Conservatives pundits and media have been sounding alarm bells about President Obama’s nomination of transnationalism-touting Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh to be the State Department’s top legal adviser. But even Newsweek’s balanced piece on the Koh nomination (April 27 issue), which concludes that he should be confirmed, enumerates plenty of reasons to be alarmed. Consider the following excerpts:
Koh argues that American law should reflect “transnational” legal values.
Were his writings to become policy, judges might have the power to use debatable interpretations of treaties and “customary international law” to override a wide array of federal and state laws.
[T]aken to their logical extreme [Koh’s views] could erode American democracy and sovereignty.
Koh has campaigned to expand some rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution—and perhaps shrink some others, including the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech—to better conform to the laws of other nations.
He has campaigned to write into U.S. law the United Nations “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women,” … A U.N. committee supervising the treaty’s implementation has called for the “decriminalizing of prostitution” in China, the legalization of abortion in Colombia, and the abolition of Mother’s Day in Belarus (for “encouraging woman’s traditional roles”).
Adoption of his ideas could expose U.S. companies to multibillion-dollar liabilities merely for doing business in countries run by human-rights violators … [and could mean] extraditing American officials to be tried as war criminals.
In 2004, Koh asserted that President Bush (by invading Iraq and flouting the Geneva accords) had put the United States into an “axis of disobedience” to international law along with North Korea and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
Koh and the other “transnationalists” are using their legal theories to advance a political agenda. The international legal norms they wish to inject into American law by and large reflect the values of Social Democratic Europe and liberal American academics. Koh is not suggesting, for instance, that American judges adapt Islamic law that discriminates against women.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
But, but, but how can this BE?
Next93 (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 11:35AM EST (link)I thought the “new world order” was nothing more than a paranoid dellusion of far right-wing nutjobs? It’s one of those “slippery slope” fantasies like the idea that welfare programs will lead to socialism, or gay rights will lead to calls for legalizing polygamy.
I know that we’re not supposed to be talking like this, but as I’ve said before, the day that this president decides that American servicepeople can be tried by foreign courts for “war crimes” is the day he stops being “my” president. Unfortunately, I don’t think it will much matter by that point.
Obama was The One in 2008.
He’ll be a BIGGER one in 2012.
Koh is pathetic.
spainishirish (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 2:40PM EST (link)All partisanship aside, this man absolutely should not be confirmed. He actually has criticized the First Amendment because European governments don’t like free speech all that much. And that’s just starters. He has little grasp of law but great appreciation of left-wing politics disgused as such. Even for this Admnistration, he’s out there on the loon fringe.
Between Harold Koh and Samantha Power.............
Kenny Solomon (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 5:00PM EST (link)………..along with ‘Mr. Bill’s’ lovely wife and Teh-Mess-I-Yah himself, we have SERIOUS trouble on the horizon with our Republic’s sovereignty.
Hey Next93…….Keep an eye on Spain……. They’re checking into holding war crimes trials against GWB, VP Cheney, Sec. Rumsfeld and The State Of Israel.