<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leaked Internal House Leadership Whip Count Shows 47 Dems at No, 8 Leaning No and 12 Undecided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:56:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: beanerecmo</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>beanerecmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>Would people stop calling these fascist social welfare collectivists - progressives. They are regressives in every sense of the word. They want to institute the thoughts and tenets that Marx, Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Ayers, Alinsky, Chomsky et al embrace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would people stop calling these fascist social welfare collectivists &#8211; progressives. They are regressives in every sense of the word. They want to institute the thoughts and tenets that Marx, Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Ayers, Alinsky, Chomsky et al embrace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LDahl752</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>LDahl752</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>or deficits.  All they want to do is destroy our economy even further than it has already been.  With more and more millions of citizens dependent on the central gov&#039;t for their very lives, they will obtain more and more power.  Washington D.C. has been taken over by a sickness that only having most of them defeated in their next re-election bid can cure.  There is no vaccine or message which will reach them, other than major electoral defeats.  This includes R&#039;s as well as D&#039;s.  In spite of the townhall meetings and tea parties, they still believe &quot;they know best.&quot;  They don&#039;t.  They answer only to the special interests and lobbyists who are supporting them or wooing them with gifts, trips, perks of all sorts.  Get them out of there!  Send them home!  And, the sooner, the better!  Potomac Fever runs deep and wide in that cesspool we call our Capitol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or deficits.  All they want to do is destroy our economy even further than it has already been.  With more and more millions of citizens dependent on the central gov&#8217;t for their very lives, they will obtain more and more power.  Washington D.C. has been taken over by a sickness that only having most of them defeated in their next re-election bid can cure.  There is no vaccine or message which will reach them, other than major electoral defeats.  This includes R&#8217;s as well as D&#8217;s.  In spite of the townhall meetings and tea parties, they still believe &#8220;they know best.&#8221;  They don&#8217;t.  They answer only to the special interests and lobbyists who are supporting them or wooing them with gifts, trips, perks of all sorts.  Get them out of there!  Send them home!  And, the sooner, the better!  Potomac Fever runs deep and wide in that cesspool we call our Capitol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LDahl752</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>LDahl752</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>to God&#039;s ears!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to God&#8217;s ears!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2100</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>&#160;&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t the Republicans bring up as an amendment to any bill the $247B slight of hand measure that Reid got stuffed on? Would Reid be able to prevent its being offered? If it came up for a vote, I suspect it would pass with virtually all the members who killed cloture voting for it. And how could the lefty Democrats vote against it? &quot;We want to say we&#039;re saving $500B in Medicare/aid waste/fraud abuse and then separately reauthorize half of that waste/fraud/abuse.&quot; Uh, right. 

If that gets added to whatever bill Reid concocts, that immediately adds $247B to the CBO cost and definitely kills Snowe&#039;s support I&#039;d think. Would this be the final straw that kills ANY bill from passing? Could Lincoln or Landrieu or even Bayh or Nelson support say a $1.2T bill that adds at least a quarter billion to the deficit?

And on a slightly different topic, why does it seem that no one except Krauthammer brings up the fact that the CBO figure - even if their calculations are perfect - is bogus because it looks at 10 years of collecting money vs only 6 years or so of spending it? (I guess we&#039;ll have a &#039;health care lockbox&#039; now. Let&#039;s hope it has a better &#039;key&#039; than the social security lockbox.) It seems the GOP should be all over this as another sleight of hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t the Republicans bring up as an amendment to any bill the $247B slight of hand measure that Reid got stuffed on? Would Reid be able to prevent its being offered? If it came up for a vote, I suspect it would pass with virtually all the members who killed cloture voting for it. And how could the lefty Democrats vote against it? &#8220;We want to say we&#8217;re saving $500B in Medicare/aid waste/fraud abuse and then separately reauthorize half of that waste/fraud/abuse.&#8221; Uh, right. </p>
<p>If that gets added to whatever bill Reid concocts, that immediately adds $247B to the CBO cost and definitely kills Snowe&#8217;s support I&#8217;d think. Would this be the final straw that kills ANY bill from passing? Could Lincoln or Landrieu or even Bayh or Nelson support say a $1.2T bill that adds at least a quarter billion to the deficit?</p>
<p>And on a slightly different topic, why does it seem that no one except Krauthammer brings up the fact that the CBO figure &#8211; even if their calculations are perfect &#8211; is bogus because it looks at 10 years of collecting money vs only 6 years or so of spending it? (I guess we&#8217;ll have a &#8216;health care lockbox&#8217; now. Let&#8217;s hope it has a better &#8216;key&#8217; than the social security lockbox.) It seems the GOP should be all over this as another sleight of hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mycountry</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>mycountry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>Another word for Socialist A-holes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another word for Socialist A-holes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Hackbarth</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Hackbarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2096</guid>
		<description>Dan, you&#039;ve been closely following the health care debate in Congress. You might like this video shown to Senate Republicans, yesterday, during their weekly lunch. These videos are rarely seen outside the lunch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmNdV0PSRy4

It shows the contrasts between Candidate Obama and President Obama when it comes to transparency.

