Dems to Self-immolate via Reconciliation


Brian Darling of the Heritage Foundation has moved the entire health care world from refitting weapons and/or R & R to DEFCON Two with these two posts, here and here. Darling is not only one of the few real operational experts on Senate Rules, he is a highly effective operative for the good guys. If Darling says the Dems are going to try it, they will. DRUDGE is now on board with his front page all-caps headline: BACK FROM THE DEAD: DEMS VOW TO RAHM THROUGH HEALTHCARE.

Add to this that Senator Reid just gave an interview saying Congress will pass ObamaCare in 60 days, and FireDogLake is reporting the Leadership is on-board for the reconciliation strategy. Also, FireDogLake is pushing the public option to be included in reconciliation. TIME and Washington Monthly are reporting that Reid intends to use reconciliation to insert the public option. Furthermore, former White House Communication Director for Obama, Anita Dunn says ObamaCare will pass Congress by November, just after Obama made another push for ObamaCare at his Nevada town hall.

It is prudent to ask, at this point, what happened to pivoting to the jobs bill or to financial reform? Apparently, the degree of difficulty presented by these two “easy” bills has forced the White House to pivot away from them, and back to the ObamaCare. (This, of course, makes the passage of ObamaCare less likely because even the easy bills have become hard to do for the walking-wounded Dems.)

What is really going on? Are the Dems that crazy to think that their attempt at using reconciliation will help them politically? Or are they just delusional, and cannot accept it is over for ObamaCare, and do not have the discipline to turn to something the public actually wants, like deficit reduction?

The Dems cannot accept the defeat of ObamaCare and will try reconciliation because Majority Leader Reid is desperate for liberal support for his failing re-election effort; Speaker Pelosi is genuinely irrational about ObamaCare, and the President believes that the entire Dem Congress should politically self-destruct to save his bill.

Mainline Dem strategists like Charlie Cook call it a “massive miscalculation.” Cook’s interview is a MUST WATCH here, at the National Journal.

Meanwhile, today the Hill is reporting that the GOP says the Dems do not have the votes on the Senate floor. This intelligence is accurate, but the Dem Senators will not embarrass Senator Reid by contradicting him publicly.

Add irrational to desperate and you get the Dems attempting to pass ObamaCare via reconciliation.

But the tough problems remain. Like abortion. The whole idea of forcing the country through months more of health care, to make the bill more liberal, and then send it back to the House floor where you would force Members in an election year to walk the plank again on abortion, ObamaCare, Medicare cuts, tax increases, the individual mandate, health benefits for illegal immigrants, while spending $2.5 trillion to do it is, quite simply, nutty.

So, let the Dems try to pass ObamaCare via reconciliation.

They will find themselves in another three or four month political valley of death. And they will still not pass the bill.

The country is not in danger of ObamaCare passing via reconciliation.

The country is, however, in danger from politically desperate and irrational leaders who are intent on the political equivalent of self-immolation.

Herein is the drama from no-drama-Obama.


RSS feed

90 Comments Leave a comment

If they pass this garbage via Reconciliation, isn't it only good for 5 yrs?

erikgershengorn (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:02PM EST (link)

?

http://www.facebook.com/#/pages/Governor-C-L-Butch-Otter/292986829831?ref=search&sid=100000502757197.902265557..1

Five years?

mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:11PM EST (link)

Tell ya what. Draw up a list of all the programs that were passed under the New Deal or the Great Society that have been killed. There’s no such thing as a five year government program.

Any law passed by reconciliation

nancylee Saturday, February 20th at 1:19PM EST (link)

Sunsets in 5 years, by law, and has to be voted on again. It’s anybody’s guess what would happen at that point.

So you actually think that we have ObamaCare

mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:24PM EST (link)

for five years and the geniuses in DC will vote to kill it?

I can get you a great deal on a bridge.

No, not at all.

nancylee Saturday, February 20th at 1:38PM EST (link)

If the law went into effect at once we would be toast, but if what comes out of reconciliation is anything like the House or Senate bills, the taxes start at once and the actual benefits (if you can call them that) don’t kick in until 2013 or 2014. If the Rs take the House in November they can kill any funding to start putting the bureaucracy in place, if they so choose, and the program can be killed once Obama is out of office.

I have no idea if this is what they will do or not, but at least there is a chance that something can be done. I hope they will, anyhow, because I will be one of the first to have my care rationed if it isn’t. I really don’t want to have to move to Mexico or somewhere that I can buy my own insurance again.

 

How many children, old people and

ceili_dancer (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 1:17AM EST (link)

some other indigent person will they wheel out and tell you to take away their care. The commercials will have the ominous music and the heartfelt voice saying that little Suzi will not get her tonsilectomy because Republicans want to take away her chance for ice cream. Then cut to old people (don’t mentiion the death panels) and say that the Republicans will hold off life saving medical treatment from Grammy. It will have you call your Senator (Republican of course) to support the extension or making permanent the health care.

 
 

sure it sunsets...but you tell me who will be there to let it die once people are dependednt on it

AceInTX (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:38PM EST (link)

five years from now….they’ll make it permanent in some emergency bill five years from now and we’ll never hear a peep about it.

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Yes, we all know that goverment programs have not

Jonbontx Saturday, February 20th at 2:08PM EST (link)

been done away with. But this is a completely different beast. So your going to tell me that the majority of people who have health insurance and get decent service with their health insurance, are all the sudden going to just shrug their shoulders and go along with higher taxes, higher premiums, piss poor service, lack of doctors, doctors offices shutting down, hospitials shutting down/or deteriorating, higher drug costs and no new medical innovation???? Don’t think so.

If those people will act at all

Raven (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 3:13PM EST (link)

It will be within a year after passage. And whatever they do in that year will be ALL they do.

“If you do not have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Luke 22:36

 
 
 

Dingy Harry

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:20PM EST (link)

Had anti-repeal provisions in his last attempt. Whether they are constitutional or not is a question I cannot answer.

