I fear that our liberal brothers are in danger of becoming hypocrites. For decades any arguments against abortion-on-demand have elicited howls about ANYONE coming between a doctor and a woman’s “right to privacy.” Now, as I watch liberals gleefully ram the federal government in between physicians and patients, a motto from Obama’s Chicago has crept into my mind: “Ubi Est Mea–Where’s mine?” Surely I have a right to privacy too, right?
Regardless of what you think about the constitutionality of Roe v Wade in the first place, the majority opinion delivered by Justice Blackmun was quite clear regarding the right to privacy:
“T]he Court has recognized that a right of personal privacy, or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy, does exist under the Constitution. … This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment’s reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.“
This “right,” though not explicitly stated in the constitution, was first established in Griswold v. Connecticut (though it pertained to marital privacy in that case). It also was important in Lawrence v. Texas regarding laws against sodomy.
Maybe I’m not following liberal thought correctly, but isn’t Obamacare an enormous constitutional violation of this “right to privacy” that they profess to hold dearly? Am I to understand that if a woman wants to abort her child it’s a choice between her and her doctor alone, but if my grandmother needs an operation it’s okay for Dr. Obama from the federal government to just give her pain pills instead? Am I to understand that if I need a medical treatment, rather than making that decision with my physician in privacy I have to appeal to a government bureaucracy to see what their comparative effectiveness research thinks about the quality of my life? Why is it that liberals who have spent decades screaming about the government potentially jumping between a woman and her physician are now so eager to interfere with medical decisions for everyone else?
There are numerous constitutional issues that need to be addressed regarding this Obamacare government takeover, and I’ll be extremely disappointed if the right to privacy isn’t one of them. Liberals can’t have it both ways on the right to privacy.
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
I see you missed the footnote on page 43 of the liberal's bible
civil truth (Diary) Friday, January 1st at 1:08AM EST (link)Where, if you parse correctly the linguistic convolutions, the “right to privacy” in the medical arena essentially is limited to contraception and abortion. Especially for females under age 18, where it also supersedes parental rights (but not parental obligations).
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
Civil_truth
edward_mosby (Diary) Friday, January 1st at 11:28AM EST (link)To me, the right to privacy is the most glaring constitutional violation of Obamacare.
I feel, as you do, that they escape with hypocrisy all too often, but in this case how can they possibly say that the only people who have a right to privacy with doctors are women who want to end the lives of their unborn children?
Seems to me
pac_NY (Diary) Friday, January 1st at 12:14PM EST (link)the Left cannot continue to have a “right to privacy” on abortion if the rest of us will not be granted the same right with regard to health issues between our doctors and ourselves.
Either Roe vs Wade would have to first be overturned, or the Dems must demolish their monstrous health care bill which essentially denies our medical privacy rights, and it should be put to them to choose which it will be.
This could conceivably keep the Left tied up in knots, viciously bickering amongst themselves for the next 30 years trying figure it out.
Perhaps then the rest of us can focus on how best to get the nation back on track with national security, the economy, etc.
He looketh on the earth, and it trembleth: he toucheth the hills, and they smoke. -Psalm 104:32