Let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, you&#8217;ve been closely following the health care debate in Congress. You might like this video shown to Senate Republicans, yesterday, during their weekly lunch. These videos are rarely seen outside the lunch.</p>
<p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmNdV0PSRy4</p>
<p>It shows the contrasts between Candidate Obama and President Obama when it comes to transparency.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2094</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Perrin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2092</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2092</guid>
		<description>post, that you would bet it will pass.

Thought I&#039;d try to respond to your offer here.

But, hey, cheer up, you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>post, that you would bet it will pass.</p>
<p>Thought I&#8217;d try to respond to your offer here.</p>
<p>But, hey, cheer up, you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Perrin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>that the odds of nothing happening were 40%.

They have increased substantially, in my view, to 65%.

The Democratic Senators who vote to end the filibuster will be crushed in the fall elections, and they know they will alienate the independents.

Spending $1 trillion when our dollar is on the edge -- in large part because of our spending is a mistake that even a handful of Democrats see clearly, and will not be forgiven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that the odds of nothing happening were 40%.</p>
<p>They have increased substantially, in my view, to 65%.</p>
<p>The Democratic Senators who vote to end the filibuster will be crushed in the fall elections, and they know they will alienate the independents.</p>
<p>Spending $1 trillion when our dollar is on the edge &#8212; in large part because of our spending is a mistake that even a handful of Democrats see clearly, and will not be forgiven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2088</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2088</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why a couple of people seem to be taking my opinion as some sort of personal insult that I need to back up with a wager of some sort. I&#039;m supposed to put up collateral if I want to offer an opinion?

I hope you&#039;re right about what happens. Let&#039;s just say that at pretty much every key moment in the past nine months we&#039;ve seen the &quot;moderate&quot; Dems cave when push came to shove.

Maybe this time that won&#039;t happen because the election is getting closer and those in the House will feel more pressure from their constituents to water down Obamacare. Or maybe it will be like most of the other times until now. 

Reid was certainly embarrassed by the recent cloture vote on the sleight of hand maneuver so maybe there&#039;s hope in the Senate. But I&#039;m sure not holding my breath. Why?
- Well we thought Snowe was 50-50 and she caved on the committee vote. Of course now that she&#039;s been thrown under the bus she might not cave again. Or maybe she will.
- Lieberman came out with all this strong language today, but all he&#039;s really saying is that he won&#039;t stop anything until the very end of the process. (Isn&#039;t that what Snowe said when she voted aye?) He has reason to stick a stick in a few of his D colleagues&#039; eyes and he may want to watch out for the insurance industry in CT, so maybe he&#039;ll hold out when all is said and done. Or maybe not.

There were earlier votes where congresscritters were told in so many words to name their price in exchange for their vote. Certainly that&#039;s going to be happening again. And people like kos and moveon will say they&#039;ll load up a primary opponent with cash against anyone who votes against Obamacare. Will that plus some stimulus money for the district sway a few people? It won&#039;t take more than a few.

Do you agree with the three possible scenarios I listed earlier?
1 - Obama doesn&#039;t get a HCR bill to sign this year.
2 - He gets one that includes some sort of public option.
3 - He gets one that has no public option trojan horse.

What&#039;s your opinion on the odds of these? I&#039;d say something like
1 - 0%
2 - At least 60% and probably more like 75%.
3 - 25-40%.

