Dems Deserve No Respect for their Self-Inflicted Wounds — None at All


Among other very high prices to be paid for the Dems health reform jihad, it will cost them control of the U.S. House.

Here is the Generic Ballot from Gallup from 1994, the year the Republicans took 50+ seats and control of the House, right after the failure of HillaryCare. (H/T the Marston Chronicles)

But it is worse now, than it was then (see 2010 Gallup Generic Ballot graph below the jump.) At least in 1994, the Dems had the sense to stop when it was obvious what HillaryCare was doing to them. Now they are irrational. Like a crazed drug addict — they will do “almost anything” to get their fix.

And, unlike 1994 — unemployment is now at 10%, the U.S. deficit and debt are soaring and our economic growth is anemic. No surprise, the public wants Congress to focus on the deficit and the economy. So, naturally, the Dems work on health care to the exclusion of all else.

Even as the Democrats keep saying they want to work on jobs and the economy, all they work on ever is HEALTH CARE — literally, they can not shut up about it, or stop themselves from working on it all the time.

They keep lying to themselves about when they will be done. (Lying to themselves is something they have done a lot of in the health care debate.) First, the Dems have said they’d be done by July 4th. No wait, we’ll be done by the August recess. Uh, definitely by Thanksgiving. Absolutely by the off-year elections in Virginia and New Jersey. On the President’s desk by Christmas — for sure.

Wait, we need it done by the special Senate election in Massachusetts (actually, they did not say that, I am just saying they said it — or will be soon.) We’ll be done by the State of Union. Now they predict sometime in early February; anyone for April 1st?

To finish, the Dems must vote to amend the Senate bill on the House floor, vote on final passage on the House floor, and then, the bill goes back to the Senate, for more 60 margin votes and amendments.

The ever-slow-to-understand-Senate-rules Dem Representatives do not understand the Senate nightmare again awaits. Nor do they understand that the reason there is no House-Senate Conference is that the Senate Republicans objected to the appointment of the conferees — thank you Senator DeMint.

Meanwhile, Dem “retirements” (read: you are insane if you think I’m running in Nov.) are at unheard of high numbers for the majority party in charge of the White House, and the party with a super-majority in both the U.S. Senate and House.

Speaking of 2010, here’s Gallup’s Generic Ballot graph going into 2010:

It has all happened before, in 1994 — right after the Dems tried to force feed America HillaryCare. It is happening again.

Did the off-year elections in Virginia or New Jersey temper the Senate Democrats or the White House or the House? No.

So why should polling data that puts Senator Kennedy’s seat in a dead heat in the bluest of blue states change their behavior? Despite the fact one of the two most accurate polling companies in the country for the just cited off-year elections are reporting that those who strongly oppose (read: HATE) the health plan are going to turn out in droves in Massachusetts. Brown, the GOP candidate for former Sen. Kennedy’s seat, is up by one point. (If Brown wins, the Dems lose would be at 59 votes in the U.S. Senate. So, if ObamaCare is successfully amended in the U.S. House and then passed, it would not get the 60 votes it needs to pass in the Senate.)

Of course, the Gallup generic ballot graphs above are like a klaxon on a submarine. Even when their friends and allies warn them like Charlie Cook — the White House and the Speakers Office just make up reasons why what is so, is not so — and the Dems and their staff believe them. None of the Dems have the courage or insight to shoot ObamaCare in the head — a mercy killing to stop their self-inflicted wounds by delusional leaders — and so ObamaCare eats them like a raging political cancer.

How hard do you have to work to deny the facts in front of your face?

How delusional must you be?

How Polly-Anna?

How blind?

They are definitely drinking the Kool-Aid. And the Jonestown Kool-Aid Gang in the White House, the Speaker’s and the unelectable Majority Leader Reid’s office cry: drink on! Drink on!

