That’s the same line she tried to feed to McCain, the implicit assumption being that we got rid of slavery by a Supreme Court decision, which is 180 degrees the opposite of the truth.

still read newspapers—I hve been paperless for 18 months now–canceled after obama won

I just posted a link to Jeff Dunetz’ RD story in the comments on that WP story

I always expect to see something like this when I see his style of drawing. When I first saw his cartoons I thought they were annoying because of the writing he always does below the picture. He makes an unfunny joke about conservatives in the cartoon, then elaborates in an even less humorous way in the lower margin. It’s a double whammy of unfunny, liberal political hack nonsense.

This does nothing to lessen their culpability, however. Anyone professionally engaged in public policy discourse should have at least a passing acquaintance with the subject at hand. Toles obviously does not. If he had such knowledge, he would not publish such tripe as this, because he would know he would be caught in a very obvious lie.

Unless he’s stupid in addition to being ignorant, in which case all bets are off.

of course, no tea partiers talk about the 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 10th amendments at all (though there is some contention over the 16th and17th).

His drawing stinks; his ideology, more so.

If this nonsense keeps up, it will be hip to be called a racist.

The cartoon, and I assume Toles, were both pretty illiterate.

Don’t believe me? Look into what the guy’s done sometime.

I’ll be toastin’ the day that guy kicks it, believe me…

“Toles and other critics of strict construction would benefit from reviewing the Constitution and the history of the civil rights movement.”

I don’t think this liar Toles is ignorant of the Constitution. More likely, he hates the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights. Leftists also hate representative government.* A leftist once told me The Federalist Papers was a “bourgeois document.” They hate the Constitution because it is designed to short-circuit totalitarianism. Judges/legal scholars can honestly debate strict construction. But when the ‘Lying Left’ gets on about originalism, they reveal their animosity to the Constitution itself, regardless of interpretation, as an obstacle to their dreams of genocide.

*”…revolution in Russia detested parliamentary institutions … democratic tomfoolery.” Ulam, Stalin biography.

I racist

So they say I

Have come to be

Wanting not for

Someone else’s dollar

Striving to be free

Yet respectful enough

To not do anything I please

Knowing right from wrong

Knowing charity from greed

Knowing compassion from abhor

I racist

So they say I

Have come to be

Associating with a party

That prefers tea to coffee

Looking to better the lot of all

And realizing that government

Has been the source of the fall

I racist

So they say I

Have come to be

Not focused upon the news of the day

Looking over my shoulder

To remiss of better days

When truth and purpose

Was a part of the American way

Not the lies and distractions

That has brought this

Country to fray

I racist

So I may be

A banner with thou

Cannot shame me

For character is the truth of oneself

And reputation is the public perception

Given by those who conspire and deceive

I so love the internet.

Yeah, we’ve got twitter mentality going on, people thinking before they write (I’m guilty), etc.

And these leftist baffoons aren’t thinking twice about exposing their gameplan.

That’s great for us. Now we know why they defecate all over the Constitution.

Knowing is wonderful, actually, because we deserve the truth about what lying in their black little, weasley, shriveled up hearts.

Now we know they’re propelling socialism and the “living Constitution” with their slavery, civil rights and distributive wealth arguments.

As though this country was corrupt and needs more “change.”

Keep it up, fools.

I just came across a kid’s Constitution book in my library, specifically on the Bill of Rights — and I couldn’t quite figure out why Martin Luther King’s picture was right beside the title page. — usually, the pages to the left of the title page are blank. But in this book, there was King. No prob.

Well, come the end of Chapter 1, we’ve got several pages referencing slavery. They devote each chapter to the first 10 amendments, but they close up the book with a whole chapter devoted to civil rights and slavery — with the final chapter focusing on activism (“.. the Supreme Court ruled that schoolchildren can’t be required to salute the American flag..”)

It’s all stated less ominously than you would think. This is a kid’s book and it is very, VERY subtle.

Now we know their basis for a “living Constitution.”

Curt, this is a very important post.

Maybe add something like ” — their reason for a “living” Constitution”?

When I clicked on this post off the frontpage, I was expecting a silly mockery of the teaparty again.

This post is much more than that. A very important post, thank you!

Toles is no different than any of us. “Opinions are like rectums, we all have one.”

…for it is fools who think such people, as “mr.” toles, lack only education. He means us harm. He is a willing and malicious tool for evil. He, and every other twit in the fake news media, HATES liberty and is simply pounding the drum that numbs the masses into accepting their plight as non-elites, thus protecting his station in society as a permanent member of the elite class.

“Review” nothing. This guy, and his ilk, knows the truth and intentionally shields others from it – clear enough?

has all the intellectual honesty and integrity of “Blacks will steal from you” and “Democrats are corrupt socialists”. You would find many times the “facts” and “examples” of the last two than the first, but all three are equally, patently and blatantly dishonest and destructive.