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

Of course they are unconstitutional

Beaglescout (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 6:20PM EST (link)

In fact I dare the Democrats to object to any repeal. An amendment can’t be repealed, except by another amendment, but a bill?

“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”

–Alexander Hamilton
 
 

Healthcare Reform is Not Happening....Link

erikgershengorn (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 9:21PM EST (link)

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2010/02/19/new-republic-policy-wonk-tosses-cold-water-leftwing-public-option-ghos

http://www.facebook.com/#/pages/Governor-C-L-Butch-Otter/292986829831?ref=search&sid=100000502757197.902265557..1

Laughing at the delusional Kossacks...

erikgershengorn (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 9:28PM EST (link)

http://dummiefunnies.blogspot.com/2010/02/kommies-build-public-option-field-of.html

http://www.facebook.com/#/pages/Governor-C-L-Butch-Otter/292986829831?ref=search&sid=100000502757197.902265557..1

 
 
 

Dan, you are a ray of sunshine

durman Saturday, February 20th at 1:14PM EST (link)

in an otherwise gloomy spot of news!

Thank you for sharing your knowledge of Senate rule procedure and insider knowledge as this horrible monostrosity of a misnamed “health care” bill stalks once more like a zombie to and fro around the halls of Congress. I’d be bumming if it weren’t for you!

So will someone please shoot this thing with a legislative silver bullet and make this undead abominable creature die?!?

silver does nothing to zombies

Raven (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 3:14PM EST (link)

We need to bash it’s head in and destroy its brains.

Without getting any on ourselves lest we become zombies, too…

“If you do not have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Luke 22:36

O yeah, that's right

durman Saturday, February 20th at 3:18PM EST (link)

I’ve got to get better at recalling the weaknesses of my undead creatures… :) I just really want this undead bill to stay dead…..

Burning works too.

Conservative Phantom Saturday, February 20th at 3:53PM EST (link)

Dip in napalm and ignite.

Crispy.

Tired of commenting on other people’s topics? Consider a visit to the “It’s About Liberty” forum where you can start your own:

http://itsaboutliberty.com/

And be as politically incorrect as you damn well please.

Gotta be careful, though

Raven (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 11:46PM EST (link)

While it’s shambling around on fire, it could ignite a few things we’d rather not catch fire, if for no other reason than their proximity to important things…

It takes a while for a zombie to succumb to fire.

“If you do not have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Luke 22:36

 
 
 
 
 

What's interesting is that it shows what a sham this "summit" is

bk (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:17PM EST (link)

- Obama and his friends are still out talking about the Republicans being the Party of No.
- Obama/Pelosi/Reid are crafting their third bill in secret in a back room with Republicans locked out.
- And now Reid makes it even clearer that he doesn’t care about having any GOP support.

Tell me again what the point of this summit is? Surely it’s not to get any Republican input. The Democrat version of the summit results is already being writeed: “Despite our welcoming them into the process with open arms, they refused to offer any ideas of any merit and did nothing but criticize our proposal.”

yikes "writeed" --> "written" -nt

bk (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:54PM EST (link)

The purpose of the summit is for Obama to

togaman Saturday, February 20th at 4:21PM EST (link)

re-frame the issue to his favor. In general he got favorable reports of the previous session where he lectured the republicans who came ill prepared for an actual debate. He wants to return to the well for more of what has been precious little good pr about the health care debate. This is all about public relations and changing perceptions.

The ideal thing for republicans would be for them to present their ideas in detail at the summit, calmly explaining how those ideas will lower the alarming rate of health care costs while improving access to health care.

I agree...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 4:56PM EST (link)

The problem is the lack of House votes. This won’t change till public perception changes. Obama is trying to effect a shift in opinion to reassure skittish House members. All this talk about a new bill or amendments to an old bill is an attempt to build momentum and to snow Congress.

 
 

The Dems must have something truly magical planned

WarEagle01 (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 5:42PM EST (link)

for the summit. Something that is just going to make all Americans suddenly embrace health care deform. That has to be it. Otherwise, the whole thing is just mindbogglingly stupid. Has to be magic.

“A wise, doughy leg with rich tingly experiences will always reach better conclusions than will a more tanned, muscular leg that hasn’t felt those thrills.” –Chris Matthews’ Leg

“The alternative to the awful extremity of abortion is the indispensable joy of introducing this flawed world to someone who might make it better.”–John Hayward (AKA Dr. Zero)

 
 

I'm not clear on this...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 1:19PM EST (link)

Will this be a new bill or an amendment package designed to address House objections to the Senate bill? If it’s a new bill, then it might just as easily be reversed with 51 votes should the Republicans retake the Senate in November or in 2012. And failing that, it would still expire after five years–unless renewed by Congress–a renewal not likely to happen if Republicans regain power. So it would all be a huge come-down for Democrats to try this–and I suspect they already know it–those not already crazed by a lust to pass this thing by hook or crook. I doubt the rank and file would find the effort worthwhile, however, measured against the price to be paid at the polls. Passage would infuriate the country and totally destroy the Democrat brand for a generation to come.

Amendment

Brian Darling (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:24PM EST (link)

It is not clear what they are going to do, but the most likely scenario is for the House to pass the Senate version of Obamacare. Then the House will use reconcilation to make amendments to that bill. The news stories indicate that this new bill will be 100% reconciliation, but that seems to be incorrect. They would have a very difficult time doing everything they want in one reconcilation package. They may make the reconcilation measure and amendment to a pending education reconcilation measure, but it is expected to be merely a means to amend the Senate ObamaCare after the House passes that measure.

Right now, I don't think the House has enough votes to even PASS the Senate bill without changes,

Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:20PM EST (link)

so this whole “reconciliation” exercise might be for naught. I honestly think that Obama and Pelosi haven’t taken this into account, they are so bent on getting ANYTHING called Healthcare “Reform” passed.

