Palin’s Sunny American Optimism Shines Against Obama’s “Doom & Gloom” America Bashing



Governor Sarah Palin’s speech to the Vanderburgh Right To Life fundraising banquet in Evansville, Indiana reminded many of us why she was chosen to run for Vice President in 2008 and why many, including myself, hope to see her run for President in 2012 or 2016.

Governor Palin’s delivery of this speech was heartfelt and real. It was authentic in a way that no other politician of this current time can match. Sarah Palin represents the real deal. A real person seeking to better her state and her nation. A servant-leader in the true Christian definition. She doesn’t seek power for power’s sake. She isn’t obsessed with herself. She isn’t fork-tongued. She doesn’t go out of her way to alienate her friends in some lame attempt to win favor with the media. She actually seems to like America. She is who she is and that’s enough.

What Sarah Palin represents is everything that Mitt Romney lacked in 2008. Romney, who spent millions of dollars in the primary still failed to connect with vast numbers of grassroots conservatives. He has many establishment supporters but he failed to catch fire with the rank and file. Mitt Romney is a good man, but he’s a politician first. Sarah Palin represents us. She is us. She walks like us. She talks like us (when she isn’t being muzzled by a campaign staff that looks down at her) and it works.

Like Ronald Reagan before her, she also brings a sunny optimism and stage presence. Her shortcomings during campaign 2008 were vastly overshadowed to many of us by her speeches (most notably the GOP convention speech) and her debate performance. Her optimism, however, isn’t Barack Obama’s brand of poll-driven false optimism. Sure, he trashes America and the economy for weeks on end, and then throws a few bones to those of us who like America because his pollsters say that he is “too negative” so he becomes “more like Reagan.”

Ronald Reagan was what the Obama concubine media would call a “right wing extremist” and would be said to be “unelectable” for that reason. In fact, bumbling and squishy moderate Gerald Ford made that very claim regarding Reagan. Many doubted that such a hardcore conservative could be elected. After all, didn’t Goldwater lose in a landslide?

It is not the message that fails in cases like that. It is the messenger. Sarah Palin is not perfect. She didn’t spend a second pursuing national politics prior to being selected by John McCain to run for Vice President. She didn’t spent months, or years studying national issues, because she was too busy focusing on her actual job of running the state of Alaska. In addition to that, the message of 2008 was not her own. Her job was to be the head cheerleader for John McCain.

Sarah Palin spoke of her personal trials and tribulation with candor, grace and authenticity. She wasn’t exaggerating things a la scrappy Joe Biden and his fantasy world of landing under sniper-fire and telling off President Bush in the Oval Office. She tells the truth from the heart and it resonates.

Governor Palin also joked openly about her interview problems, her wardrobe “scandal” and the fact that you can see Russia from Alaska with great comic timing and to great effect.

Governor Palin possesses a strong set of political chops. She can take the abstract fuzzy political speak and make it heart-piercing and personal to the listener. She shares this skill with other successful politicians like Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan.

She also represents a shot for the people of America to take our government back from the pork-loving, inept, and corrupt political prostitutes that run Washington D.C.

Ronald Reagan was able to defeat Jimmy Carter in 1980 largely because of his communication skills and presentation. He was able to take perceptions about his radical right-wing agenda and past as an actor and change them through his wit, style and grace. Conservative principles will always win elections, but they need to be communicated effectively and genuinely. The genuine sunny optimism of Ronald Reagan and his love of America convinced a large number of Americans to join the Reagan revolution and embrace conservatism over Jimmy Carter’s hopelessness.

In many ways, the political winds are shifting to the same pattern found in 1980. In only a few months, Barack Obama has gone on a worldwide apology tour, high-fiving socialist dictators, bowing to Islamic royalty, and insulting our democratic allies. He has taken every opportunity both on our soil and abroad to slam the United States. He has talked down everything from the economy to our role and position in the world. He has revealed himself to he a hallow shell of a politician that can only speak when reading from his buddy the TelePrompter, even going so far as to refuse to answer questions about pirates during a healthcare press conference because he didn’t have someone write the answer for him yet.

Sarah Palin represents just the positive, genuine and humble messenger for a new Reagan revolution. Her sunny optimism and cheery wit will bring morning again to America after this long national nightmare that is the Obama administration.

The speech in Evansville was just a glimmer as to the power of Palin’s delivery. Oh, and she didn’t even use a TelePrompter.

Keep your eye on our lady from the north. That girl is going places!


RSS feed

8 Comments Leave a comment

That girl is going places!

Rod_Patrick (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 1:50AM EST (link)

I hope don’t mean that literally – more appearances in places outside Alaska.

