He’s a willing accomplice to an anti-American ideology that can’t survive the truth.

to refute Obama’s claim? Hope so.

Too bad no one will hear this. The mainstream media is completely overrun by the left.

What part of just calling the President a LIAR don’t you understand?

You dance around the fact that the guy outright lies and then stroll through the well known evils of the bill.

Until conservative leaders start speaking clearly about the lying, dirty dealing, bribery, extortion and fascism of the Left, you just look like your arguing their points.

Black is black, white is white. This is why Palin connects and people like you don’t.

Tired of Waking Up to a Lying Communist President?

Want to Stop Obama Fast?

Here’s How We Do: http://commieblaster.com/velvet-revolution/

Leave it to BO to jump on the Heritage coat tails!

Edwin is great.
I’m joining Heritage.
Mark

Compare this Heritage Foundation package from 2003 to ObamaCare.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Testimony/Laying-the-Groundwork-for-Universal-Health-Care-Coverage

Who said: “Today there is a legal and moral obligation on society to provide some level of health care to those who become ill. … This translates into a requirement on individuals to enroll themselves and their dependents in at least a basic health plan – one that at the minimum should protect the rest of society from large and unexpected medical costs incurred by the family. And as any social contract, there would also be an obligation on society. To the extent that the family cannot reasonably afford reasonable basic coverage, the rest of society, via government, should take responsibility for financing that minimum coverage. To the extent that the family cannot reasonably afford reasonable basic coverage, the rest of society, VIA GOVERNMENT, should take responsibility for financing that minimum coverage” ?

How about just not providing cover to leftists on matters like these in the first place?

I’m out in the net trenches one day, discussing a really wretched idea about automatic conversions of 401K assets into annuities…something the Obama Administration is already trying to put into place.

The guy heading up the effort at Treasury is a former Brookings staffer. And somebody pointed me to a paper that he had written on the subject in 2006.

One of his co-authors? Somebody from the Heritage Foundation!!

What gives? You guys have done a lot of great work, I know. You don’t need to establish your bona fides with me. But why not steer clear of these odious efforts to steer (ie, control) people into things they may or may not want to do with their money?

This is exactly the kind of treatment you can expect when you try to reach across the aisle in this fashion. You become nothing but ideological cover for the left.

And let’s face it, Heritage did in fact put its imprimatur on a mandate to compel the purchase of health insurance.

i had the money to help the Heritage Foundation publish this in a Full page ad in all the major news Papers or better yet a series of Bill Boards in prominent and strategic locations. This needs to be put where the News media can’t neglect it.

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Graphics/2010/022310-Bill-comparison.aspx

from Kaiser news. It compares Obamacare to the Republican alternative plan to Hillarycare in 1993-4 and Boehner’s plan.

I prefer Paul Ryan’s plan mysel and hate Obamacare. It seems though that Obamacare lines up with what the Republicans were trying to pass during the 1993 – 1994 healthcare debate. That does not mean it was good, I did not like it then (and still don’t). The bill was introduced by Senator Chafee and had cosponsors including Bob Dole, Kit Bond, Bob Bennett, Orrin Hatch, Dick Lugar, and Chuck Grassley. It looks like the big difference between the two (and I am sure this has a great deal to do with ideology) is that the Republican alternative offered tax credits to poor to buy private insurance where Obamacare expands public insurance (Medicaid – which is an unpopular program). Also, the Republican plan has tort reform where Obamacare does not (but neither does Ryan’s plan if I remember correctly – odd in that I think tort reform is important). Other than that, they are very similar. The Republican plan was never scored by the CBO but I can’t believe the cost would have been radically different.

The CEO’s need to be coached and prepped by Ari Fleischer and some other media mavens. This will be used as “evil” CEO’s want to take away your healthcare.

This could be a great opportunity, if not the only opportunity to stop this in its tracks. Lets hope so.

Turn the tables on Waxman!!

Let’s go back to the single, most fundamental question in the debate: Whose business is healthcare? Is it the individual’s? Is it the State’s? Is the federal government’s? I believe it is the individual’s business, and his alone (or his and his doctor’s). Period. So, let’s not only repeal Obamacare, but turn the clock back and repeal a whole host of other government involvement in healthcare, from Medicare and Medicaid to government meddling in the insurance business. Let’s RESTORE the liberty the Radical Left has stolen from WE, THE PEOPLE. Healthcare liberty is a great place to start.

Chafee, Dole, Bond, Bennett, Hatch, Lugar, and Grassley. And you call the ’93 plan a “Republican Plan”? This is the same crew of left-wing Reps. who gave us the Obama Pelosi Reid Criminal Congress and Gangster Government.