Say what you will about SanFranNan, she does NOT want to be left with her keister flapping in the wind if the Senate bill goes through and the reconciled bill doesn’t. She knows that she will lose the Speakership if that happens AND if the Dems are still in the majority after November.

I said it before and I’ll say it again – the Senate bill is exactly what Obama wants; I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if the bill that he is “crafting” isn’t just an elaborate ruse to get the Senate bill passed. Once that happens, Obama is under no obligation to sign anything else that comes out of Congress on healthcare – and he has already shown himself to be a consummate liar when it comes to getting exactly what HE wants, no matter what he has to say or who he has to betray.

If the people in Congress haven’t figured that out by now, they have no one to blame but themselves when Bam-Bam pulls the rug out from under them. You’d think they would have learned what he really is, but then again, congresscritters aren’t known for their great analytical skills in most cases…..

Fasten your seatbelts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride…..

 
 
 

Mark Levin

Brian Darling (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:21PM EST (link)

Thanks Dan for the kind words. Thank you for your excellent work in educating the American People about the efforts of special interests, the Obama Administration and lefties in Congress to ram ObamaCare through the Congress. They just don’t get it. Mike Hammond of Gun Owners of America has been saying for months about ObamaCare that “It is not over. It is not over. It is not over. It is not over. Finally, its not over.”
Mark Levin mentioned on air my Op Ed (check out the 40 minute mark of http://rope.zmle.fimc.net/player/player.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpodloc%2Eandomedia%2Ecom%2FdloadTrack%2Emp3%3Fprm%3D2069xhttp%3A%2F%2Fpodfuse%2Ddl%2Eandomedia%2Ecom%2F800185%2Fpodfuse%2Dorigin%2Eandomedia%2Ecom%2Fcitadel%5Forigin%2Fpods%2Fmarklevin%2FLevin02192010%2Emp3 ). Levin made an excellent point that this is an effort by the Administration to disenfranchise the American voter. Last November the voters of NJ and VA rejected this Admin’s big govt. policies and in January the voters of the Peoples Republic of Massachusetts voted for a candidate that pledged to block ObamaCare. This Administration and liberals in Congress know that the American people reject ObamaCare, therefore they are trying to pass this legislation and get it signed into law before the November elections using the ObamaCare Nuclear Option — reconciliation. This is fundamentally undemocratic and an affront to participatory democracy.
Great work on this comprehensive piece Dan.

February Fan Dance

texasgalt (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:23PM EST (link)

Levin: “The moron Republican leadership – that’s right I said it – is part of the fan dance.”

I couldn’t agree more with the Levin on this. When you’ve WON the debate, why throw a lifeline to the loser and meet on his terms? There’s a lot of housecleaning to do at the top of the Republican party.

Twitter Button from twitbuttons.com

 

I wonder...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 3:13PM EST (link)

…if Pelosi has the votes in the House? Is this why there’s a move to revive the public option in the Senate? When they tried to have a straight-up vote, the public option was a losing proposition. But with reconciliation back in the picture, it isn’t–and it’s attractive to the House. Whether this is enough to change the outlook in the House is anybody’s guess. It would seem there are still a lot of pro-lifers and a lot of blue dogs who won’t go for this, given the political landscape.

 
 

Greater love hath no man than this,

Mayhem (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:22PM EST (link)

that a man would lay down his (political) life for a dying presidency.

James Madison, Jim DeMint, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan… You get the picture.

 

Are you sure about this?

saltlick Saturday, February 20th at 1:24PM EST (link)

Meanwhile, today the Hill is reporting that the GOP says the Dems do not have the votes on the Senate floor. This intelligence is accurate

Because, given the mood of the country, I have a hunch it would take nothing but a word for our side to recreate Chicago, 1968, right there on the Capitol steps. I’m serious.

That Hill article...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 3:18PM EST (link)

…was not particularly encouraging for Republicans. Too many so-called moderates are now looking kindly on reconciliation. I think they are thinking their situation is now so dire that SOMETHING has to get done to prove they can govern. They need something to rally around. Right now they’ve got nothing but a failed stimulus package.

The key to everything seems to be in the House, not the Senate. The issue is whether the House will rally round the Senate bill with amendments promised through an uncertain reconciliation process. It seems as if a lot of moderate senators are sending signals to the House to go ahead and pass their bill, that they are not averse to fixing it with amendments through reconciliation.

Another thought...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 3:42PM EST (link)

…Nothing has really changed. The whole point of this meeting seems to be to build pressure on the House to pass the Senate bill. But my guess is the numbers in the House are still sorely lacking. Anybody have a feel for this–as to actual no-votes among Democrats?

 
 

Not quite

Raven (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 3:20PM EST (link)

When our side gets their panties in a twist that bad, they tend to be a tad more effective.

“If you do not have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Luke 22:36

 
 

The Votes

Brian Darling (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:27PM EST (link)

Dems didn’t have the vote to pass ObamaCare when they rolled it out on the Senate floor, but added votes during the Amendment process. The Dems may not have the votes, but we don’t know what is in the Obama drafted reconciliation package. Maybe it is loaded with new Cornhusker Kickbacks and Louisiana Purchase style earmarks so that they can buy just enough votes to get it through the House. Yet again, this Administration is participating in the drafting of legislation in secret.

If it's posted...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 3:46PM EST (link)

…wouldn’t that be pretty risky? We’d pick up on it.

 
 

Self-immolate, eh?

throwback59 Saturday, February 20th at 1:29PM EST (link)

With all that Botox Nancy Pelosi will go up like a Roman candle.
Harry Reid will flash fire like dried up newspapers
Obama will just smolder, hubris doesn’t burn

 

I hope this is just noise but I keep cautioning...there is still danger of this passing...

AceInTX (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:34PM EST (link)

This situation is ripe to have some RINO, or RINOs come riding to the rescue at the last minute.

I’ve seen it too many times before to not fear it…Here’s one scenario.

Ried sits down with George Voinovich.

