Dear Senator DeMint:
By the numbers, we are yet very early in the presidential primaries. 1144 delegates are needed to sew up the nomination, and depending how you count these things, Mitt Romney has maybe 13 delegates after finishing Iowa in a de facto tie with Rick Santorum and thumping Ron Paul in New Hampshire last night. But presidential primary races are often about perception: like wars, you more often win them by convincing the other side that further resistance is futile than by total, to-the-last-man annihilation. And so the coming South Carolina primary is widely recognized as the last realistic chance to stop Romney, or at least visibly slow his momentum and eliminate the divisions among conservative candidates that have thus far precluded a unified opposition. Romney has been lining up endorsements (including SC Governor Nikki Haley), money and favorable press from conservative journalists to create an air of inevitability that he hopes will end this race by Florida, if not South Carolina. I think it is fair to say that a great many grassroots conservative activists view the prospect of a Romney candidacy with varying shades of dismay.
We may yet, indeed, be stuck with Romney. And I know you were one of a good number of conservatives to endorse him in 2008 as a tactical move to stop John McCain, so the pull of some consistency (as well as longstanding disagreements with Rick Santorum) must be drawing you back to support him again. But even if we do end up with Romney – indeed, especially if we do – it will be terribly damaging for the conservative movement if you endorse or in any way assist him while there is still a race on. Let me explain why.
President George W. Bush was perhaps the third-most-conservative president of the past century, behind Reagan and Coolidge, and he commanded significant conservative loyalty for his wartime leadership, tax cuts and social conservatism. But we knew going into his nomination in 2000 that Bush was no friend of small government. In the shadow of war and later a financial crisis, Bush was able to pressure many otherwise conservative Republicans in Congress to back a lot of most un-conservative measures, most notably the expansion of Medicare to cover prescription drugs. In this, Bush has the help of GOP leadership, as men of conservative inclination and accomplishment like Santorum and Tom DeLay twisted arms to get conservatives to fall into line. Even if these moves were individually defensible under the circumstances, collectively they badly corroded the GOP’s small-government brand, contributing significantly to the loss of Congress and many Governorships in 2006 (including Santorum’s 18-point loss and Romney’s unwillingness to stand for re-election that year). What was needed, and what only began to emerge with your leadership late in Bush’s term, was some voice inside Congress standing up for small government within the GOP.
We have made great strides since then together; the Tea Party movement has sent many conservative reinforcements to Congress, some of them at the expense of long-tenured Republican officeholders. But the battle even within the GOP for smaller government and entitlement reform is far from over.
![]()
Mitt Romney, as well all know, is not and never has been a Tea Party or small government conservative; indeed, his signature achievement in his one term in public office was passing a Ted Kennedy-backed universal health care plan that moved the most Democratic state in the nation to the left on healthcare and laid the groundwork for Obamacare. For Romney to win election against Barack Obama, something else will need to be done to motivate the grassroots activists who make up the Tea Party and related movements inside and outside the GOP. And for anything positive to be accomplished in getting our financial house in order during a Romney presidency, there must be an independent body of conservatives not beholden to Romney to apply pressure on him to pull him to the right. If there is one thing we know about Romney is that he is responsive to external pressures in making political and policy decisions. But if Romney’s position in the party is secure and unchallenged, he will never have to give conservative concerns another moment’s thought, and will look – as he did in Massachusetts – leftward.
One by one, the organs of conservative journalism and activism and the leaders of Republican officialdom have begun placing themselves in Romney’s orbit. If they will not stand up to him now, how will they do so later? And how can we convince dispirited activists that their concerns will still be represented in Romney’s Washington?
The answer, if we end up resigned to Romney, is that they will look to you. For now, we can still sell a message to the grassroots: elect more conservatives to the House and Senate, and they will keep Romney honest – with conservatives like Jim DeMint as their leaders. The goal of doing so will help us all: it will keep not-Romney activists motivated to vote and organize and donate at the House and Senate level, most of whom will then hold their breath and vote Romney as well, knowing they have done their part to provide a meaningful counterweight.
But the more those activists see interviews in which you seem to be feeding the pro-Romney inevitability narrative – much less actually endorsing the man – the more they will conclude that you are ready to play Tom DeLay to Romney’s Bush, and that the lessons of 2006-10 will be completely forgotten in the new Washington. That would be a terrible shame, and poisonous to our ability to keep alive an independent movement that stands for something besides Mitt Romney’s political advancement. Don’t surrender your independent credibility when it will be needed most. We are ready to continue the good fight, but we can’t do it without leaders.
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
It was completely disheartening
Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 12:51PM EST (link)to hear Senator DeMint now joining in the chorus that Mitt Romney now seems to be the inevitable nominee. I would guess that when anyone asks who the most influential conservative is in America, most would say Jim DeMint. If he backs Romney, even only in statements without an endorsement, that will shatter the almost hero status that many of the conservatives believe DeMint to be. Since I understand that DeMint is retiring from the Senate when his term is up, I can only pray that he doesn’t destroy his conservative reputation when he is heading for the door.
Demint will not endorse
sethellis Wednesday, January 11th at 2:02PM EST (link)I translate his comments this way:
“I really like Romney’s message, but I won’t endorse because people will be pissed no matter who I endorse, and I need that support for congressional battles”.
If that is the case then this post is just preaching to the choir. He has basically told us that he supports Romney even if he can’t formally endorse.
It is disturbing what so many are willing to throw under the bus in the name of ABR hysteria. Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, Jim Demint, and even capitalism! What’s next? The constitution?
You might want to send a copy of the Constitution
Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 2:55PM EST (link)to Romney as I don’t think he’s ever read it. It would be good bathroom reading for him, and then he could just flush it as the useless piece of paper he obviously thinks it is.
Obama back to promising same ole, same ole as he
sowa1 Thursday, January 12th at 6:18AM EST (link)did in 2008. How I pray he does not get re-elected. There are no other Republicans that can get the vote of Independants, Dems etc. besides Romney. Have to get Obama out, then will have a chance next time to elect a Conservative. Need Rubio to run as Romneys VP and run for Pres. later. All of you sound like Democrats. Debbie who-ever Shultz is blaming the Tea Party for causing shooting of Gifford. That is who all of you should be attacking along with Obama.
There is no "Next Time"
duanej Thursday, January 12th at 9:54AM EST (link)There is only right now. If we cannot elect a true bedrock, rock-ribbed conservative right now, then we never will be able to. Were you awake at all during the 2008 election or did you snooze through it? Were you around at all for the 1976 election that pitted Ford against Carter? What lesson did we learn in these elections?
Given the choice between a squishy BIG GOVERNMENT Republican and a lefty Democrat, people will choose true blue Democrats every time.
