<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cooperscopy's Diary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy</link>
	<description>Just another RedState: Where the VRWC Conspires Online weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Change is Coming!</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/04/change-is-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/04/change-is-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a class="user" href="/users/cooperscopy/">cooperscopy</a> (<a href="/cooperscopy/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/04/change-is-coming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s becoming increasingly clear that many Americans that voted for Barack Obama one year ago, completely misunderstood the change he was pushing. Lofty rhetoric like &#34;no more blue state and red state, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaU3fjVAFbE&#38;feature=related">conservative state and liberal state</a> but only the United States,&#34; resonated with the majority of Americans. Post partisan and post racial were attractive magnets to draw in even the suspicious voter, who were somewhat troubled by his liberal leanings. He talked about the process being too divisive with not enough transparency. Eloquent enumerations that suggested an America working together to tackle the tough issues of the day. Putting behind forever the racial divide with the historic election of the first African American president. Essentially, most attracted to his presidency assumed the change was about process and tone, as well as historic.</p>
<p>His policy rhetoric was actually in many ways to the right of John McCain. He promised no tax increases for 95% of Americans, and many would receive tax cuts. He said he&#8217;d be a fiscal hawk, scouring the budgets line by line to remove waste and inefficiencies. No more earmarks. He excoriated McCain for suggesting taxing employer health benefits. Lobbyist would be persona non <span class="blsp-spelling-error"><span class="blsp-spelling-error">grata</span> </span> at his White House. He would finish the job Bush didn&#8217;t when he took his eye off the ball in Afghanistan. And of course he said his administration would be the most transparent in history.</p>
<p>In reality what we&#8217;ve gotten from him and the democrats in congress is as close to a 180 degree shift from both policy rhetoric as well as his tone and process. He is anything but post partisan. We saw during the stimulus debate, a president that insisted the legislation should and would be written by, in his words those that won the election. His tone on almost every debate has been a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jifjRVLVjzA">denunciation of republicans</a> , and an incessant Bush blaming. The Democrats have defeated every republican amendment to every bill passed this year in congress. Republicans have been shut out of the health care debate and process completely, and then referred to as the party of NO. Both the White House and democrats have tried to marginalize the town hall/tea party attendees, rather than addressing their concerns.</p>
<p>He is anything but post racial. His reaction to the Gates affair this summer was telling. He immediately fell into a Rev. Wright moment when asked about the arrest of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LucTPdK8VTc">Professor Gates</a> at a health care press conference, which obviously had to be stepped back from by hosting the now famous beer summit. He allowed many to play the race card when his policy initiatives were under attack, while he positioned himself above it.</p>
<p>His deeds have not matched his policy rhetoric either. A bloated stimulus bill that did little to stimulate, and served rather as a payback to contributors was rammed through without being read and posted as promised. The omnibus bill contained 9000 earmarks that he didn&#8217;t hesitate to sign. He&#8217;s given exclusive wavers for lobbyists to work in his administration. He&#8217;s already raised taxes on alcohol and tobacco which is the most regressive of all, and the cap and trade and health care bills rattling around congress both include huge tax increases for all Americans. His administration is announcing trillion dollar deficits for the next ten years, and his fiscal year 2010 budget clocks in at almost 3.6 trillion dollars. His promise to finish the job in Afghanistan is now being reexamined, and transparency is the last word anyone would use to describe this administration and congress.</p>
