<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the NYT&#8217;s, the Number One Health Reform Bill Killing Issue Gets One Sentence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/26/in-the-nyts-the-number-one-health-reform-bill-killing-issue-gets-one-sentence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/26/in-the-nyts-the-number-one-health-reform-bill-killing-issue-gets-one-sentence/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:56:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amigag</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/26/in-the-nyts-the-number-one-health-reform-bill-killing-issue-gets-one-sentence/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator>amigag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1382#comment-2043</guid>
		<description>One of the Amendments to HR 3200 in the Energy &amp; Commerce Committee


	An amendment offered by Rep. Capps D-CA., would allow for immediate federal funding of elective abortion coverage through the public plan, permit taxpayer subsidies of private plans that cover elective abortion, and mandate that all areas of the country contain one private plan that covers abortion. For a detailed vote tally and text of this amendment, click here.

This amendment passed by a vote of 30 to 28.

***********************************************************************************

There are 36 Democrats on this Committee and 23 Republicans. 
Since these now &quot;House Democrats&quot; are not named, it is difficult to charge hypocrisy. But the roll call votes would show not only the final vote on H.R. 3200, but on the many amendments that were passed , including the one I sited above. In addition, many other amendments that the Republicans offered and voted down by this Committee. Representative Joe Pitts (R-PA) offered an Amendment to Prohibit a Federal mandate for abortion coverage and this was also voted down. I would love to know who these &quot;House Democrats&quot; are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the Amendments to HR 3200 in the Energy &amp; Commerce Committee</p>
<p>	An amendment offered by Rep. Capps D-CA., would allow for immediate federal funding of elective abortion coverage through the public plan, permit taxpayer subsidies of private plans that cover elective abortion, and mandate that all areas of the country contain one private plan that covers abortion. For a detailed vote tally and text of this amendment, click here.</p>
<p>This amendment passed by a vote of 30 to 28.</p>
<p>***********************************************************************************</p>
<p>There are 36 Democrats on this Committee and 23 Republicans.<br />
Since these now &#8220;House Democrats&#8221; are not named, it is difficult to charge hypocrisy. But the roll call votes would show not only the final vote on H.R. 3200, but on the many amendments that were passed , including the one I sited above. In addition, many other amendments that the Republicans offered and voted down by this Committee. Representative Joe Pitts (R-PA) offered an Amendment to Prohibit a Federal mandate for abortion coverage and this was also voted down. I would love to know who these &#8220;House Democrats&#8221; are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBeard</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/26/in-the-nyts-the-number-one-health-reform-bill-killing-issue-gets-one-sentence/#comment-2042</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1382#comment-2042</guid>
		<description>“House Democratic leaders are still trying to figure out exactly how to limit the use of federal money for abortions.”

Should read, &quot;House Democratic leaders are still trying to figure out exactly how to limit public discussion about their desire to use taxpayer funds to kill even more unborn children.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“House Democratic leaders are still trying to figure out exactly how to limit the use of federal money for abortions.”</p>
<p>Should read, &#8220;House Democratic leaders are still trying to figure out exactly how to limit public discussion about their desire to use taxpayer funds to kill even more unborn children.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlgrey</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/26/in-the-nyts-the-number-one-health-reform-bill-killing-issue-gets-one-sentence/#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator>earlgrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1382#comment-2041</guid>
		<description>despite all the bad press the health care reform plans have been getting, the approval on Rasmussen was up to 45% from 42% this week.  Any ideas as to why?  It makes me wonder how people get their news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>despite all the bad press the health care reform plans have been getting, the approval on Rasmussen was up to 45% from 42% this week.  Any ideas as to why?  It makes me wonder how people get their news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyindy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2009/10/26/in-the-nyts-the-number-one-health-reform-bill-killing-issue-gets-one-sentence/#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator>nyindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/?p=1382#comment-2040</guid>
		<description>In cases where the mother&#039;s life is in danger.

Otherwise, it should be treated as any other elective procedure and not covered by any insurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In cases where the mother&#8217;s life is in danger.</p>
<p>Otherwise, it should be treated as any other elective procedure and not covered by any insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

