<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rebuilding the Party: The Technology Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E Pluribus Unum</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17742</link>
		<dc:creator>E Pluribus Unum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17742</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure you are right, and Cyrus is gone.  Sure smells that way.

Steele better have a plan for transition, and it better be good.  You wipe out all that institutional memory - granted, often, and in this case, that&#039;s mostly a good thing - there better be positives that get into place PDQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure you are right, and Cyrus is gone.  Sure smells that way.</p>
<p>Steele better have a plan for transition, and it better be good.  You wipe out all that institutional memory &#8211; granted, often, and in this case, that&#8217;s mostly a good thing &#8211; there better be positives that get into place PDQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NightTwister</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17741</link>
		<dc:creator>NightTwister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17741</guid>
		<description>Unless I read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/06/steele-cleans-house-republican-national-committee/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless I read <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/06/steele-cleans-house-republican-national-committee/" rel="nofollow">this</a> wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: znelson32</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17549</link>
		<dc:creator>znelson32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17549</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a software architect/engineer of 15+ years. I&#039;ve designed and developed software for some of the biggest Fortune 500 companies. 

I can&#039;t even get my Congressman, who lives 5 mins away, to respond to my email re: technology, let alone the RNC or a campaign. No one cares about grassroots &quot;technology ideas&quot;.

The most the RNC is doing is updating the ancient Voter Vault and focusing on Facebook and Myspace accounts. Give me a break - that&#039;s kid stuff.

Why should anyone waste their time with this? There&#039;s no such thing as grassroots - it&#039;s all corporate - and I&#039;ve spent enough time with clueless corporate-types who don&#039;t know a damn thing about techology.

There is no place for brilliant people with brilliant ideas in the RNC - and if I&#039;m wrong, invite me to the next technology thinktank - I won&#039;t hold my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a software architect/engineer of 15+ years. I&#8217;ve designed and developed software for some of the biggest Fortune 500 companies. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t even get my Congressman, who lives 5 mins away, to respond to my email re: technology, let alone the RNC or a campaign. No one cares about grassroots &#8220;technology ideas&#8221;.</p>
<p>The most the RNC is doing is updating the ancient Voter Vault and focusing on Facebook and Myspace accounts. Give me a break &#8211; that&#8217;s kid stuff.</p>
<p>Why should anyone waste their time with this? There&#8217;s no such thing as grassroots &#8211; it&#8217;s all corporate &#8211; and I&#8217;ve spent enough time with clueless corporate-types who don&#8217;t know a damn thing about techology.</p>
<p>There is no place for brilliant people with brilliant ideas in the RNC &#8211; and if I&#8217;m wrong, invite me to the next technology thinktank &#8211; I won&#8217;t hold my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elronaldo</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17548</link>
		<dc:creator>elronaldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17548</guid>
		<description>Open letter to the eCampaign folks at www.gop.com

Alas, the GOP web site at www.gop.com has a few good ideas, but they are currently poorly, poorly implemented.  The GOP has a pretty fair idea in allowing one to set up your own web site/blog at whatever-your-id.gop.com - however their whole platform is so buggy, it&#039;s going to result in more harm than good.  I&#039;ll just hit the high points here:


So many bugs!  You cannot recover a password, nor log in, nor properly edit your profile.  Pix, videos and comments do not appear, and hundreds, if not thousands, of sites have been created by folks who did not realize they were creating a web site and thus have no content.  This really hurts the idea of a myGOP web site.

Too many javascript prompts and error messages were written by ESL programmers.  Improper English and bad grammar are so rife at gop.com that it begins to appear that the GOP would be pro-illegals.  If there is anywhere that should be careful about proper English, it&#039;s gop.com.  My company hires offshore programmers too, mostly from India, but we always check their English before we allow the code to go into production.  What political conclusions would visitors draw?  What about setting an example?

MOST IMPORTANTLY: the GOP is pursuing an online strategy that promises to diffuse effort rather than concentrate effort, and will turn away experienced bloggers (presumably the very audience they want to attract) after just a couple of hours of effort.