<p>What the America people were promised they&#8217;d get, they haven&#8217;t. What most didn&#8217;t expect they&#8217;d get, they&#8217;ve gotten. What the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">foreseeable</span> future holds is more of the same, except now that Virginia and New Jersey have spoken, the foot may have to be eased off the accelerator enough to at least slow the death march to socialism that was always the intent of Barack Obama. Redistribution of wealth, and redistribution of health is now crawling rather than sprinting to the finish line, as blue dogs all across the country study the exit polling from Tuesday&#8217;s smack down of Washington&#8217;s arrogant excesses. Many sounded the warning bell before November 2008. It just took a year for many to hear.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogger.com/$BlogItemURL$">Link</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s becoming increasingly clear that many Americans that voted for Barack Obama one year ago, completely misunderstood the change he was pushing. Lofty rhetoric like &quot;no more blue state and red state, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaU3fjVAFbE&amp;feature=related">conservative state and liberal state</a> but only the United States,&quot; resonated with the majority of Americans. Post partisan and post racial were attractive magnets to draw in even the suspicious voter, who were somewhat troubled by his liberal leanings. He talked about the process being too divisive with not enough transparency. Eloquent enumerations that suggested an America working together to tackle the tough issues of the day. Putting behind forever the racial divide with the historic election of the first African American president. Essentially, most attracted to his presidency assumed the change was about process and tone, as well as historic.</p>
<p>His policy rhetoric was actually in many ways to the right of John McCain. He promised no tax increases for 95% of Americans, and many would receive tax cuts. He said he&#8217;d be a fiscal hawk, scouring the budgets line by line to remove waste and inefficiencies. No more earmarks. He excoriated McCain for suggesting taxing employer health benefits. Lobbyist would be persona non <span class="blsp-spelling-error"><span class="blsp-spelling-error">grata</span> </span> at his White House. He would finish the job Bush didn&#8217;t when he took his eye off the ball in Afghanistan. And of course he said his administration would be the most transparent in history.</p>
<p>In reality what we&#8217;ve gotten from him and the democrats in congress is as close to a 180 degree shift from both policy rhetoric as well as his tone and process. He is anything but post partisan. We saw during the stimulus debate, a president that insisted the legislation should and would be written by, in his words those that won the election. His tone on almost every debate has been a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jifjRVLVjzA">denunciation of republicans</a> , and an incessant Bush blaming. The Democrats have defeated every republican amendment to every bill passed this year in congress. Republicans have been shut out of the health care debate and process completely, and then referred to as the party of NO. Both the White House and democrats have tried to marginalize the town hall/tea party attendees, rather than addressing their concerns.</p>
<p>He is anything but post racial. His reaction to the Gates affair this summer was telling. He immediately fell into a Rev. Wright moment when asked about the arrest of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LucTPdK8VTc">Professor Gates</a> at a health care press conference, which obviously had to be stepped back from by hosting the now famous beer summit. He allowed many to play the race card when his policy initiatives were under attack, while he positioned himself above it.</p>
<p>His deeds have not matched his policy rhetoric either. A bloated stimulus bill that did little to stimulate, and served rather as a payback to contributors was rammed through without being read and posted as promised. The omnibus bill contained 9000 earmarks that he didn&#8217;t hesitate to sign. He&#8217;s given exclusive wavers for lobbyists to work in his administration. He&#8217;s already raised taxes on alcohol and tobacco which is the most regressive of all, and the cap and trade and health care bills rattling around congress both include huge tax increases for all Americans. His administration is announcing trillion dollar deficits for the next ten years, and his fiscal year 2010 budget clocks in at almost 3.6 trillion dollars. His promise to finish the job in Afghanistan is now being reexamined, and transparency is the last word anyone would use to describe this administration and congress.</p>
<p>What the America people were promised they&#8217;d get, they haven&#8217;t. What most didn&#8217;t expect they&#8217;d get, they&#8217;ve gotten. What the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">foreseeable</span> future holds is more of the same, except now that Virginia and New Jersey have spoken, the foot may have to be eased off the accelerator enough to at least slow the death march to socialism that was always the intent of Barack Obama. Redistribution of wealth, and redistribution of health is now crawling rather than sprinting to the finish line, as blue dogs all across the country study the exit polling from Tuesday&#8217;s smack down of Washington&#8217;s arrogant excesses. Many sounded the warning bell before November 2008. It just took a year for many to hear.