“George…this is it…this is your last chance at the big Hurrah…you’re retiring in November anyway. What if we were to conced that YOU had convinced us to strip out the medicare cuts and to back off any future attempt to have a public option? You can break the log jam on the biggest piece of legislation in American history. You could go down in history as the guy that gave the American people affordable health care legislation.

“We’re going to do this anyway…we’ll do this through reconciliation. But you can go down in history as helping ‘IMPROVE’ the bill by convincing us to strip the medicare cuts out of it. We’ll get you a cushy new job at a lobbying group of your choice on K Street. We’ll give you anything you want to make your retirement as comfortable and profitable as possible.

What do you say George?

All it would take is for one RINO like Voinovich to break ranks…and the race to get on board as helping to “IMPROVE” the Democrat Health Care bill will begin…

The spin will be that the Democrats were going to pass it anyway…and by compromising…we were able to make it better and lessen the damage that could have been done without the compromise.

Let’s pray It won’t happen…and I’m only being paranoid…but I don’t think such a scenario or one like it is that far fetched…history has taught me it’s all too possible if not probable

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

AceinTX, I agree

snowshooze (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 1:58PM EST (link)

Obama is going to shoot for reconciliation anyway.
He will try to bait anyone he can, any way he can.
If just one RINO takes the bait the bill passes with a bi-partisan majority. If he can’t attract any Republicans, his hands were tied and he had no choice.
Either way, soon as the meeting is over they will hit the launch button. I compare their psychology to that of the suicide bomber, and the self-immolation Dan refers to ” Suicide by fire” best fits if they lose on the deal.
I too am very concerned they have a valid shot at this.
As you say, there are plenty of cushy jobs to be created for the worthy, and no wounded will be left behind.

 

I don't agree.

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 3:51PM EST (link)

The difference is the mood of the electorate. The decisive factor is the independent vote which is breaking two-to-one against Democrats. Why would any GOP moderate stick his or her neck out to buck that tide? It makes no political sense whatsoever. They might make a show out of “bipartisanship,” but I doubt that would ever translate into a vote for Obamacare.

I certainly hope you are right...but I don't have the faith that you do nt

AceInTX (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 7:26PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

It's not faith, it's politics.

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 10:39PM EST (link)

The numbers don’t add up politically. Once the Independents start siding with Republicans two-to-one, why would anyone in the GOP, conservative or moderate, want to buck that? It would be political suicide.

maybe you're right...and as I say...I hope so...

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 4:00PM EST (link)

I’m just pointing out…this isn’t dead if some RINO decides they want to get bipartisan and jumps on the Obamacare bandwagon.

The numbers should discourage them…but I’ve seen mavericky mavericks fall on their swords for bipartisanship before…and I have no faith in them now

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 
 
 
 

The Dirty Deed of Dirty Harry

teapartypatriot Saturday, February 20th at 1:37PM EST (link)

A part of me wants the loony-left d-crat socialists to exhibit their FULL CONTEMPT for voters and the democratic process and do the sleazy, dirty reconciliation deed for their socialist healthcare-rationing bill. That way, patriotic Americans will put them out of power for the rest of my life, and I won’t have to even think about them anymore.

 

Sort of a waste of 2 years

saterp Saturday, February 20th at 1:38PM EST (link)

So, this Congress will have spent its two years on: 1) Stimulus, and 2) a failure to pass healthcare?

I’m sort of conflicted about that – I’m happy if they get absolutely nothing done, but I’m stressed that they wasted nearly 900 billion dollars on Stimulus, and made me and every other rational person worry that they WOULD succeed in screwing over the country with ObamaCare.

The fact that Obama’s presidency will subsequently be a dead letter, and that Dems will be wiped out as a viable national party for a decade, is a bonus, but not worth the cost to the American economy and the stress on citizens while these doofuses ignore our actual problems.

It's not at all a wasted two years...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 3:54PM EST (link)

…because it revived conservatism and revealed the libs for what they actually are–radical socialists who show contempt for the general public and its wishes.

That's a big 10-4

saterp Saturday, February 20th at 5:43PM EST (link)

Very true, writeblock….the silver lining.

 
 
 

Could a simple majority repeal Obamacare in 2011?

d_lamar Saturday, February 20th at 1:45PM EST (link)

For our experts on parliamentary procedure:

If the dems do pass some version of Obamacare this year using reconciliation, then assume if the Republicans gain control of both the Senate and House this November, could they, with merely a simple majority vote, using reconciliation, vote to repeal Obamacare, and by-pass a dem fillibuster?

Of course, even if they could, Obama would veto the legislation. In that event, could the republicans nullify Obamacare by refusing to appropriate any funds to enable it?

Presidential vetoes can ALWAYS be overridden by Congress -

Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:25PM EST (link)

just another brilliant strategy written into our Constitution by our wonderful Founders.

Fasten your seatbelts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride…..

Veto

d_lamar Saturday, February 20th at 3:19PM EST (link)

But, doesn’t it take a 2/3 vote to over-ride a veto? That doesn’t seem feasible.

Power of the Purse

Brian Darling (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 4:00PM EST (link)

Congress could not repeal in 2011, because the President would veto. As for not appropriating funding for some of the programs, that may be an option for any changes outside of entitlement programs, tax increass and the mandates contained within the bill.

 
 
 
 

Ann Coulter said yesterday

nancylee Saturday, February 20th at 1:50PM EST (link)

on Hannity’s show that healthcare is dead and this is all a show for the far left of the Democrat party. I hope she’s right but I have learned over many years to assume nothing until the fat lady is finished singing.

I guess I’ll make phone calls, write letters, donate to the opposition and double my tranquilizers until then.

I’m really very tired of being scared. I’ve been terrified of this monster for a year, and I can see it’s going to be a while longer before I can relax.

Coulter

Brian Darling (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 4:02PM EST (link)

Hope she is right, but we need to be prepared if she is wrong. The only way the liberals get this bill passed is if the American people either let them or are asleep at the wheel when they ram it through Congress.

