are desperate for health care and the President&#8217;s plan support him by 70%.  All the polls indicate a very strong backlash against Republicans if they try to deny sick people their medicine.<br />
 Andrea&#8230;I just don&#8217;t get it.  Why would Republicans want people to die?<br />
 I don&#8217;t know Brian.  It could be because they don&#8217;t care about the poor as much as the President does.<br />
 Yes Andrea.  He certainly does.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>The people have already heard about what is in his bill and they want nothing to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swamp_Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/22/obama-at-waterloo/comment-page-1/#comment-27593</link>
		<dc:creator>Swamp_Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2635#comment-27593</guid>
		<description>I agree this is a watermark moment. His number will never be as high as they have been and he is pretty much accomplished squat.

Next summer, Congress will be concerned about their own arses. Next fall, they wont even be in session.

In some form, the Dems hoped to accomplish Universal Health Care, Cap and Tax, Amnesty, Card Check, Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell reversal and more l before 2010. Never going to happen. Not even close.

My one quibble is that we should make this Obama&#039;s moment. If we make this a Republican versus Democrat moment, we may galvanize party loyalties and push some wobbly Dems back in line. We can win, but unfortunately, we can’t do it alone.  We can smash the Dems with it in 2010 and 2012, but before the vote we probably shouldn’t being throwing stones at the pro-life Democrats and the budget hawk Democrats that we will need to sink this legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree this is a watermark moment. His number will never be as high as they have been and he is pretty much accomplished squat.</p>
<p>Next summer, Congress will be concerned about their own arses. Next fall, they wont even be in session.</p>
<p>In some form, the Dems hoped to accomplish Universal Health Care, Cap and Tax, Amnesty, Card Check, Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell reversal and more l before 2010. Never going to happen. Not even close.</p>
<p>My one quibble is that we should make this Obama&#8217;s moment. If we make this a Republican versus Democrat moment, we may galvanize party loyalties and push some wobbly Dems back in line. We can win, but unfortunately, we can’t do it alone.  We can smash the Dems with it in 2010 and 2012, but before the vote we probably shouldn’t being throwing stones at the pro-life Democrats and the budget hawk Democrats that we will need to sink this legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