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogger.com/$BlogItemURL$">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/04/change-is-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have Newt and the boys gotten the message?</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/03/have-newt-and-the-boys-gotten-the-message/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/03/have-newt-and-the-boys-gotten-the-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a class="user" href="/users/cooperscopy/">cooperscopy</a> (<a href="/cooperscopy/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/03/have-newt-and-the-boys-gotten-the-message/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I hope the complete boondoggle of NY23rd has taught Newt Gingrich and the republican masterminds of the Dede Scozzafava campaign an important  and priceless lesson. Don&#8217;t outsmart yourself, by misreading lost elections, and snubbing your most valuable asset. Your conservative base. If the town hall/tea party attendees didn&#8217;t teach you that conservatives are energized and ready for a rumble, then you&#8217;ve been stuck in the beltway too long. When you set up a liberal republican that is more democrat than the democrat in a district that is more conservative than most conservatives, you&#8217;re inviting a fight from within your own constituency. To suggest that republicans need to support a woman, simple because she has an R behind her name, which we all know stands for rino, without the conservatives putting up a fight, is ludicrous. Remember this, most republicans are republicans because they&#8217;re conservatives first, and loyalty to party only extends as far as the party&#8217;s loyalty to its core and values. When the party veers because of expediency or stupidity, it&#8217;s the responsibility of its base to stand firm and strong so as not to let the head that has got way too top heavy, explode upon impact with the fast rising earth. So, rather than excoriating your solid as a rock base, thank them for refocusing your attention on the principles that won Ronald Reagan two landslide victories&#8230;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the complete boondoggle of NY23rd has taught Newt Gingrich and the republican masterminds of the Dede Scozzafava campaign an important  and priceless lesson. Don&#8217;t outsmart yourself, by misreading lost elections, and snubbing your most valuable asset. Your conservative base. If the town hall/tea party attendees didn&#8217;t teach you that conservatives are energized and ready for a rumble, then you&#8217;ve been stuck in the beltway too long. When you set up a liberal republican that is more democrat than the democrat in a district that is more conservative than most conservatives, you&#8217;re inviting a fight from within your own constituency. To suggest that republicans need to support a woman, simple because she has an R behind her name, which we all know stands for rino, without the conservatives putting up a fight, is ludicrous. Remember this, most republicans are republicans because they&#8217;re conservatives first, and loyalty to party only extends as far as the party&#8217;s loyalty to its core and values. When the party veers because of expediency or stupidity, it&#8217;s the responsibility of its base to stand firm and strong so as not to let the head that has got way too top heavy, explode upon impact with the fast rising earth. So, rather than excoriating your solid as a rock base, thank them for refocusing your attention on the principles that won Ronald Reagan two landslide victories&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/03/have-newt-and-the-boys-gotten-the-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush is Right</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/01/rush-is-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/01/rush-is-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a class="user" href="/users/cooperscopy/">cooperscopy</a> (<a href="/cooperscopy/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/01/rush-is-right/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who watched Rush&#8217;s interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday saw Rush at his best. He was measured and confident, and left nothing to the imagination in his opposition to Obama&#8217;s agenda. He was particularly devastating in his criticism of Obama&#8217;s handling of the Dover photo op, and accusing Obama and the democrats of purposely trying to undermine the Iraq war effort in Iraq, as well as not pushing for victory in Afghanistan&#8230;He was confident about his place as a leader in opposition to all things Obama, and got personal about his addiction to prescription drugs&#8230;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who watched Rush&#8217;s interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday saw Rush at his best. He was measured and confident, and left nothing to the imagination in his opposition to Obama&#8217;s agenda. He was particularly devastating in his criticism of Obama&#8217;s handling of the Dover photo op, and accusing