 

You know Nancy you have said what WE all should say....

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 6:53PM EST (link)

to our elected representatives on Monday “I’m really very tired of being scared. I’ve been terrified of this monster for a year, and I can see it’s going to be a while longer before I can relax.”

Call your Congresspeople and Senators and say exactly that and question them as to the validity of the American populace living for a year in FEAR of a monstrous bill that only 30% of Americans want. Then remind them that this November is going to be HUGE for Republicans because of the voting on this HORROR & that in 2012 the rest will be made to pay. That at the end of the day in November of 2012 there will only be 1/3rd of the Senate left of Democrats to save their seats.

This big a bill has NEVER passed without “bipartisanship” NEVER and for these liberals to think they can this time is arrogance and an inability to recognize they are the EMPLOYEES and WE are going to FIRE THEM!

 
 

Why they won't start over:

redneck_hippie (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:01PM EST (link)

They just want the taxes that we pay starting immediately. Their crap/tax bill that was supposed to fund Obamacare will not happen. They need revenue desperately in order to continue building their Stalinist utopia. Obamacare taxes could have been stolen from the general fund just like the social security taxes were stolen from the lock box.

Now, since the Obamacare bill won’t happen either, they will be forced to steal directly what they hoped they could have stolen stealthily. The need to tax every American is what is forcing their hand. They are out of money and the administrative state can not give up trying to get this bill.

Now their so-called bipartisanship is cover so they can say after the plan fails, that Obama wrote this nifty compromise plan and the Republicans wouldn’t go along. This is how they will blame us for the continued slide to bannana republicanism. The meeting sham, as well as the commission scam were concocted to absolve The One (termer).


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

DOA = NUCLEAR OPTION

therevcharliet Saturday, February 20th at 2:02PM EST (link)

The bill does not have 51 votes in the Senate or 51% in the House. Blue Dogs will run with their tails tucked between their legs as they know this is political suicide. Here in Louisiana Charlie Melancon is running for Senate with the Obamatross hanging around his neck. If he votes for the reconciliation he will not only find unemployment in November but possible relocation to another state as he will not be welcomed in the Third District, Louisiana.

Dems are going to lose anyway

mavericktime Saturday, February 20th at 6:44PM EST (link)

They probably figure they might as well get the thing done that cost them so much.

 
 

The Republicans should warn the Dems,

Jonbontx Saturday, February 20th at 2:16PM EST (link)

that if they decide to go this route, then that opens up the option of the Republicans of doing the same thing when they get back in power.

Pick or add a reason for why the dems don't care:

anotherindyfilmguy (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:45PM EST (link)

1. The dems believe it is either the right thing to do and do now regardless of the opposition’s “dire warnings”.
2. The dems think it will ensure them power forever.
3. Like a moron looking into a keg of gunpowder the dem leaders decided that using their cigarette lighter instead of dragging the keg into the sunlight is the best way to see what is left in the keg *right now* instead of later…
4. This level of treason can’t be reached again if they are put out of the supermajority in mid term elections…
5. Fear.
6. Loathing.
7. Las Vegas…

Santorum? Well, at least he’s not Romney…
http://www.zazzle.com/enemy_of_the_statist_tshirt-235977043035297478

 
 

When will the public see

earlgrey (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:24PM EST (link)

That Obama doesn’t care about them. He doesn’t even care about his fellow dems. They are a means to an end. Just like the independets that voted for his Hope and Change.

This is heartbreaking. We have fought so hard.

When 1984 arrives

anotherindyfilmguy (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:46PM EST (link)

Or when the MSM stops loving him… not holding breath on the second option…

Santorum? Well, at least he’s not Romney…
http://www.zazzle.com/enemy_of_the_statist_tshirt-235977043035297478

 
 

Good grief, Dan. How many times now is it? 3? 4?

Bill S (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:43PM EST (link)

…that I’ve told you to stop trying to handicap the Dems based on rational behavior. You don’t seem to get that they don’t give a **** about anything except getting this passed. They think it will help them. You are coming from an entirely different POV than they are.

Do NOT underestimate their ability to pull together their people.

There is one thing you do have right – they’ll self-destruct if they do it.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

The self-destruct device destroy itself?

Raven (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 3:28PM EST (link)

Well, if they believe that, then maybe they Can get enough congresscreatures together for it…

“If you do not have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Luke 22:36

 
 

I may be wrong about this, so feel free to chime in and correct me!

Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 2:51PM EST (link)

Reconciliation can only be done on a “budget” bill, which means that some sort of bill would have to be passed in the house first. This was done for the previous Senate healthcare bill (the one that is currently back in the House, awaiting their vote).

If I am reading this right, they are planning to do the same thing – pass some innocuous “budget” bill in the House, send it to the Senate, and they will do what they did before – vote to eliminate the wording of the budget bill and substitute the new “reconciliation” bill.

However, wouldn’t they need to go through cloture to do that in the first place? They don’t have the votes for that, so this whole thing would be a non-starter in the first place. Am I understanding that correctly, or am I wrong on this point? The Republicans in the Senate could stop this in its tracks before it ever got started.

If the initial budget bill doesn’t make it through the cloture vote to bring it up for debate, it won’t be able to have the wording substituted in the first place. Even if the first budget bill comes up for debate, voting to eliminate the wording and replace it with new wording would ALSO have to meet cloture to stop a filibuster and then get a 3/5 majority vote after that (just to replace the language, not to pass the actual bill), wouldn’t it?

The 51 votes needed are just for PASSAGE of the bill, if I’m not mistaken – everything else has to meet the cloture requirements. Someone with more knowledge of the Senate rules, please chime in – I have an Engineering education, not a legal background…..

Fasten your seatbelts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride…..