Check out my website there, elronaldo.gop.com - I wasted a whole half day on this.  The headlines section allows you to post only headlines from the RNC list - not headlines (or Gadgets or Widgets) from your own sources.   The blog section will only allow you to type in an article - and not allow a reference or embed or object for a feed or Ustream TV embed.   Sorry, I already have my own blog and I&#039;m not going to copy/paste every article into elronaldo.gop.com - the one time I tried this, it did not preserve the formatting.

Now I am in the web services business (800Cart.com ) and I understand just as well as the next publisher the principle of  &#039;publish-it-now-so folks-can-see-what-is-so-attractive-and-fix-the-bugs-later&#039; as well as the next guy.  But the GOP carried this principle way, way too far.

If GOP.com wants to have thousands of identical, lame &#039;web sites&#039; to lower its search engine authority, that&#039;s one thing.  But if they want to harness the web/blog talent that&#039;s already out there, they will allow Gadget, widgets, Ustream embeds, rss feeds and all of the labor-savings devices that bloggers have evolved to distribute their political thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open letter to the eCampaign folks at www.gop.com</p>
<p>Alas, the GOP web site at www.gop.com has a few good ideas, but they are currently poorly, poorly implemented.  The GOP has a pretty fair idea in allowing one to set up your own web site/blog at whatever-your-id.gop.com &#8211; however their whole platform is so buggy, it&#8217;s going to result in more harm than good.  I&#8217;ll just hit the high points here:</p>
<p>So many bugs!  You cannot recover a password, nor log in, nor properly edit your profile.  Pix, videos and comments do not appear, and hundreds, if not thousands, of sites have been created by folks who did not realize they were creating a web site and thus have no content.  This really hurts the idea of a myGOP web site.</p>
<p>Too many javascript prompts and error messages were written by ESL programmers.  Improper English and bad grammar are so rife at gop.com that it begins to appear that the GOP would be pro-illegals.  If there is anywhere that should be careful about proper English, it&#8217;s gop.com.  My company hires offshore programmers too, mostly from India, but we always check their English before we allow the code to go into production.  What political conclusions would visitors draw?  What about setting an example?</p>
<p>MOST IMPORTANTLY: the GOP is pursuing an online strategy that promises to diffuse effort rather than concentrate effort, and will turn away experienced bloggers (presumably the very audience they want to attract) after just a couple of hours of effort.</p>
<p>Check out my website there, elronaldo.gop.com &#8211; I wasted a whole half day on this.  The headlines section allows you to post only headlines from the RNC list &#8211; not headlines (or Gadgets or Widgets) from your own sources.   The blog section will only allow you to type in an article &#8211; and not allow a reference or embed or object for a feed or Ustream TV embed.   Sorry, I already have my own blog and I&#8217;m not going to copy/paste every article into elronaldo.gop.com &#8211; the one time I tried this, it did not preserve the formatting.</p>
<p>Now I am in the web services business (800Cart.com ) and I understand just as well as the next publisher the principle of  &#8216;publish-it-now-so folks-can-see-what-is-so-attractive-and-fix-the-bugs-later&#8217; as well as the next guy.  But the GOP carried this principle way, way too far.</p>
<p>If GOP.com wants to have thousands of identical, lame &#8216;web sites&#8217; to lower its search engine authority, that&#8217;s one thing.  But if they want to harness the web/blog talent that&#8217;s already out there, they will allow Gadget, widgets, Ustream embeds, rss feeds and all of the labor-savings devices that bloggers have evolved to distribute their political thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itrytobenice</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17547</link>
		<dc:creator>itrytobenice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17547</guid>
		<description>You will let us know the outcome, won&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will let us know the outcome, won&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17546</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17546</guid>
		<description>&quot;libertarian&quot; and &quot;moderate&quot; are nowhere near the same thing, it&#039;s a bit hard to figure out what the professor had in mind without reading his whole blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;libertarian&#8221; and &#8220;moderate&#8221; are nowhere near the same thing, it&#8217;s a bit hard to figure out what the professor had in mind without reading his whole blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlSchurz</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17545</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlSchurz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17545</guid>
		<description>Than a Liberal.

