If you are in an individual health insurance plan, you cannot get a new one, period. You must go to the government-run Health Information Exchange, which is just an arm of the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, who will control every plan in the Exchange, and every detail of every plan.
Its BIG BROTHER (in the Orwellian sense) health care.
Here is what the second Investor’s Business Daily editorial on the same subject said:
Rep. Dave Camp, the ranking member on Ways and Means, told us that “any existing plan will not be able to enroll members.” There will be “a prohibition,” the Michigan Republican said, “on enrolling individuals in private health plans” after the bill becomes law in 2013.
It was also confirmed by Ways and Means staff director Cybele Bjorklund, who, in response to questions from Republican Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin during a committee markup session, admitted last week that insurance providers “cannot create new policies outside of that window outside of the exchange.”
The exchange is not a private marketplace as IBD points out:
the exchange will not be a private market. It will be a program in which Americans can buy individual plans from private companies in competition with the “public option” provision of the bill that will provide taxpayer-subsidized coverage.
But that’s only part of the story. The exchange will be a highly regulated clearinghouse of providers that meet the government’s standards. Only those providers that follow Washington’s stringent guidelines will be allowed to join this exclusive club.
The government, through an unelected health choices commissioner, will set premiums, dictate benefits, determine deductibles and establish coverage. Exchange participants will be required to insure anyone who asks to be covered and to accept all renewals. Ryan believes the weight of the mandates will mean only five or six providers will be able to survive and sell coverage in the exchange.
Anyone who wonders how such an exchange will operate need only look at Massachusetts, home to the only health coverage exchange in existence. The Cato Institute’s Michael Tanner testified before the Kansas House in 2007 that “in practice, at least as demonstrated in Massachusetts,” an exchange “can quickly devolve into a regulatory body.”
It’s government run everything. And if you don’t like your government-run Health Information Exchange, you can have your government other, even more government run health plan.
It’ll cost a trillion dollars and destroy our health care, but it will make President Obama feel better about America.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Fix the link please.
DCTrav (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 1:09AM EST (link)The one link in the article sends you right back to this post.
This is unbelievable. Of course the issue becomes that most people on the left want our inevitable single payer system, so good luck telling them that this is a bad thing.
Fixed,
Dan Perrin (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 7:06AM EST (link)Thanks for the heads up.
Here is the Heritage Foundations take..link
Samsara (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 2:11AM EST (link)So IBD is wrong: individual health insurance will not be outlawed. But it will be effectively regulated out of existence… which is effectively the same thing.
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/16/does-the-house-plan-outlaw-private-insurance/
The “outlaw” claim is incorrect. Over-regulate and therefore destroy is closer to the mark in making an accurate argument.
You can't have it,
Dan Perrin (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 7:09AM EST (link)because companies can’t sell it, by law.
That’s outlaw to me.
The way I
dantes (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 2:49PM EST (link)read the bill, private insurers couldn’t automatically enroll you, but had to make sure you see what all of your options are and have the choice to go with what is best for the consumer. It’s a way for competition to exist in a market that frankly has little to no competition.
Nice to see that commissars are back in fashion
aesthete (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 4:49AM EST (link)After tsars was brought back as a positive term, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the name they go with: it certainly would be an accurate descriptor. At any rate, I’m really hoping that overreach and an effective Republican opposition kills this thing, because if it doesn’t, I can’t see it ever getting repealed. I’ll definitely be keeping up the good fight on my end.
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton
As long as the MSM
Dan Perrin (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 7:11AM EST (link)keeps puffing it up, we have a real shot, because the American people know they are just reading White House press releases, and it will keep driving Americans to different sources of information.
We're in a Hurry!
VizBiz (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 6:36AM EST (link)Will someone please explain to me why we are in such a hurry to pass this. The President said that he gets “tons” of letters from desparte families that need Health Coverage. However the darn thing wouldn’t kick in in till 2013. Ironically it sounds as if the Democrats will get the glory of passing the Healthcare bill, before the 2010 and 2012 elections, but won’t be blamed for it’s aftermath until after the votes ar cast.
Runs with scissors, walks with Wacom.
Because, otherwise
Dan Perrin (Diary) Thursday, July 23rd at 7:14AM EST (link)“it will destroy my Presidency” — From the CongressDaily::
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/hca_20090722_6620_pf.php
A telling episode recounted by Senate Finance ranking member Charles Grassley reveals the Obama administration might be more worried than they are letting on that a Republican senator’s comparison of the healthcare overhaul to Waterloo might be dangerously close to the truth.
Grassley said he spoke with a Democratic House member last week who shared Obama’s bleak reaction during a private meeting to reports that some factions of House Democrats were lining up to stall or even take down the overhaul unless leaders made major changes.
“Let’s just lay everything on the table,” Grassley said. “A Democrat congressman last week told me after a conversation with the president that the president had trouble in the House of Representatives, and it wasn’t going to pass if there weren’t some changes made … and the president says, ‘You’re going to destroy my presidency.’ ”
The White House did not respond to requests for comment.