No Cloture necessary for this plan

Brian Darling (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 4:12PM EST (link)

If the House can pass a reconciliation measure and send it to the Senate then they avoid a filibuster. Theoretically there may be 60 vote points of order that lie against some provisions in the measure, yet they will put the VP or a Senator in the Chair to igrore the reconcilation rules and avoid any opportunities for the Rs to take out provisions of the bill with points of order. Here are the steps in this plan
1) House pass Reconcilation measure (will be a series of amendments to the Senate passed ObamaCare bill;
2) House passes Senate passed ObamaCare bill;
3) Senate puts friendly Senator or VP in Chair to ignore Republican points of order during consideration of reconciliation;
4) Senate needs 50 votes + VP to get reconcilation to President; and,
5) President signs ObamaCare then reconciliation measure.

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 5:07PM EST (link)

Does anyone know if the House has the votes for the Reconciliation package in the first place? Or if they have the votes to pass the Senate bill that is currently before them? My understanding is that the abortion issue might be a real sticking point, as that can’t be introduced in the Reconciliation bill, as it has nothing to do with budgetary issues.

Also, the House members who were given a “pass” the first time around aren’t going to be too eager to stick their necks out to vote for the even less popular Senate bill. Pelosi doesn’t have the votes right now to do that.

If they don’t have the votes to pass the first Senate bill, won’t reconciliation be a moot point? There isn’t much sense in having an amendment bill if there isn’t a primary bill in place.

And there STILL isn’t any way to guarantee that Obama won’t sign the Senate bill – the one that has everything in it that he really wants – and then decide that he isn’t going to sign the reconciliation bill. I wouldn’t put it past him….

Fasten your seatbelts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride…..

 
 
 

The contempt Congress has for the American people

jodetoad Saturday, February 20th at 3:20PM EST (link)

is mutual.

If passed, this bill will be next to impossible to get rid of. They know that, that’s why they are willing to run over the cliff to get it. It will turn political conversation in this country to the left, as it has in every country that has tried it.

I disagree.

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 4:02PM EST (link)

There’s a likelihood the next two elections will be a clean sweep for the GOP, given the level of anger this will evoke. Then the bill will be targeted. Any Dem fighting repeal would be risking his/her political life.

That said, I think before that the Supreme Court will probably shoot it down. If ever there was a power grab by the federal government, running roughshod over states rights and the bill of rights, this is it.

 

No Congress has the right to bind a future Congress

renny (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 5:28PM EST (link)

But, the problem is Congresses tend to address problems by expanding bad programs and giving them more funding than by eliminating them.

I think that tradition may be at an end. I don’t think we give enough credit to a change in the political dynamic produced by the net and the tea parties, FOX, the cons. interest groups, and the now failing and dying MSM.

If you go back only a few years, there was almost nothing but the National Review. The entire media spectrum save for the editorial page of the WSJ, the Manchester Guardian, and Washington Times were solidly, deceptively liberal. Now 100s of print is cons., 100s of radio shows and pundits are cons., and dozens of websites rep. cons. Ideas and causes. This year, the entire lefty whacko press has been thoroughly exposed and discredited by O’s campaign and admin. It can’t kill Palin this year the way it trashed her last year. And it never will again.

The net now speeds info and money like light, and technology offers things like calling for a candidate in MA from your own home in NJ. Scott Brown showed not only can an outside candidate win but he/she can also have the entire country as a stage and not just a district or a state. Redstate proves that daily.

Cong. ran the old way with if I get a bridge then you get a highway through 2009, but it’s liable never to work quite that way again. Horse trading will still happen but the transparency has been forced on pols., when their deals are known within hours and even closed doors cannot keep the knowledge from escaping.

 
 

Right on, Jodetoad.

realskinny (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 3:59PM EST (link)

The political sociopaths running Washington are giving the American people ulcers worrying what new outrage will be inflicted upon them..

 

Obamacare redux ad nauseum

majorkong Saturday, February 20th at 4:00PM EST (link)

Listen, and understand. That terminator is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.

Kyle Reese, Freedom Fighter

 

No, it will pass

Menlo (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 4:22PM EST (link)

The Senate has the votes. Those 18 Democrats only opposed this maneuver last year. They have said they’ve changed their minds. Republicans knew it and only wanted to “expose hypocrisy,” which is not going to help anyone.

I can assure you the votes are there no matter what is in it or no matter what future electoral prospects, which Democrats do not care about, are like.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

But the issue is...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 5:03PM EST (link)

…whether the House has the votes.

 

Dem Senators That Should Oppose Reconcilliation

IJB Saturday, February 20th at 5:06PM EST (link)

So, let’s list the D’s who by all accounts should oppose reconciliation:

Lieberman (*ID-CT)
Webb (VA)
Warner (VA)
Hagen (NC)
Nelson (FL)
Bayh (IN)
Landrieu (LA)
Pryor (AR)
Lincoln (AR)
McCaskill (MO)
Nelson (NE)
Conrad (ND)
Dorgan (ND)
Tester (MT)
Feingold (WI)
Byrd (WV)

All of these are either in Southern states, or play to being a moderate or to “respecting the process”.

But how many of them can be counted on?

I think Lieberman *has* to vote No on reconciliation – his only chance is independent voters, and they’ll hate this. Similarly, Lincoln has to be considered a No vote based on her electoral peril and her recent statements.

OTOH, Dorgan’s and Bayh’s retirements make them more likely to vote for this.

The rest are the ones that have to be hit to vote No.

No

Menlo (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 7:29PM EST (link)

If you read the article linked, it quotes several of those on your list saying that they will support it, even though they said otherwise earlier.

Again, I don’t know why you think the senators’ electorates matter. Not a one cares about his or her future electoral prospects. At this point, it won’t even change the outcome either way.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

The 18 Number is Bogus; The Hill Has It Between 8 and 12

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 7:38PM EST (link)

I think The Hill is right. The GOP is putting out statements by Democrats that have opposing reconciliation. But many of them support it now. Perhaps they hope the to expose them as flip-floppers and unprincipled.

