Despite all the talk of fixing it, California’s budget is still a mess. One of those “fixes” was implemented last summer when the state Legislature increased revenue projections by $4 billion to avoid balancing the budget. Of course, the problem with using such “phantom money” is that it often has a habit of disappearing when you need it most. And it has disappeared just when money for schools is needed. Now deep cuts are on the table. The people lose again.
Naturally the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office recently reported that the state will receive virtually none of the $4 billion in projected revenue, forcing the state to make some tough decisions in the coming weeks. On the table are major cuts to the education budget, including shortening the school year by a week, not to mention cuts to in-home healthcare programs, and programs for people with developmental disabilities.
Obviously Californian’s budget needs all the help it can get but it looks like it’s business as usual in Sacramento. For instance, an upcoming ballot measure sponsored by a career politician would baffle anyone that truly understands the mess California is in. The so-called California Cancer Research Act coming before voters in June, asks California voters to raise taxes by nearly $1 billion for a whole new perpetual bureaucracy. That is unacceptable to voters. Maddeningly this new program doesn’t even guarantee that the money will be spent in the state! Apparently former state Sen. Pro Tem Don Perata, the career politician pushing the measure, thinks Californians who already paying some of the highest taxes in the nation should reach deeper into their pockets just to potentially send that money across state lines to benefit others. And all the while the budget for the education for those same taxpayer’s kids is about to be slashed.
So, what is the “solution” proposed by Democrats in Sacramento? Raise taxes, of course.
“Today’s numbers make it clear that the state’s first priority must be to get to the ballot in November and raise needed revenues to avoid any more damage to Californians,” said Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento. “The notion of cutting deeper into education, public safety and services for those in need is unthinkable. I imagine an overwhelming majority of Californians agree.”
The “damage” to Californians is not too little “revenue” (the Democrat’s favorite new word for high taxes) being raised. It’s waste and abuse coming right out of our state houses and Washington.
Raising taxes during record unemployment and massive budget deficits and creating whole new bureaucracies when government is already strangling the state just to potentially ship the money out of state is exactly the sort of dysfunctional thinking that got California into the mess it’s in today.
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
They already sent quite a bit to China.
Menlo (Diary) Sunday, November 20th at 9:11PM EST (link)I still can’t get over their project to have the Bay Bridge built in China. That’s their way of “saving taxpayer dollars.”
Somehow, I don’t think you are going to be able to convince the voters in California to “oppose cancer research.” I don’t think that could be defeated in ANY state.
“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter
Because of how much
conservativeparrothead Monday, November 21st at 6:06PM EST (link)State municipal workers make these days, the cost of some of these projects makes it much cheaper to outsource, thats not just California. My understanding is some of toll roads in Texas, especially one near Austin, was built by a Spanish company, they built the roads, they get the revenue or a portion of it is my understanding.
I cant tell you how many times on Sunday shows or whatever, Ive heard libbies call for “WPA” type projects. Have they ever done a little research on this? If you take WPA pay rates, and put them into 2011 dollars, the workers would get about $18000 annually. If you can put together workers to build schools, roads, and improvement projects for $18000 Im all for it, but you cant. Government workers would cost tax payers $18000 alone in benefits annually: health care, social security contribution, workmans comp insurance, and the list goes on and on and on. Not to mention the fact that most people can sit on their a$$ and collect unemployment which would be more than 18000 a year. So would you rather go build a bridge for 18000 a year or $23000 sitting on your duff collecting unemployment? Im guessing most opt for the duff.