Now lets compare and contrast. Let’s look at the election of 1980 between Carter and Reagan or Reagan and Mondale of 1984. What did we learn from THOSE elections? Well, we learned simply that when conservatism is on the ballot, IT WINS. IT ALWAYS WINS. IT NEVER LOSES!!!
Putting Romney on the ticket is the same as putting McCain, Ford, or GHWBush on the ticket.
You can look over the last 100 years of elections and find this to be true. If you nominate a squish, unless that squish is somehow linked to a strong conservative as a VP, the squish will lose EVERY SINGLE SOLITARY TIME.
WE DO NOT NEED TO PICK A CANDIDATE WHO APPEALS TO INDEPENDENTS AND MODERATES FROM THE VANTAGE POINT OF INDEPENDENTS AND MODERATS. WE NEED TO PICK A CANDIDATE WHO EXPRESSLY, PASSIONATELY, JOYFULLY, AND UNAPOLOGETICALLY EMBRACES CONSERVATISM AND WHO CAN CONVINCE INDEPENDENTS AND MODERATES THAT THEY ARE WRONG AND THAT CONSERVATISM IS RIGHT!!!!!
So right, the America First Committee had it identified
fastpat Thursday, January 12th at 10:24AM EST (link)Only someone who puts America, and only America, first should be supported.
There is only one actual conservative running; it isn’t Romney (aka Obomney), Gingrich, or Santorum (aka Sanctorum).
There is a Calvin Coolidge running now. There is a candidate that demands lawful government. There is a candidate that opposed ALL bailouts of the banksters.
We must support that candidate.
If his initials are
duanej Thursday, January 12th at 10:39AM EST (link)Ron Paul, please don’t be on my side.
Libertarians are worse than Democrats, IMO. Paul is just another RINO…just another wolf in sheep’s clothing, only he’s rabid.
Congressional battles?
mirac777 (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 6:24AM EST (link)What “support?” I have tons of respect for DeMiint , yet he hasn’t won one single battle in getting any conservative legislation passed in how long? Nothing solid has come out of the U.S. Senate for at least 4 years now. Sure Reid is a tyrant and a serial liar who plays the game well, but with the likes of McCain, Graham, McConnell Snowe, Collins, Brown, Blunt, on and on with the progressives with an “R” after their name, we end up with Obama-care, a fake Food Safety bill, NDAA, massive power grabbing by the EPA, and oh say an EXTRA 5+ trillion in debt in the last 4 years.
Again what battles does DeMiint supposedly want to reserve all that “support” for?
United we stand…. Divided we fall.. into the pits of Socialism.
Shame if he did
nancysabet Wednesday, January 11th at 6:56PM EST (link)Perry is the real Tea Party candidate…man up DeMint and endorse him..
Have you ever seen this kind of enthusiasm and inspiration elicited by any other candidate but Perry?
Perry Woman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSXZ0ylAORY&feature=related
HIS BOOTS ARE MADE FOR WALKING – Rebecca Winterowd http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC39JNJGgwA&fmt=18
Carolina by Morning
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WulljNKwdIo&feature=share
DeMint Disappoints
shinglejim (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 12:57PM EST (link)As you mention above, the interviews where he seems to be drop hints that promote Romney are getting annoying. He rips Perry from attacking from the left but not a word was spoken when Romney does the same.
I believe the only reason he hasn’t endorsed Romney is it would hurt his standing with whats left of the tea party. That means Washington is growing on him. He is more concerned with his standing and legacy than the original goal of electing conservatives.
“I fortunately have never worried about irritating people.”
— Bob Knight
Follow @Shinglejim
I don't know whether DeMint is losing the fire or
lineholder (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 1:06PM EST (link)whether he simply had a weak moment when the spirit of “inevitability” crept in on him.
We genuinely and sincerely need for all Conservatives in Congress to stand their ground on Conservative principles with us and for us during this time, not give way to rhetoric!
Don't know what to make of his support for Paul.
expanding_man Wednesday, January 11th at 1:11PM EST (link)I love DeMint. Now that I think my original candidate is toast, I’m inclined to listen to him.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/203557-sen-demint-urges-republicans-to-listen-to-ron-paul-
This kind of support of Paul
lightspeed Wednesday, January 11th at 1:55PM EST (link)from a mainstream conservative icon like DeMint is appalling. Why don’t all Republicans disavow this racist, anti-Semitic, 9/11 truther pandering, conspiracy nut coddling, white supremacist associating, isolationist, Israel-hating, hypocritical, pork-barreling, maybe-I’ll-run-independent dirtbag? Throw his a$$ to the curb.
lightspeed, LOVE your description of Ron Paul - it
pttx333 (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 2:13PM EST (link)is perfect!
Thanks
lightspeed Wednesday, January 11th at 2:30PM EST (link)I just don’t get why Ron Paul gets a pass on all of this stuff in the MSM and, most especially, by the other candidates.
Liberals are probably praying Paul runs 3rd party
clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 3:30PM EST (link)So their media is puffing him up to increase the probability.
He is also labelled as a Republican yet voices a lot of views usually only heard from leftists and so serves them well as a useful idiot.
Demint was pumping paul on the Ingrahm show today
veto Wednesday, January 11th at 2:49PM EST (link)Was listening to the Ingraham show today at work and he was saying we need more libertarian ideas in the party etc etc etc… It didn’t sound like though he plans on endorsing any candidate.
I wouldn't read too much into that
clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 3:33PM EST (link)He’s probably just trying to attract some of the less insane elements who currently support Ron Paul.
A lot of Republicans – even some of the other candidates – find common ground with Ron Paul – to a point- on some issues.
America did fine prior to 1965
Paul Fallavollita (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 8:46PM EST (link)You do realize that a lot of those liberal buzzwords and epithets describe the Old Right prior to 1945, and mainstream America itself prior to 1965? What you describe as a “mainstream conservative” today in 2012 is really a Cold War liberal of the 1960s (as opposed to the crazier PC liberals of 2012).
Thank you
mirac777 (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 6:25AM EST (link)and Amen.
United we stand…. Divided we fall.. into the pits of Socialism.
DeMint is no longer a conservative hero...
jj2012 Wednesday, January 11th at 1:12PM EST (link)…if he continues propping up RINO Romney like he has been. Senator DeMint, you’re rapidly losing your conservative creds. Or are you “focused on the Senate” because all you really care about is getting your chairmanships back? NO MITT ROMNEY!!!
Apparently, DeMint is in the same bracket as FOX.
annie54 Thursday, January 12th at 11:50PM EST (link)Governor Rick Perry is too good for all of them.
Thank heavens for college basketball! GOOOOO Buckeyes!
Because he makes a tactical assessment that is different than yours?
JSobieski (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 11:57PM EST (link)What makes a person conservative is the policies they advocate for.
What makes someone a tactician is how they go about achieving their objectives.
