Comments on: The Greatest Thing Ever Written About Ruth Bader Ginsburg

By: mfdegs

mfdegs — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:01:51 +0000

… who ends sentences with prepositions? That is the worst thing ever written BY Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

By: kyle8

kyle8 — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:01:53 +0000

I like him even better than Rush when he fills in. Walter Williams too.

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:00:04 +0000

golfing or some such thing. I suspect he’ll be all over this next week when he returns.

By: NightTwister

NightTwister — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:57:13 +0000

Certainly God will deal with her, but I wouldn’t dare suggest how.

By: antisocial

antisocial — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:24:26 +0000

Eugenics…. Progressives….. Superior race..

We have such perverted minds on supreme court. How can this be? I don’t know how I feel about this….. stoned….. don’t know really.

By: Jack_Savage

Jack_Savage — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:00:44 +0000

I could not help but think of Sanger when I read this – her evil philosphy permeates the pro-abortionists.

The reasoning behind Roe v Wade is on par with forced sterilization and other atrocities condoned by our government. It is a relic of an era when those considered beneath the elitists were sterilized or their babies aborted for “their own good”. They even did it to their own at times – Joseph Kennedy had the daughter that didn’t quite measure up lobotomized to calm her down, and she recently died where she lived her life after that moment – being cared for in a nursing home, far outside the reach of her family.

By: Repair_Man_Jack

Repair_Man_Jack — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:56:48 +0000

I have no desire to hate liberals. I just find that they inspire that hatred. It’s hard. I really want to be fair. As an ORSA and a Cost Analyst, I’m expected to believe lots of impossible feke before breakfast and always try and at least understand oppossing views.

The more I understand this statement, the more I want to summon this woman’s inner child and beat its amoral, evil, bullying little @$$!

By: izoneguy

izoneguy — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:51:37 +0000

Starting in 2011 when a new Congress is seated.

By: Menlo

Menlo — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:39:19 +0000

As you recall, she didn’t want word to get out on the true motives and agenda of Planned Parenthood. The Roe court complied with a big pack of lies built on lies.

Ginsburg’s statement seems to correlate well with the recent release of Richard Nixon’s response to the Roe ruling when it was handed down. The eugenics motive is undeniable.

By: Menlo

Menlo — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:39:19 +0000

As you recall, she didn’t want word to get out on the true motives and agenda of Planned Parenthood. The Roe court complied with a big pack of lies built on lies.

Ginsburg’s statement seems to correlate well with the recent release of Richard Nixon’s response to the Roe ruling when it was handed down. The eugenics motive is undeniable.

By: ciscoguy

ciscoguy — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:36:55 +0000

Many of us Catholics, who are supposed to uphold values over economic interests (though I suspect many are now regretting their votes for those reasons), elected the most morally bankrupt president in US history. Welcome to the club.

By: BillM

BillM — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:21:53 +0000

Ginsburg’s interviewer, Emily Bazelon (granddaughter iirc of David Bazelon, a 60′s DCC judge who ruled that a man pounding on the door of a closed business at night with a gun in his hand can’t be presumed to be a robber & that mentally patients have the rights to refuse medication and sleep on the streets) also recently reviewed the following book: http://www.slate.com/id/2222028/

“At the end of his uncompromisingly critical appraisal of the Supreme Court, James MacGregor Burns issues a challenge to the high bench that could make the justices fall right off it. In Packing the Court, Burns imagines a president—he hopes this president—leading Congress to pass progressive legislation that amounts to a new New Deal. If a “hostile” Supreme Court then struck down such a compact, the president, Burns proposes, should refuse to obey the court. The president “would flatly announce that he or she would not accept the Supreme Court’s verdicts because the power of judicial emasculation of legislation was not—and never has been—in the Constitution.” ”

Mindboggling. So it would’ve been fine for Nixon not to “accept” Roe, Bush I not to “accept” Casey, W not to “accept” Lawrence, etc. I guess Clinton not “accepting” Bush v Gore would’ve been fine though.

One thing you have to give the libs credit for, they’re being very honest with their plans.

As for Ruthie and those icky people who should be aborted, where are FOX News & GOP Senators? Will Rush lead off tomorrow with this?

By: Scope

Scope — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:55:48 +0000

is that better?

By: Joe_Cor

Joe_Cor — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:28:44 +0000

Gerald Ford was part of an effort to impeach Earl Warren. Perhaps some Republican Congresspeople should revive the idea for Ginsberg. It seems a gross violation of jurisprudence to view the Supreme Court as an instrument for furthering the cause of eugenics. At the very least, perhaps such an effort could help enlighten the public on the mentality of the American left.

By: scottbomb

scottbomb — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:53:48 +0000

Just ask Dr. Alveda King (niece of MLK) about Margaret Sanger, eugenics promoter and founder of Planned Parenthood. Abortion clinics are scarce in affluent neighborhoods but rather abundant in the inner city neighborhoods.

By: Alberta

Alberta — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:43:43 +0000

I mean, its not like half of us got murdered for belonging to an undesirable population or anything.

I cannot write down in words how this statement, made by a Jew, makes me, a Jew who knows survivors, feel.

By: DONTREADONME

DONTREADONME — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:46:53 +0000

By: eburke

eburke — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:46:28 +0000

great ad by the NRCC. Glad to see they’re running stuff like this this far out!

By: NightTwister

NightTwister — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:45:21 +0000

A frequently-used argument against the death penalty is that it is disproportionally used on minorities. Apparently it only matters when you kill them…

By: tbeauchamp

tbeauchamp — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:40:45 +0000

It’s the best abortion documentary I’ve ever seen.

Pretty off topic, I know. Sue me.