Obama and the democrats of purposely trying to undermine the Iraq war effort in Iraq, as well as not pushing for victory in Afghanistan&#8230;He was confident about his place as a leader in opposition to all things Obama, and got personal about his addiction to prescription drugs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/11/01/rush-is-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle one goes to conservatives over GOP Bigwigs</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/31/hatfield-and-mccoys-battle-one-goes-to-conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/31/hatfield-and-mccoys-battle-one-goes-to-conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a class="user" href="/users/cooperscopy/">cooperscopy</a> (<a href="/cooperscopy/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/31/hatfield-and-mccoys-battle-one-goes-to-conservatives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2 class="date-header">Saturday, October 31, 2009</h2>
<p><a name="4313554970993632210"></a></p>
<h3 class="post-title entry-title"><a href="http://cooperscopy.blogspot.com/2009/10/hatfield-and-mccoys-battle-one-goes-to.html"><br />
</a></h3>
<p>The ever escalating battle between the GOP hierarchy and the conservative movement energized by Barry&#8217;s abundant spending spree can chalk up battle one to The tea party/town hall attendees. aka, &#34;new conservative movement.&#34; The hand picked Republican candidate <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/1009/BREAKING_Scozzafava_drops_out_of_NY_23.html">Dede Scozzafava </a> has dropped out of the NY 23rd, congressional race in the midst of dropping poll numbers and ever mounting big time endorsements for her conservative opponent, Doug Hoffman. Recent polls showed Scozzafava running third behind a close first and second between Hoffman and the democrat Bill Owens.</p>
<p>This blows up the theory, espoused by Newt Gingrich, Michael Steele, and others that endorsing a third party candidate, would split the conservative vote and elect the democrat. Could it be that Newt is underestimating the strength of this new conservative movement. Scozzafava is anything but a conservative. She&#8217;s, pro choice, pro gay marriage, supported the stimulus, and has been in favor of tax increases to name some of her bonifide liberal credentials. Hopefully this will send a message to GOP top dogs that conservatives aren&#8217;t going to support liberal Republicans just because they aren&#8217;t democrats.</p>
<p>It may also send a message to beltway republican pundits that have been for one year decrying the right wing, and advocating a center shift for the republican party. They have excoriated Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin to name a few, proclaiming they must be marginalized for republicans to win, even though the tipping point in the NY 23rd race was Palin&#8217;s endorsement of Hoffman. It&#8217;s clear that conservatives, like Palin and Limbaugh to name a few, have decided they&#8217;re conservatives first, and republicans second. With Rush&#8217;s ratings exploding, and Sarah Palin&#8217;s advanced book sales tracking galactic, maybe they should shut up and listen to some of what they have to say. They have missed what the tea party/town halls were all about.</p>
<p>They only need to take a look at how democrats and the mainstream media have tried to demonize both Limbaugh and Palin with false accusations. Why. Because they want to marginalize them because they know their message resonates with a majority of Americans. Maybe the republican party should accept the old adage, &#34; my enemies enemy is my friend,&#34; and listen to what they&#8217;re saying that has got the dems and mainstream media&#8217;s blood pressure erupting.</p>
<p>Or maybe they should read recent polls that show 40% of Americans identify themselves as conservative, 37% moderate, and only 20% liberal. It&#8217;s not rocket science. The country, thanks to the Obama administration is not just moving, it&#8217;s accelerating right at whiplash speed, and if the GOP doesn&#8217;t stop this moderating trend they will be left out in the cold. With 2010 approaching, and conservatives set to challenge liberal leaning republicans in primaries all across the country, I have one message for the GOP hierarchy. &#34;WATCH YOUR BACKSIDE.&#34;<br />
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/$BlogItemURL$">Link</a></p>
<p><a href="edit.php?tag=httpcooperscopyblogspotcom">http://cooperscopy.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 class="date-header">Saturday, October 31, 2009</h2>
<p><a name="4313554970993632210"></a></p>
<h3 class="post-title entry-title"><a href="http://cooperscopy.blogspot.com/2009/10/hatfield-and-mccoys-battle-one-goes-to.html"><br />
</a></h3>
