Just a day. A warm, pleasant, September day.

And now Team Obama is telling the enemy what to expect should any of them be caught or captured.

Obama is a fabulous recruiter for muslim extremists. Nothing motivates one to fight better than a naive and timid adversary.

Our President has displayed for the world that he is not interested in winning the war on terror – he has even ordered staff to stop using the term. Our President has displayed for the enemy his unwillingness to fight to protect his homeland. What a great invitation to those that would kill us.

double down and FIGHT…

I’m taking orders for an ALL pictorial 911 speciall diary….

Coming this weekend….

and the terrorists are alive and well and planning more attacks.
Unless Obama has something up his sleeves like a look maw no hands kind of thing then he is as naive as I thought he was.

the other aspect about this which strikes me, is this: Isn’t Blair’s remark a variation on the defense offered by many Nazi prison camp guards? How far different is, “I was following orders I believed to be legal but which you regard as a human rights abuse” from “I was just following orders.” Because to me, even with the extra words worked in, the problem is still that it either was or wasn’t a human rights abuse. And if it wasn’t a human rights abuse (my position) then the appropriate defense is that it was a human rights abuse. You can’t really make the argument “It was a human rights abuse, but we’re going to defend the people who committed that offense because they had bad information.” And that seems to be the position Blair and Obama are taking.

I recall one of his posts dealing with Obama’s candidacy for president just months before he won the race. In that post, he wrote that one of reasons he was afraid that once Obama would win, his administration would return to the old way before 9/11. That type of old thinking would in effect lead to more innocent lives lost. Thousands will die on Obama’s watch due to the lack of attention to practicing anti-terrorist measures.

So, it’s amazing that how Erick’s post turned out to be correct. If Obama pursues this type of thinking, then may God help us all. I think it’s not just Erick’s post that struck my mind, but a few other notable posters saying the same thing as Erick did in months before Obama won the race.

It’s a tragic day for all Americans. A very tragic day, indeed!

he’s runnig around to other countries making up lies and apoligizing for them.

(O)

We just have to hope we’re lucky enough to be gone on the day of the attack.

Proper grammar saves lives.

Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.

---

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

Now Obama, Panetta, (and apparently Blair (he of Chas Freeman fame) are ideologues. But to be on record as denying that there’s a threat-and that’s what they’ve done-opens them to serious political repercussions should anything bad happen during the next three years or so. The Carter and Clinton eras were marked by shabby and dishonest policy that weakened American intellegence and counter-terrorism capabilities. But those were duplicities, undertaken in the shadows because at least some of the time, slimeballs like Vance and Christopher, and Albright knew they would need to temporize.

In contrast, the Obama crowd seems to be completely unaware that this sort of smug self-congratulation can be immensely destructive if anything bad goes wrong on the terrorism front. It’s one thing to acknowledge a threat and, if something bad happens, explain why every effort had been made to avoid it. It’s quite another to deny a potential problem and find oneself confronting a painful and bloody denial or your denial. That’s unnecessary, and that’s where the Obamaist conceit has brought them.

The following statement was made by British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, in front of #10 Downing Street, London, after his arrival home from the notorious Munich Conference of 1938

We, the German Fuhrer and Chancellor, and the British Prime Minister, have had a further meeting today and are agreed in recognizing that the question of Anglo-German relations is of the first importance for our two countries and for Europe.

We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again.

We are resolved that the method of consultation shall be the method adopted to deal with any other questions that may concern our two countries, and we are determined to continue our efforts to remove possible sources of difference, and thus to contribute to assure the peace of Europe.

My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honor. I believe it is “peace for our time.” Go home and get a nice quiet sleep