My sense is that the public’s determination to vote the Dems out is only increasing every step the health care bill takes. Meaning, the more determination the White House and the Speaker show in cramming down the public’s throat — the harder the public’s resolve becomes to return the favor in November. Peggy Noonan calls this the risk of a “catastrophic victory.”


RSS feed

52 Comments Leave a comment

In 1994 we had some other things going for us

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 1:36PM EST (link)

that we don’t have now.

Newt was still a conservative and a “kill ‘em all and let God sort ‘em out” leader.

We had the Contract With America.

Now, we’ve got the Keystone Kops.

Don't forget

Return to Revolution (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 2:11PM EST (link)

about the House banking scandal, which involved dozens of dems and 1 or 2 republicans. There are plenty of scandals today, though its hard to say if they are getting the same attention.

Another difference: the democrats had been in control of the House for 40+ years in 1994. Nonetheless its hard to not see a repeat of 1994 or something close to it.

The million dollar question though is will they get enough of something passed to make the losses worthwhile, i.e., fundamentally changing the debate on proper role of gov’t? Also, the possiblity of legislation like Universal Voter Registration are troubling.

Out of hand Constitutional fetishist

If they pass Universal Voter Registration

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 2:29PM EST (link)

they will probably gain seats.

Did you see the Gallup results or

Dan Perrin (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 4:36PM EST (link)

read Charlie Cook’s projections or the fact that this political wave is real since Brown is up one point and the Dems are planning to delay his seat?

This trend is real and the off-year election results prove it.

I certainly hope so Dan.

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:15PM EST (link)

But frankly, my concern is that Democrats fully understand that they are war we are the enemy. The idiots who run our party still are stupid enough to think that they have “friends” on the other side of the aisle.

The Dems have organization in place to steal close elections right now. I don’t think I need to provide the obvious list. Pass UVR and they’ll be stealing everything that’s less than 5 points.

I believe the trend, and I really think Brown has a decent shot at getting the most votes in MA. On the first count. I don’t know if he can sustain it through the last count and that’s the only one that matters.

As Stalin said, it doesn’t matter who votes. What matters is who counts the votes [paraphrase].

 
 
 
 

We also were not saying goodbye to a

davidstone Sunday, January 10th at 2:47PM EST (link)

President that had the lowest approval ratings in American history. The 1992 election was about bashing encumbants where 2008 was about bashing Republicans. In 1992, the Democratic President won with 43% of the popular vote with Perot being the reason he won. The republican party was not in as bad shape as they were in 2008.

Don’t get me wrong, I think they are in bad shape for the 2010 elections, but it may not play out as well as 1994 did in spite of current polling. I hope I am wrong and we take back both the house and the senate – not just make gains.

 

Newt was the face of the Republican

redneck_hippie (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 3:58PM EST (link)

party in 94. Any contract with America developed in 10 will be fronted by the Tea Party movement. Plenty of time between now and November for Conservatives and others to forge a leader from their midst.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

"Movements" don't provide leadership. Men do.

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 4:17PM EST (link)

We can count on one hand the people who might – MIGHT – step up, but if they do they’ll have open warfare from the current congressional leadership on their hands.

And no, Palin will not be one. She’s a commentator, not an official and based on her recurrent “independent” theme she’s not in any position to be a Republican Party Leader in ’10.

So spake the oracle of all things Palin. nt

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 4:19PM EST (link)

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

Thought that was achance

SteveLA (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 4:32PM EST (link)

mbecker is the Vice Oracle….geesh.

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity and litmus tests

I don't much care what She Who Was Once Governor does

Achance (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:41PM EST (link)

now that she doesn’t do it in Alaska. I do note that, kinda like when she was in Alaska, most of the controversy she’s causing is WITHIN the Republican Party.

In Vino Veritas

 
 

I'm no oracle, but perhaps you could 'splane to me

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:04PM EST (link)

just how Palin would get congresscritters to rally round her leadership.