One of the reasons why everyone is running around like a chicken without a head is that people can’t seem to differentiate between goals and plan/strategy/tactics.
Coulter and Rush are both great examples of this. They are both conservative in what they want, but I think they are both totally wrong about how to move the ball forward in the context of the 2012 election.
If we don’t acknowledge that people with the same goals are capable of disagree on the candidates/process for achieving them, we won’t be able to accomplish much as a movement.
DeMint is a conservative hero. There is however no reason to assume that his conservative bona fides make him a particularly wise strategist.
My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.
STOP THE MADNESS!
A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!
Do We Want a Lobbyist as President?
bobguzzardi Wednesday, January 11th at 1:15PM EST (link)1) Gingrich Ventures Took In More Than $105 Million Over A Decade’s Time
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
http://njtoday.net/2011/11/22/gingrich-ventures-took-in-more-than-105-million-over-a-decades-time /
2) One political committee, one think tank, one consulting firm: it all adds up
Read more: http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-12-20/politics/30537084_1_callista-gingrich-group-newt-gingrich#ixzz1jArR9mgH
Here’s a breakdown of the empire that Newt built:
Need I remind you
mirac777 (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 6:29AM EST (link)that every single Congressional critter, Governor, and every single elected official in the last 100 years has been one form of lobbyist or another while sucking off the taxpayer teat at some point in their careers? Thats all the do is lobby their pals when passing bills to screw the taxpayer.
United we stand…. Divided we fall.. into the pits of Socialism.
Captain Edward John Smith
bobguzzardi Wednesday, January 11th at 1:18PM EST (link)Like Mitt Romney, Captain Edward John Smith was a man of great integrity and managerial competence.
The Titanic Sank.
Excellent, bobguzzardi, but Romney won't
annie54 Friday, January 13th at 12:07AM EST (link)sink with America because he has so many homes and $$$$ that he’ll just hop scotch around with the other RINOS while the citizenry suffers.
GOP lost cause.
votemout2012 Wednesday, January 11th at 1:32PM EST (link)The leaders of the tea party caucus have given up and ready to fall into the ranks of the establishment GOP. DeMint leading the charge. I see all of the supposed campions of conservatism failing us by not throwing down the gauntlet and supporting a conservative candidate. I give up. Our country is all but lost to the Washington elite.
yup^
flgal208 Wednesday, January 11th at 1:37PM EST (link)after the primary, I’m changing my party to Independent. I no longer have much in common with the GOP and the Tea party is worse because they have turned into hypocrites. What happened to fighting the good cause? What happened to standing on principle? What happened to dying on the sword? What happened to being able to look yourself in the eye and know you stood for something? That moral and principles matter? That it’s better to stand UP for what you believe than kneel down for what you don’t?
WHAT HAPPENED?
I said this months ago: Romney's nomination will kill the TEA party
jakeofalltrades (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 1:42PM EST (link)And then we go back to status quo ante until the inevitable plummet into the abyss.
The ruling class v. the grass roots, (tea party) country class
arthurmanger17 (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 8:43AM EST (link)The one thing that Ann Coulter, (book merchant and part time commentator) and George Will, (regular on ABC and columnist) have in common with the main stream media, “They don’t investigate.” They are a part of the ruling class in this country. The most important part of this class, as their job is to steer the American peoples opinion. Those that are actually in office could not get away with the constitution stomping activity that it has, if the fourth estate did it’s job. The marching orders of these two “conservatives” is, (undermine the tea party movement) it’s why Mitt is the man.
What the ruling class wants in this election season, is mediocrity. Mitt Romney if nothing else, is mediocre! Sarah Palin was a lesson that the ruling class learned very well. This governor of Alaska, this women who, (unlike Hillary Clinton) was not groomed to be in the national spotlight, ignited a spark in Americans and saved the McCain candidacy from an embarrassing loss on the par with McGovern in 92. It was a wakeup call to the ruling class. Not because Palin was a dynamic politician but that Americans could again be sparked into movement which she did. Out of it’s complacency and energized with hope, they moved to take back their government.
The 2010 elections was a disaster for the propaganda wing, (the press) of the ruling class. Despite accusations that the tea party was a bunch of old white, racist males and false reports of racist remarks by demonstrators against Obamacare in Washington, this movement of Americans continued to grow. The question was how can this movement be stopped, cut the head off the eagle, but their was no head to cut and the trashing of Palin wasn’t working. Although she is a voice she was not and is not the head of the various grassroots groups collectively known as “tea party“. So how does one go about killing a movement that has the characteristics of an amoeba.
During the midterm elections there was a lot of commentary and polling data backing up the premise; a) That the attempted take over by these ultra right wing Tea partiers, (Americans) might in fact be hurting the Republican party. B) The tea party candidates forced on the republican slate during the primaries are turning off voters and hurting the chances of Republicans taking back the house and might even help Obama’s reelection in 2012. All this commentary was being back up by polls taken as many times as necessary to bolster this story line. Nowhere, did any news report the tremendous activity by Americans leading up to the midterms. Every poll was designed to show that in fact they were being turned off. No polling organization could not or would not and did not indicate what would happened November 2, 2010. So after the results were in, they feigned complete surprise.
“Numerous politicians have seized absolute power and muzzled the press. Never in history has the press seized absolute power and muzzled the politicians.” David Brinkley
The symbiotic relationship between the government and the press is now clearly visible. The main stream medias support of president Obama is beyond doubt. Their verbal assault against the tea party movement has reached hysteria. But what about the so called “conservative” commentators.
Ann Coulter wanted Chris Christie to get into the race. A man who has some great sound bites on Youtube but has only been Governor less than 2 years and as yet unproven as a leader. George Will suggested early on that people when considering Sarah Palin would worry about her having a finger on the nuclear trigger. The last time that was said, it was said by the left during Reagan’s campaign in 1980. Oh, he never voiced that concern in relation to Obama! Coulter called Gingrich a big government progressive. Maybe because after being the leader that engineered the take over of the house and senate by Republicans in 94, he helped Bill Clinton pass Hillarycare. No? Or maybe as a “Christian” conservative she didn’t like that while Gingrich was speaker three bills that banned partial birth abortion was passed by congress and vetoed by Clinton. Will called Gingrich a Marxist, since when was cutting taxes and spending, welfare reform and balance budgets Marxism. That means Obama is what? Maybe Mister Will should have left “This Week” when ABC showed David Brinkley the door. Clearly being surrounded so long by so many with the mental disorder “Leftism” has infected him.
Newt has always fought the fight of conservatives when in office. He has shook up the political class while in office. He has battled the left stream press, even as a junior congressmen. He has done this and had much more success in these battles than any other modern day politician. That is why the ruling class fears Newt Gingrich. Mitt Romney as president would not cause a ripple in the ruling class’s pond.
