<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government squashes Nantucket Tea Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Maidment</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2890</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Maidment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2890</guid>
		<description>and get us taxpayers to pay for it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and get us taxpayers to pay for it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2889</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 06:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2889</guid>
		<description>DONTREADONME said: &quot;You can get vouchers for cars but not for schools&quot;

catchy, simple, to the point....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DONTREADONME said: &#8220;You can get vouchers for cars but not for schools&#8221;</p>
<p>catchy, simple, to the point&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2888</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2888</guid>
		<description>great point Doc....

I said above about gathering unofficially and that &quot;No DJ, No Speakers, So what?!?!&quot; though I hadn&#039;t thought about putting it as clear and pointed as you just did. If people need some fancy Official &quot;gathering&quot; to draw them out and coordinate them &quot;to  be seen&quot; then they are not really/truly &quot;fed up&quot; as they should be. We should be motivated to making our concerns/demands known at even RANDOM/spontaneous last minute (Twitter, email, etc...) driven moments that quickly group/assemble people to a &quot;general area&quot; with shirts, small signs, small wave flags, etc... that don&#039;t have to be over-blown to make the point and require permits. The small Parade (just inches size) size Flags can be obtained through Quinn Flags and many other places and these events, IMO, will in a way be more impressive if they are the quickly popping up events that get the message out to our fellow common Americans (friends, neighbors, etc). If they occur enough and in cities all across the Nation we should be able to get out the message with part of that message being that folks &quot;Rights of Assembly&quot; are being infringed and we shall not be detered.

TEApeat (Official and UnOfficial rally) info - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/congressman_pete_sessions/2009/06/25/our-goal-is-to-retire-nancy-pelosi-by-electing-republicans-who-represent-your-values-in-government/#comment-33&quot;&gt;TEApeats (info) PLUS How to organize an UNOFFICIAL non-permit TEApeat&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great point Doc&#8230;.</p>
<p>I said above about gathering unofficially and that &#8220;No DJ, No Speakers, So what?!?!&#8221; though I hadn&#8217;t thought about putting it as clear and pointed as you just did. If people need some fancy Official &#8220;gathering&#8221; to draw them out and coordinate them &#8220;to  be seen&#8221; then they are not really/truly &#8220;fed up&#8221; as they should be. We should be motivated to making our concerns/demands known at even RANDOM/spontaneous last minute (Twitter, email, etc&#8230;) driven moments that quickly group/assemble people to a &#8220;general area&#8221; with shirts, small signs, small wave flags, etc&#8230; that don&#8217;t have to be over-blown to make the point and require permits. The small Parade (just inches size) size Flags can be obtained through Quinn Flags and many other places and these events, IMO, will in a way be more impressive if they are the quickly popping up events that get the message out to our fellow common Americans (friends, neighbors, etc). If they occur enough and in cities all across the Nation we should be able to get out the message with part of that message being that folks &#8220;Rights of Assembly&#8221; are being infringed and we shall not be detered.</p>
<p>TEApeat (Official and UnOfficial rally) info &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/congressman_pete_sessions/2009/06/25/our-goal-is-to-retire-nancy-pelosi-by-electing-republicans-who-represent-your-values-in-government/#comment-33">TEApeats (info) PLUS How to organize an UNOFFICIAL non-permit TEApeat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaimo</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2887</guid>
		<description>Everyone should bombard Nantucket with emails saying that they won&#039;t vacation there until they start respecting the right to free assembly.

Did someone say that Obummer was going to be vacationing in Martha&#039;s Vineyard, but I thought that he was the most hard working President Evah!  I bet when it comes down to it, Obummer will have taken more vacations than George Bush in 4 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone should bombard Nantucket with emails saying that they won&#8217;t vacation there until they start respecting the right to free assembly.</p>
<p>Did someone say that Obummer was going to be vacationing in Martha&#8217;s Vineyard, but I thought that he was the most hard working President Evah!  I bet when it comes down to it, Obummer will have taken more vacations than George Bush in 4 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karina</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Karina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>No need to pull up old crap when they&#039;re shoveling more than enough new crap at us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need to pull up old crap when they&#8217;re shoveling more than enough new crap at us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2885</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2885</guid>
		<description>I can find no relevant bills from the Senate at all doing thomas.loc.gov searches on &#039;handgun&#039; or &#039;registration,&#039; so Sen. Reed isn&#039;t at it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can find no relevant bills from the Senate at all doing thomas.loc.gov searches on &#8216;handgun&#8217; or &#8216;registration,&#8217; so Sen. Reed isn&#8217;t at it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2884</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2884</guid>
		<description>Just_Saying: Did you read your own link?  That bill you reference was from the year 2000.  Not the current Congress.  There isn&#039;t even an S.2099 for the current Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just_Saying: Did you read your own link?  That bill you reference was from the year 2000.  Not the current Congress.  There isn&#8217;t even an S.2099 for the current Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karina</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2883</link>
		<dc:creator>Karina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2883</guid>
		<description>http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/taxreturns.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/taxreturns.asp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just_Saying</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2882</link>
		<dc:creator>Just_Saying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2882</guid>
		<description>Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It may require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun.


The bill was introduced on Feb. 24th and will become public knowledge 30 days after it is voted into law.. This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee can pass this without the Senate voting on it at all..

