Soaking the Rich


Soak the rich


Category: , , , , ,

RSS feed

5 Comments Leave a comment

Is that a play on trickle down economics?

Greg (Diary) Wednesday, February 3rd at 8:44AM EST (link)

Just like taxing corporations..

I was thinking "trickle down effect" of the Federales :)

Dave Poff (haystack) (Diary) Wednesday, February 3rd at 8:55AM EST (link)

nt

“It does not take a majority to prevail … but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”
~Sam Adams

 
 

While we are on topic of soaking the rich . . .

reallyfive Wednesday, February 3rd at 9:25AM EST (link)

Fox reporting that projections are we will hit the newly approved debt ceiling by February–of this year!!!

Surely the Republicans will put a foot down about this if it comes up for a vote again in just one month???

 

Not quite trickle down,

johnt Wednesday, February 3rd at 9:49AM EST (link)

which was ridiculed for the supposed, indirect affect tax cuts for’”fat cats” would have. Of course it was and is a valid economic fact but that never mattered.
No, this is smokescreen economics. You boldly and maliciously lie about who will be taxed, playing to envy and stupidity . Then you tax everything and everybody you can reach and hurt.
There’s nothing indirect about it and nothing to trickle down except the entire economy and nation. Except it won’t be a trickle, it will be a collapse.
Little Liberals will squeal with delight.

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

 

Collecting taxes with buckshot from a new Remington assault shotgun. I had hoped the lesson was learned last time.

archer52 Wednesday, February 3rd at 11:56PM EST (link)

http://truthandcommonsense.com/2010/02/04/a-nice-note-from-the-irs-they-are-buying-combat-shotguns/

I picked this up on the Drudge report and needless to say I became a little queasy. I was just on the job when Waco and Ruby Ridge burned across the television. It was funny how our department was split between the “hut hut” guys (SWAT) and the regular cops who thought nothing justified assaulting a compound filled with children or shooting a mother in the head. As I said in my post, I support agents being able to protect themselves, but these weapons are not defensive, they are offensive, which begs the question who in the world does the IRS think they are going to have to shoot? Tax evaders? What happened to court filings, garnishing wages, etc.

As I said in my post. The last time we had a liberal democrat in office it didn’t work out so well. I was hoping the lesson had been learned and remembered. Maybe I’m wrong.

I wonder what Victor Davis Hansen and other opinion makers has to say about this and Obama’s determined effort to push THROUGH the citizens.