It's a good thing that caucus doesn't reflect the Tea Party
snowshooze (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 1:46PM EST (link)So don’t sweat it.
They are trying to get a free ride on us…
But we don’t give rides to anyone.
Don't tar and feather me here, but
flgal208 Wednesday, January 11th at 1:32PM EST (link)I’d rather vote for Ron Paul than Romney. Because I believe romney won’t change a thing—all he wants is to BE president. period. not lead. not fix. BE. BO in all his Marxistness at least wanted to be president to DO something…yes, destroy it and it’s working because he has the fire in his gut. Where’s Willard’s fire?
The point will be moot because barring some event that George Soros can’t control, BO will beat Willard because Willie has NO fire and that’s why he’s a flip-flopper. Not to get things done (like I think BO did politically), but because he has no BELIEF in a set of values he holds true.
Same here.
aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 1:41PM EST (link)To be honest, the GOP field is appalling enough most years that it’s easy to understand the appeal of someone like Ron Paul.
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton
You would rather vote for a
lightspeed Wednesday, January 11th at 2:00PM EST (link)racist, anti-Semitic, 9/11 truther pandering, conspiracy nut coddling, white supremacist associating, isolationist, Israel-hating, hypocritical, pork-barreling, maybe-I’ll-run-independent dirtbag?
If so, then you are what is wrong with the Republican party.
Me too
becky5 Thursday, January 12th at 7:03AM EST (link)If it’s down to Romney vs. Paul, I’m going with Paul.
But at this point I am still hoping against hope that Perry gets his act together.
This is what Rush meant by Repubs believing that BO will win.
tonotisto Wednesday, January 11th at 1:48PM EST (link)DeMint does not want to endorse. His wicket is building a Conservative block in the Senate. He doesn’t want to anger anyone on the Repubs side or pick a loser (thus appearing weaker). DeMint will risk a progressive moderate Romney (Romeny’s words, not mine) nomination for the ultimate prize of the conservative Senate.
This is about politics and power. DeMint believes the way to that is thru the Senate.
Still IMHO Perry/West 2012
Unsubscribed from the DeMint newsletter today
tonotisto Wednesday, January 11th at 2:00PM EST (link)A shame because he was promotting Cruz for Senate. Cruz is great, but I can’t donate to the fund any longer.
DeMint insulted me with a “Ted Cruz for President” subject line joke.
Then DeMint went on to say “I thought the subject line of this email might get your attention. Ted Cruz is not running for president, but his candidacy for the U.S. Senate in Texas is extremely important and should not be overlooked.?” He was using his non-endorsement for one of the not-Romneys as a joke!
I know it was a joke to have me read the Email quicker, but it really touched a nerve.
If he thinks handing back the Govt to BO is a joke, then to heck with him.
Plus, if he thinks that we are all giddy about Progressive Moderate Romney (Romney’s word, not mine) as the Rupub standard bearer….
My fallback has always been to fight for the House and Senate. Now what?
I rec'd the same email
tjms Wednesday, January 11th at 2:37PM EST (link)and I do support Cruz. But I too unlisted from rec. emails and will not donate. I only donate to individual candidates. don’t need any more politicians deciding where my money will go.
There is One Prime Reason Why I
edintexas Wednesday, January 11th at 1:57PM EST (link)There is one prime reason why I -w-o-u-l-d- will vote for Mittens in the General Election come November, IF he is the GOP nominee that is. That reason is potential SCOTUS appointments, and also the other routine Judicial appointments. Other Republicans, particularly Senators, will have significant input on any such nominees with Mittens, not only John Sununu (Heaven forbid that one again!).
Other than that, I will grudgingly admit that he is actually is somewhat preferable to 4 more years of Dear Leader.
He won’t support repeal of Romn- er Obamacare. He’s already said he would “make changes”, and that isn’t repeal. I don’t know if he would sign a bill repealing his signature issue in MA, assuming a Republican Senate had 60 votes for cloture and House and Senate passed repeal (I guess he would, but it is not his current stated preference).
He won’t try to limit government in any meaningful manne. But I can’t say I believe a majority of Republican politicians would, at least not without a strong President with a Conservative mandate to drive them to do so.
Kowalski
edintexas Wednesday, January 11th at 1:58PM EST (link)Where’d that danged “r” go? “…manne.” should obviously be “…manner.”
DoWe Need A Lobbyist As President Part 2
bobguzzardi Wednesday, January 11th at 2:12PM EST (link)Fake Conservative Washington Lobbyist Hires Fake Conservative Pennsylvania Hack as Penna. Campaign Chair.
http://www.mcall.com/news/nationworld/blog_pennsylvania_ave/mc-charlie-gerow-named-gingrich-campaigns-pa-chairman-20120111,0,3101936.story?track=rss
Looking at Charlie Gerow’s proven record of expensive failures,
I think we can, safely, conclude that Newt Gingrich cannot win the Presidency because he cannot win Pennsylvania.
Incompetent Phony – Fake Intellectual Statesman Find Each Other
Charlie Gerow Incompetent Hack Parts 1 to 5 The Liberty Blog
http://thelibertyblog.org/?s=gerow+
Only superficial and shallow JournoLists would think that Charlie Gerow is expert in anything but phony self-promotion.
How in the world did we get here...
TexasTami Wednesday, January 11th at 2:26PM EST (link)…with Mitt Romney as the “frontrunner” for conservatives? I’m still shaking my head over McCain’s nomination in 2008, and now we’re facing the SAME SITUATION with a Moderate (AGAIN!) representing our party? Where are our leaders? I actually thought Jim DeMint was one of us. PLEASE STAND UP FOR US, Senator DeMint! We need at least one conservative voice saying “No, I won’t back the Moderate, Romney!” no matter the cost. This is principled integrity. Please don’t lose yours over Mitt Romney.
TexasTami
Unfair to DeMint
clintonformccain Wednesday, January 11th at 2:30PM EST (link)I doubt that Jim DeMint is any happier with the sad-sack cast of characters in the GOP nomination contest than we are. But, unlike some of us, he understands that the goal is to keep the goal the goal. And, in this case, the goal is nominating someone who at least has a chance of beating Barack Obama.
You look who is left in the race, there’s really only one candidate left who has demonstrated any ability to run a well-funded major league national campaign. Ron Paul is crazy and the rest of them, for whatever reason, couldn’t even manage to get on the ballot in Virginia.
Thank You Sen. DeMint
ajdx3 Wednesday, January 11th at 2:31PM EST (link)for supporting our Nominee. Finally a voice of reason among all the insanity and bitterness among so many Redstaters. Sen. DeMint, you have my support.
Dan, Thank You
onenationundrgod Wednesday, January 11th at 2:34PM EST (link)I have been trying to say this for days. Thank you for capturing it so eloquently.