<p>The ever escalating battle between the GOP hierarchy and the conservative movement energized by Barry&#8217;s abundant spending spree can chalk up battle one to The tea party/town hall attendees. aka, &quot;new conservative movement.&quot; The hand picked Republican candidate <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/1009/BREAKING_Scozzafava_drops_out_of_NY_23.html">Dede Scozzafava </a> has dropped out of the NY 23rd, congressional race in the midst of dropping poll numbers and ever mounting big time endorsements for her conservative opponent, Doug Hoffman. Recent polls showed Scozzafava running third behind a close first and second between Hoffman and the democrat Bill Owens.</p>
<p>This blows up the theory, espoused by Newt Gingrich, Michael Steele, and others that endorsing a third party candidate, would split the conservative vote and elect the democrat. Could it be that Newt is underestimating the strength of this new conservative movement. Scozzafava is anything but a conservative. She&#8217;s, pro choice, pro gay marriage, supported the stimulus, and has been in favor of tax increases to name some of her bonifide liberal credentials. Hopefully this will send a message to GOP top dogs that conservatives aren&#8217;t going to support liberal Republicans just because they aren&#8217;t democrats.</p>
<p>It may also send a message to beltway republican pundits that have been for one year decrying the right wing, and advocating a center shift for the republican party. They have excoriated Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin to name a few, proclaiming they must be marginalized for republicans to win, even though the tipping point in the NY 23rd race was Palin&#8217;s endorsement of Hoffman. It&#8217;s clear that conservatives, like Palin and Limbaugh to name a few, have decided they&#8217;re conservatives first, and republicans second. With Rush&#8217;s ratings exploding, and Sarah Palin&#8217;s advanced book sales tracking galactic, maybe they should shut up and listen to some of what they have to say. They have missed what the tea party/town halls were all about.</p>
<p>They only need to take a look at how democrats and the mainstream media have tried to demonize both Limbaugh and Palin with false accusations. Why. Because they want to marginalize them because they know their message resonates with a majority of Americans. Maybe the republican party should accept the old adage, &quot; my enemies enemy is my friend,&quot; and listen to what they&#8217;re saying that has got the dems and mainstream media&#8217;s blood pressure erupting.</p>
<p>Or maybe they should read recent polls that show 40% of Americans identify themselves as conservative, 37% moderate, and only 20% liberal. It&#8217;s not rocket science. The country, thanks to the Obama administration is not just moving, it&#8217;s accelerating right at whiplash speed, and if the GOP doesn&#8217;t stop this moderating trend they will be left out in the cold. With 2010 approaching, and conservatives set to challenge liberal leaning republicans in primaries all across the country, I have one message for the GOP hierarchy. &quot;WATCH YOUR BACKSIDE.&quot;<br />
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/$BlogItemURL$">Link</a></p>
<p><a href="edit.php?tag=httpcooperscopyblogspotcom">http://cooperscopy.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/31/hatfield-and-mccoys-battle-one-goes-to-conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Jihad Against Fox News.</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/30/the-jihad-against-fox-newshttpcooperscopyblogspotcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/30/the-jihad-against-fox-newshttpcooperscopyblogspotcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a class="user" href="/users/cooperscopy/">cooperscopy</a> (<a href="/cooperscopy/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/30/the-jihad-against-fox-newshttpcooperscopyblogspotcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, the inevitable has happened. We know why Obama has hesitated on sending extra troops to Afghanistan. He believes his real enemies are here in the homeland. The Taliban doesn&#8217;t pose as real a threat to his administration, as Fox News does. Notice I said administration, not America. Does this president really care about America? I hesitate to say that about any US president but it&#8217;s becoming increasingly clear that his main concern is his agenda. America and the constitution, go to the end of the line.</p>
<p>The chilling Jihad against Fox News should move all Americans to action. A full court censorship play is being enacted on the conservative news organization in broad daylight. <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/10/18/david_axelrod_fox_news_not_really_a_news_station.html">David <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Axelrod</span> </a> <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/10/18/david_axelrod_fox_news_not_really_a_news_station.html"> </a> said on This Week, referring to Fox, &#8216;It&#8217;s not really news, it&#8217;s pushing a point of view and the bigger thing is other news organizations like yours, ought not to treat them that way.&#8221; A veiled threat? perhaps. In other words, we don&#8217;t consider them legitimate, therefore you better not pick up and run with any stories that originate from Fox. Why? Because in the &#8220;new America&#8221; the only News organization that&#8217;s challenging this administration is Fox. Look at the Acorn and Van Jones scandals. The mainstream media were found prostrate in messiah worship, and were only forced to cover them when they became unavoidable..</p>
