(h/t to the folks at hillaryclintonforum.net)
Last I looked at places like 538.com and ElectionProjection, they were calling Nevada either “leans McCain” or “tossup”. But this story in the Las Vegas Review Journal makes that assumption pretty suspect.
On the first day of early voting, 62 percent of Clark County voters were Democrats, while 23 percent were Republicans and the rest nonpartisans or members of minor parties. Through Sunday, 55 percent of early voters were Democrats, 29 percent Republicans.
Ok, now pay close attention, the early voting gives Democrats a 26 point edge in in votes cast.
Exit polling of early voters conducted by a local political consultant suggests a close presidential contest in the Silver State: Democratic nominee Barack Obama had the votes of 50 percent who had voted, while Republican nominee John McCain had 48 percent of the early vote.
Whoa! That is a heck of a lot of PUMAs. Let’s take a look at the actual vote totals:
Through the end of voting Sunday, about 300,000 people had voted early statewide, a turnout of 24.9 percent of the state’s 1.2 million active voters.
So if we do a little math, this means 150,000 people have voted Obama, and 148,000 for McCain. But 165,000 of the voters are Democrat, while 87,000 are Republicans. For these results to be valid, at least 13,000 Democrats have to have voted to McCain, and up to 61,000. Assuming that the Independents are splitting 50/50, this gives us about a 37,000 Democrat crossover votes, or 12% of the electorate, assuming 100% support for McCain among Republicans. Put more realistically, the Republicans in Nevada have a 12% advantage in crossover support.
Amusingly, the article quotes Larry Sabato, then uses his prediction for Nevada:
Sabato, whose “Crystal Ball” tracks his election predictions, foresees Nevada going narrowly for Obama.
If that is going to happen, then the Dems need to have at least a 12% turnout advantage over the Republicans. Because if we get a 2004 even turnout between parties, McCain will win Nevada by 12 points, at the current rate. The only way this reserves is if the PUMAs all voted early, and Obama supporters are waiting for Nov. 4th.
Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
Daniel Horowitz
Jake Walker
Good news is always welcome.
nogyro35 (Diary) Tuesday, October 28th at 6:36PM EST (link)I’ve also heard things are tighter than expected in the NH Senate race. I hope so.
Of course the best news political news of the year was the selection of Palin for VP.
Excellent!! nt
Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Tuesday, October 28th at 6:58PM EST (link)nt
Rendell Doesn't believe the Polls in Pa. either
PaRep (Diary) Tuesday, October 28th at 8:35PM EST (link)http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/219-10282008-1612218.html
View from a PUMA
LaBonBon Tuesday, October 28th at 8:38PM EST (link)What a great article! I have always believed the PUMA impact has been greatly underestimated. Just look at the number of sites clustered under the “Just Say No Deal” coalition. Visit Hillbuzz.com and NoQuarter.com and see how hard the PUMAs are working for McCain-Palin. Nothing would make me happier than the knowledge that my fellow disaffected Dems and I won this election for McCain-Palin and in the process brought down the socialist wing of the Democrat party.
KEEP FIGHTING & Thanks for the Help
PaRep (Diary) Tuesday, October 28th at 8:42PM EST (link).
What about the early voting in Colorado and North Carolina???
Lysander the Spartan (Diary) Tuesday, October 28th at 8:54PM EST (link)Anyone with any updates??? The same goes for PA and Virginia??????
Lysander
Thanks for the great work!
DrJeff Tuesday, October 28th at 8:55PM EST (link)If we win, we definitely will give you the credit you deserve!
These are only CLARK COUNTY numbers.
eander99 Tuesday, October 28th at 10:19PM EST (link)The totals in the article DON’T INCLUDE McCains base of support in Rural Nevada, nor do they include swing county Washoe. They are only numerating Democratic stronghold Clark County.
I am a moby troll and an active member of the Clark County Democratic Party. My faith in my arguments is so poor, that I had to resort to lying about who I am in order to try to make my points. That is why I got banned.
Clark County
dld1717 (Diary) Tuesday, October 28th at 10:21PM EST (link)Are these numbers bad news for Porter in Nevada? He is in a very close race with Titus any thoughts?
Here you go read this From the McCain Campaign
PaRep (Diary) Tuesday, October 28th at 11:13PM EST (link)http://www.foxnews.com/urgent_queue/index.html#1c0439fc,2008-10-28
Nevada is close
Desert_Conservative Wednesday, October 29th at 12:46AM EST (link)I crunched some numbers on this. The poll sample was only for a single Friday over the whole state. I’m trying to get a statewide breakdown of voters(Dem/Rep/Ind) that day so I can accurately extrapolate. In short, using some guesswork, the numbers would indicate McCain is getting 4-5% more than he polls at. That would make it basically even.
Having seen the fist couple days of early voting I don’t think there was much crossover those first couple of days when Democratic turnout was heavy.
That being said, I think there has been increased crossover since then. I suspect a lot of Union people are lying to their party bosses and voting McCain.
BTW – My initial impression was that the numbers were even better for Porter than for McCain, but I haven’t confirmed it yet.
Do you think Obama's cockiness comes from his inexperience in close elections?
nogyro35 (Diary) Wednesday, October 29th at 11:40AM EST (link)We all say he lacks experience outside academia and campaigns , but he has no experience in hard fought elections either.
I could see an inexperienced nominee misreading the polls.
I pulled these quotes from your article. I bet Obama is misreading this….
“Last night, 81% of voters described their interest in this election as a 10(scale of 1 to 10)! Wow. (As opposed to 75% who described their interest as 10 out of 10, in 2004)
In todays terms, that could mean breaking the barrier of 130 million voters!
There is simply no model that begins to know or predict the composition of the electorate at this level of turn-out.
My own view and our own weights in our surveys reflect a belief that African American turn-out will be at historic levels, there will be a significant boost with voters 18 to 29 years old, yet the overall high level of turn-out will begin to mute the increase in the percentage these sub-groups represent in the overall electorate.“
The Palin effect!!!