For hevens sake Jim Demint please stand up!! We have our Tea party candidate, everyone knows who it is.
Dan, Thank You
onenationundrgod Wednesday, January 11th at 2:34PM EST (link)I have been trying to say this for days. Thank you for capturing it so eloquently.
For hevens sake Jim Demint please stand up!! We have our Tea party candidate, everyone knows who it is.
A political leader
ahlondon Wednesday, January 11th at 2:44PM EST (link)This isn’t at all unfair to DeMint. It is spot on. If Perry goes down, then DeMint is the highest ranking politician in the limited government army. With one decision he can lead us or demoralize us. The movement needs a political leader to rally around. It doesn’t have to be the president, though that would help. But with DeMint making concessions to Romney and Rush willing to get on the big government conservative side of Gingrich and Santorum, that leaves, well, Erick Erickson. Erick and RedState are doing a fine job, but a political leader would sure help.
Wobbly
ahlondon Wednesday, January 11th at 2:48PM EST (link)Oh and I forgot, that National Review won’t lead us either. They went wobbly already.
Money talks. Not one more dime of my money to support
1bunny Wednesday, January 11th at 3:19PM EST (link)his Senators Fund. I sent a message yesterday that I would never send another donation if he backs Romney. Sent the same message to Tea Party groups too. I am done supporting liars. And after all this wailing and begging for donations to fight for TRUE conservatives and to take back govt from the those who are destroying the US and now to fall in line like good little zombies behind big govt republicans I am done. Maybe if enough people will stop funding (along with a letter of why no more money will be coming their way) DeMint’s Senator Fund and Tea Parties they will get the idea. Money talks and lack of donations should be a big message. This is not a time to worry about your legacy or go along to get along or the scratch your back you’ll scratch mine mentality. It is about actually saving this country and sacrifices must be made. Stand up for the beliefs you have been espousing -smaller govt, control spending etc or you are just a liar. Go with the candidate that backs all you have based your “fight” on. Right now with Bachmann and Cain out Rick Perry is the only onther candidate to actually be for smaller govt and cut the spending. He in fact is the only one with the record of cutting govt and spending less.
Everryone keeps saying that Romney can beat Obama or I’ve heard Rush say anyone can beat Obama but I don’t believe that. Have they met Obama and his Chicago machine of election dirty fighting and tricks? They are delusional if they think it will be easy. We need a clear contrast to Obama and sorry but Romney is not it. Or the other argument is even if Obama is re-elected but we take back the senate and keep the house we can stop Obama. He is already bypassing the constitution and ruling by executive order. What is going to change? Are the leaders suddenly going to grow a backbone to fight him, to stop him? I just don’t see it, not even with republican majorities. They are too afraid of being called racist or something. Maybe just too entrenched in the DC way to actually fight or too worried about re-election. Does it always come down to self interest instead of the interest of the country?
I must admit, I am disappointed in DeMint as well.
runner12 (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 5:06PM EST (link)It is not because he will not endorse a candidate. I can understand why he would not want to do that. But in a recent article on Fox, he gave an endorsement/non-endorsement to Romney. Sen. DeMint, please tell me how Mittens’ record reflects small government and fiscally sound policy? The answer is that it doesn’t. Please do not not undo your reputation as a Conservative hero by pretending that a Massachusetts moderate has somehow turned into a Conservative that we should all cheer about.
Mittens very well may win the nomination, but let’s not lie and pretend he is some small government Conservative or a Conservative at all for that matter. He would just be less-awful than Obama. Period.
Tea Party Candidate
Lesstressrx (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 5:49PM EST (link)Senator DeMint. we the people need some support. The establishment is trying to pick our candidate. We have few in Washington that care about the tea party. In fact they want us to fail. We could use your support for Perry. I understand he is in favor of reducing congresses time in Washington but since you support the movement, I would think that wouldn’t bother you. Washington is so broken and if we don’t win this time our wonderful country could be gone forever.
Andy Roth of the Club For Growth gives Rick Perry the top grade out of all the candidates for fiscal conservative ideas and
following through with what he says. If you haven’t seen this you tube please watch and then consider helping us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69_jTexx2Kk&feature=youtu.be&utm_source=The+Perry+Almanac&utm_campaign=d4c91b9b9c-Email_19_15_2011&utm_medium=email
No Excuses for Senator DeMint
ctredstater Wednesday, January 11th at 9:39PM EST (link)I made multiple (small) donations to Senator DeMint’s fund in 2010 – and I admired his courage in standing up to the DC Republican Establishment – and going against the grain in endorsing “controversial” candidates. There is absolutely no excuse for him to go wobbly right now.
This is one former Senate Conservatives Fund contributor who won’t give another dime. If Senator DeMint cannot stand up and be counted at this critical time in the history of the country and the conservative movement, what is the point of his being in politics?
Senator DeMint – there is time to correct this. Endorse Governor Perry – or whomever else you believe would be the best candidate to take on President Obama – and lead our country back from the brink.
Who is, Senator DeMint?
Please tell me that DeMint didn't say it was time to start listening to Ron Paul
Scope (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 9:39PM EST (link)Please tell me that DeMint didn’t say that. I am sick to my stomach, because he did say that. What in the hel1 is going on with Jim DeMint.
The Republican Party should start listening to Ron Paul.
mbecker908 (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 9:45PM EST (link)And maybe they’d realize the old racist fool is NOT a Republican and throw him out of the Party and deny him access to the convention.
I was slobbering with delight and what followed your sarastic comment title
jakeofalltrades (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 9:49PM EST (link)when I saw it on the home page.
Agreed 100%.
2012 has been very weird year --- DeMint says "its time to start listening to Ron Paul"
JSobieski (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 10:00PM EST (link)http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/11/jim-demint-its-time-to-start-listening-to-ron-paul/
My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.
STOP THE MADNESS!
A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!
I really hate to say this, J. Sobieski... but
acat (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 10:14PM EST (link)if DeMint is talking, as he *seems* to be – given his actual comments – about cribbing some of Ron Paul’s financial platform… I could be okay with listening to Ron Paul. A little.
(I think I just threw up in my mouth… a little)
Seems to this cat that DeMint doesn’t mean taking Ron Paul seriously, more that he’s trying to reach out to the folks who like Ron Paul’s more .. sane .. fiscal positions. The ones his supporters don’t mention, not “gold standard” or “fed audit”, but “deep cuts”.
Before we go checking DeMint for a sell-by date or a mark of the beast, let’s let him explain what he means….
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
I think he also means it in the way Palin means it
JSobieski (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 11:17PM EST (link)i.e. don’t needlessly alienate his supporters.
Frankly, if one of the bones thrown to Paul is an aggressive budget in the Republican platform—we wouldn’t complain right?