I can make love to a libertarian. Making love to a liberal is a chore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Than a Liberal.</p>
<p>I can make love to a libertarian. Making love to a liberal is a chore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17544</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17544</guid>
		<description>he thinks Steele will take the party in a more &quot;moderate and libertarian&quot; direction.

Which is the last thing he should do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he thinks Steele will take the party in a more &#8220;moderate and libertarian&#8221; direction.</p>
<p>Which is the last thing he should do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elronaldo</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17543</link>
		<dc:creator>elronaldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17543</guid>
		<description>Alas, a lot of critical functions for GOP.com  are badly broken right now...  I tried 4 different browsers...

Maybe it&#039;s some poorly tested changes posted on Fri that will get fixed on Mon

* cannot log in...

* cannot recover password...

* attempt to recover password produced a search result as if user wished to search gop.com

They DO have some really good resources there!  Like contacting others in your own neighborhood - that is a great start!  

Presumably these will get fixed on Monday....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, a lot of critical functions for GOP.com  are badly broken right now&#8230;  I tried 4 different browsers&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s some poorly tested changes posted on Fri that will get fixed on Mon</p>
<p>* cannot log in&#8230;</p>
<p>* cannot recover password&#8230;</p>
<p>* attempt to recover password produced a search result as if user wished to search gop.com</p>
<p>They DO have some really good resources there!  Like contacting others in your own neighborhood &#8211; that is a great start!  </p>
<p>Presumably these will get fixed on Monday&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17542</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17542</guid>
		<description>and not the other way around.

I think of really good systems as providing multiple knobs and levers that give the user the ability to do what they want to do.  As opposed to a system that forces the user to do a lot of unnecessary stuff.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html#TheUnpredictabilityofRequirements&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Noted software thinker Martin Fowler has stated&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
There&#039;s a refrain I&#039;ve heard on every problem project I&#039;ve run into. The developers come to me and say &quot;the problem with this project is that the requirements are always changing&quot;. The thing I find surprising about this situation is that anyone is surprised by it. In building business software requirements changes are the norm, the question is what we do about it. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A humorous small illustration of Erick&#039;s point
&lt;blockquote&gt;
It is vastly easier for a technologist to vet a shiny new tool with pretty bells and whistles than it is a political consultant. Too many political consultants get distracted by the shiny.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theserverside.net/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29079&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here, see the emboldened text for brevity&lt;/a&gt;.  I have no familiarity with the RNC&#039;s technology efforts, but one point Erick raises it the question of whether the RNC has technology folks that can evalutate these types of criteria, and not just from a static &quot;present functionality&quot; viewpoint that will be left behind as the RNC&#039;s needs inevitably change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and not the other way around.</p>
<p>I think of really good systems as providing multiple knobs and levers that give the user the ability to do what they want to do.  As opposed to a system that forces the user to do a lot of unnecessary stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html#TheUnpredictabilityofRequirements" rel="nofollow">Noted software thinker Martin Fowler has stated</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
There&#8217;s a refrain I&#8217;ve heard on every problem project I&#8217;ve run into. The developers come to me and say &#8220;the problem with this project is that the requirements are always changing&#8221;. The thing I find surprising about this situation is that anyone is surprised by it. In building business software requirements changes are the norm, the question is what we do about it.
</p></blockquote>
<p>A humorous small illustration of Erick&#8217;s point</p>
<blockquote><p>
It is vastly easier for a technologist to vet a shiny new tool with pretty bells and whistles than it is a political consultant. Too many political consultants get distracted by the shiny.
</p></blockquote>
<p>can be found <a href="http://www.theserverside.net/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29079" rel="nofollow">here, see the emboldened text for brevity</a>.  I have no familiarity with the RNC&#8217;s technology efforts, but one point Erick raises it the question of whether the RNC has technology folks that can evalutate these types of criteria, and not just from a static &#8220;present functionality&#8221; viewpoint that will be left behind as the RNC&#8217;s needs inevitably change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bc3</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17540</link>
		<dc:creator>bc3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17540</guid>
		<description>Rasmussen poll just released. 43% of Republicans want GOP to become more conservative, compared to only 17% who want it to become more moderate (liberal).