Because if you do, you’re technically wishing the Lady to have more legal suits against her in Alaska.

 

Palin has the talent, but she's not at Reagan's level yet

red_oakster (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 12:01PM EST (link)

By the time Reagan ran for President in 1976, he had 12 years of careful, well-argued speaking and writing behind him. He was well-read and capable of taking on his political opponents and dispatching them with razor-sharp logic and rhetoric.

Palin, by contrast, has Reaganesque instincts, but is not the mistress of her brief in many areas of public policy. She has time to master those briefs, but failing to do so would make it hard for her to succeed.

She needs to become fluent on foreign policy and national security. Supporting missile defense won’t cut it if she doesn’t communicate a grip of American and international history. Taking time to hit the books will solve the problem, with the question being whether she will do it. She also needs to get a much fuller understanding of constitutional law and judicial review. Like it or not, it is a crucial issue, and a successful presidential candidate must be able to show depth and refinement. She’s not there on this issue either.

Her vulnerability is that she will be smeared in the primaries and beyond as a bumpkin. The reason such an attack never worked against Reagan is that he was literate and well-prepared. With some disciplined work, Palin can be ready too. And if and when she goes head to head with David Gregory or Bob Schieffer and sends them running, the snobbish attacks on her will simply melt away.

But if she tries to wing it, the Romenys and Huckabees will be lying in wait, and it won’t be pretty.

Comment recommended, red_oakster nt

Xasteius (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 12:12PM EST (link)

Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!

The only poll that counts is the one at the ballot box.

I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be a Chance/Soros hybrid.

 

exactly

Common_Cents (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 12:35PM EST (link)

Our candidate has to be much much quicker, smarter, sharper. Why?

Because we don’t have the MSM covering for us like they do for Obama. Just imagine if Obama got the Palin treatment by the MSM? He’d flop more than a fish out of water.

Unfortunately until we even out the media, we will have to play “who’s smarter than a fifth grader” w/ the MSM and Palin has much work to do.

IMHO she has great potential and will make a big contribution to conservatism but she isn’t ready for prime time.

Obama=Golfer in Chief, Leading from, behind, the Back Nine.
Leaders don’t create movements. Movements create leaders. Get involved. Your future depends on it.
Govt “invests” YOUR tax money for POLITICAL return rather than economic return.

 

What about 1968?

Finrod (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 12:56PM EST (link)

Ronald Reagan’s first run for President was in 1968, four years after his first real political speech at the 1964 RNC convention, and two years into his first term as Governor of California. His ultimately successful run in 1980 was his third try.

Let’s get down to brass tacks here. How much for the ape?

I agree completely

Aetius728 Monday, April 20th at 4:17PM EST (link)

with all of the above comments. Fair or not, the impression left in the minds of a lot of people after the last election was that she did not know her stuff.

She needs to study foreign policy, defense, law, and ECONOMICS! We must be able to fully and completely destroy the Democrat’s economic nonsense. If she goes up against Obama, she will need to be able to clearly and mercilesslly shred his arguments.

And her debate with Biden was awful, as somebody else wrote. He came off as far more knowledgeable. And impressions matter, we know that 75% of what he said was complete BS, but the average voter does not.

OK, I’ve done my bashing. She does have good instincts, and the ability to connect with people. She has a lot of potential, but she will have to work to develop it.

 
 
 

Why not a significant

jonathanswift (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 3:03PM EST (link)

Cabinet position first, say Energy or Interior? (Sen. McCain should have done that. Heck, Pres. Obama should have done it to take her out of the mix for 2012, an election that will likely be contentious.)

I was not that impressed with her in the Biden Debate. However, I like her on the stump: real political talent in an old fashioned, likeable way.

 

i agree with a lot of what is said here

Bill@cityonahillpolitics (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 6:00PM EST (link)

there is no question that Governor Palin needs to get involved in national issues and formulate her own positions and whatnot…I do think, however, that being governor of a state is a perfect preparation for being president, so I don’t know that she needs years and years of experience before she could run for president. By all accounts, she is a quick study and I would suggest that her political chops are incredible. If she focuses over the next few years on speaking out on and formulating a platform, I think 2012 is certainly a possibility for her…now she is also certainly young enough that she could choose to sit out 2012 and try for something later after she ends her tenure as governor and could travel the country more freely. I think she has tremendous potential and believe that she can and will be ready by 2012.

Bill

Visit my other sites:
www.cityonahillpolitics.blogspot.com

www.govpalin2012.blogspot.com

http://www.examiner.com/x-19697-Camden-County-Conservative-Examiner

Follow me on Twitter:

http://twitter.com/Bill_C_Hughes