My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.
STOP THE MADNESS!
A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!
I wouldn't *complain*, J. Sobieski. I'd think it very, very odd...
acat (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 11:24PM EST (link)because from what I can tell, budget issues are not what motivate the Paulistines.
End of the day, I’m more concerned about results than about who gets the credit….
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
If we legalize pot we can extinct the Libertarian party.
jakeofalltrades (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 11:36PM EST (link)Food for thought.
Heck, if we can just turn it back into a States issue, Jake...
acat (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 11:39PM EST (link)That ought to take care of it.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
Best of all, acat,
jakeofalltrades (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 11:43PM EST (link)they’ll be too high and demotivated to participate in politics ever again.
Only in States that can afford ...
acat (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 9:53AM EST (link)a high and/or demotivated work force.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
John Bolton to back Romney
jimmyg Wednesday, January 11th at 10:34PM EST (link)As If you haven’t had enough disappointment today
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/01/11/bolton-to-back-romney/
Wasn't Bolton with Newt?
becky5 Thursday, January 12th at 7:23AM EST (link)I think Romney is playing on the faux strength of his recent wins to get the entire GOP establishment on board with him — “Support me now and I’ll give you plum positions in my administration. But if you join later when victory is assured I can’t make any promises”.
This type of thing wouldn’t work on any politician with principles, who actually stood for something, but therein lies the problem.
Ever since DeMint and Coburn
avgjo (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 11:32PM EST (link)didn’t raise their voices in the unanimous consent motion that gave us the horrendous ‘food safety’ bill, I knew he was suspect. (Coburn and his defense of Nancy Pelosi against FOX and its viewers did it for me.) Unimpressive lack of leadership in the lame duck sealed it.
As I said elsewhere, our ‘conservative superstars’ are not very impressive.
Ceterum autem censeo, Obamaecuram esse delendam.
It’s the morality, stupid.
Ever since DeMint and Coburn
avgjo (Diary) Wednesday, January 11th at 11:32PM EST (link)didn’t raise their voices in the unanimous consent motion that gave us the horrendous ‘food safety’ bill, I knew he was suspect. (Coburn and his defense of Nancy Pelosi against FOX and its viewers did it for me.) Unimpressive lack of leadership in the lame duck sealed it.
As I said elsewhere, our ‘conservative superstars’ are not very impressive.
Ceterum autem censeo, Obamaecuram esse delendam.
It’s the morality, stupid.
agree, I have no idea where the worship for those 2 comes from
thurman Thursday, January 12th at 12:09AM EST (link)I’ve been nothing but unimpressed by either of them
They all said they’d go nuclear and shut the Senate down with the Obamacare reconciliation fiasco, and did zero, zip, nothing. Demint said he had a whole pocket full of amendments he would use to grind the Senate to a halt with, and chickened out.
Coburn has been even worse with his Gang of Six garbage and waffling on taxes, and essentially putting tax increases back on the table for his party
They pass on one opportunity after another to make principled stands and go against the grain
Honestly, Rand Paul is the one Senator I actually ever see willing to get dirty and cause a ruckus anymore. He and Rubio and Rob Johnson are our hope.
Demint and Coburn are not close to the conservative icons this site hypes them up to be.
DeMint extended interview with Jon Stewart on Daily Show
lizzie Thursday, January 12th at 2:14AM EST (link)Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2012. DeMint on book tour. I only watched what was broadcast, but when asked why some have not dropped out, DeMint said something like “all six are good candidates”.
DeMint did mention his working to get more US Senators elected like Rand Paul and Marco Rubio.
There was 21 minutes that did not air, but are watchable on Comedy Central’s website.
Considering how Stewart opened with Mitt-bashing, but had read DeMint’s book, and it was a serious discussion, just thought y’all would like to know.
Hey, I am still befuddled as to why Rick Perry keeps saying Ron Paul might/would make a good Federal Reserve Chairman. I assume that is to keep Ron Paul from any more attacks.
Every pundithead always qualifies any mild criticism of Ron Paul with “I hope my email is not flooded with thousands of angry emails.RonPaul2012!
Good for all of you protesting by unsubscribing to DeMint’s Senate Fund/newsletter.
in 2004, I got hoodwinked by John Kerry’s ‘Act Blue’ to support veterans for Congress. Just once. Then I realized it was yet another ever-demanding vacuum for money;
but at least you knew your donation was going to a specific candidate, not a general fund..
"Primary Beauty Contests"
myron_j_poltroonian Thursday, January 12th at 5:27AM EST (link)It does seem rather strange, does it not, that so many are ready to throw in the towel themselves, or think others should do so, after only two or three primary “Beauty Contests” and a gaggle of “Gotcha” debates hosted by ideological sycophants of the opposition. Iran, China, Pakistan, North Korea, Big Government interference in the market place (picking winners and losers) and so many more important, relevant areas of policy to discuss and cover; yet, we’re treated to questions (on a par with, and/or) about whether or not the candidates would restrict a child’s right to be taught how many condoms to put on a cucumber? “Mainline Progressivism”, how vein. [Not a typo.]
Exactly, myron-j-poltroonian
ctredstater Thursday, January 12th at 6:18AM EST (link)nt
Hear ! Hear!
jiminga Thursday, January 12th at 7:31AM EST (link)Well said Dan. Your post is eloquent and thoughtful without including any of the rage I felt after reading DeMint’s “not-endorsement”.
Reality
Sandy Salt Thursday, January 12th at 7:56AM EST (link)We must all live in the real world and I am sure that we all say and do things that don’t appear exactly right on target some times. I believe as Dan does that we need a strong fiscal conservative Congress backing the eventual winner of the Presidential race, whomever that maybe.
We need strong leadership and people of principle, so I am willing to give a guy that has stood up time and time again for those very things a pass on this particular issue. We don’t know if this is a true change of heart and if it is the time to attack is when have confirmation of this new stance, vice some election drivel that might not be what is truly felt or presented by the spin doctors in the media.
I say support fiscally conservative candidates for Congress and then hold them accountable. It is good that people are disappointed because it shows DeMint that you truly care and he should be made aware of that fact.
But, lets not throw him under the bus just yet.
Angry Joes unite and turn this country around.
Message To SC: Vote Romney or Be Wrong
snappy101 Thursday, January 12th at 9:11AM EST (link)Do you know what the political tactic is in South Carolina to make sure Romney is the nominee? It’s to keep reminding people from that state that since 1980 they’ve always picked the eventual nominee and then talking up like Romney as the inevitable one. It puts pressure on the people of the state to vote for “Most Electable” Romney to keep their streak going. Don’t beleve me? Sit and listen to the message Fox News has been sending to the people of SC. That message to SC is “Vote for Mitt Romney or be wrong for the first time in a long time.” They do that by emphasizing the SC streak and then talking like Romney is inevitable.