I dont think its a done deal though. The whole summit thing is going to give some of the fence sitters like Landrieu, Webb, Pryor some leverage to blame Republicans and perhaps support reconciliation.

It will be a grand fight.

Here's Some Interesting Stuff For Ya

GJ Merits (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 12:05AM EST (link)

Senate duplicity exposed: The Senate Already Nixed Reconciliation on Healthcare:

http://tinyurl.com/y8fpa33

Reconciliation can be stopped by the amendment bomb approach: The Amendment Bomb – How I Learned Not To Fear Reconciliation:

http://tinyurl.com/yk46y5w

The Senate president and parlimentarian cannot stop the amendment process other than the Senate president (VP Biden) or Senate leader (Reid) invoking the Byrd option (now called the constituional option) and basically killing the filibuster. I would be VERY surprised if the Dems have 50 votes for that. Say what you will about McCain, but when the Repubs tried it under GWB for judicial nominees, McCain used the gang of 14 to stop it. Smart move as it would have ruined the comity of the Senate for years and provided coverage for Dems to use it now. So I think reconcilation is stoppable if the Republicans use the amendment bomb process.

Why will they use this process? I was part of a team that exposed the Senate Republican leaderships plan to use ObamaCare’s passage to gain votes in November. Read:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30869.html

Our efforts lead to a memo from Steele to Senate Repubs to follow DeMint’s lead and start obstructing. Rush picked it up and the Senate leadership had a sudden change of heart. If the GOP folds now, all of their gains with the electorate will evaporate, so I am not too concerned about them holding the line. Dr. Hunter of the Social Security Institute just sent out another email blast as a friendly reminder not to fold at the summit. Again, I am not to concerned with the GOP folding.

If ObamaCare somehow manages to make it – especially if they kill the filibuster – then I would not be surprised to see a HUGE nullification movement start. Check out:

http://tinyurl.com/yjt5n7t

I would also recommend the tenthamendmentcenter.com and http://socialsecurityinstitute.com/news/state-sovereignty/

ObamaCare is dead. The left knows it. The summit is a combination messaging and exit strategy. I don’t buy any of this and I think the country would revolt if Obama shoved this down our throats. The backlash would be huge and unpredictable, but the outcome would be the same in the end – no ObamaCare.

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents….James Madison

If you want to go fast – go alone. If you want to go far – go together.

To win against tyranny you must embrace not only novel solutions, but fear of the unknown as well.

They don't follow the rules

Menlo (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 12:04PM EST (link)

They are already breaking the rules to pass this through reconciliation. Why would they follow any of the other rules?

I don’t think there will be much consequence either unfortunately. People may be opposed, but not enough to refuse to obey the mandate and penalties, to not pay taxes, to not work, to leave the country, or to seek (or vote for anyone who would seek) state defiance of federal officials. And certainly given what has happened in the past fifty years, if nullification was not pursued then (when there has been more than ample reason), it certainly won’t be now.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

That Must Be Why

GJ Merits (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 10:42PM EST (link)

The Tenth Amendment Center is exploding is popularity and states are starting to introduce legislation that has teeth – not just resolutions, but legislation that states that federal agents who violate the state law will get 30 years (go to the site).

You are also forgetting something else. I don’t care what happened or did not happen “then”. This is a whole new political atmosphere we are in today and Obama is killing this country before our eyes in such an obvious and blatant manner. He makes Jimmy Carter look like a genius. Sorry, but I don’t buy your argument or its premise.

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents….James Madison

If you want to go fast – go alone. If you want to go far – go together.

To win against tyranny you must embrace not only novel solutions, but fear of the unknown as well.

It could be unnecessary

Menlo (Diary) Monday, February 22nd at 12:19AM EST (link)

Individuals can defy it themselves. All it requires is defying the mandate and the penalties. Under the Senate bill, the federal government is actually prohibited from taking any action as a result of that defiance. Whether that remains or not, if the opposition is both strong enough and deep enough, enough people will refuse to buy anything called “health insurance” or pay penalties that no funding mechanism will exist from the start. Of course we’ve still got to convince medical device makers to not pay the new taxes they will be charged.

I’d like to see any of the Republicans in Congress with the fortitude to tell people to do just that.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

What is there to do?

earlgrey (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 4:58PM EST (link)

I feel like crying “uncle!”. This has been exhausting. I gave generously ( for my circstances) to the Dick Morris ads and S. Brown’s election as well as Rubio, DeMints PAC. I am running out of money stashes that hubby doesn’t know about.

Should we all just grab our ankles and wait for November? I have R Senators and R Congresswoman.

"Uncle" be damned...

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 5:12PM EST (link)

…This has always been war. It’s not for the faint-hearted. If we lose, we take the fight to the Supreme Court and if we lose there we take it into the poll booths. This fight won’t end because the American people won’t let it end. We’ll kill this one way or another. If this stands, then we’re not America anymore and become a socialist nation in which the individual becomes a ward of the state. First, we lose essential freedoms. Second, the economy is crippled. Third, a crippled economy means a diminished presence around the world. Fourth, means a far more dangerous world. So get ready for an exhausting struggle for the next ten years.

Thanks writeblock for the pep talk!

earlgrey (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 9:02PM EST (link)

Count me in.

 
 
 

No, grab pitchforks and hammers

renny (Diary) Saturday, February 20th at 5:09PM EST (link)

If they should pass Obamanationcare by reconciliation, millions should desced on DC with baseball bats and ring the Capitol like the storming of the Bastille.

But I don’t think any Reps. are going to break ranks. They haven’t so far in the Sen., and they know what’s at stake in the fall, maybe more than the House.

Reps. smell blood in the water and won’t give up the feeding fest to pollute the kill.