Newt was in the Congress. He could rally the troops because he would be the leader. Palin doesn’t have that in her little deck of cards, she’s a commentator and after the election is over she will still be a commentator. Same can be said for Romney, Huckabee and Rudy. As well as current Republican Governors.

This has nothing to do with my opinion of Palin, it has everything to do with her ability to attract enough Critters to be perceived as a “leader” and in a year when she’s not in office and not running for national office that won’t happen.

I don't disagree in the least

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:27PM EST (link)

with your assessment. It’s just that, up to that point in the thread, no one had even mentioned Palin.

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

And Vegas, the only reason I mentioned Palin

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 7:06PM EST (link)

is because of the comment about the Tea Party Movement defining Republican leadership and some people are making a big deal about her being the keynoter at the TP convention.

Well the Democrat Hitman (60 Minutes) Aided By McCain Camp Loser

rcov092 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 7:50PM EST (link)

destructor Steve Schmidt are out in full force attacking Palin. He does, in the end stick the knife in McCain’s back though and twist hard. But make no mistake, he is angling to run another campaign, either Dem or GOP in 2012. If there is a GOD, he and Nicole Wallace will end up in charge of Hillary’s campaign and they can assist in the utter destruction of the Democrat party instead.

“Not One Red Dime for the NRSC or NRCC till they stop trying to elect liberals”

You watch it?

SteveLA (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 7:56PM EST (link)

60 minutes has not come on out West, so all I’ve seen are clips. Warming up the TIVO.

You expected Schmidt and others to just sit there after and not fire back after Governor Palin had her say in Going Rogue?

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity and litmus tests

 

I haven't watched a 60 minutes since "The Guns of Autumn"

nessa (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 8:05PM EST (link)

but it might be worth it to see a knife in McCains back. That would show him what I felt like last year when I cast my vote for him.

“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Contributor to Unified Patriots

teh twitter

 
 
 
 

Big 5,

basalt_conservative (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 8:10PM EST (link)

mbecker!

I totally agree.

Life is hard; it’s harder if you’re stupid. – John Wayne

Man is not free unless government is limited. – President Ronald Reagan

 
 
 

Well, the economy is far worse than

Dan Perrin (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 4:38PM EST (link)

1994, so it will more than compensate for no Newt or Contract with America.

That is not to say we could have a similar manifesto like the Contract with America in 2010.

We won't be running "on" anything unlike '94.

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:07PM EST (link)

We will only be running as “not them”. It will certainly be enough to win some Senate seats and have the ability to sustain a filibuster and we will win a bunch of House seats, but not enough to take control. And even if we do take control of the House, so what? Our leadership will be just who?

How abaout a man like Michelle Bachmann. nt

redneck_hippie (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:17PM EST (link)

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

Actually Bachmann and DeMint would make

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:27PM EST (link)

a dynamic duo.

Which one would be Robin?

redneck_hippie (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:34PM EST (link)

Heh. The thing I keep coming back to is, The Dem legislative agenda is hanging over this election year like a nor’ wester that is monkey-wrenching detailed planning. The founding principles and the lies of Obama are our strongest suit, IMO.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

I don't much care RNH. I just want somebody

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 7:07PM EST (link)

who’s not afraid to draw blood.

Agreed, The Conservative Revolution

redneck_hippie (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 8:11PM EST (link)

is not for the faint of heart, nor for those only looking out for the main chance. I don’t care who the leader turns out to be, either. I do see the leader(s) as distilling out of the ferment to come.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

Another big 5,

basalt_conservative (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 8:12PM EST (link)

mb!!!!

Life is hard; it’s harder if you’re stupid. – John Wayne

Man is not free unless government is limited. – President Ronald Reagan

 
 
 
 
 

"Not them" worked just fine for the Democrats in '06.

Third Street (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:20PM EST (link)

They weren’t for a single thing that year. They didn’t have to be. Likewise, this year the Republicans won’t have to be, though it would certainly help.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

Sorry Third, no sale.

