Chuck Schumer wants the White House’s Office of Management and Budget to tell states they have no choice in the use of porkulus funds.
Below the fold is the entire letter. It’s is amazing in its reach. In effect, states will have zero discretion in how they spend the money and which parts they take.
This stems from Gov. Bobby Jindal and others saying they would not take the whole package because some parts would force state tax increases to comply with the terms of Porkulus.
Schumer says that’s tough. States will be forced to increase taxes and take 100% of the money if he has his way. And the states will have no discretion.
For instance, at least two governors have proposed rejecting a program to expand unemployment insurance for laid-off workers. Economists consistently rank unemployment insurance among the most efficient and cost-effective fiscal stimulus measures; by one frequently cited estimate, it provides an economic return of as high as $1.73 for every dollar invested. Thus, by denying this provision for their residents, these governors are not just depriving some of the neediest Americans of relief in a dire economy; they are undermining the overall stimulative impact of the package.
No one would dispute that these governors should be given the choice as to whether to accept the funds or not. But it should not be multiple choice.
This is breathtaking. It, in effect, makes the states servants of the federal government. States rights, etc. are out the window. And never mind that the unemployment insurance provisions would force taxes on the small businesses that are currently the only thing propping up the American economy.
This is how it is to be, folks — the federal Emperor and his Imperial Senate ordering fealty and servitude from the states. And if Washington does not get the fealty and loyalty, the states will be cut off, their people hurt, their businesses shut down, etc.
Washington has become Rome. And with Barney Frank up there, we’ve even got the licentiousness and male prostitution rings. Next up: throwing Christians t the lions.
February 24, 2009
Dear Director Orszag:
In recent days, a small minority of governors, mostly Republicans, have publicly weighed the possibility of foregoing certain emergency provisions provided under the American Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act signed last week by President Obama. I believe this prospect not only would undercut the stimulative effect of the recovery package, but also is inconsistent with a key provision included in the law passed by Congress. To protect the integrity of the recovery program, I urge the administration to issue implementation guidance clarifying that while any Governor may exercise his or her discretion to accept or reject the federal funds provided in the stimulus, no Governor should have the authority to arbitrarily adopt a select subset of the overall package.
As you know, Section 1607(a) of the economic recovery legislation provides that the Governor of each state must certify a request for stimulus funds before any money can flow. No language in this provision, however, permits the governor to selectively adopt some components of the bill while rejecting others. To allow such picking and choosing would, in effect, empower the governors with a line-item veto authority that President Obama himself did not possess at the time he signed the legislation. It would also undermine the overall success of the bill, as the components most singled out for criticism by these governors are among the most productive measures in terms of stimulating the economy.
For instance, at least two governors have proposed rejecting a program to expand unemployment insurance for laid-off workers. Economists consistently rank unemployment insurance among the most efficient and cost-effective fiscal stimulus measures; by one frequently cited estimate, it provides an economic return of as high as $1.73 for every dollar invested. Thus, by denying this provision for their residents, these governors are not just depriving some of the neediest Americans of relief in a dire economy; they are undermining the overall stimulative impact of the package.
No one would dispute that these governors should be given the choice as to whether to accept the funds or not. But it should not be multiple choice. The composition of the package was rightly dictated by economic considerations; we should not let the implementation of the package be dictated by political considerations.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Schumer
United States Senator
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
Over reaching?
NickDeringer (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 12:28PM EST (link)If this doesn’t define the phrase then it has no meaning.
NickDeringer
Our Founding Fathers Knew!
kchand Tuesday, February 24th at 12:30PM EST (link)“That government is best which governs least.”
“It is the duty of the Patriot to protect his country from its government.”
Thomas Paine
——————–
The ‘N’ word is November! Nov 6, 2012 will be the next cleansing.
This kind of rhetoric, on Schumer's part, is so dangerous...
Attack Mode (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 12:43PM EST (link)These guys are going to reach too far and find themselves to be the object of contempt of the American people, and the American people are in favor of disproportionate response, rightly so.
These guys truly mean to do harm to us and our country, whether they realize it or not.
“Land of the Free and Home of da Whopper” Peter Griffin…Family Guy
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
Steel-Belted Radial Right Winger

“I’ll create 5 million jobs from out of unicorn farts and pixie dust” Justatron paraphrasing Obamessiah…yes I love it that much.
