<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Steelman Called</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJ "Beaglescout" Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18763</link>
		<dc:creator>LJ "Beaglescout" Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18763</guid>
		<description>No way the congressional republicans will ever go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way the congressional republicans will ever go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1SGinTN</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18762</link>
		<dc:creator>1SGinTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18762</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18761</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18761</guid>
		<description>If the state Leg balks, sue them; it&#039;s black letter law and the SC gives you your closed primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the state Leg balks, sue them; it&#8217;s black letter law and the SC gives you your closed primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1SGinTN</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18760</link>
		<dc:creator>1SGinTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18760</guid>
		<description>We need to end open primaries.  I can&#039;t think of any good reason for them.  A primary is all about the party chosing its candidate.  Why let outsiders get involved in the process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to end open primaries.  I can&#8217;t think of any good reason for them.  A primary is all about the party chosing its candidate.  Why let outsiders get involved in the process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itrytobenice</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18755</link>
		<dc:creator>itrytobenice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18755</guid>
		<description>You walk in, tell them if you want a D ballot or an R ballot and go vote.  No party ID of any kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You walk in, tell them if you want a D ballot or an R ballot and go vote.  No party ID of any kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18753</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18753</guid>
		<description>And I won&#039;t...I don&#039;t have a dog in this fight...The only thing I said that got this ball rolling was that people need to vote for the person they think is the best one for the job and stop letting the Media and the Party bosses convince them that to vote for their chosen candidate is a wasted vote! It&#039;s the way a minority of the party has been able to stay in the driver&#039;s seat since I started watching politics.

What I find so mind numbing about all this is hearing now what I heard 20 years ago...and it hasn&#039;t changed...Democrats keep advancing the ball toward the Socialist end zone and we keep giving ground because we&#039;re in prevent defense instead of on offense...

Well...we&#039;re in the red zone and they&#039;re about to win the game with a last second touchdown...the time for prevent defense has long since past...either we focus on aggressive Defense...with the entire team focused on stopping them and those on the team who refuse to stop turning over the ball to the other team need to assume a long overdue seat on the bench! ONce they&#039;re stopped...we can&#039;t afford to let them have the ball again...we need to stay on offense and start focusing on reducing the size and scope of government. I&#039;m not talking about limiting the amount of growth in government but in driving it back towards it&#039;s natural constraints as prescribed in the Constitution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I won&#8217;t&#8230;I don&#8217;t have a dog in this fight&#8230;The only thing I said that got this ball rolling was that people need to vote for the person they think is the best one for the job and stop letting the Media and the Party bosses convince them that to vote for their chosen candidate is a wasted vote! It&#8217;s the way a minority of the party has been able to stay in the driver&#8217;s seat since I started watching politics.</p>
<p>What I find so mind numbing about all this is hearing now what I heard 20 years ago&#8230;and it hasn&#8217;t changed&#8230;Democrats keep advancing the ball toward the Socialist end zone and we keep giving ground because we&#8217;re in prevent defense instead of on offense&#8230;</p>
<p>Well&#8230;we&#8217;re in the red zone and they&#8217;re about to win the game with a last second touchdown&#8230;the time for prevent defense has long since past&#8230;either we focus on aggressive Defense&#8230;with the entire team focused on stopping them and those on the team who refuse to stop turning over the ball to the other team need to assume a long overdue seat on the bench! ONce they&#8217;re stopped&#8230;we can&#8217;t afford to let them have the ball again&#8230;we need to stay on offense and start focusing on reducing the size and scope of government. I&#8217;m not talking about limiting the amount of growth in government but in driving it back towards it&#8217;s natural constraints as prescribed in the Constitution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18751</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18751</guid>
		<description>at minimum that a member of the caucus vote with the caucus on all procedural votes.  Then they can be free to represent their particular constituency on the actual vote on the bill.  That has long been the rule for the R majority in our legislature and some have required that a member also vote with the caucus on the final budget.  As you may be aware, there have been several instances of people being banished from their committees etc. for straying off the reservation.  Of course, when you do that, you catch Hell from the Ds but it doesn&#039;t last any longer than any other root canal.

Something like that is what I&#039;d do with &quot;our&quot; errant three senators; get a committment on procedural votes including cloture votes and if they won&#039;t give it, who needs them in the caucus?  Then they can officially suck up to their Democrat &quot;friends.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at minimum that a member of the caucus vote with the caucus on all procedural votes.  Then they can be free to represent their particular constituency on the actual vote on the bill.  That has long been the rule for the R majority in our legislature and some have required that a member also vote with the caucus on the final budget.  As you may be aware, there have been several instances of people being banished from their committees etc. for straying off the reservation.  Of course, when you do that, you catch Hell from the Ds but it doesn&#8217;t last any longer than any other root canal.</p>
<p>Something like that is what I&#8217;d do with &#8220;our&#8221; errant three senators; get a committment on procedural votes including cloture votes and if they won&#8217;t give it, who needs them in the caucus?  Then they can officially suck up to their Democrat &#8220;friends.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scope</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18750</link>
		<dc:creator>Scope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18750</guid>
		<description>that only a few days before the election is when Obamas tape about bankrupting the coal industry came out.  If I am not mistaken there were all kinds of messages sent out from the Coal Miners Union asking them not to vote for Obama.  Again, it was only a few days before the electon.  The message apparently didn&#039;t get out to enough Union members as they Obviously still voted Obama.  Now, it is more than clear, Obama is going to kill the coal industry either with massive regulation and/or Cap and Trade policies.  WV is not a very wealthy state, and a major hit to coal will make them more poor and will increase the unemployment rate tremendously.  By 2010 WV will be begging for Republican elected officials.