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:30PM EST (link)

In ’06 the Ds ran “not them” against an empty suit. Bush was a non starter, he refused to defend his policies and just hid under his desk. Obama won’t be doing that, they will go to war.

They’ll still lose seats, but they won’t lose the war like we did in ’06 and again in ’08.

I think the dynamic will still be all

Dan Perrin (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:39PM EST (link)

about health care, and we still have a real shot at killing it if the left is
denied any of their key issues, abortion, taxing health plans or the public option.

They and we can kill this.

On this I agree, but we need an accomplice

Vassar Bushmills (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:42PM EST (link)

…the GOP. In WE, I assumed you meant those guys.

 
 

The difference, though, is that...

Third Street (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 6:08PM EST (link)

…Obama going to war will backfire on his party, because he will be defending the indefensible, fighting for policies that cannot be substantively supported. The Democrats have been at war against us for a long time. For the last year you haven’t been able to turn on the TV without seeing Obama’s haughty mug staring back at you, and the more he’s gotten out there to talk about health “reform”, trying terrorists in civilian courts, the lower his numbers and those of his party have gotten. I welcome Obama stepping up his rhetorical attacks, reminding Americans throughout the year why they have grown so distrustful, angry, and afraid of the Democrats.

Had Bush chosen to stand up for himself, he would have been explaining and defending policies that reflected (and continue to reflect) the values shared by a majority of Americans. He would have been defining himself and his party, instead of sitting back and letting the Democrats do so. If Obama wants to spend the coming months going on TV every day with more condescending “let me be clear” speeches as the economy continues to collapse and his terrorism policies breed more attempts against airliners and God knows what else, let him.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

 
 

Different mechanics involved

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 6:11PM EST (link)

Dems have an organized and disciplined caucus, an agenda, and a built-in constituency naturally in favor of more government. In addition, they have compliant organs of public opinion. Republicans, in contrast, have a fractured caucus, little to no discipline to remedy this problem, and no constituency strongly in favor of limited government (at least, not to the extent that Dem constituencies favor expansion of said government). Republicans are also hindered by a greater concern on the part of its constituencies for public morality in its pols, and by the fact that it has to attract more independents than Dems do. This is besides the fact that the payoffs for politicians are naturally predisposed to more government spending, much in the same way that more customers benefit a firm. In that light, we should ask ourselves, how do we stop and reverse the trend for more government? I don’t have the answer to that question, but I do know that it will likely require the use of party infrastructure to make it costly for congresscritters who won’t tow the party line. It would also require the development of constituencies naturally opposed to government growth, which is why a marriage of libertarian-minded folk, the Tea Party movement, and other small government constituencies (small business owners, the self-employed) is in the best interests of small-government conservatives, and why these groups should be welcomed, and not derided for their deviations from mainstream conservative thought.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dems have learned the wrong lesson from 1994

mustango (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 2:06PM EST (link)

“At least in 1994, the Dems had the sense to stop when it was obvious what HillaryCare was doing to them.”

You have to keep in mind that it is current Democrat “wisdom” that THIS was the mistake that cost them Congress; that America wasn’t angry over Hillarycare but the fact that Hillarycare failed.

Of course that doesn’t explain how, if that were so, it would make sense for America to vote in the party that had been aligned against Hillarycare, but then again Democrats have never in my lifetime been a party to give the American electorate credit for rationality.

“I just miss — I miss being anonymous.” — Barack Obama

I fully sympathize, Mr. President. I miss you being anonymous too.

I think you're close, but not quite.

earthmover (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 2:34PM EST (link)

I think the current Dem wisdom is that the mistake they made was to give up. Although they didn’t have 60 in the Senate at the time, so it wasn’t quite as “easy” as it is now. I really don’t think they care about the ’10 election, at least not nearly as much as they care about getting Obamacare through. As they have said over and over again, this is their chance to get it. If they fail now, it will be a long time before they can try again, and as we all know, this is what they have been waiting for for a long time.