It was bad enough when they confiscated our money
Achance (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 12:44PM EST (link)and made us kiss the ring to get some of it back – the way things worked from the Great Society onward. Now, as Francis so notably pointed out, in the short run they don’t even need our money. They don’t have to ask for tax increases to hold the states hostage, they just print and borrow money. This is what truly makes Washington the Imperial City; there’s nothing we can do to stop them and the effects of the inflation and borrowing are so abstract and the effect so diffuse that the dumbed down electorate simply cannot be made to understand it.
In Vino Veritas
Nero?
Spartan4Life (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 12:44PM EST (link)Isn’t it widely held that John of Patmos had Nero in mind as the anti-Christ?
I’m noy saying, I’m just saying….
We should demand a "do over".
Praying (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 12:51PM EST (link)This is obscene. First of all, Obama signs this grotesque “stimulus” bill, and sets his promise to “reduce the taxes for 95% of Americans ” in place, and the very next week, he claims to want to reduce the deficit by raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations. OMG! Let’s just get rid of the whole stupid thing! There is no “stimulus” in this bill, to speak of. It is only a vehicle to ram through the left’s socialist agenda. I wish EVERY SINGLE STATE would reject these funds! It is only going to hurt the states in the long run. This country has gone freaking MAD!
No!!!11!1!!1!1! The Bilderbergers are coming
Butthead Schumer has no authority in this matter
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 12:51PM EST (link)It does not MATTER what he says, what he wants, what he claims.
He can just go suck it.
If he wants to make an issue of it, he will find out what is what. Only the federal courts can force the states to do that (and I’d say the states can mount a formidable case to stop it).
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
We should really count Chucky as an allie and asset...
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 7:54PM EST (link)every time he opens his self righteous, condescending, snobbish and arrogant pie hole he reinforces in people’s mind what is wrong with the Democrat Party.
I can’t think of any other single individual that could send people scurrying in desperation to the polls in 2010 than Cuck the pompous Schumer!
Bring on the 10th Amendment fight
texas214 (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:08PM EST (link)Schumer may not want this fight given there is clear law on that the fed’s can’t impose new laws onto or infringe on the states rights. I would expect the Supreme Court would bitch slap Schumer so fast his head would spin.
All of this legislation and stimulus appears to be a move by highly urbanized blue states which are having trouble competing in the “market place” of jobs, lifestyle, and desirability; forcing others states and parts of the country to accept thimgs they don’t like to “equalize’ competiveness. You see it with the unions, car companies, auto standards, welfare, banking regulation…… This administration and congress are only making the divide bigger.
NOTE: Obama’s comment about those “clingers” says it all.
I really doubt
BlueLandRed (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:52PM EST (link)SCOTUS is going to take this up because they have repeatedly allowed the feds to fund projects with restrictions that states don’t like.
Schumer’s argument is that the governors have a choice, all or nothing. I don’t know enough about whats in the bill to know that’s in fact true. But assuming Schumer is right, nothing the Feds are doing is forcing the states to take the money, so there is hardly a 10 amendment case here.
It’s the same with all the highway spending bills, obey the federal regulations on autos and road and stuff or no money for you.
Actually
red4ever (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:03PM EST (link)all or nothing is not allowed. The best case on this was South Dakota v. Dole which involved highway funds and the legal drinking age. I don’t have it handy, so I am going from memory here. Anyway, the basic factors are 1) there must be a rationale relationshp between the federal program funded and the restriction and 2) the states must be able to make a rational choice. In S. Dakota only 5% of the highway funds were at stake if the drinking age was not raised, so that was considered a small enough stick to still allow the states to choose. By forcing the states to either take all the money or get nothing at all for anything, an argument could be made that the states really don’t have a choice here.
Someone with a better memory on this case, might want to check me on this.
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante
Wikipedia (for what it is worth)
BlueLandRed (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:36PM EST (link)has an article on it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Dole
Anyways, I’m just not convinced that SCOTUS is going to jump into this mess.
Of course, I’m not exactly sure what Schumer and his allies would do if the some of the governors took all the money and then just didn’t actually spend it all.
not just 10th amendment
LoveThatConstitution Tuesday, February 24th at 2:14PM EST (link)Most of this bill in the first place cant be tied to any enumerated power in the Constitution in the first place.
Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
- Ronald Reagan
Yeah, and whoever tries to throw the whole thing out
Achance (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:16PM EST (link)as outside federal jurisdiction will bring down the wrath of the Looters and Moochers and put themselves in the Wilderness for generations. I’m sure BHO and his buds would just love for some Republican governor/AG to sue to declare Porkulus unconstitutional.
In Vino Veritas
It will happen
LoveThatConstitution Tuesday, February 24th at 2:21PM EST (link)Tonight i will go home, close my eyes, fall asleep and dream.
But then i wake up.
Ah, if someday John Shadegg’s Enumerated Powers Act became a reality…there’d be a lot of prime commercial real estate available in DC.
Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
- Ronald Reagan
There in is the rub...
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 8:04PM EST (link)It’s the way the Federal Government has gotten to where it is by skirting the 10th Amendment.
The Federal Government has taken on the roll of a crack dealer…put a little crack, (read federal funding) out there for free and with no strings attached to get the mark, (Read the States)addicted….once they become junkies and only then, the Crack Dealer dangles more crack in front of the junkies and demand that they turn tricks for the dealer and pay with their soul in order to get their next fix! It’s all good at first…but eventually the junkie starts deteriorating and ultimately dies! leaving the dealer to move onto the next mark!
See Attached
texas214 (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 4:05PM EST (link)http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30807
A good explaination.
Read the 10th Amendment
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:11PM EST (link)http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30807
When the Constitution was being ratified during the 1780s, the 10th Amendment was understood to be the linchpin that held the entire Bill of Rights together. The amendment states: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
Is there any legal action to be taken here?
RJD (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:26PM EST (link)Could Sanford and Jindal and other governors sue the US Congress for violation of the 10th Amendment?
NYT mad at Governors
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:31PM EST (link)http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/24/opinion/24tue1.html
I think all the governors should sue.
But I doubt the democrats will. They would not mind a federal take-over. And we know how Arnold feels – “Give me the money”.
So here it is – The feds take our tax money – redistribute it by force and then destroy the very engine that produces the tax money.
These democrats are real smart.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
I imagine the ball is not in the states' court to sue
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:47PM EST (link)First act – actively refuse the money and tell the Administration and Congress to go pound sand.
Second act – the feds decide whether to sue to force the states to act.
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
3rd act
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:56PM EST (link)the states counter sue –
Take the money and then deposit it off shore accounts the Feds cannot touch.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
"it provides an economic return of as high as $1.73 for every dollar invested." he said without laughing.
Alberta (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:34PM EST (link)if unemployment insurance ‘provides an economic return of as high as $1.73 for every dollar invested.’ really is true, why do any of us work?
Democrats are so cute when they try to play with numbers.
Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God’s side, for God is always right.
Abraham Lincoln
Unemployment insurance is why I fired everyone
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:43PM EST (link)and closed my business.
It was just such a burden. I had a service business so I did not know if I would have cash flow on any given month. I had to pay employees if I had business or not. It was like Russian roulette. Of course this is true for any business. That was 8 years ago so I imagine it must be even tougher today. And people wonder why they lose jobs and cannot find another one. They need to try a start a business and then run it to see what small business owners are up against. Obama is not the friend of small business.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
they need to offer their work as contractors if they want work
mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:09PM EST (link)I contract with several different places. I basically have unlimited work.
One company I contracted with was sued and forced to hire everyone as an employee. Now yhey refuse to hire in states that don’t allow opting out of unemployment or workman’s comp. I’m not sure which one it is.
I know we posted about this before but at a place I worked before, one department gave up their benefits and went per diem to keep the dept open. Now they were still an employees though just no benefits or a guaranteed 40 hour work week on paper.
People are like we have to have insurance but you can buy coverage for a with a high deductable like $5 or 7,000 in case of something serious happens you will only have the 5 or 7, 000 deductable and it’s very inexpensive to buy that type of coverage.
It seems like for the middle class the idea of paying anything but $10 of pocket freaks them out and they want fully covered everything for insurance not just something serious to keep their hospital or home health bills paid and protect their home or bank accounts.
Notice the 3-significant digits precision on the predicted return
civil truth (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 1:48PM EST (link)With prophetic skills like that, Schumer is seriously underemployed. Why with such ability to predict the future, he should be Treasury Secretary. Heck, that’s not high enough a positin – he should be chief augur to the emperor!
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
Yes, it can be $1.73 return
LoveThatConstitution Tuesday, February 24th at 2:17PM EST (link)That is of course if you calculate that in government economics, not market economics.