BTW, wasn&#039;t WV the home of the Hatfields and the McCoy&#039;s?  That is what this thread is starting to sound like.

Ace, I respect and admire you for sticking with your principles and opinions as to the fate of the Republican Party.  It seemed a no-brainer to me that we were told at the ballot box in 2006 and 2008 that when you become a slightly darker shade of pale, the real Democrat/Liberal will win every time.   With the Liberals you know how they are going to vote every time.  With the quasi-Republicans you just never know what surprise good or bad might be lurking around the corner, which spells no confidence to the discipline Republicans need to grab onto and hold if they ever dream of coming out of the wastelands. 

From the comments on this thread, and on the site in general there is no sense of unity between the moderates/compromisers and the principled conservatives.  The party is as broken as it ever was, and I don&#039;t have much hope that Steele will rally anyone into one place, particularly using language like &quot;hip hop.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that only a few days before the election is when Obamas tape about bankrupting the coal industry came out.  If I am not mistaken there were all kinds of messages sent out from the Coal Miners Union asking them not to vote for Obama.  Again, it was only a few days before the electon.  The message apparently didn&#8217;t get out to enough Union members as they Obviously still voted Obama.  Now, it is more than clear, Obama is going to kill the coal industry either with massive regulation and/or Cap and Trade policies.  WV is not a very wealthy state, and a major hit to coal will make them more poor and will increase the unemployment rate tremendously.  By 2010 WV will be begging for Republican elected officials.</p>
<p>BTW, wasn&#8217;t WV the home of the Hatfields and the McCoy&#8217;s?  That is what this thread is starting to sound like.</p>
<p>Ace, I respect and admire you for sticking with your principles and opinions as to the fate of the Republican Party.  It seemed a no-brainer to me that we were told at the ballot box in 2006 and 2008 that when you become a slightly darker shade of pale, the real Democrat/Liberal will win every time.   With the Liberals you know how they are going to vote every time.  With the quasi-Republicans you just never know what surprise good or bad might be lurking around the corner, which spells no confidence to the discipline Republicans need to grab onto and hold if they ever dream of coming out of the wastelands. </p>
<p>From the comments on this thread, and on the site in general there is no sense of unity between the moderates/compromisers and the principled conservatives.  The party is as broken as it ever was, and I don&#8217;t have much hope that Steele will rally anyone into one place, particularly using language like &#8220;hip hop.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18749</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18749</guid>
		<description>but we reward our moderates when they destroy everything we&#039;ve worked and voted for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but we reward our moderates when they destroy everything we&#8217;ve worked and voted for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TxCon</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18748</link>
		<dc:creator>TxCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18748</guid>
		<description>is that they have never stood against their leadership when it comes to actually blocking bad legislation. The &quot;Blue Dogs&quot; all talked big before the Stimulus vote. When it came to pressing that final button, all but 7 caved in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that they have never stood against their leadership when it comes to actually blocking bad legislation. The &#8220;Blue Dogs&#8221; all talked big before the Stimulus vote. When it came to pressing that final button, all but 7 caved in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18747</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18747</guid>
		<description>and it&#039;s besides the point...they were all part of the gang of 14 that got us a couple good judges...threw a couple more good judges over the side...and resulted in the last 4 years with most of Bush&#039;s nominees not confirmed and never to be confirmed!

But by your math 2 or three good appellate and circuit court judges at the expense of hundreds more is a victory because we avoided being excessively partisan and we cat 1% of what we wanted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and it&#8217;s besides the point&#8230;they were all part of the gang of 14 that got us a couple good judges&#8230;threw a couple more good judges over the side&#8230;and resulted in the last 4 years with most of Bush&#8217;s nominees not confirmed and never to be confirmed!</p>
<p>But by your math 2 or three good appellate and circuit court judges at the expense of hundreds more is a victory because we avoided being excessively partisan and we cat 1% of what we wanted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18746</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18746</guid>
		<description>What liberal CA Republicans like SteveLA never fail to mention is that the CA GOP has run both conservatives and moderates statewide and *lost* both ways. 

The same thing happens in Senate races in states like MA. 

What some Republicans fail to get through their thick skulls is that Republicans simply *can&#039;t* win in certain Blue States (remember - Arnie only got in on a fluke). ECons like to pretend that everything is SoCons fault, but the fact is *neither* ECon or SoCon policy (or even NatSacCon) plays in states like CA - these guys (the majority Coastal voters) are Commie Red, Red, Red and will be for the forseeable future. 