The full text of the proposed amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage 

You can find it by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099. http://ron.dotson.net/guns/sb2099.htm

You know whom to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know to help STOP this bill !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It may require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun.</p>
<p>The bill was introduced on Feb. 24th and will become public knowledge 30 days after it is voted into law.. This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee can pass this without the Senate voting on it at all..</p>
<p>The full text of the proposed amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage </p>
<p>You can find it by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099. http://ron.dotson.net/guns/sb2099.htm</p>
<p>You know whom to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know to help STOP this bill !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Holliday</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2881</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Holliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2881</guid>
		<description>the original Boston Tea Party was not a party at all, it was a serious, aggressive act of defiance.  Many just want to bring their kids and have a good time, that is fine, but it has little to do with the tea party originally suggested by Rick Santelli, and it has nothing in common with the original tea party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the original Boston Tea Party was not a party at all, it was a serious, aggressive act of defiance.  Many just want to bring their kids and have a good time, that is fine, but it has little to do with the tea party originally suggested by Rick Santelli, and it has nothing in common with the original tea party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billg</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>billg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>when Acorn can conduct a &quot;government census&quot;; the ACLU can receive taxpayer money to use OUR LAWS to destroy our freedoms and restrict &quot;Freedom of Speech&quot; when they don&#039;t agree with that speech; the &quot;abortionists, the GLAD &amp; GAYS and other nutroots&quot; can protest and nothing is done; well, as was said by kayfromcarroll, get you signs and &quot;GO SHOPPING IRANIAN STYLE&quot;.  There was a lady from Nantucket...............etc.
DUMP SOME TEA  in the NANTUCKET water!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when Acorn can conduct a &#8220;government census&#8221;; the ACLU can receive taxpayer money to use OUR LAWS to destroy our freedoms and restrict &#8220;Freedom of Speech&#8221; when they don&#8217;t agree with that speech; the &#8220;abortionists, the GLAD &amp; GAYS and other nutroots&#8221; can protest and nothing is done; well, as was said by kayfromcarroll, get you signs and &#8220;GO SHOPPING IRANIAN STYLE&#8221;.  There was a lady from Nantucket&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;etc.<br />
DUMP SOME TEA  in the NANTUCKET water!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kayfromcarroll</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2879</link>
		<dc:creator>kayfromcarroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2879</guid>
		<description>Take your signs and go &quot;shopping&quot; with them...
Walk up and down Main Street (Don&#039;t need to BUY anything)
If you&#039;re stopped by the Secret Police, tell them you&#039;re &quot;shopping&quot;

[Not an original thought...Got it last week from an Iranian site]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take your signs and go &#8220;shopping&#8221; with them&#8230;<br />
Walk up and down Main Street (Don&#8217;t need to BUY anything)<br />
If you&#8217;re stopped by the Secret Police, tell them you&#8217;re &#8220;shopping&#8221;</p>
<p>[Not an original thought...Got it last week from an Iranian site]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2878</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2878</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daezy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2877</link>
		<dc:creator>daezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2877</guid>
		<description>Hope you&#039;re not giving up. That&#039;s the whole point.
My thoughts and prayers are with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you&#8217;re not giving up. That&#8217;s the whole point.<br />
My thoughts and prayers are with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daezy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>daezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>Did I wake up one morning and discovered I was in the U.S.S.R.?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I wake up one morning and discovered I was in the U.S.S.R.?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obis_Sister</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2875</link>
		<dc:creator>Obis_Sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2875</guid>
		<description>Except it wasn&#039;t local gov&#039;t bureaucrats, it was Democratic neighbors. Who lied about it -  (from Facebook msg sent 6/30 to Facebook respondees for the ATL party)

&quot;As many of you know, Gwinnett Place Mall (Simon Properties) forced us to cancel the Atlanta Independence Day Tea Party, based on &quot;reciprocal property easement agreements&quot; - even thought it was held on private property NOT owned by the Mall/Simon. We have since found out the covenants and restrictions expired in 2004, and there were no current restrictions that would have allowed them to make us cancel. We were bluffed and bullied.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except it wasn&#8217;t local gov&#8217;t bureaucrats, it was Democratic neighbors. Who lied about it &#8211;  (from Facebook msg sent 6/30 to Facebook respondees for the ATL party)</p>
<p>&#8220;As many of you know, Gwinnett Place Mall (Simon Properties) forced us to cancel the Atlanta Independence Day Tea Party, based on &#8220;reciprocal property easement agreements&#8221; &#8211; even thought it was held on private property NOT owned by the Mall/Simon. We have since found out the covenants and restrictions expired in 2004, and there were no current restrictions that would have allowed them to make us cancel. We were bluffed and bullied.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy streu</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>randy streu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>Good for that bank, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for that bank, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pharos</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2873</link>
		<dc:creator>pharos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2873</guid>
		<description>&quot;We don’t want &lt;b&gt;this kind of&lt;/b&gt; politics on Main Street.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We don’t want <b>this kind of</b> politics on Main Street.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karina</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2872</link>
		<dc:creator>Karina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2872</guid>
		<description>with their quote “we don’t want politics on Main Street.”  I guess closed back room deals are better.  My guess is they don&#039;t see many Acorn people there with that policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with their quote “we don’t want politics on Main Street.”  I guess closed back room deals are better.  My guess is they don&#8217;t see many Acorn people there with that policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swami7774</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>swami7774</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/?p=366#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>..Martha&#039;s Vineyard, the ultimate playground for rich libs. The One himself will be vacationing there later this summer.
I live on the Cape, and I&#039;ll make it a point to go inland during that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..Martha&#8217;s Vineyard, the ultimate playground for rich libs. The One himself will be vacationing there later this summer.<br />
I live on the Cape, and I&#8217;ll make it a point to go inland during that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