The more nothing the Cong. does the better, because the tax code is already three-feet thick, the stimulus was nearly trillion, and the budget deficit is nearly 2 trillion, so it’s better if no votes and no legislation is ever passed again.

with interest

partyof1 Saturday, February 20th at 7:22PM EST (link)

it’s a trillion

 
 

At least Dems are finally open in their contempt

johnt Saturday, February 20th at 5:18PM EST (link)

for the American people, as are their little lib supporters, former champions of Privacy and Choice. Small solace I know but at last the Beast has been exposed.
I hope the Repubs have some deft moves up their sleeves just in case the Dems don’t destroy one another.

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

 

Three points:

writeblock Saturday, February 20th at 11:16PM EST (link)

1. I don’t think the problem for Obama is located in the Senate. I think Reid has the votes he needs. I think the problem is with the House. I think they are short there by quite a lot. The revival of the public option in the Senate is probably an attempt to sweeten the deal for reluctant House members. The Senate is saying, “You vote for our bill and we’ll amend our bill by voting for this additional goody through reconciliation.”

2. That would only win over some liberals in the House, however. There are still pro-lifers who object. And there are a lot of terrified blue dogs who took Massachusetts to heart. They can see the adverse political landscape. Nor is Obama strong enough in the polls to sway them to risk their own necks by voting for a bill it knows the public despises. So it’s still a stalemate. Which is why Obama is calling for a “summit.” After all, if he had the votes, why bother to do this? In fact, he hasn’t.

3. The whole charade this Thursday seems designed to nudge reluctant House members into voting yes for the Senate bill by changing the public’s perception of it. This administration knows as long as polls keep showing the public to be negative, the House remains the stumbling block to passage. Obama is trying his damnedest therefore to appear open and bipartisan. He will also use the opportunity to advertise some changes that undo the more scandalous aspects of the Senate bill such as the Nebraska deal. All this would be an effort to build some momentum, get the media talking, and thus create a mood for legislative resolve and action.

 

With overprice gasoline or just matches?

jeannieology (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 7:25AM EST (link)

www.jeannie-ology.com

 

They aren't delusional. They are ideologues.

fortcollins (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 12:14PM EST (link)

“What is really going on? Are the Dems that crazy to think that their attempt at using reconciliation will help them politically? Or are they just delusional, and cannot accept it is over for ObamaCare, and do not have the discipline to turn to something the public actually wants, like deficit reduction?”

Neither. They realize that is IS over, and they intend to follow a scorched-earth policy. Every Senator who faces certain defeat or who already has announced retirement has already come to grips with the truth reflected in multiple polls. They have the “luxury” of not caring. They can vote for this abomination with no further consequences.

The only slender hope of defeating this bill is that enough Democratic Senators in the Classes of 2010 and 2012 still hold to the illusion that they can get re-elected. I can’t find enough, by any count.

Others have noted valid points:
- There is nothing as permanent as a temporary tax or temporary federal program
- Democrats need the tax hike now, to allow Obama to offer the illusion that he can balance the budget while acting like a spendthrift Hollywood starlet.
- Democrats believe that, once passed, the government insurance program will avoid repeal because the private industry and private options will be gone by 2013.
- Democrats believe that a GOP House can refuse to fund the administration needed to run the program, but that Obama can bypass Congress by using Executive Orders and administrative rulemaking. They gamble that Congress either cannot defeat proposed rulemaking or that Obama can veto any legislative repeals and have his veto upheld. It will take time to challenge this under a separation of powers analysis.

I am convinced that we will recapture the House this year. I am 50-50 on whether we will retake the Senate. Neither scenario would allow for repeal of the monstrosity until 2013, because there won’t be enough votes to override Obama’s veto.

Republicans DO need to attend the “summit,” if for no other reason than public perception. They must go armed with two lists: provisions in the current bill that are unacceptable (with clear, concise reasons) and a few provisions that are not in the current bill that are essential (such as tort reform). The GOP must present its alternative bill and be prepared to articulate why it is both necessary and better. Public opinion polls on these issues back the GOP position. Democrats will ignore all of the GOP requests for deletion, saying that the requests are “partisan.” Democrats may add one or two innocuous provisions advocated by the GOP to say that they are being “bipartisan.” The GOP needs to keep score and take it to the public. Public opinion matters, even if not to Democrats. To set the stage for the budget showdown that must follow, the GOP needs the solid backing of American voters. To get this backing, the GOP needs to be both the party of “no, and here’s why” and the party of “here’s a better alternative.”

Notwithstanding all of these efforts, the bill will pass the Senate on a reconciliation vote and will also pass the House, though narrowly.

That leaves a three-fold last, best hope. It isn’t for the weak of heart.
(1) Immediately challenge key provisions in friendly courts, where the appeal is to circuits having significant numbers of federalist judges.
(2) Meanwhile, refuse to pass a budget bill in 2011 unless all funding for the administrative mechanisms to operate this monstrosity are eliminated. this may necessitate eliminating significant sub-agencies within the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, Commerce, and Treasury. Obama certainly would veto such a budget, and there aren’t votes to override the veto.
(3) Finally, and only if unavoidable, refuse to pass continuing resolutions other than defense and homeland security, and force a government shutdown. This is just as heavy-handed as the reconciliation vote, but MAY garner the support of American voters if ALL other avenues have been exhausted. this is why it is essential to attend the sham summit and to propose alternatives in good faith. A government shutdown in 2011-2012 would prevent implementing any of the operational provisions of the bill, although the tax increases would still exist. This could buy enough time to set the stage for actual repeal in 2013.

 

Dan, I think your wrong.

aruges Sunday, February 21st at 11:52PM EST (link)

Enough Dems know they are screwed weather they pass this or don’t pass this. Enough know that once passed, regardless how it’s passed, undoing it will be hard if not impossible. They will die on this hill, but they will have pushed the boulder over the other side. All for the cause, because enough Dems are dyed in the wool Socialists.

McConnel said today that he doesn’t have the votes in the Senate to stop the abuse of reconciliation and therefore there is zero reason for the House Dems to block passage of the Senate version of the bill as any issue they have will fixed. But what of the Pro Life Dems, you ask? They never really existed in the first place.

They will get everything they want.

Game Over.