Lessons Learned from Tuesday’s Primary Results


The August 3rd primaries in Michigan, Missouri and Kansas gave political junkies yet another opportunity to peer into the mind and psyche of the American electorate. So…what fresh, new insights did last night’s results give us?

Well, if you ever wondered whether or not your vote makes a difference, or whether you should really send out that email to your list of friends and relatives shilling for your favorite conservative candidate, or whether you should talk to your next door neighbor about voting, the results of the GOP primary in MI CD-1 should forever disabuse you of that notion. According to the unofficial tallies at the Michigan Secretary of State site, grassroots conservative Dr. Dan Benishek leads SEIU-backed career politician Jason Allen by one vote (yes, you read that right). There are four words for conservatives to ponder and pound in the 90 or so days left to the November 2 elections: Get. Out. The. Vote.

Second, the Republican Party simply must do something about allowing open primaries to skew the results of its candidate selection. The state of Michigan allows a voter to select which primary he wishes to vote in at the polling place. I have absolutely no doubt, in the absence of a contested Democrat race in the aforementioned MI CD-1, that many SEIU/labor union-type folks “crossed-over” to vote for Allen in the GOP primary. The same may very well be true in the Michigan GOP gubernatorial race where moderate-to-liberal Rick Snyder bested his 3 conservsative rivals by acquiring 37% of the vote. If you’re really tired of watching moderate/liberal Democrats and Independents choose your Party represesentative, do something about it.

And while on the subject of the Michigan primary, how many times are conservative candidates going to watch the sole moderate/liberal candidate become the party nominee with substantially less than a majority of the vote before they figure it out? In MI CD-1, Linda Goldthorpe and Tom Stillings, who held positions virtually identical to Dr. Benishek, combined to attract approximately 10,000 votes. They never had a chance to win from the day they entered the race, polling showed a week before the end of the race that they had no chance, and virtually every vote they received would most likely have gone to Dr. Dan. Same dynamic in the governor’s race: 3 conservative candidates split 63% of the vote allowing the most liberal candidate by far to win the nomination.

Memo to conservative candidates: I know you’ve got egos like everyone else but for just the next 2 or 3 election cycles while we’re trying to take back our country, if you don’t have a chance to win? Get! Out!

And finally, just like the sun rising in the east and setting in the south, Tuesday’s results reaffirmed the ineffable ability of the LSM to demonstrate it’s bias. In Missouri, Proposition C allowed Missourians to express their opinion on the unprecedented mandate that individuals buy health insurance. It passed by a crushing 3 to 1 margin. From the LSM? Crickets chirping.

But the award for making lemons out of lemonade? The Kansas Senate race where you had the Media’s two favorite conservative villians – Sarah Palin and Jim DeMint – endorsing different candidates (Todd Tiahrt and Jerry Morran, respectively). Since obviously one of them had to win, and knowing the Media finds no greater delight than to be able to marginalize the influence that either of these conservatives have, I was curious as to how they would handle this seemingly impossible situation.

Not a problem. Headline on the Yahoo news bites? “Palin-backed candidate loses Kansas Senatorial Bid.”

It’s nice to know there are immutable constants in the world.

Originally posted at 73wire.com


RSS feed

14 Comments Leave a comment

It really is a shame that one of them had to lose nt

mikerazar (Diary) Wednesday, August 4th at 10:59AM EST (link)

We have a nation to save, people.

 

Excellent post eburke

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, August 4th at 11:18AM EST (link)

especially when you ask those candidates that know they don’t have any chance of winning to drop out. I am beginning to get very suspicious of why there are so many candidates in some of the races to begin with. In the past, there were several contests where the R’s had no candidates, and the D’s won by default. Is it because it appears to be a great year for Republican’s?

I am very worried about the Benishek/Allen race. It smells very bad. Allen, having been in state government, has alot of friends in high places, including the corrupt SEIU.

 

thanks for the autopsy eburke

tngal (Diary) Wednesday, August 4th at 11:23AM EST (link)

was hoping someone would pcik apart the mess. You mentioned egos…I would add that despite the race being rollercoaster for much of the night, Allen chose to declare victory about a half an hour before a final precinct had been counted. Then the (latest) final came in and only then did Dr. Dan declare victory.

Since we can’t be certain at this point who the winner will be, its safe to say your ego or arrogance should not get in the way of the people. Everyone should have a shot at a seat, but none are entitled to it. The “establishment” candidates should remember this.