I think we are making a huge mistake right now if we gloat over election projections instead of putting all our energy into stopping Obamacare. If this gets through, the election will be far less significant than we would like to think it will be, no matter the results.

Well, I agree we should not gloat over election

Dan Perrin (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 4:34PM EST (link)

projections before they happen and we should put all our energy into holding every one of the NO Dem votes, but the reality is that this is the progressive’s fight now.

If put up some NO votes in serious numbers, in the numbers of at least those who said they would vote no if there is no public option, then it will fail.

The ball is in their court, we focus on holding our previous NOs.

 

The dems lost in '94 because they had a wannabe Persian potentate..

Vassar Bushmills (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:24PM EST (link)

…and not a true-believing, get-even socialist in the White House.

There is no cause that Bill Clinton would have gone to the mat for the 10-count , except the one he did go for, his own preservation.

This is a different crowd. We still don’t know who the invisible hand is…but things have change. They will kill to get this.

I think you're exactly right, vassar.

earthmover (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:49PM EST (link)

This is the be-all-end-all for Obama and his ilk. Nothing else (*nothing*) matters to them at this point and that’s why we have to stay focused on it as well.

Dan, I agree that this in large part the progressive’s fight, and it is somewhat heartening to see them take up against in small measures. However, we can’t sit back now and say, “We did what we could, now we’ll leave it in your hands.” As has been said here before, all we have to do in the Senate is pick up one vote and it’s all over. I don’t know about anyone else here, but I don’t trust any left-leaning group/coalition, progressive or otherwise, to take care of that for us.

 
 
 
 

Ahh, but that's just it...there isn't anything we can do

Conservative Phantom Sunday, January 10th at 2:57PM EST (link)

to stop them. And it isn’t that the media is aligned with them (they are, of course) but that the media is simply going “blackout mode” and ignoring all legislative news.

We are powerless until 2010 and, ironically, that is our only power now. The threat of the 2010 election is the only weapon available to us.

When you have nothing you go with nothing.

Tired of commenting on other people’s topics? Consider a visit to the “It’s About Liberty” forum where you can start your own:

http://itsaboutliberty.com/

And be as politically incorrect as you damn well please.

It is not true,

Dan Perrin (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 4:39PM EST (link)

everything done to date has put the Democrats in the position they are now in political and that was done by opposing ObamaCare.

Why give up and do nothing when the correlation of political and economic forces is in our favor?

You're right, Dan.

earthmover (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:55PM EST (link)

If we had thrown up our hands in June and said, “You have the majority and there’s nothing we can do,” we would already be living under Obamacare. This is no time to give up. If it passes, there won’t be any going back, and we could win as many seats as we want in November, but we’ll still be well on our way to single-payer.

 
 
 

"So why should polling data that puts Senator Kennedy’s seat in a dead heat in the bluest of blue states change their behavior? "

erod (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 3:15PM EST (link)

Are they changing their behavior Dan? It seems like they are still going full steam ahead and trying to deliver by the end or middle of February with the bill. Even if Brown wins, which I think is possible, they will just ram it through before February 20 when Brown can come into the Senate.

Another excellent post though, I hope your right.

It is not the leadership that I am thinking will change

Dan Perrin (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:42PM EST (link)

their behavior, not the White House, not the Speaker’s office and not Reid’s office, it is the rank and file that need to have their attitudes adjusted.

 
 

Has Anyone Seen ACORN, SEIU, or Other Dem Cheat Groups At Large in Massachusetts?

Ausonius (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 3:49PM EST (link)

We know from other areas (Cleveland, Chicago, NYC, Minnesota, etc.) the power of Dem Cheat Groups to steal elections.

Have there been any reports of their activities recently in Massachusetts, officially or unofficially?