Far more more Republicans want the GOP to be like Palin than like McCain. Dems don&#039;t see it that way.

Pailin polls surprisingly strong among unaffliiated (35% HIGHLY favorable).

Look for the left and liberal GOP Frum-types to keep up the attack.

See www.bejohngalt.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen poll just released. 43% of Republicans want GOP to become more conservative, compared to only 17% who want it to become more moderate (liberal).</p>
<p>Far more more Republicans want the GOP to be like Palin than like McCain. Dems don&#8217;t see it that way.</p>
<p>Pailin polls surprisingly strong among unaffliiated (35% HIGHLY favorable).</p>
<p>Look for the left and liberal GOP Frum-types to keep up the attack.</p>
<p>See www.bejohngalt.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bc3</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17541</link>
		<dc:creator>bc3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17541</guid>
		<description>Rasmussen poll just released. 43% of Republicans want GOP to become more conservative, compared to only 17% who want it to become more moderate (liberal).

Far more more Republicans want the GOP to be like Palin than like McCain. Dems don&#039;t see it that way.

Pailin polls surprisingly strong among unaffliiated (35% HIGHLY favorable).

Look for the left and liberal GOP Frum-types to keep up the attack.

See www.bejohngalt.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen poll just released. 43% of Republicans want GOP to become more conservative, compared to only 17% who want it to become more moderate (liberal).</p>
<p>Far more more Republicans want the GOP to be like Palin than like McCain. Dems don&#8217;t see it that way.</p>
<p>Pailin polls surprisingly strong among unaffliiated (35% HIGHLY favorable).</p>
<p>Look for the left and liberal GOP Frum-types to keep up the attack.</p>
<p>See www.bejohngalt.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darvin_Dowdy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17539</link>
		<dc:creator>Darvin_Dowdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17539</guid>
		<description>...Patton said, &quot;fixed fortifications are a monument to the stupidity of man&quot;.   In other words be mobile, go on the offensive.    And do we really expect Steele to go on the offensive to protect Mr. Krohn?  No. He will not. I expect him to operate very much like &quot;W&quot; the doormat and his disgusting &quot;New Tone&quot; method.  [needless to say I&#039;m not excited about the Steele nomination-nor was I about any of the other 5]. Honestly, I hope/pray I&#039;m proven wrong about Steele.  

So it&#039;ll be up to the Redstate&#039;s of this world to go on the offensive.  Against, who?  Well Erick, you said it here. Very timidly, &quot;McCain staffers&quot;.   Almost in a whisper. COME ON ERICK!  Name names. Point fingers. Start identifying these enemies of the Conservative Movement.   (like you did  N. Wallace- remember Operation Leper?) Our immediate enemy is within the Party.  Its an unpleasant task going after this negative element but it must be done. Many of them were, just a short time back, our comrades, true.  Its not an easy task but are we willing to watch the Conservative Movement drift off into history?  Become a memory?  Glory days?  

Another thing Patton said, &quot;God have mercy on my enemies, because I won&#039;t&quot;.  Darvin Dowdy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Patton said, &#8220;fixed fortifications are a monument to the stupidity of man&#8221;.   In other words be mobile, go on the offensive.    And do we really expect Steele to go on the offensive to protect Mr. Krohn?  No. He will not. I expect him to operate very much like &#8220;W&#8221; the doormat and his disgusting &#8220;New Tone&#8221; method.  [needless to say I'm not excited about the Steele nomination-nor was I about any of the other 5]. Honestly, I hope/pray I&#8217;m proven wrong about Steele.  </p>
<p>So it&#8217;ll be up to the Redstate&#8217;s of this world to go on the offensive.  Against, who?  Well Erick, you said it here. Very timidly, &#8220;McCain staffers&#8221;.   Almost in a whisper. COME ON ERICK!  Name names. Point fingers. Start identifying these enemies of the Conservative Movement.   (like you did  N. Wallace- remember Operation Leper?) Our immediate enemy is within the Party.  Its an unpleasant task going after this negative element but it must be done. Many of them were, just a short time back, our comrades, true.  Its not an easy task but are we willing to watch the Conservative Movement drift off into history?  Become a memory?  Glory days?  </p>
<p>Another thing Patton said, &#8220;God have mercy on my enemies, because I won&#8217;t&#8221;.  Darvin Dowdy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darrren12000</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17538</link>
		<dc:creator>darrren12000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17538</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2009/01/black-progressive-law-professor.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Black Progressive Law Professor Responds to News That Michael Steele Will Lead the GOP&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2009/01/black-progressive-law-professor.html" rel="nofollow">A Black Progressive Law Professor Responds to News That Michael Steele Will Lead the GOP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsar</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17537</link>
		<dc:creator>tsar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17537</guid>
		<description>Everyone kept talking about grass roots campaigns in the local Meetings of republicans during the Bush beginning all the way through to the second Bush election. I got involved and ended up as a precinct chair, a poll watcher, and a person that made phone calls, go vote! 
 I kept saying I could accomplish more if they would let me; I have 20 years experience in the Computer/Web business.  I made suggestions of a website for our local area as a way of sharing more information quicker, to post requests for specific things that needed to be done in the area quickly, plus an open discussion area, or an online newsletter. I even offered to do it for free. No one ever took me up on my offer, I was introduced to some of the paid republican technology people for the state, and they wanted nothing to do with my local &quot;grass roots&quot; web information center. 
My frustration in feeling like I wasn’t able to help and not have been taken seriously led me to walk away from the local party politics meetings. The very definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results, all they wanted to do here was the same thing they had always done.
My disgust with the last two years of the politics of name calling and vitriol has actually drawn me back in, we need some changes. We need to explain:
 
What conservatives are.
Who we are as a party 
what the republicans have in mind.
What&#039;s the plan? 

I am looking for my niche, how I can help. I am looking for Ideas.  Anyone have any, for a slightly disabled 52 year old computer guy with a lot of time on his hands?
Maryland is losing republican representation, maybe it&#039;s time for some changes. I have high hopes for Michael Steele.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone kept talking about grass roots campaigns in the local Meetings of republicans during the Bush beginning all the way through to the second Bush election. I got involved and ended up as a precinct chair, a poll watcher, and a person that made phone calls, go vote!<br />
 I kept saying I could accomplish more if they would let me; I have 20 years experience in the Computer/Web business.  I made suggestions of a website for our local area as a way of sharing more information quicker, to post requests for specific things that needed to be done in the area quickly, plus an open discussion area, or an online newsletter. I even offered to do it for free. No one ever took me up on my offer, I was introduced to some of the paid republican technology people for the state, and they wanted nothing to do with my local &#8220;grass roots&#8221; web information center.<br />
My frustration in feeling like I wasn’t able to help and not have been taken seriously led me to walk away from the local party politics meetings. The very definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results, all they wanted to do here was the same thing they had always done.<br />
My disgust with the last two years of the politics of name calling and vitriol has actually drawn me back in, we need some changes. We need to explain:</p>
<p>What conservatives are.<br />
Who we are as a party<br />
what the republicans have in mind.<br />
What&#8217;s the plan? </p>
<p>I am looking for my niche, how I can help. I am looking for Ideas.  Anyone have any, for a slightly disabled 52 year old computer guy with a lot of time on his hands?<br />
Maryland is losing republican representation, maybe it&#8217;s time for some changes. I have high hopes for Michael Steele.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woodsman</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17535</link>
		<dc:creator>woodsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17535</guid>
		<description>when using the technology to raise campaign funds over the net use the verification system on the electronic transactions.  You do not have to say the other party did not, just say you have to provide reassurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when using the technology to raise campaign funds over the net use the verification system on the electronic transactions.  You do not have to say the other party did not, just say you have to provide reassurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hibbert</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17534</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hibbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17534</guid>
		<description>making decisions that it&#039;s a tool to help us do a better job. I know you&#039;ve got a bit more influence with these people than I do so I&#039;m  thrilled that you get it. 