I don&#039;t trust any Democrat in Washington, so I figure 2 is more likely than 3. I don&#039;t have any special insight or inside connections - it&#039;s just purely gut feel. Is that okay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why a couple of people seem to be taking my opinion as some sort of personal insult that I need to back up with a wager of some sort. I&#8217;m supposed to put up collateral if I want to offer an opinion?</p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;re right about what happens. Let&#8217;s just say that at pretty much every key moment in the past nine months we&#8217;ve seen the &#8220;moderate&#8221; Dems cave when push came to shove.</p>
<p>Maybe this time that won&#8217;t happen because the election is getting closer and those in the House will feel more pressure from their constituents to water down Obamacare. Or maybe it will be like most of the other times until now. </p>
<p>Reid was certainly embarrassed by the recent cloture vote on the sleight of hand maneuver so maybe there&#8217;s hope in the Senate. But I&#8217;m sure not holding my breath. Why?<br />
- Well we thought Snowe was 50-50 and she caved on the committee vote. Of course now that she&#8217;s been thrown under the bus she might not cave again. Or maybe she will.<br />
- Lieberman came out with all this strong language today, but all he&#8217;s really saying is that he won&#8217;t stop anything until the very end of the process. (Isn&#8217;t that what Snowe said when she voted aye?) He has reason to stick a stick in a few of his D colleagues&#8217; eyes and he may want to watch out for the insurance industry in CT, so maybe he&#8217;ll hold out when all is said and done. Or maybe not.</p>
<p>There were earlier votes where congresscritters were told in so many words to name their price in exchange for their vote. Certainly that&#8217;s going to be happening again. And people like kos and moveon will say they&#8217;ll load up a primary opponent with cash against anyone who votes against Obamacare. Will that plus some stimulus money for the district sway a few people? It won&#8217;t take more than a few.</p>
<p>Do you agree with the three possible scenarios I listed earlier?<br />
1 &#8211; Obama doesn&#8217;t get a HCR bill to sign this year.<br />
2 &#8211; He gets one that includes some sort of public option.<br />
3 &#8211; He gets one that has no public option trojan horse.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your opinion on the odds of these? I&#8217;d say something like<br />
1 &#8211; 0%<br />
2 &#8211; At least 60% and probably more like 75%.<br />
3 &#8211; 25-40%.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t trust any Democrat in Washington, so I figure 2 is more likely than 3. I don&#8217;t have any special insight or inside connections &#8211; it&#8217;s just purely gut feel. Is that okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarlos</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>scarlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>Honestly it&#039;s something I do alot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly it&#8217;s something I do alot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farstar99</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>farstar99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>As for the bribes, they&#039;d better be good, because anyone who takes one is out of political life forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the bribes, they&#8217;d better be good, because anyone who takes one is out of political life forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scope</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2084</link>
		<dc:creator>Scope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2084</guid>
		<description>If they called for a vote before August, even with a vapor bill, they would have had more of a chance then they do now.  After next Tuesday, the corpse of Obamacare will finally get it&#039;s funeral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they called for a vote before August, even with a vapor bill, they would have had more of a chance then they do now.  After next Tuesday, the corpse of Obamacare will finally get it&#8217;s funeral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scope</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Scope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>put your money where your mouth is, and all that.  You have alot of negativism to say, you are so sure everyone can be bought off,  and that some sort of Government Healthcare will win.  Even if you don&#039;t believe what Dan Perrin has to say, with some inside knowledge, have you read what so many others have said also.  Have you missed the part about the tremendous infighting between those leftists that won&#039;t vote for passage if it doesn&#039;t have a robust public option, as opposed to other not so far lefties, that won&#039;t vote for passage if it does include the public option.  Some Democrats won&#039;t vote for the bill if it includes government funding of abortions, some other Dems won&#039;t vote for it if it cuts medicare payments, or if the doctors will all have to accept medicare reduced payments.  The only goal for the hard left is to gain Government control of our medical system, which will give them massive control of all our lives, in every way.  I tend to believe, that not only Lieberman, but at least some other Democrats will not vote for our country&#039;s demise.  They would be the old fashioned Democrats, who at one time really were for the little people, misguided as they may have been.  They cannot get the votes in either the House or the Senate, without major major changes, and, if they change one thing to suit some, they anger the other faction.  And, again, after next Tuesday, they will lose even more support within the Democratic ranks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>put your money where your mouth is, and all that.  You have alot of negativism to say, you are so sure everyone can be bought off,  and that some sort of Government Healthcare will win.  Even if you don&#8217;t believe what Dan Perrin has to say, with some inside knowledge, have you read what so many others have said also.  Have you missed the part about the tremendous infighting between those leftists that won&#8217;t vote for passage if it doesn&#8217;t have a robust public option, as opposed to other not so far lefties, that won&#8217;t vote for passage if it does include the public option.  Some Democrats won&#8217;t vote for the bill if it includes government funding of abortions, some other Dems won&#8217;t vote for it if it cuts medicare payments, or if the doctors will all have to accept medicare reduced payments.  The only goal for the hard left is to gain Government control of our medical system, which will give them massive control of all our lives, in every way.  I tend to believe, that not only Lieberman, but at least some other Democrats will not vote for our country&#8217;s demise.  They would be the old fashioned Democrats, who at one time really were for the little people, misguided as they may have been.  They cannot get the votes in either the House or the Senate, without major major changes, and, if they change one thing to suit some, they anger the other faction.  And, again, after next Tuesday, they will lose even more support within the Democratic ranks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry915barry</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>barry915barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>And sorry to step on your toes after-the-fact, scarlos.  Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And sorry to step on your toes after-the-fact, scarlos.  Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceili_dancer</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>ceili_dancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>n/t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n/t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry915barry</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/27/leaked-internal-house-leadership-whip-count-shows-47-dems-at-no-8-leaning-no-and-12-undecided/#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator>barry915barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1411#comment-2078</guid>
		<description>With 2 vacant seats, 1 leaning D (CA-10) and 1 leaning R (NY-23)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 2 vacant seats, 1 leaning D (CA-10) and 1 leaning R (NY-23)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

