This is the seventh, eighth, and ninth proposals for new amendment to our Constitution I’m hoping Santa will magically bring me Christams morning in order to restore limits to our national government so that when I tell my kids with a straight face that two of the principles of our Constitution are limited government and federalism.
Proposal #7 – Prohibiting Congressional Entitlements and Limiting Bailouts
Section 1. The Congress shall not provide any Grant or Loan directly to any Person, except Loans to Banks so as to regulate the value of the Money of the United States; nor shall it authorize any Part of the Government of the United States to do the same, notwithstanding outlays drawn from the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds for Persons who contributed directly to said Trust Funds prior to the date this Article is ratified, but thereafter all such Programs and Benefits shall not be administered by the Congress, but by the States or the People respectively.
Section 2. Neither the Congress nor the several States shall abolish or assume any Debt, but this does not preclude them from mandating, in Cases of Bankruptcy, reasonable changes in the Rate of Interest and the Payment Schedule, and granting Deferments for a limited Time.
Section 3. This Article shall take effect within 1 year of it Ratification.
Proposal #8 – Reigning in Congressional Spending by Granting the President Limited Line-Item Veto
Section 1. Whenever the total Amount of the public Debt of the United States at the close of any fiscal Year is greater than the total Amount of such Debt at the close of the preceding fiscal Year, each Representative in the House of Representatives and Senator in the Senate shall forfeit and repay to the United States any and all Payments they received from the United States in that Year that just closed and shall not receive any future Payments from the United States until that Amount is repaid.
Section 2. Whenever the total Amount of the public Debt of the United States at the close of any fiscal Year is greater than the total Amount of such Debt at the close of the preceding fiscal Year, the President may (during the next annual Session of the Congress) in any Bill authorizing the withdrawal of Money from the Treasury, disapprove any Item of Appropriation, or reduce the Amount of any Item of Appropriation without disapproving the remaining Parts of the Bill, provided that no Amount of Money for the operation of the Congress or the Judiciary Department of the United States is affected and provided that the Grants to the several States remain proportional to the most recent Census, he may likewise disprove any such Item of Appropriation without disapproving the remaining Parts of the Bill.
Section 3. In the fore mentioned Case, if any Bill is approved by the President, any Item or Amount of any Item of Appropriation contained therein which is not disapproved shall become Law, while any Item or amount of any Item of Appropriation therein which is disapproved shall not become Law. In such cases he shall, in signing the Bill, designate any Item of Appropriation disapproved, note the Amount remaining of any Item reduced, and return a Copy of the same, with his Objections to the House of Representatives, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and may proceed to reconsider any disapproved or reduced Item of Appropriation; and any such Item of Appropriation shall become Law in the Manner prescribed in the Case of a Bill disapproved by the President.
Proposal #9 – Limiting Executive Regulatory Power, the President’s Recess Appointment Power, and His Power of Clemency.
Section 1. Any Regulation or Order made by the Executive Department of the United States Government under authority granted by the Congress prior to the ratification of this Article shall be null and void if each House of the Congress fails to affirm said Regulation or Order by concurrent Resolution within four years from the date that this Article is ratified.
Section 2. Upon ratification of this article, any Regulation or Order made in a given Term of the Representatives in the House of Representatives by the Executive Department of the United States Government under authority granted by the Congress following the ratification of this Article shall be null and void if each House of the Congress fails to affirm said Regulation or Order by concurrent Resolution before the proceeding Term expires.
Section 3. An Appointment made by the President to fill a Vacancy while the Senate is recessed must be confirmed by the Senate within 30 Days of the End of that Recess, or that Appointment shall be Null and Void and the Position shall be considered Vacant until it can be filled according to the Methods established in this Constitution.
If the Senate fails to confirm an Appointment made when the Senate is in Recess within 30 Days of the End of that Recess, then any rule, decision, or action made by that Appointee under the authority granted to that Position by the laws of the United States or this Constitution shall be Null and Void.
Section 4. Prior to being granted by the President, any Reprieve or Pardon for an Offence against the United States must be recommended by a Committee of the United States House of Representatives selected according to the Rules of the House of Representatives for the Purpose of recommending Reprieves and Pardons.
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
I like em, not sure if the last one is really necessary
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, December 26th at 12:55PM EST (link)Also, I would like to see something like this:
No single individual shall serve more than twelve years total of service in either or both houses of congress.
and this:
The public display of any traditional religious symbol or a non sectarian public prayer shall be considered innocuous and shall not be considered an establishment of religion.
And this:
The congress of the United States shall henceforth be enjoined against the payment of any subsidies, special tax considerations, or any specific aid or relief in any way to any privately held company or industry. Nor shall it favor one industry over any other, nor any firm over others, nor shall it favor any industry over the public.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
kyle, as to your #2,
gekster (Diary) Monday, December 26th at 1:14PM EST (link)it is already in the law.
The First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The part: “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”
does not include “unless you are on any type of goverment property, unless you are in public, unless you are in a school, unless you are around some idiot who just doesn’t like religeon.”
To me it means I can be religeous anywhere I am.
They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.
We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway
Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved
yes but, we need another amendment to spell it out
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, December 26th at 1:17PM EST (link)because the courts have perverted the original.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
To me it is spelled out.
gekster (Diary) Monday, December 26th at 1:31PM EST (link)But I do agree with you.
The courts see things in there that are not in there.
They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.
We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway
Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved
Thanks Kyle
dvdmsr (Diary) Wednesday, December 28th at 1:52AM EST (link)Actually I was thinking my prohibition against grants to persons would cover corporations because they’re considered legal persons/entities, but that designation is premised on judicial rulings so I guess including language I you suggested would be the better course; afterall what the courts giveth, the courts can taketh away.
Personal Responsibility Conservative