Comments on: MSNBC’s Norah O’Donnell picks fight with 17-yr old Palinite, gets scoreboarded

By: bobmontgomery

bobmontgomery — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:07:57 +0000

Female WAPO writers actually posted about fantasizing about having sex with Obama. They are all sick. Very, very sick.

By: momtotwo

momtotwo — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:45:35 +0000

Me thinks Norah acted stupidly.

She looked liked she wanted to scratch the poor girls eyes out.

By: skorrent1

skorrent1 — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:22:20 +0000

Had she not gone back to Dad (?) for a wrap up. She allowed him to say that the purpose of TARP was completely changed after passage to something completely unacceptable. (It’s a wonder that made the cut!) Then she said the supporters had no specifics. Clear loser!

By: MacAoidh

MacAoidh — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:29:24 +0000

hhh

By: Flagstaff

Flagstaff — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:04:40 +0000

she would have walked past her to a different victim.

Interesting that both interviewees were able to express themselves so well under adverse circumstances.

By: churchillian

churchillian — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:49:34 +0000

Who the hell was that male anchor? And what’s with the Kermit the Frog voice?

By: 6eorge Jetson

6eorge Jetson — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:00:31 +0000

By: GregInFla

GregInFla — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:30:05 +0000

the argument fails, because she was agreeing with Norah’s candidate (Obama). It’s just like pro-abortion people complaining that a Republican made some decision sometime against pro-life causes. They are complaining about someone agreeing with them. The man made a great comment, that TARP was for Toxic Assets when it was passed, and THEN it was used for different baliout purposes.

By: reverendred

reverendred — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:18:11 +0000

the reporter is reading her question from a piece of paper. It is obviously meant to be a real stumper of a question, and she is going around trying to find a good victim. Hoping for easy prey, she latches on to a teenage girl (thereby insulting her own gender). Really, it is despicable reporting. Reminds me of how Sarah got misused by Katie Couric.

Reverend Red

By: E Pluribus Unum

E Pluribus Unum — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:35:14 +0000

Norah asked (a) an ambush question, other than what they discussed before cameras rolled, and (b) a trap question, trying to pin to Sarah Palin a position that she HAD to take as McCain’s VP candidate. The dumb b*tch used cue cards because she’s not smart enough to think on her feet, even when she’s asking the questions.

Jackie responded by saying, correctly, that she does not think that’s Palin’s position. No cue cards. Correct on the facts.

By: E Pluribus Unum

E Pluribus Unum — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:31:14 +0000

Thanks for looking that one up, CW. I loved that one.

By: mom2oneson

mom2oneson — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:07:42 +0000

It’s amazing that she did the same at her age. What an idiot that reporter is still reading off her statement after the young lady already responded to her about it more than once.

By: ColdWarrior

ColdWarrior — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:59:33 +0000

You may recall I suggested to Liz at the Redstate gathering that her and her mother open a consulting business for conservative Republican lawmakers and Party leaders teaching how to debate the Minion Media talking airheads like O'Donnell. Enjoy! Thank you. ColdWarrior

By: mom2oneson

mom2oneson — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:51:06 +0000

with a beautiful face and makeup! I can’t believe she picked on that girl! Good you dad you have done a GREAT job raising your daughter !!!!!!!! I bet her dad had to hold back from punching her!! I would not have been so patient even I had known my daughter could hold her own. I can’t believe how sick that reporter is. Watching that was surreal.

By: Rod_Patrick

Rod_Patrick — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:22:27 +0000

O’Donnell’s passion, fighting spirit, and tactical skills in twisting the facts in favor of her arguments are extraordinary and sterling.

But Obama, Huck, Romney, and the rest are SO SO ANGRY of O’Donnell. She practically converted Jackie into a full-pledged Palinite.

And in 3 years, Jackie will be a young lady, and … an eligible voter. That means that O’Donnell has given Palin at least 4 votes in 2012 if Palin decides to run:

1 – Jackie
2 – Jackie’s future boyfriend [She will be a beautiful confident young lady.]
3 – at least one of Jackie’s close friends
4 – at least one member of Jackie’s household

In the end, Norah won the debate and she successfully assured Palin of at least 4 votes in 2012.

By: penguin2

penguin2 — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:21:05 +0000

will tell them exactly what they/we think of them. As in, “Nora, you Leftist agenda driven media hacks are the ignorant ones, and your lack of ethics and brains is obvious to everyone but you.” I guess that will end up on the cutting room floor?

By: SoFiMil

SoFiMil — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:49:53 +0000

was appalling apparent in the last 5 seconds of the clip when she stated that Palin supporters “can’t be specific in some cases about the issues.”

The young woman succinctly cited the issues. It was Obama supporters during the election who could not provide specifics (other than the fact that Obama had dreamy eyes).

By: bk

bk — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:24:57 +0000

By: TNJim

TNJim — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:08:26 +0000

This young lady and others like her are where our future lives. She’s the real hope, not the phony Obama kind. Thanks to djemi for posting the link to her blog so us RedStaters can see what she is all about. She’s also great on twitter.

So, Norah. Do you feel like you accomplished something by ambushing (or trying to) a 17-year-old? Rush thinks she did a fine job, and so do I.

By: vettepilot

vettepilot — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:57:42 +0000

The subject of that post was certainly not aimed at you! Missed a qualifier there…