See, you get people onto unemployment for a buck. The number of people now dependent on unemployment has grown. Next year you can go back and show how many more unfortunate people need it and can ask for $1.73 for every dollar you got the year before.
Simple.
Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
- Ronald Reagan
LOL!!!!nt
mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:21PM EST (link)Yeah...we could all collect unemplyment
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 8:13PM EST (link)and the Federal Government would be so awash in cash from that 73 cents on every dollar we all are collecting that the government could increase our unemployment even more so they’d have 73 cents more on every dollar to send out and earn 73 cents more…
Makes perfect sense to me Alberta…let’s do it!
I need to get some of these for my 201k!
jackbenimble (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:00PM EST (link)it provides an economic return of as high as $1.73 for every dollar invested.
This sounds like one terrific investment! I wonder if there is a way to securitize all these unemployed people into some sort of investment vehicle. We could sell them to banks and hedge funds and all their problems would be solved. Just to make sure nobody got stuck holding securities where to many people actually managed to find jobs, we could cut them up into risk pools which tried to distinguish between the temporarily unemployed, the chronically unemployed and the flat-out unemployable.
I can’t image why we would want anybody to work when we can just invest in everybody being on unemployment and we all get rich. If 7% unemployment yields these kinds of high double digit returns just think how much better off we would be if we had 14% unemployment. The economy would be rocking and rolling and the deficit problem would be solved.
“I repudiate the idea of voting for a Democrat
Securitize all the unemployed people
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:03PM EST (link)LOL – Don’t give Wall Street anymore ideas!!!!
You should e-mail your thoughts to Chuckie!!!!
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
I admit I don't get this
red4ever (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:08PM EST (link)I am willing ot admit I don’t understand economics. Can someone please explain how there is a return on paying people not to work? I mean sure, through unemployment insurance the laid off person still has money so can pay his bills. But, 1) he has less than he would be making if he was working so can pay fewer bills and/or spend less and 2) if he were working he would be paying his bills and spending anyway. So where does the ROI come from?
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante
I would love to know too
mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:24PM EST (link)It’s probably some thinking like it keeps them from poverty or off a different gov assistance program. Like TANF vs daycare assistance. Susbisized daycare saves all of that TANF $. They are just spending more on daycare payments for 5 kids than TANF payments though.
Shhhh, red4ever, do NOT attempt to question
janis (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:24PM EST (link)voodoo economics. The price is too high to doubt the GOVERNMENT’S word on such things. You must cast away all doubts and just believvvvvvvveeeeeee……………
Or you can join the revolution with the rest of us. These people are so off in the weeds with this stuff that you can barely see the tops of their pointy little heads. One wonders if they believe their own s**t or if they just throw it out there thinking that the rest of us are too stupid to figure it out.
Not voodoo economics
jackbenimble (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 3:17PM EST (link)When GHWB first coined the phrase voodoo economics he was referring to Volker Style Monetarism and most particularly to Art Laffer’s laffer curve.
This 1.73 multiplier thing is pure Keynsianism. All Government spending gets a Keynsian multiplier attached to it and as Obama informed us a couple of weeks ago “all spending is stimulus”.
It of course begs the question, if $700+ billion of spending (which Chuckie refers to as “investment”) is good, why not just go the whole hog and spend $700+ trillion?
Just fire up the presses and start printing out those “Obama Bucks”. In the Chosen One We Trust.
There is only one slight hitch with the whole Keynsian multplier thing. It has been tried again and history has pretty much proven that it does not work.
“I repudiate the idea of voting for a Democrat
Wasn't referring to specific "voodoo economics",
janis (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 3:22PM EST (link)just used that phrase to describe something completely off the wall that makes no sense in the real world. “Make-believe” economics if you prefer.
Or “Obamanomics.” Same thing.
Obama Bucks
mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 7:56PM EST (link)That is so funny!!!!
It sounds like a rebate/reward type of promotion.
201K
Cowboy (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:47PM EST (link)That’s good. You should patent that one.
I'd like to take credit
jackbenimble (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:50PM EST (link)But the 201K thing has been floating around a lot lately.
“I repudiate the idea of voting for a Democrat
Briliant!!!! nt
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 8:19PM EST (link)Do you think we even need unemployment?
mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:19PM EST (link)I don’t believe it that people can’t find work. I have always been able to find work! Even in a new city without a car, with a toddler by my side. I was able to find work within a week of moving there.
