Comments on: Pro-Abortion House Dems Solidify Opposition to Conference Report with Stupak Amendment

By: mikedaire

mikedaire — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:28:00 +0000

If the pro-abortion forces were serious and principled in their belief, the house version of the bill would have failed. It didn’t because taking over 1/6th of the American economy and control over every one’s life is more important to them than abortion. They also believe that this and future congresses will weaken any prohibitions. The abortion issue was a red herring thrown into the mix to misdirect the attention of the masses. It was a cold political calculation by Pelosi to distract the Republicans and it worked.

By: peg_c

peg_c — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:36:59 +0000

Once it served its purpose.

By: peg_c

peg_c — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:35:42 +0000

Call it like it is, Louise. You support taxpayer-funded MURDER of innocents.

By: Marcus_Traianus

Marcus_Traianus — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:21:06 +0000

No text needed.

By: archer52

archer52 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:31:10 +0000

This is a dance. They know once government healthcare is in place, in a year, or two years or maybe the next day, the abortion can be added. Maybe a little at a time, but it will be added.

Watching the Dems play with the Republicans is like watching a boa twist around a rabbit. The rabbit can struggle, but sooner or later, it is dinner.

By: gunnerbs

gunnerbs — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:08:08 +0000

may have two options…except in politics, there is rarely two options. Call me cynical, but I predict a “compromise” that will allow pro-life AND pro-abortion democrats to “vote their conscience.”

I’m hoping the bill doesn’t get that far!

By: louesc

louesc — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:31 +0000

It is a dark day in America the house has just passed health care reform bill H.R. 3962. This is a direct infringement on our liberties. The congress men and women that Voted for this bill are not freedom loving Americans. Take for instance the turn coat Repubican Joseph Cao he needs to be defeated in 2010 along with his Anti Free Market buddies the Democrats… Go to the link to read the rest of the Article and Join Me in the Fight for 2010!

https://www.americanpatriotsprevail.com/BetrayersOf_Freedom09.html

By: tgharris

tgharris — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:45:16 +0000

“We will not vote for a conference report that contains language that restricts women’s right to choose any further than current law,”

Hey Pro-Abortion Letter Writing Democrats:

Prohibiting federal funding no more restricts your imaginary “right” to an abortion than it does your actual right to own a firearm. The only thing is you pay for it, not me.

By: snowshooze

snowshooze — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:13:36 +0000

Stupak is an amendmendment sponsored by Democrats for Democrats.
Anyone dumb enough to vote for health care reform based on this bait and switch tactic is certainly too dumb to represent me.
Let the Democrats have their abortions…right? soon they will die out.
Even I cannot choke that down.
Either way, the Democrats put this in merely as bait.
They think the sanctity of life could be played against me as a political card to get me to try to protect the lives of the unborne…at any cost.
Unfortunantly…it might work.
I am no baby killer.
And even I do not know how far I might go to save Gods promise and the future of the world.
But rather than play into their hands, we have many options.
The first, easiest and most effective…is just to say no.
No health care reform as outlined by the Democrats in the House bill.
No rush to judgment.
No Obamacare at all.
And after they get over it, well, we can begin a systematic overhaul of health care regulations from the bottom up, and over time that will ultimately cut costs and liabilities to bring some meaningful change.
There is no Saturday night emergency. Honorable legislation is not passed by the cover of darkness.

By: ciscoguy

ciscoguy — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:21:10 +0000

Let’s hope they stick to their bloodthirsty principles for the sake of defeating this bill.

I would just love to ask them 2 questions:

1) Why should it be necessary that anyone who opts for preferred coverage must also pay for others abortions?

2) Why can’t people just get their abortion coverage from a private insurer?
(Gee, could it have anything to do with their single-payer vision or their desire to kill off minorities and low-income families?)

By: ciscoguy

ciscoguy — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:03:06 +0000

It would never happen, but wouldn’t it be nice to see a NYT headline:

“Slaughter leads Dems in battle for abortion coverage”

By: Dan Perrin

Dan Perrin — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:40:36 +0000

NARAL, Emily’s List and Planned Parenthood are not sitting back on this one, they cannot — since they lost big time in the House.

They must win in the Senate or be forced into killing their own pal’s bill.

By: Dan Perrin

Dan Perrin — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:28:42 +0000

ironies, Slaughter

By: Kyle-MI

Kyle-MI — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:24:38 +0000

You know, the bill with the Stupak amendment. Either she is bluffing now, or she was playing cutesy political games then.

I would how Stupak and his Democrat support feel about this?

While I would love to sit back and enjoy the popcorn, this is too important an issue. We need to subtly skillfully egg them on against each other.

By: mikefisk

mikefisk — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:17:29 +0000

…that one of the Congresswomen cited in the report is named Slaughter?

There’s pro-choice, then there’s whatever this group of conspirators is.

One can only hope they bring the whole mess down.