This incident happened before Christmas:

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/12/complaint-against-seiu-in-mass-senate.html

If you have not yet read it, this article shows Coakley-ACORN as Siamese Twins:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/01/will_massachusetts_send_acorn.html

Ausonius: 310-395 A.D. Teacher, Poet, Consul, General, Farmer.

Personal Tutor to the future St. Paulinus of Nola and to young Gratian, heir to the throne during the turbulent final years of the Western Roman Empire. When his former student Gratian was assassinated, Ausonius threw up his hands and retired to his farm in Gaul. Rome was captured by barbarians 14 years after his death.

Cato@rock.com

 

Perhaps we should have a RedState election

Dan Perrin (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:43PM EST (link)

fraud observer team descend on Massachusetts?

What’d think?

 

Dan, Slight quibble/question concerning your analysis...

AceInTX (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 5:53PM EST (link)

To finish, the Dems must vote to amend the Senate bill on the House floor, vote on final passage on the House floor, and then, the bill goes back to the Senate, for more 60 margin votes and amendments.

The ever-slow-to-understand-Senate-rules Dem Representatives do not understand the Senate nightmare again awaits. Nor do they understand that the reason there is no House-Senate Conference is that the Senate Republicans objected to the appointment of the conferees — thank you Senator DeMint.

If the House Dems pass the Senate version, isn’t it game set and match?

Then it’s a question whether San Fan Nan can roll the moderate Dems on the Stupack amendment as I understand it.

Or did I miss something?

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 

DeMint in the Senate and Pence in the House

itsjoanne Sunday, January 10th at 6:36PM EST (link)

Those are two great leaders. DeMint especially is doing a great job in the Senate, and one I would think many could rally behind.

 

Remember who's been saying 80 seats ever since the August recess

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 8:25PM EST (link)

When it happens, money and gifts are not necessary. [ If you insist, I really like dark chocolate and fast, heavily modified turbo-powered japanese cars.]

All I really ask is that I be cited and lauded copiously by everybody who’s anybody.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

I need clarification on your prediction.

Bill S (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 8:29PM EST (link)

Are you saying the GOP will get a net gain of 80 (ie. 40 more GOP seats) or there will be 80 more GOP seats than before?

I need to have this recorded for posterity so I know who buys in Austin…

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Well, not Austin necessarily...

Bill S (Diary) Sunday, January 10th at 8:29PM EST (link)

…since that’s before the election. But at some point.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 

Hehe, for clarification

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Monday, January 11th at 11:22AM EST (link)

80 NET GAIN. As in, the approximate count at the moment is 258 Dems, 177 Repubs, and I am predicting 257 Repubs, 178 Dems.

But yes, I’m buying if I’m wrong. I’m buying even if I’m close but wrong. I mean, if we gained say a net 72, I’d be pretty happy about it. But I’d still be buying, bro.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

Damn.

Bill S (Diary) Monday, January 11th at 11:40PM EST (link)

I guess I can’t make you buy if it’s a 40-seat gain (80 seat net gain) for the GOP, because I agree with you.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 
 
 

Another big difference between now and 1994

itrytobenice (Diary) Monday, January 11th at 12:21PM EST (link)

In 1994 there was a reform that said that any member who retired that year got to keep their campaign stash. After that year, if they retired they got stuck with just their pension and whatever they could steal.

That is why there were so many open seats and so many chances to take them away.

This year, our biggest opportunity is that BO is turning out to be as incompetent as Carter (or worse) and that Ds are turning kamikazi over this HCR.

Right now according to Rassmussen, it is at -26 in strongly approve vs. strongly disapprove. Those are the people who are most informed and most likely to vote.

And every single D voted for the bill itself, not just cloture. That had to involve blackmail, because some of those Ds are *extremely* vulnerable and could have gotten away with voting for cloture and against the bill and still been able to fool many of their constituents.

Proper grammar saves lives.

Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots