
As a general matter, while I write a fair amount about national security strategy, I’m usually hesitant to wade into military tactics, a subject best left to the professionals. Even among those who know their stuff, military tactical decisions often involve difficult tradeoffs on which reasonable people can and do disagree, plus people who lack a military background (as I do) often make hilarious mistakes when attempting to lay out the facts of such stories, let alone dissect them, without running them by someone who knows their stuff. I’d prefer to avoid the kind of armchair generalship we had among so many on the Left during the Bush years who were hair-trigger quick to accuse U.S. tactical decisions of being (1) incompetent or (2) atrocities.
All that being said, I find myself utterly baffled by this report from the Associated Press on comments made by and on behalf of the new commanding officer in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, and his spokesman, Rear Adm. Greg Smith, and of course I have to wonder if the order comes from McChrystal or originates higher up the chain of command from the political branches:
The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday.
The order would be one of the strongest measures taken by a U.S. commander to protect Afghan civilians in battle. American commanders say such deaths hurt their mission because they turn average Afghans against the government and U.S. and NATO forces.
Civilian casualties are a major source of friction between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. The U.N. says U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians in the Afghan war last year.
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the “number of Afghans shielded from violence,” and not the number of militants killed.
McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.
“But if there is a compound they’re taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that’s the option they should take,” Smith said. “Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban.”
McChrystal’s predecessor, Gen. David McKiernan, issued rules last fall that told commanders to set conditions “to minimize the need to resort to deadly force.”
But McChrystal’s orders will be more precise and have stronger language ordering forces to break off from battles, Smith said.
As the article notes, there are reasons why the U.S. military needs to be careful about civilian casualties, because casualties make us unpopular with the Afghan public and cause friction with the Karzai government. But then, the “Team America” image of left-wingers to the contrary, our military is always more careful about civilian casualties than it would be if it was 100% focused on killing the enemy. That’s the nature of our military even without formalizing an order in the rules of engagement, and moreso when you consider the rules of engagement typically ordered in most circumstances.
But McChrystal’s order strikes me as going way too far in taking us out of the business of fighting the enemy. First, we know full well that our jihadist enemies love to use innocent or captive civilians as human shields; that particular war crime is their standard M.O. and has been for many years (as it is against the Israelis as well) – I can recall that being their standard tactic at least as far back as Mogadishu. To give them a complete sanctuary by virtue of committing a war crime is a very bad precedent that diminishes the U.S. military’s effectiveness – thus prolonging the war – and only encourages more of the same barbarity. Second, publicly announcing that the strong preference for not shooting at people hiding behind civilians is being codified in a hard and fast rule only gives the enemy more encouragement and advice as to how to nullify our forces.
McChrystal “has said his measure of effectiveness will be the ‘number of Afghans shielded from violence,’ and not the number of militants killed.” Now, it was true in Vietnam and Iraq and is true in Afghanistan that enemy body counts alone are rarely the sole measure of success. You win by breaking the enemy’s will to fight and belief that it can accomplish anything by fighting, and while attrition alone can occasionally win a war, in the usual course you have to demonstrate the futility of resistance in other ways as well. But in any military engagement, simply playing defense cedes too much initiative to the enemy, and an enemy with the initiative and secure places to hide can always talk itself into continuing the fight.
What finally worked in Iraq was a 1-2-3 punch – more U.S. and especially local troops, expanded rules of engagement, and a dedication to clear and hold areas of the country and deny safe havens among the Iraqi people. McChrystal’s new rules, if accurately described here, seem to be a move in the opposite direction on both of the latter two scores, and a repeat of some of the less successful tactics tried in Iraq. That’s bad news all around.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
One hand tied behind their back...
The Grognard (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 7:47PM EST (link)Those rules of engagement will completely ham string a military force, particularly in light of the fact that the islamic enemy in Afghanistan not only hides behind civilians, but the civilians themselves are often sympathetic to and aiding the enemy.
All we heard from the left on Iraq for years was “vietnam-like” quagmire, and now Barry is instituting military rules that will lead to precisely that.
The only thing missing from the quoted piece was the old “hearts and minds” adage.
How many more Haditha’s must our troops suffer now under Obama?
Sorry to reply to myself...
The Grognard (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 7:57PM EST (link)…but this goes hand in hand with Obama ordering the US Navy to stay in “non-incident mode” in the Gulf, just days after we get news that Iran is planning air force maneuvers in the Gulf.
If fighting were to break between Iranian planes and US naval assets, can we on the right scream “Conspiracy” and call it Obama’s Gulf of Tonkin incident?
we call it a Kowalski
David Hinz (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 9:11PM EST (link)and Alex Kowalski has been known to reply to himself four and five times before anyone else has a chance to reply…
The Minority Report — The HinzSight Report — TMRB.tv — MFOB “Miss Tagart, do you know the hallmark of the second-rater? It’s resentment of another man’s achievement.”
They're already fighting with 1 hand behind their backs.
Raven (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 9:56PM EST (link)Now they have been informed that their other hand and a foot are being tied back, too.
“If you do not have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Luke 22:36
Hahaha
thecoondawg (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 7:48PM EST (link)Runaway!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Seriously, this is the type of crap that I knew would come along. My son, U.S. Marine, asked me about future deployments and I warned him this would happen. I saw it when I was in from Carter and Clinton. It was just a matter of time before this came down the pike…..disgraceful.
Also, Special Forces are now required to
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 7:56PM EST (link)call out “Ready or not, here I come” as they begin approaching their targets.
lol
jw32181 Monday, June 22nd at 8:03PM EST (link)Oh, now I get it.
Okay is it just me
kat (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 7:59PM EST (link)Or does “number of Afghans shielded from violence,’ and not the number of militants killed”, sound kind of like “jobs saved or created?”
Heaven help us all.
“Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.” Thomas Jefferson
Join the RedState Strike Force
That's exactly what went through my head when I read it! (nt)
Karina (Diary) Tuesday, June 23rd at 4:37AM EST (link)That's exactly what went through my head when I read it! (nt)
Karina (Diary) Tuesday, June 23rd at 4:38AM EST (link)I disagree about one hand tied behind their backs
bk (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 8:02PM EST (link)It seems like this leaves them with BOTH hands tied behind their backs.
And while we’re at it, shouldn’t all drone missile attacks cease? Those always seem to kill innocent women and children — or at least some dead ones are always there for the cameras.
also civilians
Dan McLaughlin (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 8:26PM EST (link)since people who fight out of uniform, when dead, become “civilians”
“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” – Winston Churchill
This Is Nothing More Than The Precursor To The Pullout
IJB Monday, June 22nd at 8:27PM EST (link)Obama and his Left Wing supporters have wanted out of Afghanistan since 2001. This is just the first step to facilitating them declaring Afghanistan “lost”, so they can completely pull out of the area.
I still suspect we (& NATO) will be entirely out by the end of 2010.
Obama shouts: Human Shields = America runs = bad guys win
JLenardDetroit (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 8:30PM EST (link)real simple stuff that a Liberal/Democrat will never comprehend.
+Surrender – Surrender Doctrine (Democrats ALWAYS cut/weaken U.S.Defense)
+Loose Lips – Loose Lips Sink Ships (Feinstein Torpedoes Pakistan)
+Iraq SOFA – Iraqi SOFA (TV next?)
Regards from NoMoTown (the MOTORlessCITY)
“Liberals, looking to do for? America what they’ve done for? Detroit! which is DESTROY IT!”
“I think, therefore I am Conservative”
“Conservative by choice, Republican by necessity”
“You can lead a Liberal to the Truth/Facts, but you cannot make them THINK!”
“Romney [No, not my first choice] does NOT have a MORMON problem. He has a, far too many Americans; these days; are MORONS problem!”
Follow @JLenardDetroit
(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (message) (Warning: Children Will Die!!)
Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
“The first Liberal was Satan” – a Rush caller (other Quotes)
of COURSE Obama is using human shields
David Hinz (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 8:43PM EST (link)his entire campaign was centered around the use of human shields… it’s how he got elected.
The Minority Report — The HinzSight Report — TMRB.tv — MFOB “Miss Tagart, do you know the hallmark of the second-rater? It’s resentment of another man’s achievement.”
Seriously!
Pomme (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 9:04PM EST (link)One day without someone in this administration making a Monty Python-esque move!
One!
Day!
“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views” William F Buckley Jr.
My training in the Air Force
Wing Zero (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 10:17PM EST (link)When I was an Airman attached to the First Fighter Wing, we didn’t have to worry all that much about civilian casualties. Mostly because right up until I left – we were a F-15C base. The F-15C carries no air to ground weapons. There were some occasions that an “intell body” would deploy to help the army or do another non-primary job (meaning it wasn’t Air to Air combat for us.)
While in training at Goodfellow though, it was a different animal. We did take into account where bombs would land, and how far away they were from houses, or religious or cultural sites. That was just training. The guys at Strike Eagle units or F-16 units, or B-1B’s or B-52′s I’m sure have a whole painstaking process they have to go through.
Then there’s the decision that has to be made when we have a predator or reaper in the air filming some dirtbag that kills our troops. His kid is there with him. Do we take him out, or wait for him to leave in his car/camel/scooter? Most of these dregs of humanity KNOW we don’t like killing innocents. They hide behind women and children and send duped young men to blow themselves up, many times those men not knowing they are going to blow themselves up. Then they march and mourn in the streets the moment someone is killed inadvertently, while our media bemoan these “poor victims.”
I say forget it. If you’re stupid enough to hide in your family’s house with your 4 kids and cousins and brother, then their blood is on your head. Send an F-15E with a couple of 500lbs JDAMS into the window of their house and take the whole thing down. The life of one American Soldier is far more valuable to me than that of a terrorist who hides behind his family.
1-21-09 – We are so screwed… Wait… maybe not just yet.
isn't General Petraeus in charge of this guy?
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 10:22PM EST (link)Last I heard Petraeus was CINC-CENTCOM, and would have command authority over Afghanistan operations,
I can’t imagine he’d allow something like this to go on under his nose.
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
It likely wasn't under his nose
Wing Zero (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 10:26PM EST (link)It was over his head… as in from Obama.
1-21-09 – We are so screwed… Wait… maybe not just yet.
One certainly gets that impression -nt
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Tuesday, June 23rd at 12:17AM EST (link)Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
What will they be doing in Kandahar province?
mrdadx6 (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 10:39PM EST (link)I spent May 07 to May 08 deployed in Kandahar Province, stationed just outside of Kandahar Airfield. We ran missions all over the province, including several Village Medical Operations, and frequent missions out to Canadian firebases Moshem Ghar and Sperwhen Ghar.
As far as I know, the ONLY time we were ever attacked by an enemy not hiding in a civilian compound or in civilian buildings, was a trip into the interior of the country, that was attacked from a ridgeline.
The worst thing that I can see coming of this new policy is that it makes it basically impossible for an Embedded Training Team to defend itself effectively. I spent about 4 to 6 weeks attached to the ETT’s at Sperwhen Ghar, and they went into Panjwai 5 days a week. We would set up security at the village police station, and the LT would work with the police captain to see what training or material aid we could provide. I have pictures somewhere, maybe even on my blog, but the village police station (we called it the district center, because Panjwai was the local district capital), while on the outskirts of Panjwai, was surrounded by other buildings.
In fact, the entire route to Sperwhen Ghar from Panjwai, led through a series of small villages and compounds. The Canadians actually lost 6 guys to a massive White Phosphorus IED just below a mosque on that route. The only place on that route where we would be able to return fire would be if they attacked from within the marijuana fields.
I don’t know whether that means the new general wants to see more foot patrols, or whether he’s disconnected from the reality of the battlespace, or whether it’s a directive from higher. I just know that if I were still there, it would give me the cold-snake willies.
Mrdadx6
“One man plus the truth is a majority. One infantryman plus a radio is an army.”
Thank you for your service Mrdadx6
Karina (Diary) Tuesday, June 23rd at 4:44AM EST (link)I really appreciate it and I’m glad you’re home now!!!
What the...
WarEagle01 (Diary) Monday, June 22nd at 11:19PM EST (link)‘… his measure of effectiveness will be the “number of Afghans shielded from violence,” ‘——-just how does he propose to measure that? It’s like Barry’s “created or saved” nonsense.
“A wise, doughy leg with rich tingly experiences will always reach better conclusions than will a more tanned, muscular leg that hasn’t felt those thrills.” –Chris Matthews’ Leg
“The alternative to the awful extremity of abortion is the indispensable joy of introducing this flawed world to someone who might make it better.”–John Hayward (AKA Dr. Zero)
This isn't strategy or tactics... it's political hegemony
Max Venom (Diary) Tuesday, June 23rd at 1:16AM EST (link)If this isn’t another Vietnam I don’t know what is. This is BAD policy, and only gives shelter to enemy combatants by telling them where they can take safe refuge.
Not only is it wrongheaded, but it has Obama stamped all over it. Who else wouldn’t care about number of militants killed? Why are we over there if that isn’t what it’s about. Why are we dying over there if it isn’t about killing them first?
Lets correct the policy statement: Message to Afghan civilians; If you harbor terrorist you will be killed.
CVW-14_-_10_-_Nov_2000.jpg