I just wonder how hard peple are trying? I’m sure there are some elderly it can be hard for due to discrimination but I don’t believe it for people under 60 that they can’t find work. I have seen it through the years,where a friend’s husband who has has his wife to watch their child supposedly can’t find work for months but I have always been able to find a job very quickly. There are always places like call centers, janitorial and food service that are hiring.
Those are jobs a lot of Americans won't do. nt
Achance (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:29PM EST (link)Actually, I’m not much troubled by UI since it is a form of insurance and employees pay for it. Granted, employers pay as well, but that is money that could be on a paycheck but rather goes to UI.
In Vino Veritas
That is their choice
mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:39PM EST (link)They make it sound like the unemployed “can’t find work.” It should be they can’t find work they prefer to do. They make it into a desperate situation when it isn’t.
I grew up in WV and I know a lot of guys that worked
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 8:27PM EST (link)laying natural gas pipelines with the international laborers union…these guys would go out 3 months out of the year, (in summer usually), work 12 and 16 our days 6 days a week for those 3 months and lay back and collect unemployment benefits for nine months out of the year. They did quite well with while collecting 80% of their pay for that quarter. each quarter your new benefits were calculated based on the amount you collected the quarter before unemployment so it was a sliding scale so it was a declining return which they made up for with all the overtime money they collected in their savings accounts by working 16 hour days 6 days a week.
When the well went dry it was summer again and off they’d go for another 3 months…
Nice huh?
What they mean is they can't find a job like the one they had
JustLeaveMeAlone (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:40PM EST (link)Same pay, benefits, etc.
“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
btw thanks for the explaination
mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:43PM EST (link)to both of you! I have always wondered what the deal was. Like these men have nothing to do around the house, the don’t have to bring kids with them, they have cars, they live in the community so probably know where places are, I just have never understood it.
It is a lifestyle here in the seasonal industries
Achance (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:55PM EST (link)like construction and fishing. You work huckletybuck all summer, make all the money you can then get laid off come the end of the season. You take off to some place warm and draw your UI until it is time to go to work next spring. Of course, because of this, Alaska has among the highest UI insurance costs in the Country.
In Vino Veritas
I am looking more and more forward to the Atlanta Tea Party FRIDAY!!!
Elizabeth Christian (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:22PM EST (link)n/t
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
~Benjamin Franklin
Rome v. USA
palinberry2012 Tuesday, February 24th at 2:43PM EST (link)Interesting post. I actually did a term paper on this subject. The parallels of the rise and fall of our civilizations are pretty eerie.
cluckie schummmmmmmer is a dangerous man
bobojake (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:47PM EST (link)Cluckie and obama are twins ,the gloves fits. God Bless America in this time of need.
Is this ok for him to do?
mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 2:50PM EST (link)Can he acutally do it?
Does this mean that...
fmaidment (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 6:45PM EST (link)…in 300 years, Scientology will be our state religion?
Follow Me on Twitter
“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.”
– - Thomas Jefferson, to Archibald Stuart, 1791
If only...
Incredible (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 7:12PM EST (link)If only we could have a war over states rights (that some would later claim was really about economics and the practitioners thereof).
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” Thomas Jefferson
Join the RedState Strike Force
It is agreat tragedy of history that state's rights got equated exclusively with slavery and racist laws
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 7:35PM EST (link)when federalism was such a key part of the miracle that made this country great with its happiness maximization effect
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
It's too true...
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 8:42PM EST (link)Oddly enough…those that subverted states rights to bring about “equality” are the very people who favored big government solutions to every problem. It’s quite a coincidence that those supporting big government anti federalist policies ended up being the main beneficiaries of the Civil War and the Civil Rights movement and somehow the plight of the people they swore to support were demoralized and destroyed by their policies after the end of segregation!
Do what Chucky?
AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 7:45PM EST (link)Isn’t the whole package made up of political considerations including all this tiny minute earmarks you claim the American People don’t care about.
I think it’s high time every single Governor and legislature across this country stop taking any money from the federal government and accepting the Federal Regulatory strings that come with it.
Each state should collect it’s own taxes and ay a small percent to Washington to maintain itself with limiting it’s functions to those enumerated in the Constitution in the order of priority presented in the Constitution and nothing more. Return us to a federalists form of government and drain the swamp that is foggy bottom!
I know, I know…it’ll never happen without a bloody revelution so it will never happen…But I can dream can’t I?