We can have the prettiest sites on the net, but they&#039;re useless if there is no substance behind it.  An ugly site with substance have more power than a pretty &quot;empty suit&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>making decisions that it&#8217;s a tool to help us do a better job. I know you&#8217;ve got a bit more influence with these people than I do so I&#8217;m  thrilled that you get it. </p>
<p>We can have the prettiest sites on the net, but they&#8217;re useless if there is no substance behind it.  An ugly site with substance have more power than a pretty &#8220;empty suit&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Emanuel</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Emanuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17533</guid>
		<description>....who will be angling to get a piece of those &quot;lucrative technology contracts,&quot; but who -- in reality -- have no business getting within spitting distance of the RNC&#039;s operations. This &lt;em&gt;has&lt;/em&gt; to come down to effectiveness and deliverability, not who can write the prettiest proposal or slimily schmooze their way into the innermost circle.

All too many &quot;tech&quot; consultants on the right are selling snake oil, or are genuinely lacking in knowledge and understanding of that which they want to be hired to provide. Cyrus needs to stay at the RNC, and the entire organization needs to run from the snake-oilers and incompetents as fast as it can. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.who will be angling to get a piece of those &#8220;lucrative technology contracts,&#8221; but who &#8212; in reality &#8212; have no business getting within spitting distance of the RNC&#8217;s operations. This <em>has</em> to come down to effectiveness and deliverability, not who can write the prettiest proposal or slimily schmooze their way into the innermost circle.</p>
<p>All too many &#8220;tech&#8221; consultants on the right are selling snake oil, or are genuinely lacking in knowledge and understanding of that which they want to be hired to provide. Cyrus needs to stay at the RNC, and the entire organization needs to run from the snake-oilers and incompetents as fast as it can. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USNJIMRET</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17532</link>
		<dc:creator>USNJIMRET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17532</guid>
		<description>The &quot;new&quot; guy with the mandate to &#039;change&#039; things in order to &#039;fix&#039; everything?
I am 100% behind the idea of super emulation of what the left did to create the atmosphere that resulted in two electoral victories in a row. No, not the lies, distortions, pork, vote buying and the rest of the corruption that is the stock and trade of the left.
But if, and it seem pretty clear to me, technology is a critical factor in how the left did what they did, the right would be dolts to ignore it.
And if there are recently added people in place who, as the author of the thread head stated, know this stuff, have expertise in the extreme, AND happen to already be in place.....what is accomplished by starting over with this week&#039;s &quot;guru&quot;?
Change for the sake of change is rarely, if ever, a net positive.
And it really alienates the people who get kicked out in the name of &#039;change&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;new&#8221; guy with the mandate to &#8216;change&#8217; things in order to &#8216;fix&#8217; everything?<br />
I am 100% behind the idea of super emulation of what the left did to create the atmosphere that resulted in two electoral victories in a row. No, not the lies, distortions, pork, vote buying and the rest of the corruption that is the stock and trade of the left.<br />
But if, and it seem pretty clear to me, technology is a critical factor in how the left did what they did, the right would be dolts to ignore it.<br />
And if there are recently added people in place who, as the author of the thread head stated, know this stuff, have expertise in the extreme, AND happen to already be in place&#8230;..what is accomplished by starting over with this week&#8217;s &#8220;guru&#8221;?<br />
Change for the sake of change is rarely, if ever, a net positive.<br />
And it really alienates the people who get kicked out in the name of &#8216;change&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hibbert</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/01/31/rebuilding-the-party-the-technology-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17531</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hibbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=1206#comment-17531</guid>
		<description>Managers always expect too much from  technology.  They still don&#039;t get the idea that computers don&#039;t REASON, they only calculate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Managers always expect too much from  technology.  They still don&#8217;t get the idea that computers don&#8217;t REASON, they only calculate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