How do we know that Jim DeMint isn’t under some kind of party pressure to endorse Romney?
I want to make one more point, the TV news media (all of them) is trying to sell all Republicans as Conservatives. They use the words Republican and Conservative interchangeably, Fox News is doing it to sell Romney as the nominee to conservatives.
In 2008, Jack Kemp wagged his finger at conservatives and told us to shut up and get in line behind McCain. McCain’s mother told us to hold our nose and vote for her son. Well, I’m not holding my nose and voting anymore. As long as Rick Perry is still on the ballot in my state, I’m voting for him and when it comes time for the General Election, if Most Electable Mitt Romney is the nominee, I’ll make a protest vote for some obscure candidate on some obscure party ticket or I will write in Rick Perry.
Inspiring read, thanks because its a long way till
Juggernaut (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 9:14AM EST (link)this race is over and today the media are shifting away from the celebration narrative to its not quite possible Mitt and a new poll places Newt and Mitt in a statistical tie. Ball less wonder of ignore the dem stupidity types who are afraid to fight the dem lies that 2001 through 2008 was all the gop’s fault knowing full well dems obstructed banking reform and enjoyed every bill Bush signed. The gop has poor marketing skills when it comes to firing back at rabid dem and lib media lies. They must fight back or we may see a defeat no matter who wins. They must toughen up and remain calm while explaining who is also at fault so the public shall know all the facts.
RomneyCare is Right Wing Socialism – please feel free to use is as often as possible…….it will kill his campaign.
Romney “severely conservative”? That’s the opposite of a “compassionate conservative” like George W. Bush? Actually, we know what a severely conservative is. It’s Dick Cheney and Mitt Romney is no Dick Cheney.
squirrels in the highway
malvernpa (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 9:17AM EST (link)Too many of you act like squirrels on the highway. You see a car coming and each eye sees the on coming car and you try to run in both directions at once. No one elected man will fix America. The Tea Party has changed the conversation in Washington for many years to come. The media wants to see all of the Tea Party marching down Pennsylvania Ave with our hair on fire and we are passed that. Any of our candidates will be better than Obama. Mit will not be the end of the movement if he wins. Ours is a political war of attrition not some failed political bonzai charge. Our work and effort on the tea party level will change the complexion of the house and senate with or without even the presidency. We will continue to drive back the size of government but too many of you feel like if you do not win every battle then you just want to fold up your tent and go home. Grow up, this fight to reduce the size of government may need to be carried on by our children so train them well.
To Turn America into Red Country We need a Red State Gov. For President
2caminos Thursday, January 12th at 9:37AM EST (link)Red State Governor Rick Perry has a very inspirational song out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSXZ0ylAORY&context=C3ef6990ADOEgsToPDskLDu1JxGt7Lw0e50Gv9iqEE
Send this on and if it reaches 1 million viewers Perry will win.
I take issue with the statement the either of the Bush
ihateliberals Thursday, January 12th at 9:58AM EST (link)Presidents were very conservative. The first thing GHW Bush did when he took over from Reagan was create the 1000 points of light. Neither of the Bush’s had any concept of small government an openly support lax immigration policy for those south of the border. Bush 43′s legacy is that he was President when the Trade Center was brought down. This would have been Bill Clinton’s baby if the first Trade Center bombing had been successful. If that had happened i don’t believe we would have had a Bush presidency in 2000. Al Gore would have taken over from Clinton. There would not have been a middle east war because the Democrats had no interest in revenge. Democrats don’t fight wrs they lose them. i digress.
Jim De mint is one of the last beacons of hope inhte congress and now he has capitulated his principles and moved to the left with his Endorsement of Romney. The liberals are fighting their kind of wr. They are defeating America from within and using her very own laws to do it. Where ahve all the Reagan type conservatives gone? I’m stil here but i have no voice. I don’t have the bully pulpit of some. Even the Radio conservatives are fading away. Rush, Savage, Ingram are being engulfed by the movement.
I missed this, when did he endorse Romney?
explodinghead (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 12:44PM EST (link)If you are referring to the fact that he said he thought Romney would win SC, that is not the same as an endorsement of Romney. Did I miss another real endorsement?
The problem with the GOP leadership is...
TexasTami Thursday, January 12th at 9:59AM EST (link)…all of us conservatives look at a person’s record on life and marriage and if it’s sound, we call them “conservative”. That’s only HALF the agenda. The other half is reducing the size of government. George W. Bush is a perfect example of this: he was very strong on two of our cores issues but exploded government. Rick Santorum, same thing. Mitt Romney (PLEASE don’t lump him in the conservative category). We need moral leadership, a person who will not yield on core principles. People can SAY they adhere to conservative principles (and abortion and marriage stand at the top of that list of principles) and we get excited about it, but the other half is as important because therein lies the potential for loss of freedoms. Yes, the list of candidates is grim for me. God help us if Romney gets the nomination. Too many people have said they would rather stay home than vote for the Flipper (which is RIDICULOUS, but nonetheless true). He was in office one term as governor of Massachusetts, and his main accomplishment? RomneyCare, which openly funds abortion. Principles, anyone?
But one person stands out, and that’s Rick Perry. He is everything we conservatives want, save for one issue and even that one (a discussion for another day) doesn’t bother me that much. Let’s all get behind the only true conservative, fiscally and socially and, yes, morally, and that’s Rick Perry.
TexasTami
Rick Perry is a true conservative.
kegan05 Saturday, January 14th at 12:04AM EST (link)I totally agree with your comments. I have been supporting Rick Perry since he announced for President but I have become very disgusted with the Republican “elites” and the Media. They would like to pretend that Rick Perry doesn’t exist!
Governor Perry has an excellent record to run on and is a conservative from head to toe. He is also a veteran, as I believe all presidential candidates should be. I refuse to hold my nose and vote for another RINO, flip-flopping, Wall Street money man or any of the Congress Critters who have no experience in governing.
I don’t want to sit this election out but right now I am thinking it will end up that way.
Dan you forgot
texashistorian (Diary) Thursday, January 12th at 10:39AM EST (link)Warren G. Harding. Pedantic, I know, but he goes ahead of Bush too.
The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false.
- Paul Johnson
Money Bombs/DeMint/Conservative Support
carolynr Thursday, January 12th at 12:32PM EST (link)During the upcoming 2010 election…I was deluged by e-mails asking for money. I like the candidates that got in…Toomey and Lee, ET AL. We felt like we had taken back our country. Who was at the helm…Jim DeMint. The people he asked us to give $$$ to were Conservatives…NOT INDEPENDENTS. If we lose this election to Obama…we lose the country. It’s that simple.
About Romney. I resent…oh…how I resent having to do this a second time…and this time I know the outcome…BIG MEGA SPENDING from Romney. He is EXACTLY like Obama…says one thing does another…his record PROVES that. So…suppose Romney does get in…ok…one of two things will happen…the end of America or the second I cannot mention…and I am not so sure we have the strength to do it.
People who are Conservatives, believe in America, have worked hard all their lives feel “had”….”used”. All of our hard work has amounted to one stupid hedge fund manager (btw where is his resume and financial disclosure?) who gets rattled by Governor Perry. We haven’t even seen what Obama will do…with the exception that OWS is set up especially for Romney…take that to the bank.
Senator DeMint…stand by your principles or don’t say anymore. We have to listen to what we thought were honest commentators switch their ideologies from that of Conservatism to MODERATE.
Iowa was a crap shoot. Dems registered as Indies to vote in the election and help Romney bolster his rationalization that “we can only win from the middle”. Hey…WILLARD…that was set up by Obama…you fool. NH…again…not a Republican primary…other people got to pick our candidate…AND we’re not happy.
How will Romney win FL and play into Obama’s hands? He has no solution to Medicare or SS. He..WILLARD, does nothing. So…that plays into Obama’s plan also…THE COUNTRY GOES DOWN…BROKE LIKE GREECE. For such a supposed smart man…WILLARD IS STUPID.
I can't believe some of the things that I'm reading in this thread
lineholder (Diary) Friday, January 13th at 12:23AM EST (link)DeMint has supported promoting Conservatives in what way he can, and he’s accomplished more than any of us here can claim.
He had not endorsed a candidate, but people are responding as if he is a traitor to the cause all the same.
There are even comments from people who will protest vote for Ron Paul (of all people) if Romney wins the nomination.
People are withdrawing their support NOW when they know beyond any shadow of doubt that if by some chance Romney does win the nomination, electing Conservatives to Congress will be even more important???
And we call ourselves reasonable? Smart? Intelligent?
At this particular moment, I’ve got my share of questions about how true that may or may not be.
People are confusing goals with tactics/strategy
JSobieski (Diary) Friday, January 13th at 12:29AM EST (link)Principled conservatives can make erroneous tactical judgments
Shrewd tacticians can be absolutely devoice of principle
The inability to differentiate between these two things is a big reason as to why you may feel like RS is devouring itself.
It will pass.
My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.
STOP THE MADNESS!
A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!
lineholder, I had the same reaction.
Melody Warbington (rwm52) (Diary) Friday, January 13th at 2:07AM EST (link)And I’ll go a step further. There’s a lot of angst from some here about DeMint’s comments that perhaps the GOP should consider Ron Paul’s ideas, namely some of his fiscal ideas. Yet those same posters are silent about their candidate’s suggestion that he might name Paul as his Federal Reserve Chairman were he the POTUS.
Senator DeMint is committed to electing conservatives like Rubio, West, and Lee to the Senate in an effort to “bring bold conservative leadership to Washington by supporting only those candidates who have the courage to fight for the timeless conservative principles of limited government, strong national defense, and traditional family values.”
Consider his comment from the article here:
(emphasis mine)
Perhaps those who are threatening to withhold their support of the Senate Conservatives Fund should take another look at its website here instead of taking their ball home and refusing to play because Senator DeMint didn’t ask their opinion before speaking his mind which he has every right to do.
For the record, I’m not a Romney supporter.
The woman saith unto him, I know that Messiah cometh (he that is called Christ): when he is come, he will declare unto us all things. (John 4:25)
A Challenge
cacharlie Friday, January 13th at 3:11AM EST (link)If you have any sense that your life counts for something, you owe it to yourself to watch the movie “The Undefeated.” Then, no matter what your political persuasion, you will see your responsibility to pursue its best outcomes for you and the generations that follow you in this country and this world.
As for me, I am trying to find a way to influence an open convention where we can blast Gov. Perry into the nomination.
Sounds good to me, cacharlie! I'm sure that it will
pttx333 (Diary) Friday, January 13th at 3:16AM EST (link)sound good to lots of other Perry supporters when they learn about your challenge.
What is “The Undefeated” about?
How can a true Conservative endorse Mitt?
kegan05 Friday, January 13th at 11:54PM EST (link)Any true Conservative who endorses Mitt Romney for President will never be credible again, IMO. I was shocked that Nikki Haley, a Tea Party Conservative (?) jumped on his bandwagon.
I realize we all want to win because we HAVE to win. I just can’t understand why a real conservative would put his or her name on the line and actually endorse a RINO flip-flopping, big government, anti-2nd amendment guy like Mitt Romney. He may be the inevitable candidate but he would have to do it without my endorsement.
Rick Perry for President – A REAL conservative with a REAL record of accomplishment who would be a REAL Commander in Chief!
"Friendly Fire"
tosho Saturday, January 14th at 10:06AM EST (link)Tragic war-time casualties are sometimes the result of accidental firing on our own troops. I have been increasingly concerned about the impending presidential election becoming a defeat no matter who gets sworn in next year. A watershed moment to turn our country from the brink of collapse may be blunted by We the People firing into our own camp.
For you agenda-driven knee-jerkers out there I’m using a metaphor, I’m not in any way advocating violence.
I listened to the interview to which you refer in this article and I cannot for the life of me understand the negative response to one of the few true honorable men on The Hill. I heard Senator DeMint simply make a statement based on the empirical evidence at hand.
I am begging my like-minded conservative fighters to concentrate on the actual enemies of American liberty and expend no more ammunition on each other.
Where was the Newt we saw yesterday!
krish (Diary) Tuesday, January 17th at 7:55PM EST (link)How much I wish for Newt that showed up yesterday? I wish somebody got hold of Newt said to him you do not attack Romney & Bain but let your surrogates do that! He can then claim that he has no control over others!
I have to agree with most of you with respect to Romney- his win will be conservative major loss!
Sen. Demint – Failure to Take a Stand is Same as Tacit Support for Romney (many of the horrors we see today are due to good people not doing enough …case in point Penn State Coaches & Asst. Coaches!)
Real Danger of Romney Presidency – He Will Split the Republican Party (sad to see good conservatives switiching sides such as Nikki Haley).
Are There Any Principled Conservatives Who Will Make a Stand against Romney & Republican Establishment.
MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION – Do We Elect Moderate Rino that will Filp Flop & Take a Major Backward Step for Conservatism OR Be United, Elect Conservatives to House & Senate, Have Obama for 4 more years!
I Would Like to Hear from Likeminded Conservatives on their Thoughts?
I am tending towards the second option beacuse I do not want young people to think Romney is conservative & his policies are conservative when they fail! As usual, radio talk show hosts & other conservatives will not criticize a sitting Republican President just like GW Bush years!
Million Dollar Question (after DeMint failure to take a stand = supporting Romney!