<p>This White house is aware that more will be coming out, because they know Fox is doing the work as democracies watchdog, and this is a preemptive shot across the bow, so the administration&#8217;s lap dogs, &#8220;the Main stream media,&#8221; don&#8217;t go with the Fox stories. <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/10/19/rahm_emanuel_on_white_houses_war_with_fox_news.html"><span class="blsp-spelling-error">Rahm</span> Emanuel</a> was on CNN Sunday spouting the same narrative. It&#8217;s an obvious coordinated effort to marginalize the only network challenging the power structure in Washington.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s revealing to me that Stephanopoulus didn&#8217;t even challenge Axelrod about his assessment of Fox. Shouldn&#8217;t they be a little embarrassed that the White House is only upset with one network? And, that they are admitting Fox is the only one asking the tough questions? Shouldn&#8217;t they be outraged that the administration is telling them how to treat a competitor. Are they so blinded by the radiant glow around Obama&#8217;s brow, they&#8217;re afraid to challenge? Could the White House&#8217;s strategy already be working? Are those White House cocktail parties so alluring? The chance to touch the hem of his garment and maybe feel his power. They don&#8217;t want to risk losing access to the closest thing to heaven they may ever know. It looks to me like the Chicago thug machine has already neutered the Main stream media.</p>
<p>The only hope we have of the Main stream media pulling itself out of this Obama worship paralysis, is free market capitalism. How Ironic is that? When they continue to see Fox&#8217;s ratings soar like balloon boys transport, that grabbed everyone&#8217;s attention, maybe they&#8217;ll realize they actually have to work for a living. Ad revenues are through the roof for Fox, while others are struggling. Maybe that will awaken them, or maybe they&#8217;ll just continue to tow the messiah&#8217;s line, and hope he grants them redemption, or should I say a bailout&#8230;..See: &#8220;The Independent Press Is On Life Support&#8221; down this page&#8230;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the inevitable has happened. We know why Obama has hesitated on sending extra troops to Afghanistan. He believes his real enemies are here in the homeland. The Taliban doesn&#8217;t pose as real a threat to his administration, as Fox News does. Notice I said administration, not America. Does this president really care about America? I hesitate to say that about any US president but it&#8217;s becoming increasingly clear that his main concern is his agenda. America and the constitution, go to the end of the line.</p>
<p>The chilling Jihad against Fox News should move all Americans to action. A full court censorship play is being enacted on the conservative news organization in broad daylight. <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/10/18/david_axelrod_fox_news_not_really_a_news_station.html">David <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Axelrod</span> </a> <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/10/18/david_axelrod_fox_news_not_really_a_news_station.html"> </a> said on This Week, referring to Fox, &#8216;It&#8217;s not really news, it&#8217;s pushing a point of view and the bigger thing is other news organizations like yours, ought not to treat them that way.&#8221; A veiled threat? perhaps. In other words, we don&#8217;t consider them legitimate, therefore you better not pick up and run with any stories that originate from Fox. Why? Because in the &#8220;new America&#8221; the only News organization that&#8217;s challenging this administration is Fox. Look at the Acorn and Van Jones scandals. The mainstream media were found prostrate in messiah worship, and were only forced to cover them when they became unavoidable..</p>
<p>This White house is aware that more will be coming out, because they know Fox is doing the work as democracies watchdog, and this is a preemptive shot across the bow, so the administration&#8217;s lap dogs, &#8220;the Main stream media,&#8221; don&#8217;t go with the Fox stories. <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/10/19/rahm_emanuel_on_white_houses_war_with_fox_news.html"><span class="blsp-spelling-error">Rahm</span> Emanuel</a> was on CNN Sunday spouting the same narrative. It&#8217;s an obvious coordinated effort to marginalize the only network challenging the power structure in Washington.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s revealing to me that Stephanopoulus didn&#8217;t even challenge Axelrod about his assessment of Fox. Shouldn&#8217;t they be a little embarrassed that the White House is only upset with one network? And, that they are admitting Fox is the only one asking the tough questions? Shouldn&#8217;t they be outraged that the administration is telling them how to treat a competitor. Are they so blinded by the radiant glow around Obama&#8217;s brow, they&#8217;re afraid to challenge? Could the White House&#8217;s strategy already be working? Are those White House cocktail parties so alluring? The chance to touch the hem of his garment and maybe feel his power. They don&#8217;t want to risk losing access to the closest thing to heaven they may ever know. It looks to me like the Chicago thug machine has already neutered the Main stream media.</p>
<p>The only hope we have of the Main stream media pulling itself out of this Obama worship paralysis, is free market capitalism. How Ironic is that? When they continue to see Fox&#8217;s ratings soar like balloon boys transport, that grabbed everyone&#8217;s attention, maybe they&#8217;ll realize they actually have to work for a living. Ad revenues are through the roof for Fox, while others are struggling. Maybe that will awaken them, or maybe they&#8217;ll just continue to tow the messiah&#8217;s line, and hope he grants them redemption, or should I say a bailout&#8230;..See: &#8220;The Independent Press Is On Life Support&#8221; down this page&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/30/the-jihad-against-fox-newshttpcooperscopyblogspotcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin Takes A shot Across The Bow Of The U.S.S. GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/30/sarah-palin-takes-a-shot-across-the-bow-of-the-uss-gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/30/sarah-palin-takes-a-shot-across-the-bow-of-the-uss-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a class="user" href="/users/cooperscopy/">cooperscopy</a> (<a href="/cooperscopy/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="post-body entry-content">Sarah Palin last week endorsed Doug Hoffman for representative of New York&#8217;s 23rd congressional district, and snubbed The GOP&#8217;s selection of liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava on her <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=157794838434">face book</a> posting. Hoffman is running as a conservative. This all comes with the backdrop that 73% think Republicans in congress have lost touch with GOP voters throughout the nation, according to a <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/october_2009/73_of_gop_voters_say_congressional_republicans_have_lost_touch_with_their_base">Rasmussen reports</a> poll.</p>
<p>Is this a shot across the bow of the good ship U.S.S. GOP? Is Sarah trying to steer the GOP back to it&#8217;s conservative roots. Is she threatening to take her star power and <a href="http://www.sarahpac.com/landing/?cdtrack_creative=9df74b6d-be24-4a77-8294-b45618d96e40&#38;cdtrack_source=6766ecf9-5d7e-4988-ba24-e120e6fe0873">SarahPAC</a> money to third party and maybe conservative democrats running for congress in 2010? She announced she would donate, from her SarahPAC as much allowed by law to Doug Hoffman&#8217;s campaign. Is it time for the GOP&#8217;s heavy hitters to reconsider their endorsements of squishy democrat lite Republicans, whom they say are the only ones who can win in certain districts?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s becoming increasingly clear, that voters all across the country are disenchanted with the two major parties positioning themselves in what they think are strategic rather than principled ideals. The main stream media missed the whole message given by tea party, and town hall attendees all across the country this year. And that message was, &#8220;a pox on both your houses.&#8221; It was not a Republican movement as they would like you to believe. It was a reduce spending, taxes, and give us back our freedom movement. Republican spending went through the roof over the last 8 years and the budget deficit for 2008 was second only to that of 2009. It&#8217;s true president Bush reduced taxes, but he also increased spending at an alarming rate, angering many Conservatives in his own party.</p>
<p>So what is Sarah Palin up to. Maybe she&#8217;s that post partisan politician that Barack Obama said he would be, but we all know turned out not to be. Maybe her Republican loyalty is second to her conservative values. Maybe it&#8217;s time for the GOP bigwigs to listen to the grassroots tea party / town hallers, and return to the Ronald Reagan type conservatism, that doesn&#8217;t blur the line between the two parties. Could it be they have misread the reason for the their last two devastating defeats to mean they have to move more to the center? Maybe their out of control spending, and expansion of government was the real reason. Need I remind you Barack Obama positioned himself as a tax cutter for the majority of America, and a fiscal conservative, which we all came to realize was a cruel hoax.</p>