So rather than wasting resources on these states, we need to run against them nationally, and scare places like OH and WI that &quot;if they&#039;re not careful, they&#039;ll become just like CA &amp; MA&quot;. 

But in states like CA, the GOP should focus on the inland GOP areas, and basically write it off statewide and Coastally (failing some massive scandal that tarnishes the Dem brand statewide - but those only come along every couple of decades) - it&#039;s not worth the time or the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What liberal CA Republicans like SteveLA never fail to mention is that the CA GOP has run both conservatives and moderates statewide and *lost* both ways. </p>
<p>The same thing happens in Senate races in states like MA. </p>
<p>What some Republicans fail to get through their thick skulls is that Republicans simply *can&#8217;t* win in certain Blue States (remember &#8211; Arnie only got in on a fluke). ECons like to pretend that everything is SoCons fault, but the fact is *neither* ECon or SoCon policy (or even NatSacCon) plays in states like CA &#8211; these guys (the majority Coastal voters) are Commie Red, Red, Red and will be for the forseeable future. </p>
<p>So rather than wasting resources on these states, we need to run against them nationally, and scare places like OH and WI that &#8220;if they&#8217;re not careful, they&#8217;ll become just like CA &amp; MA&#8221;. </p>
<p>But in states like CA, the GOP should focus on the inland GOP areas, and basically write it off statewide and Coastally (failing some massive scandal that tarnishes the Dem brand statewide &#8211; but those only come along every couple of decades) &#8211; it&#8217;s not worth the time or the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18745</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18745</guid>
		<description>by keeping liberals with Rs by their names entrenched!

But what do I know...I don&#039;t understand Politics...and I&#039;m unteachable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by keeping liberals with Rs by their names entrenched!</p>
<p>But what do I know&#8230;I don&#8217;t understand Politics&#8230;and I&#8217;m unteachable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18744</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18744</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18743</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18743</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18742</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18742</guid>
		<description>this is mind numbing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is mind numbing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18741</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18741</guid>
		<description>and you know it all?

I know your experience...but I also can see 70 years of history and what doing what you guys advocate have gotten us...

But what do I know...I&#039;m un-teachable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and you know it all?</p>
<p>I know your experience&#8230;but I also can see 70 years of history and what doing what you guys advocate have gotten us&#8230;</p>
<p>But what do I know&#8230;I&#8217;m un-teachable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18740</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18740</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You clearly don’t get politics.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know you don&#039;t win buy constantly giving the other team the ball...and you don&#039;t win by having 4 members of your team insisting on giving the other team the ball!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You clearly don’t get politics.</p></blockquote>
<p>I know you don&#8217;t win buy constantly giving the other team the ball&#8230;and you don&#8217;t win by having 4 members of your team insisting on giving the other team the ball!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18739</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18739</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/02/26/sarah-steelman-called/comment-page-1/#comment-18738</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1415#comment-18738</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;they won this time and in 2006 using a 50 state strategy! and they did it running Conservative Democrats to attract conservative votes&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;ll say that yeah...that&#039;s why we need to use moderate Republicans just like the Dems used Conservative Democrats....but that&#039;s not the point at all...you keep telling me how the Demographics are against us...but you refuse to acknowledge that the Dems win elections by acting like us...they win elections by using Conservative Democrats to defeat us...but when it comes to governing...those Conservative Democrats toe the line because the Dems make them toe it....they don&#039;t bend over and take it!

I&#039;ll say it again...we lost because people don&#039;t see a difference between us and the Democrats...We lost not because there were more Democrats voting in 2006 and 2008...we lost because Conservatives were so disheartened an d didn&#039;t turn out and the polls show it as a fact...so spare me the crap please...

We don&#039;t win with these guys we lose...and the Stimulus bill is yet one more example of what we get by allowing to run rampant and force their view of the world on the rest of us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>they won this time and in 2006 using a 50 state strategy! and they did it running Conservative Democrats to attract conservative votes</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;ll say that yeah&#8230;that&#8217;s why we need to use moderate Republicans just like the Dems used Conservative Democrats&#8230;.but that&#8217;s not the point at all&#8230;you keep telling me how the Demographics are against us&#8230;but you refuse to acknowledge that the Dems win elections by acting like us&#8230;they win elections by using Conservative Democrats to defeat us&#8230;but when it comes to governing&#8230;those Conservative Democrats toe the line because the Dems make them toe it&#8230;.they don&#8217;t bend over and take it!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say it again&#8230;we lost because people don&#8217;t see a difference between us and the Democrats&#8230;We lost not because there were more Democrats voting in 2006 and 2008&#8230;we lost because Conservatives were so disheartened an d didn&#8217;t turn out and the polls show it as a fact&#8230;so spare me the crap please&#8230;</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t win with these guys we lose&#8230;and the Stimulus bill is yet one more example of what we get by allowing to run rampant and force their view of the world on the rest of us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