 

Rick Snyder / Jason Allen

ktsub (Diary) Wednesday, August 4th at 11:24AM EST (link)

The Michigan results were fine, especially for a blue state, that is rapidly blueing. It should be a good thing, that the GOP brought a group of candidates that is more diverse in ideology than the Democrats. That has corned the Dems in Michigan in a left-wing corner.

I would look at it like, the open Republican primary, caused Michigan Dems to nominate the most liberal, unelectable candidates for November. Rick Snyder is a lifelong Republican, that got *shudder* “Reagan Democrats” to cross over and vote for him. Jason Allen is a conservative, the union SB 731 is way over-hyped and a cursory research of the topic, should be done and it shows Jason Allen actually inserted language to clarify the legislation (that was sponsered by 8 other Republicans). Eitherway with the good Dr. or Allen, either will be a good candidate, and a conservative vote.

 

the August 4th primaries? How about the August 3rd primaries?

pilgrim (Diary) Wednesday, August 4th at 11:25AM EST (link)

This opening sentence of yours could have been used on the cross-over idiots. They just needed to be told to wait to vote in the August 4th primary. Perhaps the results of the August 3rd primaries would be different. smile, eburke. You’re a good man.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

Dang it, pil...now ya went and screwed up my whole plan -nt-

eburke (Diary) Thursday, August 5th at 12:06AM EST (link)

Ok, in reality…too much Teton fog still in my brain and this is what happens when you blog before coffee.

Got ‘er all taken care of now :-)

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Unified Patriots

 
 

SCOREBOARD !!!

indyent Thursday, August 5th at 2:38PM EST (link)

To all the conservative right-wing evangelical fundamentalists of West Michigan (and supporters thereof): this is how you win an election ! You run on a moderate platform, abandon the divisive and outdated issues you still “cling” to, and most importantly, completely disassociate yourself with any flavor of tea party affiliation. Mr. Hoekstra certainly learned that lesson, eh Pete? (tea party caucus – pashaw)

Now, since Snyder bears the banner of a republican, all the tools and clones of the fringe right wing will claim victory and get on board. Actually, the reality is that you and your “principles” have been profoundly SHUT OUT as per the primary results. You do not have a seat at this table in November.

The best part is, that as a registered independent, I have the pleasure of having voted for President and Commander in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama AND Rick Snyder. Besides that Snyder has better ideas than the democrats anyway, I found it most beneficial to vote against any tea-party-esque candidate.

Again, in a word – SCOREBOARD !!!

5th post by this troll, all the exactly same.

gekster (Diary) Thursday, August 5th at 2:42PM EST (link)

Where’s the bunny when y ou need him.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

Sounds more like a "third party" nitwit to me. [nt]

acat (Diary) Thursday, August 5th at 2:49PM EST (link)

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

 
 

Uh, conservatives got more than 60% of the vote in the primary

JSobieski (Diary) Thursday, August 5th at 2:45PM EST (link)

If there would have been 3 moderates and one conservative, the winner would have had a majority and not a mere plurality.

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

This kid has no thoughts of his own.

gekster (Diary) Thursday, August 5th at 2:50PM EST (link)

Somebody wrote this for him, and taught him how to copy and paste.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

 
 

G'bye (nt)

Neil Stevens (Diary) Thursday, August 5th at 2:48PM EST (link)

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

*applause*

kyle8 (Diary) Thursday, August 5th at 2:55PM EST (link)

Funny how running an extremist, non-centrist, campaign seems to work for the Donks, all the time, but it can’t work for us? Right.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 
 
 

Thanks for this, e.

Flagstaff (Diary) Saturday, August 7th at 7:51PM EST (link)

We have something like this in AZ CD-1. Only there is no Democrat shill, AFAIK. We have about 8 people running in the primary to go up against the unopposed Ann Kirkpatrick, with one of the least appealing candidates spending a lot of money to advertise on Rush’s show. (She lost to Kirkpatrick last time).

Arizona has the same open primary system, open to the same mischief. I know it’s mischief because the AZ Repugnant thinks it’s a good idea. With a primary system, however, I don’t know how you prevent it. The logical preventive would be a party process that picks our one and only single candidate, which is also bad.

Has Jason Allen contested the primary results yet?

“The press is so powerful in its image-making role that it can make a criminal look like he’s the victim and make the victim look like he’s the criminal. If you aren’t careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”– Malcolm X, Audubon Ballroom, December 13, 1964