<p>If the Republican party continues down this path, they will watch as a major sea change slips through their ideologically vacant fingers. With most of the country fed up with government largess, and a plurality identifying themselves as conservatives, the beltway GOP continue to push a center tack, even though the number that identify themselves as Republican continues to bleed. It&#8217;s clear Sarah Palin and a few other Republicans see and understand the mood of the country. The Republican hierarchy and most GOP members of congress do not.</p>
<p>The democrat party&#8217;s over reaching, deficit spending and overall power grab, has given every reason for a massive power shift in 2010. But does the Republican party really know how to position themselves without bungling the opportunity. Maybe they should take a tip from the fly over country conservatives. The bitter clingers. The unsophisticated anti elitist army of American lovers. Maybe they should listen to Sarah Palin!</p>
<p>http://cooperscopy.blogspot.com/</p></div>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="post-body entry-content">Sarah Palin last week endorsed Doug Hoffman for representative of New York&#8217;s 23rd congressional district, and snubbed The GOP&#8217;s selection of liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava on her <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=157794838434">face book</a> posting. Hoffman is running as a conservative. This all comes with the backdrop that 73% think Republicans in congress have lost touch with GOP voters throughout the nation, according to a <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/october_2009/73_of_gop_voters_say_congressional_republicans_have_lost_touch_with_their_base">Rasmussen reports</a> poll.</p>
<p>Is this a shot across the bow of the good ship U.S.S. GOP? Is Sarah trying to steer the GOP back to it&#8217;s conservative roots. Is she threatening to take her star power and <a href="http://www.sarahpac.com/landing/?cdtrack_creative=9df74b6d-be24-4a77-8294-b45618d96e40&amp;cdtrack_source=6766ecf9-5d7e-4988-ba24-e120e6fe0873">SarahPAC</a> money to third party and maybe conservative democrats running for congress in 2010? She announced she would donate, from her SarahPAC as much allowed by law to Doug Hoffman&#8217;s campaign. Is it time for the GOP&#8217;s heavy hitters to reconsider their endorsements of squishy democrat lite Republicans, whom they say are the only ones who can win in certain districts?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s becoming increasingly clear, that voters all across the country are disenchanted with the two major parties positioning themselves in what they think are strategic rather than principled ideals. The main stream media missed the whole message given by tea party, and town hall attendees all across the country this year. And that message was, &#8220;a pox on both your houses.&#8221; It was not a Republican movement as they would like you to believe. It was a reduce spending, taxes, and give us back our freedom movement. Republican spending went through the roof over the last 8 years and the budget deficit for 2008 was second only to that of 2009. It&#8217;s true president Bush reduced taxes, but he also increased spending at an alarming rate, angering many Conservatives in his own party.</p>
<p>So what is Sarah Palin up to. Maybe she&#8217;s that post partisan politician that Barack Obama said he would be, but we all know turned out not to be. Maybe her Republican loyalty is second to her conservative values. Maybe it&#8217;s time for the GOP bigwigs to listen to the grassroots tea party / town hallers, and return to the Ronald Reagan type conservatism, that doesn&#8217;t blur the line between the two parties. Could it be they have misread the reason for the their last two devastating defeats to mean they have to move more to the center? Maybe their out of control spending, and expansion of government was the real reason. Need I remind you Barack Obama positioned himself as a tax cutter for the majority of America, and a fiscal conservative, which we all came to realize was a cruel hoax.</p>
<p>If the Republican party continues down this path, they will watch as a major sea change slips through their ideologically vacant fingers. With most of the country fed up with government largess, and a plurality identifying themselves as conservatives, the beltway GOP continue to push a center tack, even though the number that identify themselves as Republican continues to bleed. It&#8217;s clear Sarah Palin and a few other Republicans see and understand the mood of the country. The Republican hierarchy and most GOP members of congress do not.</p>
<p>The democrat party&#8217;s over reaching, deficit spending and overall power grab, has given every reason for a massive power shift in 2010. But does the Republican party really know how to position themselves without bungling the opportunity. Maybe they should take a tip from the fly over country conservatives. The bitter clingers. The unsophisticated anti elitist army of American lovers. Maybe they should listen to Sarah Palin!</p>
<p>http://cooperscopy.blogspot.com/</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/cooperscopy/2009/10/30/sarah-palin-takes-a-shot-across-the-bow-of-the-uss-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

